REVIEW 1 cited by
LXMERT Model Compression for Visual Question Answering
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large-scale pretrained models such as LXMERT are becoming popular for learning cross-modal representations on text-image pairs for vision-language tasks. According to the lottery ticket hypothesis, NLP and computer vision models contain smaller subnetworks capable of being trained in isolation to full performance. In this paper, we combine these observations to evaluate whether such trainable subnetworks exist in LXMERT when fine-tuned on the VQA task. In addition, we perform a model size cost-benefit analysis by investigating how much pruning can be done without significant loss in accuracy. Our experiment results demonstrate that LXMERT can be effectively pruned by 40%-60% in size with 3% loss in accuracy.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Can Argus Judge Them All? Comparing VLMs Across Domains
A VLM benchmark paper that proposes a cross-dataset consistency metric, but the abstract and body evaluate different model sets and the metric's bounds are incorrect.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.