Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 43 references

Compact pulsed laser deposition system for in-situ polarized neutron reflectometry

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A compact pulsed laser deposition chamber installed in the magnet gap of a polarized neutron reflectometer lets magnetic thin films be grown and measured without moving the sample; first results on CoFeB/Mo show signs of perpendicular…

desk verdict Valuable PLD-in-situ-PNR instrument, but the PMA evidence is overinterpreted and internally inconsistent. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.08108 v1 pith:OGZRR67P submitted 2025-01-14 physics.ins-det cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-scinucl-ex

Grigorii Kirichuk , Alexey Grunin , Artur Dolgoborodov , Pavel Prokopovich , Petr Shvets , Alexey Vorobiev , Anton Devishvilli , Alexandr Goikhman
show 1 more author
Ksenia Maksimova
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.ins-detcond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-scinucl-ex
keywords pulsedlaserdepositionpolarizedneutronreflectometryin-situgrowthperpendicularmagneticanisotropyCoFeB/Momultilayerthinfilmmagnetisminstrumentation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the first successful operation of a pulsed laser deposition (PLD) chamber combined with in-situ polarized neutron reflectometry (PNR), so that thin films can be grown and neutron-measured inside the same vacuum volume without moving the sample. The authors built a small, 16 kg chamber that fits into the gap between the magnets of a neutron reflectometer, and used it to grow a Mo/[CoFeB/Mo]12 multilayer step by step, taking a neutron reflectivity curve after each growth cycle. They also annealed a single CoFeB film to 450°C, capped it with ~5 Å of molybdenum, and observed that its in-plane magnetization rises sharply when the applied field increases from 0.01 T to 0.75 T, which they interpret as the formation of perpendicular magnetic anisotropy at the CoFeB/Mo interface. If the claims hold, the system gives materials scientists a way to follow the magnetic structure of spintronic stacks as they are built, layer by layer, under realistic growth conditions.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing element is the compact PLD chamber itself, engineered to sit in the magnet gap of a polarized neutron reflectometer: the sample holder, made of titanium to avoid magnetic interference, includes a graphite heater capable of 800°C, motorized rotation for uniform deposition, and a linear actuator that moves the sample vertically so the neutron beam can reach incidence angles up to 20° (Qz ~ 0.42 Å−1). The operating protocol is cyclic: deposit one step, interrupt growth, measure polarized neutron reflectivity in place, then resume deposition. The physical quantity that carries the magnetic interpretation is the magnetic scattering-length density profile extracted from the fitted reflectivity curves, specifically the field dependence of this profile between 0.01 and 0.75 T.

What would settle it

Perform polarized neutron reflectometry on the same CoFeB(15 Å)/Mo(5 Å) stack while sweeping the external field through zero after saturating perpendicular to the film, and check for a non-zero remanent perpendicular magnetization; alternatively, measure a hysteresis loop with the field perpendicular to the film using a magnetometer on an identical sample. If the easy axis turns out to be in-plane, the paper's PMA interpretation is ruled out.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a compact PLD system can be integrated directly into a PNR instrument and perform both functions: the chamber is installed between the electromagnet poles, the sample stays in place through deposition and measurement, and the resulting reflectivity curves track the structural and magnetic evolution of the growing film. For the Mo/[CoFeB/Mo]12 multilayer, the authors resolved the layer stack after each of four growth steps, observed Kiessig oscillations that indicate reproducible layer thicknesses, and found a small magnetic scattering-length density (9 ± 3 kA/m) with no visible spin-split in a 0.1 T in-plane field; following prior PNR work, they take this absence of splitting as an indicator of perpendicular magnetic anisotropy. For the annealed CoFeB film, the neutron profiles show boron diffusing into the SiO2 substrate to form a ~7 Å mixing layer while the magnetization rises from 640 to 760 kA/m; after a 5 Å Mo cap, the same film shows in-plane magnetization growing from 210 ± 40 kA/m at 0.01 T to 550 ± 50 kA/m at 0.75 T, which the authors interpret as PMA in the CoFeB/Mo bilayer. The paper's stated aim is to demonstrate that the combined PLD/in-situ PNR system works and is capable of characterizing both single-layer and multilayer CoFeB/Mo structures.

Load-bearing premise

The PMA conclusion rests on the assumption that the absence of a split between the two neutron spin-channel reflectivities at low magnetic field indicates perpendicular magnetic anisotropy, but the same flat response could come from magnetically dead CoFeB layers, incomplete coverage, or out-of-plane domain formation, and the paper reports no direct measurement of the perpendicular magnetization or anisotropy field.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A multilayer stack such as Mo/[CoFeB/Mo]12 can be grown and its neutron reflectivity measured after every deposition cycle, so the evolution of layer thickness, density, and magnetization can be followed step by step without breaking vacuum.
  • The same chamber enables in-situ annealing (up to 800°C) combined with PNR, so structural changes such as boron diffusion and interface mixing can be correlated with magnetic changes in the same sample.
  • The low in-plane magnetization measured for the un-annealed multilayer (9 ± 3 kA/m) suggests that, if PMA is present, nearly all CoFeB moments point out of plane even without a post-growth anneal.
  • A 5 Å molybdenum capping layer is sufficient to induce the field-dependent magnetic response attributed to PMA in a thin CoFeB film, which constrains how thin the heavy-metal cap can be in such stacks.
  • The combination of PLD with in-situ PNR makes it possible to test growth recipes developed on standard lab PLD systems directly at a neutron beamline, since the compact chamber preserves the high-vacuum environment and heating capabilities.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the PMA interpretation holds for the un-annealed multilayer, it implies that PLD-grown CoFeB/Mo stacks may not require the annealing step that is typically used to develop perpendicular anisotropy in Ta/CoFeB/MgO systems; the paper notes the surprising formation of anisotropy in a non-annealed structure but does not explore the mechanism.
  • The experiment could be extended to map the full anisotropy by measuring PNR at several field values between 0.01 and 0.75 T and fitting the magnetization curve, something the paper does only at two fields for the bilayer; such a field series would yield an estimate of the anisotropy field.
  • A control sample with known in-plane anisotropy, measured under the same protocol, would test the paper's rule that missing R+/R− splitting at low field is a reliable PMA indicator; without that control, the rule remains plausible but unvalidated in this geometry.
  • The chamber's gas inlet suggests an obvious next step: repeating the growth in a reactive atmosphere or measuring during annealing to watch how oxidation or boron migration changes the magnetic profile in real time.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports the design, construction, and operation of a compact pulsed laser deposition (PLD) chamber integrated into the SuperADAM polarized neutron reflectometer at the ILL, enabling in-situ polarized neutron reflectometry (PNR) measurements during film growth without sample transfer. The authors demonstrate the system by growing a Mo/[CoFeB/Mo]12 multilayer step-by-step and collecting PNR after each deposition stage, and by studying a single CoFeB film annealed to 450°C and then capped with ~5 Å of Mo. From the absence of spin-splitting at low field in the multilayer and from field-dependent in-plane magnetization in the bilayer, they infer perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (PMA) formation at CoFeB/Mo interfaces. The paper's central claim is twofold: the first successful operation of a combined PLD and in-situ PNR system, and the confirmation of PMA in the CoFeB/Mo system.

Significance. The instrument development is a valuable contribution: a low-weight (16 kg) PLD source with target and sample in vacuum, laser outside, and flexible geometry is integrated into the magnet gap of a neutron reflectometer, enabling layer-by-layer growth with immediate neutron characterization. The demonstrated sequential PNR of a multilayer and the observation of structural evolution are credible and showcase genuine capability. However, the physical claim of PMA formation is not well supported by the presented data. The field-dependent PNR results are qualitative; the single low-field point is inconsistent with the hard-axis response expected from the 0.75 T datum, and the multilayer inference relies on a single field measurement. Because the abstract and summary elevate this physical result to a 'confirmation' of PMA, the scientific conclusion overreaches the data, even though the instrument demonstration itself is sound. With appropriate tempering and additional analysis, the paper would be suitable for publication.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.2 (PMA in CoFeB/Mo)] The claim that the PNR data 'confirm' PMA formation is not quantitatively supported. The two measured points, mSLD = (0.58 ± 0.12)×10⁻⁶ Å⁻² at 0.01 T and (1.5 ± 0.15)×10⁻⁶ Å⁻² at 0.75 T, do not follow the hard-axis magnetization curve expected for a perpendicular easy axis. Taking M_s ≈ 760 kA/m from Table 1 (annealed CoFeB), the 0.75 T datum implies H_k ≈ 1.0 T, which would predict M(0.01 T) ≈ 7 kA/m, whereas the fitted value is 210 ± 40 kA/m, a discrepancy of about five standard deviations. The increase from 0.01 T to 0.75 T is qualitatively consistent with a hard-axis response, but the low-field value is far too high, suggesting canted anisotropy, a distribution of easy axes, or a non-saturating in-plane component. The authors should either present a full M(H) curve from PNR at several fields, or explicitly soften the conclusion to 'consistent with the possible presence of PMA' and discuss alternative explanations quantitatively.
  2. [Section 2 (Multilayer structure)] The inference of PMA from the absence of R+ and R− splitting in the multilayer at a single applied field of 0.1 T is underdetermined. Magnetically dead CoFeB layers, superparamagnetic islands, or closure domains with zero net in-plane moment would produce the same observation. The cited literature (refs. 17, 36, 37) may support the interpretation, but those works typically combine PNR with complementary magnetization measurements. The manuscript states that 'the absence of splitting ... serves as a primary indicator of the presence of PMA,' which is too strong an assertion when no alternative magnetic models are tested against the data. The authors should acknowledge this degeneracy explicitly and avoid stating that the multilayer results demonstrate PMA without additional evidence (e.g., field-dependent PNR or ex-situ magnetometry).
  3. [Abstract and Summary] The language used in the abstract and summary is internally inconsistent and overstates the evidence. The abstract first says the multilayer data 'suggested the potential formation of PMA' and then says the bilayer results 'confirming PMA formation,' while the Summary states that the bilayer 'demonstrated the formation of PMA.' Given the quantitative inconsistency identified in the first major comment, the word 'confirm' and the phrase 'demonstrated the formation' are not justified. The authors should revise these statements to reflect that PMA formation is a possible interpretation consistent with the data, not a confirmed finding, unless additional measurements are provided.
minor comments (5)
  1. [References] Reference [11] (New Directions for Student Leadership, 2023) is unrelated to magneto-optic Kerr effect or spin-orbit torque and appears to be a citation error; this reference should be replaced with an appropriate MOKE methodology paper.
  2. [References] Reference [13] is incomplete: 'Real-Time MOKE Microscopy Made Simple 2012' lacks author, journal, and DOI information; the full bibliographic details should be provided.
  3. [Summary] The Summary states that the in-plane magnetization 'increased from 240 to 550 kA/m' as the field raised from 0.01 to 0.75 T, whereas the Results section reports 210 ± 40 kA/m at 0.01 T; this numerical inconsistency should be corrected.
  4. [Section 2 (Internal design)] The text states 'The entire sample unit is made of titanium' but also mentions an 'external molybdenum shield' in the same paragraph; the description should clarify which components are titanium and which are molybdenum.
  5. [Experimental details] The fitting of the PNR data with GenX is described, but no goodness-of-fit metrics (e.g., chi-squared) or confidence intervals for the structural parameters are given; providing these would increase confidence in the extracted mSLD values, which are central to the magnetic conclusions.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation; the instrument demonstration and PMA inference rest on measured reflectivity fits and external literature, not on self-referential definitions.

full rationale

The paper's load-bearing claim is the first operation of a compact PLD chamber for in-situ PNR. This is directly evidenced by the measured R+/R- reflectivity curves and GenX fits; no prediction is made from a quantity that was fitted into the same claim. The PMA interpretation is an inference from fitted mSLD values (e.g., 0.58±0.12e-6 Å^-2 at 0.01 T versus 1.5±0.15e-6 Å^-2 at 0.75 T in Section 3.2) using the literature-based criterion that absence of R+/R- splitting at low field indicates PMA. That criterion is not defined in terms of the fitted values; it is an external empirical rule supported by refs [17,36,37], including independent non-overlapping works. Self-citations [17,29,42,43] are present but not load-bearing: [17] is one of several supporting references for the PMA indicator, [29] describes the SuperADAM station, and [42,43] are beamtime acknowledgments. No equation in the paper reduces to an input fit or to a self-citation chain. The possible overinterpretation of PMA from two field points is a scientific-correctness concern, not a circularity, and the paper itself repeatedly states that further studies are required.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim of successful instrument operation relies on standard reflectometry modeling, while the PMA interpretation depends on a domain assumption about the meaning of missing spin-splitting. The fitted layer parameters are the main free inputs, and the mixing layer added after annealing is an ad hoc model component without independent confirmation.

free parameters (6)
  • CoFeB layer thickness (multilayer) = 8 ± 1 Å
    Fitted in GenX to PNR data; defines layer structure used for interpretation.
  • Mo layer thickness (multilayer) = 58.0 ± 1.5 Å
    Fitted in GenX; used to build SLD profile.
  • CoFeB mSLD in multilayer = (0.03 ± 0.01)e-6 Å-2
    Fitted from spin-dependent reflectivity; low value drives PMA interpretation.
  • CoFeB mSLD in bilayer at 0.01 T = (0.58 ± 0.12)e-6 Å-2
    Fitted from PNR at 0.01 T; used to show field-dependent magnetization.
  • CoFeB mSLD in bilayer at 0.75 T = (1.5 ± 0.15)e-6 Å-2
    Fitted from PNR at 0.75 T; used to support PMA.
  • SiO2-B mixing layer thickness = 7.0 ± 1.0 Å
    Added to the model after annealing to account for boron diffusion; no direct chemical profiling.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Reflectivity of layered structures follows the standard optical transfer-matrix formalism implemented in GenX.
    Used implicitly for all PNR fitting; a well-established method.
  • domain assumption Absence of R+/R- splitting at low magnetic field indicates perpendicular magnetic anisotropy.
    Stated in Section 3.2, based on citations [17,36,37]; this is the key interpretive step for the multilayer.
  • domain assumption Boron diffuses from CoFeB into the SiO2 substrate during annealing, forming a mixing layer.
    Invoked in Section 3.3 to justify the added 'mix' layer; based on prior literature [39,40].
  • domain assumption The neutron beam footprint is fully contained on the 20x20 mm sample with uniform film thickness.
    Required for the 1D SLD profile fits; sample rotation and RBS uniformity check lend partial support.
invented entities (1)
  • SiO2-B mixing layer
    purpose: Model layer used to fit the annealed CoFeB film's nuclear SLD profile.
    Introduced ad hoc to account for the increased nSLD near the substrate after annealing; not directly measured by chemical or structural analysis.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Compact pulsed laser deposition system for in-situ polarized neutron reflectometry." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OGZRR67P

@misc{pith2026250108108,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Compact pulsed laser deposition system for in-situ polarized neutron reflectometry},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OGZRR67P}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.08108}
}
read the original abstract

The development of ferromagnet/heavy metal thin-film structures, such as CoFeB/Mo, with spin-orbit interaction requires advanced methods for their production and study. Polarized neutron reflectometry (PNR) provides unique insights into the evolution of magnetic properties, especially when applied in-situ during the growth process. Pulsed laser deposition (PLD) is a versatile method for producing magnetic thin films, and combining PLD with in-situ PNR measurements offers new possibilities for their investigation. In this work, we developed a compact vacuum chamber integrated into the neutron instrument, enabling step-by-step deposition and in-situ PNR measurements. A multilayer Mo/[CoFeB/Mo]12 structure was grown, and neutron reflectivity curves measured after each cycle revealed the gradual evolution of sample properties. A weak magnetic field response suggested the potential formation of perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (PMA) at CoFeB/Mo interfaces. Additionally, a single CoFeB film was annealed up to 450{\deg}C, followed by the deposition of a ~5 {\AA} Mo layer. PNR measurements in magnetic fields of 0.01 T and 0.75 T showed a significant increase in in-plane magnetization, confirming PMA formation. Thus, we demonstrate the first successful operation of a combined PLD and in-situ PNR system, showcasing its capabilities for characterizing single-layer CoFeB and multilayer CoFeB/Mo thin-film structures.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.08108 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. a) Photograph of the PLD system installed in the gap between the magnets of the SuperADAM station, ILL. b) Schematic of the PLD facility. 2. Internal design Inside the vacuum chamber of our PLD system, there are several components, including sample and target holders, sample shutter, several windows, gas inlet, and power connector ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. A photograph of the internal design of the PLD chamber. Here, the sample unit is in a fixed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Schematic of the sample unit of the PLD system. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Ranges of maximum angles of incidence and reflection for the sample position: a) at the center of the chamber/magnets, b) shifted by 26 mm. Experimental details The scheme of the experiment for measuring polarized neutron reflectometry for a sample grown in the PLD cha…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Scheme of the in-situ PNR experiment. Film growth and reflectometry measurements are done in the PLD chamber installed in the gap between the magnets. For the deposition, we utilized a Nd:YAG laser equipped with harmonic splitters to emit radiation at a wavelength of 2…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Diagrams of the thickness distribution for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: a) PNR curves for R⁺ and R⁻ polarizations for each [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: a) PNR curves for the CoFeB film before and after annealing. b) Schematic representation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: a) PNR curves for the CoFeB/Mo sample measured under magnetic fields of 0.01 and 0.75 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Modulation of Heavy Metal/Ferromagnetic Metal Interface for High‐performance Spintronic Devices

    Peng, S.; Zhu, D.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, B.; Cao, A.; Wang, M.; Cai, W.; Cao, K.; Zhao, W. Modulation of Heavy Metal/Ferromagnetic Metal Interface for High‐performance Spintronic Devices. Adv Elect Materials 2019, 5, 1900134, doi:10.1002/aelm.201900134

    doi:10.1002/aelm.201900134 2019

  2. [2]

    Recent Developments in Perpendicular Magnetic Anisotropy Thin Films for Data Storage Applications

    Tudu, B.; Tiwari, A. Recent Developments in Perpendicular Magnetic Anisotropy Thin Films for Data Storage Applications. Vacuum 2017, 146, 329 –341, doi:10.1016/j.vacuum.2017.01.031

    doi:10.1016/j.vacuum.2017.01.031 2017

  3. [3]

    Kim, S.; Kong, B.K.; Kim, T.W.; Choi, G. -M. Optical Detection of Spin -Orbit Torque in Ta/CoFeB and W/CoFeB Bilayers. Current Applied Physics 2024, 61, 1 –6, doi:10.1016/j.cap.2024.02.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cap.2024.02.001 2024

  4. [4]

    Topological Transport of Vorticity in Heisenberg Magnets

    Zou, J.; Kim, S.K.; Tserkovnyak, Y. Topological Transport of Vorticity in Heisenberg Magnets. Phys. Rev. B 2019, 99, 180402, doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.99.180402

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.99.180402 2019

  5. [5]

    Interfacial Contributions to Spin-Orbit Torque and Magnetoresistance in Ferromagnet/Heavy -Metal Bilayers

    Belashchenko, K.D.; Kovalev, A.A.; Van Schilfgaarde, M. Interfacial Contributions to Spin-Orbit Torque and Magnetoresistance in Ferromagnet/Heavy -Metal Bilayers. Phys. Rev. B 2020, 101, 020407, doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.101.020407

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.101.020407 2020

  6. [6]

    Magnetic Anisotropy in Metallic Ultrathin Films and Related Experiments on Cobalt Films (Invited)

    Chappert, C.; Bruno, P. Magnetic Anisotropy in Metallic Ultrathin Films and Related Experiments on Cobalt Films (Invited). Journal of Applied Physics 1988, 64, 5736 –5741, doi:10.1063/1.342243

    work page doi:10.1063/1.342243 1988

  7. [7]

    Evolution of Magnetic Anisotropy in Cobalt Film on Nanopatterned Silicon Substrate Studied in Situ Using MOKE

    Bukharia, K.; Karmakar, P.; Kumar, D.; Reddy, V.R.; Gupta, A. Evolution of Magnetic Anisotropy in Cobalt Film on Nanopatterned Silicon Substrate Studied in Situ Using MOKE. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 2020, 497, 165934, doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.165934

    work page arXiv 2020

  8. [8]

    An Integrated Ultra -High Vacuum Apparatus for Growth and in Situ Characterization of Complex Materials

    Vinai, G.; Motti, F.; Petrov, A.Yu.; Polewczyk, V.; Bonanni, V.; Edla, R.; Gobaut, B.; Fujii, J.; Suran, F.; Benedetti, D.; et al. An Integrated Ultra -High Vacuum Apparatus for Growth and in Situ Characterization of Complex Materials. Review of Scientific Instruments 2020, 91, 085109, doi:10.1063/5.0005302

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0005302 2020

Show all 43 references
  1. [9]

    Design, Development and Performance of UHV Chamber for in-Situ Magneto-Optic Kerr Effect and Resistivity Measurements

    Kumar, D.; Potdar, S.; Reddy, V.R.; Gupta, A. Design, Development and Performance of UHV Chamber for in-Situ Magneto-Optic Kerr Effect and Resistivity Measurements. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 2008, 114, 012034, doi:10.1088/1742-6596/114/1/012034

    2008 doi

  2. [10]

    Absence of Detectable MOKE Signals from Spin Hall Effect in Metals

    Su, Y.; Wang, H.; Li, J.; Tian, C.; Wu, R.; Jin, X.; Shen, Y.R. Absence of Detectable MOKE Signals from Spin Hall Effect in Metals. Applied Physics Letters 2017, 110, 042401, doi:10.1063/1.4974044

    2017 doi

  3. [11]

    Exploring the Utility, Limitations, and Possibilities of the Leadership Identity Development (LID) Model

    Bitton, A.L.; Devies, B.; Hassell‐Goodman, S.; Shetty, R.; Owen, J.E. Exploring the Utility, Limitations, and Possibilities of the Leadership Identity Development (LID) Model. New Drctns Student Lead 2023, 2023, 119–128, doi:10.1002/yd.20560

    2023 doi

  4. [12]

    Unraveling Femtosecond Spin and Charge Dynamics with Extreme Ultraviolet Transverse MOKE Spectroscopy

    Probst, H.; Möller, C.; Schumacher, M.; Brede, T.; Dewhurst, J.K.; Reutzel, M.; Steil, D.; Sharma, S.; Jansen, G.S.M.; Mathias, S. Unraveling Femtosecond Spin and Charge Dynamics with Extreme Ultraviolet Transverse MOKE Spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Research 2024, 6, 013107, doi:10...

    2024 doi

  5. [13]

    Real-Time MOKE Microscopy Made Simple 2012

    Chvykov, P.; Stoica, V.; Clarke, R. Real-Time MOKE Microscopy Made Simple 2012

    2012

  6. [14]

    Polarized Neutron Reflectometry: Recent Developments and Perspectives

    Felcher, G.P.; Te Velthuis, S.G.E.; Rühm, A.; Donner, W. Polarized Neutron Reflectometry: Recent Developments and Perspectives. Physica B: Condensed Matter 2001, 297, 87–93, doi:10.1016/S0921-4526(00)00821-8

    2001 doi

  7. [15]

    Polarized -Neutron Reflectometry

    Ankner, J.F.; Felcher, G.P. Polarized -Neutron Reflectometry. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 1999, 200, 741–754, doi:10.1016/S0304-8853(99)00392-3

    1999 doi

  8. [16]

    The Study of Perpendicular Magnetic Anisotropy in the Magnetic Sensors with Linear Sensitivity Using Polarized Neutron Reflectometry

    Zhu, T. The Study of Perpendicular Magnetic Anisotropy in the Magnetic Sensors with Linear Sensitivity Using Polarized Neutron Reflectometry. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 2016, 711, 012004, doi:10.1088/1742-6596/711/1/012004

    2016 doi

  9. [17]

    Observation by SANS and PNR of Pure Néel -Type Domain Wall Profiles and Skyrmion Suppression below Room Temperature in Magnetic [Pt/CoFeB/Ru]10 Multilayers

    Ukleev, V.; Ajejas, F.; Devishvili, A.; Vorobiev, A.; Steinke, N.-J.; Cubitt, R.; Luo, C.; Abrudan, R.-M.; Radu, F.; Cros, V.; et al. Observation by SANS and PNR of Pure Néel -Type Domain Wall Profiles and Skyrmion Suppression below Room Temperature in Magnetic [Pt/CoFeB/Ru]10...

    2024

  10. [18]

    Spin Polarised Neutron Reflection Studies of Ultrathin Magnetic Films

    Bland, J.A.C.; Bateson, R.D.; Heinrich, B.; Celinski, Z.; Lauter, H.J. Spin Polarised Neutron Reflection Studies of Ultrathin Magnetic Films. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 1992, 104–107, 1909–1912, doi:10.1016/0304-8853(92)91600-X

    1992 doi

  11. [19]

    Design and Realization of a Sputter Deposition System for the in Situ and in Operando Use in Polarized Neutron Reflectometry Experiments: Novel Capabilities

    Ye, J.; Book, A.; Mayr, S.; Gabold, H.; Meng, F.; Schäfferer, H.; Need, R.; Gilbert, D.; Saerbeck, T.; Stahn, J.; et al. Design and Realization of a Sputter Deposition System for the in Situ and in Operando Use in Polarized Neutron Reflectometry Experiments: Novel Capabilities...

    2020

  12. [20]

    In Situ Magnetometry with Polarized Neutrons on Thin Magnetic Films

    Nawrath, T.; Fritzsche, H.; Klose, F.; Nowikow, J.; Maletta, H. In Situ Magnetometry with Polarized Neutrons on Thin Magnetic Films. Phys. Rev. B 1999, 60, 9525 –9531, doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.60.9525

    1999 doi

  13. [21]

    A Molecular Beam Epitaxy Facility for in Situ Neutron Scattering

    Dura, J .A.; LaRock, J. A Molecular Beam Epitaxy Facility for in Situ Neutron Scattering. Review of Scientific Instruments 2009, 80, 073906, doi:10.1063/1.3169506

    2009 doi

  14. [22]

    A Versatile UHV Transport and Measurement Chamber for Neutron Reflectometry under UHV Conditions

    Syed Mohd, A.; Pütter, S.; Mattauch, S.; Koutsioubas, A.; Schneider, H.; Weber, A.; Brückel, T. A Versatile UHV Transport and Measurement Chamber for Neutron Reflectometry under UHV Conditions. Review of Scientific Instruments 2016, 87, 123909, doi:10.1063/1.4972993

    2016 doi

  15. [23]

    A Practical Guide to Pulsed Laser Deposition

    Shepelin, N.A.; Tehrani, Z.P.; Ohannessian, N.; Schneider, C.W.; Pergolesi, D.; Lippert, T. A Practical Guide to Pulsed Laser Deposition. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2023, 52, 2294–2321, doi:10.1039/D2CS00938B

    2023 doi

  16. [24]

    Pulsed Laser Deposition – an Alternative Route to the Growth of Magnetic Thin Films

    Jenner, A.G.; Hayes, J.P.; Stone, L.A.; Snelling, H.V.; Greenough, R.D. Pulsed Laser Deposition – an Alternative Route to the Growth of Magnetic Thin Films. Applied Surface Science 1999, 138–139, 408–412, doi:10.1016/S0169-4332(98)00433-4

    1999 doi

  17. [25]

    Ultrasmooth Epitaxial Pt Thin Fi lms Grown by Pulsed Laser Deposition

    Torres-Castanedo, C.G.; Buchholz, D.B.; Pham, T.; Zheng, L.; Cheng, M.; Dravid, V.P.; Hersam, M.C.; Bedzyk, M.J. Ultrasmooth Epitaxial Pt Thin Fi lms Grown by Pulsed Laser Deposition. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2024, 16, 1921–1929, doi:10.1021/acsami.3c16065

    2024 doi

  18. [26]

    Interfacial Dzyalos hinskii-Moriya Interaction and Chiral Magnetic Textures in a Ferrimagnetic Insulator

    Ding, S.; Ross, A.; Lebrun, R.; Becker, S.; Lee, K.; Boventer, I.; Das, S.; Kurokawa, Y.; Gupta, S.; Yang, J.; et al. Interfacial Dzyalos hinskii-Moriya Interaction and Chiral Magnetic Textures in a Ferrimagnetic Insulator. Phys. Rev. B 2019, 100, 100406, doi:10.1103/PhysRevB....

    2019 doi

  19. [27]

    Quasi‐Two‐Dimensional Ferromagnetic SrRuO3 Grown by Pulsed Laser Deposition with Layer‐by‐Layer Growth Fashion

    Deng, Z.; Liu, J.; Hong, Y.; Wei, L.; Hu, S.; Xiao, W.; Li, L.; Wang, L.; Chen, K.; Liao, Z. Quasi‐Two‐Dimensional Ferromagnetic SrRuO3 Grown by Pulsed Laser Deposition with Layer‐by‐Layer Growth Fashion. Adv Materials Inter 2022, 9, 2201371, doi:10.1002/admi.202201371

    2022 doi

  20. [28]

    Neutron Study of In -Plane Skyrmions in MnSi Thin Films

    Meynell, S.A.; Wilson, M.N.; Krycka, K.L.; Kirby, B.J.; Fritzsche, H.; Mon chesky, T.L. Neutron Study of In -Plane Skyrmions in MnSi Thin Films. Phys. Rev. B 2017, 96, 054402, doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.96.054402

    2017 doi

  21. [29]

    Recent Upgrade of the Polarized Neutron Reflectometer Super ADAM

    Vorobiev, A.; Devishvilli, A.; Palsson, G.; Rundlöf, H.; Johansson, N.; Olsson, A.; Dennison, A.; Wollf, M.; Giroud, B.; Aguettaz, O.; et al. Recent Upgrade of the Polarized Neutron Reflectometer Super ADAM. Neutron News 2015, 26, 25 –26, doi:10.1080/10448632.2015.1057054

    2015

  22. [30]

    Polarized Neutron Reflectometry Study from Iron Oxide Nanop articles Monolayer

    Ukleev, V.; Snigireva, I.; Vorobiev, A. Polarized Neutron Reflectometry Study from Iron Oxide Nanop articles Monolayer. Surfaces and Interfaces 2017, 9, 143 –146, doi:10.1016/j.surfin.2017.09.001

    2017 doi

  23. [31]

    X -Ray and Neutron Reflectivity Analysis of Thin Films and Superlattices

    Zabel, H. X -Ray and Neutron Reflectivity Analysis of Thin Films and Superlattices. Appl. Phys. A 1994, 58, 159–168, doi:10.1007/BF00324371

    1994 doi

  24. [32]

    GenX 3 : The Latest Generation of an Established Tool

    Glavic, A.; Björck, M. GenX 3 : The Latest Generation of an Established Tool. J Appl Crystallogr 2022, 55, 1063–1071, doi:10.1107/S1600576722006653

    2022 doi

  25. [33]

    Quantitative RBS Analysis Using RUMP

    Climent-Font, A.; Wätjen, U.; Bax, H. Quantitative RBS Analysis Using RUMP. On the Accuracy of the He Stopping in S i. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 1992, 71, 81 –86, doi:10.1016/0168 - 583X(92)95343-P

    1992 doi

  26. [34]

    Influence of Boron Diffusion on the Perpendicular Magnetic Anisotropy in Ta|CoFeB|MgO Ultrathin Films

    Sinha, J.; Gruber, M.; Kodzuka, M.; Ohkubo, T.; Mitani, S.; Hono, K.; Hayashi, M. Influence of Boron Diffusion on the Perpendicular Magnetic Anisotropy in Ta|CoFeB|MgO Ultrathin Films. Journal of Applied Physics 2015, 117, 043913, doi:10.1063/1.4906096

    2015 doi

  27. [35]

    A Very Large Perpendicular Magnetic Anisotrop y in Pt/Co/MgO Trilayers Fabricated by Controlling the MgO Sputtering Power and Its Thickness

    Gweon, H.K.; Yun, S.J.; Lim, S.H. A Very Large Perpendicular Magnetic Anisotrop y in Pt/Co/MgO Trilayers Fabricated by Controlling the MgO Sputtering Power and Its Thickness. Sci Rep 2018, 8, 1266, doi:10.1038/s41598-018-19656-9

    2018 doi

  28. [36]

    Investigation of Perpendicular Magnetic Anisotropy in Pt/Co20fe60b20/Pt Multi -Layer Structures

    Cestarollo, L.; Srinivasan, K.; El-Ghazaly, A. Investigation of Perpendicular Magnetic Anisotropy in Pt/Co20fe60b20/Pt Multi -Layer Structures. SSRN Journal 2022, doi:10.2139/ssrn.4150522

    2022 doi

  29. [37]

    High Thermal Stability of Perpendicul ar Magnetic Anisotropy in the MgO/CoFeB/W Thin Films

    Guo, Y.Q.; Bai, H.; Cui, Q.R.; Wang, L.M.; Zhao, Y.C.; Zhan, X.Z.; Zhu, T.; Yang, H.X.; Gao, Y.; Hu, C.Q.; et al. High Thermal Stability of Perpendicul ar Magnetic Anisotropy in the MgO/CoFeB/W Thin Films. Applied Surface Science 2021, 568, 150857, doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.150857

    2021

  30. [38]

    Effect of Thermal Annealing o n Boron Diffusion, Micro-Structural, Electrical and Magnetic Properties of Laser Ablated CoFeB Thin Films

    Swamy, G.V.; Pandey, H.; Srivastava, A.K.; Dalai, M.K.; Maurya, K.K.; Rashmi; Rakshit, R.K. Effect of Thermal Annealing o n Boron Diffusion, Micro-Structural, Electrical and Magnetic Properties of Laser Ablated CoFeB Thin Films. AIP Advances 2013, 3, 072129, doi:10.1063/1.4816811

    2013 doi

  31. [39]

    Role of Boron Diffusion in CoFeB/MgO Magnetic Tunnel Junctions

    Mukherjee, S.; Knut, R.; Mohseni, S.M.; Anh Nguyen, T.N.; Chung, S.; Tuan Le, Q.; Åkerman, J.; Persson, J.; Sahoo, A.; Hazarika, A.; et al. Role of Boron Diffusion in CoFeB/MgO Magnetic Tunnel Junctions. Phys. Rev. B 2015, 91, 085311, doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.91.085311

    2015 doi

  32. [40]

    Highly Stable Perpendicular Magnetic Anisotropies of CoFeB/MgO Frames Employing W Buffer and Capping Layers

    An, G.-G.; Lee, J.-B.; Yang, S.-M.; Kim, J.-H.; Chung, W.-S.; Hong, J.-P. Highly Stable Perpendicular Magnetic Anisotropies of CoFeB/MgO Frames Employing W Buffer and Capping Layers. Acta Materialia 2015, 87, 259–265, doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2015.01.022

    2015 doi

  33. [41]

    Bor on Migration during Amorphous to Crystalline Transformation in CoFeB/MgO Multilayers: A Reflectivity Study

    Vishwakarma, P.; Sharma, G.; Modi, M.H.; Gupta, M.; Stahn, J.; Gupta, A. Bor on Migration during Amorphous to Crystalline Transformation in CoFeB/MgO Multilayers: A Reflectivity Study. Materials Research Bulletin 2023, 161, 112150, doi:10.1016/j.materresbull.2023.112150

    2023

  34. [42]

    VOROBIEV Alexei; Olga Dikaya; DOLGOBORODOV Artur; GOIKHMAN Alexander; GRUNIN Aleksei; KIRICHUK Grigorii and K.Maksimova. (2024). In situ growth and investigation of FeCoB thin films for energy storage applications. Institut Laue -Langevin (ILL) doi:10.5291/ILL-DATA.CRG-3091

    2024 doi

  35. [43]

    GOIKHMAN Alexander; DOLGOBORODOV Artur; GRUNIN Aleksei; KIRICHUK Grigorii; K.Maksimova and VOROBIEV Alexei. (2024). FeCoB/Mo and FeCoBo/Mo/NiO multilayers magnetic properties investigation upon In-situ growth and and in-operando heating by PNR. Institut Laue-Langevin (ILL) doi...

    2024 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.