REVIEW 2 cited by
Naming the Pain in Machine Learning-Enabled Systems Engineering
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Context: Machine learning (ML)-enabled systems are being increasingly adopted by companies aiming to enhance their products and operational processes. Objective: This paper aims to deliver a comprehensive overview of the current status quo of engineering ML-enabled systems and lay the foundation to steer practically relevant and problem-driven academic research. Method: We conducted an international survey to collect insights from practitioners on the current practices and problems in engineering ML-enabled systems. We received 188 complete responses from 25 countries. We conducted quantitative statistical analyses on contemporary practices using bootstrapping with confidence intervals and qualitative analyses on the reported problems using open and axial coding procedures. Results: Our survey results reinforce and extend existing empirical evidence on engineering ML-enabled systems, providing additional insights into typical ML-enabled systems project contexts, the perceived relevance and complexity of ML life cycle phases, and current practices related to problem understanding, model deployment, and model monitoring. Furthermore, the qualitative analysis provides a detailed map of the problems practitioners face within each ML life cycle phase and the problems causing overall project failure. Conclusions: The results contribute to a better understanding of the status quo and problems in practical environments. We advocate for the further adaptation and dissemination of software engineering practices to enhance the engineering of ML-enabled systems.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Define-ML: An Approach to Ideate Machine Learning-Enabled Systems
Define-ML extends Lean Inception with Data Source Mapping, Feature-to-Data Source Mapping, and ML Mapping activities, and practitioners in two studies perceived it as useful and expressed intention to adopt it.
-
Towards Requirements Engineering for RAG Systems
A case study of a maritime company shows that RAG system requirements are elicited iteratively with users, yielding a five-stage process model centered on retrieval requirements.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.