Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Classification of color superconductivity by one-gluon exchange helicity amplitudes and renormalization group equations

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Same-helicity p-wave pairing beats the spin-triplet channel in single-flavor color superconductivity.

desk verdict Solid amplitude-level classification of OGE channels in dense QCD, but the headline claim (1P1 over 3S1) rests on unpublished gap formulas from the author's companion paper. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.19222 v1 pith:OIZ6MD6K submitted 2025-08-26 hep-ph nucl-th

Yuki Fujimoto This is my paper
classification hep-phnucl-th MSC 81V0581T17
keywords colorsuperconductivityone-gluonexchangehelicityamplitudesrenormalizationgroupsingle-flavorpairingcolor-spinlockingp-wavedenseQCD
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper works out, from the one-gluon-exchange interaction in dense QCD, which Cooper-pairing channel is most attractive in quark matter and therefore which color-superconducting condensate forms. Its central result is a reclassification: for color-antisymmetric, flavor-antisymmetric pairs the usual s-wave (¹S₀) pairing wins, but for flavor-symmetric pairs—the single-flavor case—the same-helicity p-wave (¹P₁) channel beats the conventionally assumed spin-triplet (³S₁) channel by a fixed factor of about e⁻⁴ in the gap. The claim matters because it revises the standard spin-one color-spin-locked picture of single-flavor superconductivity, and it shows the vacuum-repulsive color-sextet channel becomes attractive in-medium through unscreened magnetic gluons. With mismatched Fermi surfaces, the small-separation regime keeps ¹S₀ (CFL/2SC) stable, while color-spin locking takes over at large separation.

What carries the argument

The helicity-amplitude decomposition into states labeled by (color, flavor, helicity, ²ˢ⁺¹L_J), built on Jacob-Wick partial-wave expansion and the Clebsch-Gordan map between helicity states and canonical LS states. The load-bearing mechanism is the in-medium hierarchy of gluon propagators: magnetic (transverse) gluons are only dynamically screened while electric (longitudinal) gluons are Debye screened, so Dᵐ_L > Dᴱ_L; this makes the same-helicity spin-triplet amplitudes, which are proportional to Dᵐ − Dᴱ, attractive even where vacuum intuition would say repulsive. The decoupling of the RG equations in these channel labels then lets each candidate gap be evaluated independently, and the most

What would settle it

Compute the two gap formulas (39) and (40) directly from the RG equations with the same numerical inputs and check which gap wins over the full coupling range; if the ³S₁ gap exceeds the ¹P₁ gap at any physical µ, the paper's revision fails. A second check is observational: a 0.1–1 MeV p-wave gap would suppress quark direct-Urca cooling, whereas the previously assumed keV-scale spin-one gap would not, so neutron-star cooling data can discriminate between the two pictures.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Starting from the one-gluon-exchange amplitude in the hard-dense-loop effective theory, the author decomposes quark-quark scattering near the Fermi surface into channels labeled by color representation, flavor representation, helicity, and the nonrelativistic term symbol ²ˢ⁺¹L_J. Because the medium breaks Lorentz invariance, spin is frozen in the rest frame and the renormalization-group flows decouple by channel at leading order, so each pairing gap can be computed independently. The discovery is that the most attractive channel depends on the color-flavor symmetry: for color ¯3 with antisymmetric flavor, ¹S₀ dominates and gives the CFL/2SC condensates; for color ¯3 with symmetric flavor, re

Load-bearing premise

The quantitative claim that the ¹P₁ gap always exceeds the ³S₁ gap rests on the closed-form gap solutions taken from the author's unpublished companion paper; if those solutions are wrong, the winner could reverse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Single-flavor quark matter pairs in the same-helicity ¹P₁ channel, producing a color-spin-locked condensate that locks color to orbital angular momentum and is isotropic in both color and real space.
  • The color-6 channel, repulsive in vacuum, supports a genuine but tiny in-medium pairing (³P₀/³S₁ gaps below 10⁻⁹ eV in the weak-coupling regime), negligible phenomenologically but real.
  • The conventional ¹S₀ pairing in CFL and 2SC phases is unchanged; however, the CFL phase can become unstable against unpairing even near µ ≈ 1 GeV, depending on the renormalization scale.
  • The gap ratio ∆¹P₁/∆¹S₀ ≈ e⁻⁴ is fixed at leading order, so the ¹P₁ gap stays in the 0.1–1 MeV range for two flavors.
  • If the 2SC phase persists into the nonrelativistic, nonperturbative region, blue quarks may pair via the same mechanism as ³P₂ neutron superfluidity, possibly enabling quark-hadron continuity.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same-helicity amplitude argument extends to QED, where the color factor c=1 gives an analogous attractive in-medium p-wave pairing, potentially testable in ultracold atomic or condensed-matter analogues.
  • Single-flavor pairing in the ¹P₁ channel implies an isotropic p-wave condensate with all quarks gapped; if realized in neutron-star cores, the 0.1–1 MeV gap would suppress quark Urca cooling, a signature distinguishable from the older spin-one picture.
  • The paper leaves the magnetic quantum number degeneracy unresolved; other mechanisms (e.g., instantons, momentum-dependent self-energy) could lift it, and testing the ¹P₁ vs ³S₁ competition with nonperturbative methods would clarify the phase diagram.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a classification of quark-quark pairing channels in dense QCD using one-gluon-exchange helicity amplitudes evaluated in the hard dense loop effective theory, then maps the resulting J-channel amplitudes onto non-relativistic 2S+1LJ channels. The main physical claims are: (i) in-medium effects can make the vacuum-repulsive color-6 channel attractive; (ii) for color-3bar with antisymmetric flavor the 1S0 channel dominates; (iii) for color-3bar with symmetric flavor the same-helicity 1P1 channel prevails over the conventional opposite-helicity 3S1 channel, revising the standard single-flavor picture; and (iv) with Fermi-surface mismatch, the 1S0 channels (CFL/2SC) remain stable at small mismatch, while color-spin-locked 1P1 pairing takes over at large mismatch. The paper also compares the CFL gap with the strange-quark mass stress to estimate the CFL instability scale.

Significance. If correct, the claimed dominance of the same-helicity 1P1 channel over the opposite-helicity 3S1 channel for symmetric flavor is a significant revision of the conventional spin-one color-superconductivity picture, with implications for the color-spin-locked condensate and for quark-hadron continuity. The derivation of the helicity amplitudes themselves is transparent and self-contained, and the observation that D_M > D_E can make the color-6 channel attractive is a clean, model-independent insight. The paper is also commendable for presenting analytic formulas for the partial-wave projected amplitudes and for being explicit about the channel labels that enter the RG equations. However, the most consequential quantitative claims are not derived here: they are taken verbatim from an unpublished companion paper (Ref. [22]). This makes the central revision effectively uncheckable in the present manuscript and is the main barrier to acceptance.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section IV, Eqs. (39)-(40) and Eqs. (29)-(31)] The central claim that the same-helicity 1P1 channel prevails over the opposite-helicity 3S1 channel is determined entirely by the gap formulas (39) and (40), which are quoted with the text 'we use the one evaluated by solving the RG equation (see Ref. [22] for details)'. The RG equations (29)-(31) are also presented as quoted results rather than derived. This is load-bearing because the tree-level amplitude comparison after Eq. (38) shows that for g>0.92 the 3S1 amplitude is actually more attractive when judged by H alone; the conclusion that 1P1 nevertheless always wins depends on the exponential and prefactor structure of the unpublished solutions. A small error in either formula would overturn the paper's headline result. The manuscript is not self-contained on this point: please either provide the derivation of the gap solutions in an appendix, or cite a published/available companio
  2. [Section V.A and Fig. 4] The statement that the factor 2^{-1/3} found in Ref. [52] can be omitted 'because the pairing channel does not include the 6 channel' is an assumption that changes Delta_CFL by about 20% and shifts the extracted mu_c. The one-sentence justification is insufficient, especially since the figure's conclusion that CFL may become unstable even for mu>1 GeV depends on the numerical comparison between Delta_CFL and m_s^2/(4 mu). Please demonstrate explicitly (or via a reliable published derivation) why the 2^{-1/3} does not apply, or include it and show that the conclusion is unchanged within the scale-variation band.
  3. [Section IV, text after Eqs. (39)-(40)] The statement 'It turns out that the gap is always larger in the 1P1 channel compared to the 3S1 channel' is presented as a numerical observation from Fig. 2. The two formulas have different exponents and different powers of (1+4 mu^2/m_D^2), so the comparison is not a simple inequality; the claim 'always' needs either an analytic inequality valid over the plotted weak-coupling range or a clear statement of the parameter range where it holds. This is particularly important because the abstract elevates this to a general revision of the single-flavor picture.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section IV, Eq. (32)] The inequalities DE/M_L > DE/M_{L+1} > 0 are stated as 'follow[ing] from the Rodrigues formula', but the proof is not shown. A brief justification or reference would improve readability and reduce the number of unstated lemmas.
  2. [Section IV, Eq. (41)] The fixed ratio Delta_1P1 / Delta_1S0 = e^{-4} is a striking consequence of Eqs. (36) and (39). Since it is used to justify the 'constant' behavior of the 1P1 gap, it would help to note explicitly that the mu-dependence cancels in this ratio and that the plotted bands come from the running coupling and renormalization-scale variation.
  3. [Section III, Table I] The Clebsch-Gordan decomposition in Eqs. (21)-(22) is central to the interpretation, but the table is inserted with minimal explanation. In particular, the sign conventions and the normalizations should be double-checked and the reader should be pointed to the relevant equations in Ref. [49] beyond just 'taken from Sec. 8.5'.
  4. [Section V.C] The phrase 'the CSL pairing occurs between quarks with the same helicity in contrast to the preceding literature' is the key claim, but at this point it restates, rather than proves, the result from Section IV. This is fine if the earlier section is self-contained, but given the dependence on Ref. [22] it would be helpful to reiterate the derivation status explicitly.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

1P1-over-3S1 conclusion is inherited from same-author unpublished Ref. [22] gap formulas, not derived in this paper.

  1. self citation load bearing [Sec. IV, Case 2, after Eq. (38); gap formulas (39)-(40)]
    "For the pairing gap, we use the one evaluated by solving the RG equation (see Ref. [22] for details). ... It turns out that the gap is always larger in the 1P1 channel compared to the 3S1 channel."

    The paper's headline claim (for symmetric flavor, the same-helicity 1P1 prevails over 3S1) is decided by comparing the quoted gap formulas ∆(++,1P1) in Eq. (39) and ∆(+−,3S1) in Eq. (40). Those formulas are not derived in this manuscript; the text says they come from solving the RG equation 'see Ref. [22] for details,' and Ref. [22] is the same author's unpublished 'To appear (2025)' companion paper. The paper's own tree-level comparison (Eqs. (37)-(38)) is explicitly inconclusive—at g ≳ 0.92 the 3S1 amplitude is actually more attractive—so the ranking rests entirely on the quoted gap expressions. The central revision therefore reduces to accepting the companion paper's unpublished solutions as input; no independent derivation or check is provided in this paper.

full rationale

Most of the paper's analytic content—the OGE helicity amplitude computation, the partial-wave decomposition, the identification of the in-medium attractive 6c channel, and the (S,L,J) classification—is self-contained and not circular. However, the strongest quantitative claim, that 1P1 beats 3S1 for flavor-symmetric ¯3 pairing and thereby 'revises the conventional single-flavor picture,' is not established by the in-paper calculation. The decisive comparison is made with gap formulas (39) and (40), which are explicitly sourced to Ref. [22], an unpublished companion paper by the same author. The paper's own amplitude inequality is left inconclusive at larger coupling, so the ordering is inherited from the quoted formulas rather than derived here. This is a load-bearing self-citation rather than an independent derivation, making the central revision not self-contained. The score is 6 rather than higher because the qualitative classification and the new attraction in the 6c channel are independently derived; only the numerical gap ranking underlying the headline claim reduces to the companion-paper input.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new entities and fits no free parameters to data. It relies on the standard inputs of weak-coupling dense QCD (running coupling, quark masses, Debye mass) and on results from a self-cited unpublished manuscript (Ref. [22]) for the gap solutions. The ad hoc omissions and unproven decoupling assumptions are the main ledger entries.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The HDL-resummed gluon propagator (Eqs. 5-7) provides the leading-order interaction kernel for quark-quark scattering near the Fermi surface.
    The paper assumes this standard weak-coupling description of dense QCD; it is not derived in the manuscript.
  • domain assumption In the Lorentz-noninvariant medium, spin is a well-defined quantum number and the two-particle states can be decomposed into |JM;LS> with no leading-order LS mixing.
    Justifies the nonrelativistic classification; the paper argues this from broken boost invariance but does not prove absence of higher-order mixing.
  • domain assumption The renormalization group equations decouple in the (color, flavor, helicity, 2S+1L_J) channels at leading order.
    Stated in Sec. IV, attributed to Refs [10,18-22]; this decoupling is essential for treating each channel independently.
  • ad hoc to paper The gap formulas (36)-(45) are the correct solutions of the stated RG equations.
    These central quantitative formulas are quoted from Ref. [22], an unpublished 'To appear' paper by the same author, and are not derived in this manuscript.
  • ad hoc to paper The factor 2^{-1/3} in the CFL gap (Ref. [52]) can be omitted because the pairing channel does not include the 6 representation.
    Sec. V A: 'seems to be the origin of this factor'; no explicit computation supports this omission.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Classification of color superconductivity by one-gluon exchange helicity amplitudes and renormalization group equations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OIZ6MD6K

@misc{pith2026250819222,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Classification of color superconductivity by one-gluon exchange helicity amplitudes and renormalization group equations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OIZ6MD6K}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.19222}
}
abstract

Quark matter at high baryon density exhibits diverse pairing patterns classified by color, flavor, and angular momentum quantum numbers. We compute one-gluon exchange (OGE) helicity amplitudes and introduce a nonrelativistic classification of the pairing channel, justified by the channel decomposition in a Lorentz-noninvariant medium and the decoupling of renormalization group flows at leading order. We find the new attractive channel in OGE; the medium effects can render the vacuum-repulsive color $\boldsymbol{6}$ channel attractive in the spin-triplet sector. For color $\boldsymbol{\bar{3}}$ with antisymmetric flavor, the dominant pairing is ${}^1S_0$, while for symmetric flavor the same-helicity $^1P_1$ prevails over $^3S_1$, revising the conventional single-flavor picture. With a mismatch of the Fermi momenta, $^1S_0$ channel, leading to color-flavor locked or two-flavor color superconductor, remains most stable when the separation is small, and the color-spin locked pairing becomes favored as the mismatch gets large. We suggest there are possible quark-hadron continuity in certain cases as expected in the literature.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.19222 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The tree-level helicity amplitude for quark-quark scattering via single gluon exchange. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Pairing gap evaluated in the weak-coupling regime for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Illustration of the mismatched Fermi momenta of various colors and flavors of quarks with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Comparison between the CFL gap ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_4.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Renormalization group analysis of color superconductivity revisited

    hep-ph 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An RG treatment with self-energy corrections reproduces the known O(g^0) color-superconducting gap and claims to fix its overall coefficient, implying a factor-two reduction.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [22]

    Fujimoto, Renormalization group analysis of color superconductivity revisited, To appear (2025)

    Y. Fujimoto, Renormalization group analysis of color superconductivity revisited, To appear (2025)

    work page 2025

  2. [52]

    Patterns of Symmetry Breaking in QCD at High Baryon Density

    T. Sch¨ afer, Patterns of symmetry breaking in QCD at high baryon density, Nucl. Phys. B 575, 269 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/9909574

    work page Pith review arXiv 2000

  3. [1]

    M. G. Alford, A. Schmitt, K. Rajagopal, and T. Sch¨ afer, Color superconductivity in dense quark matter, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1455 (2008), arXiv:0709.4635 [hep-ph]. 22

    arXiv 2008

  4. [2]

    Fukushima and T

    K. Fukushima and T. Hatsuda, The phase diagram of dense QCD, Rept. Prog. Phys. 74, 014001 (2011), arXiv:1005.4814 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2011

  5. [3]

    Fukushima, QCD phase diagram and astrophysical implications, J

    K. Fukushima, QCD phase diagram and astrophysical implications, J. Subatomic Part. Cos- mol. 3, 100066 (2025), arXiv:2501.01907 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  6. [4]

    Nagata, Finite-density lattice QCD and sign problem: Current status and open problems, Prog

    K. Nagata, Finite-density lattice QCD and sign problem: Current status and open problems, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 127, 103991 (2022), arXiv:2108.12423 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2022

  7. [5]

    Bailin and A

    D. Bailin and A. Love, Superfluidity and Superconductivity in Relativistic Fermion Systems, Phys. Rept. 107, 325 (1984)

    work page 1984

  8. [6]

    Jacob and G

    M. Jacob and G. C. Wick, On the General Theory of Collisions for Particles with Spin, Annals Phys. 7, 404 (1959)

    1959

Show all 71 references
  1. [7]

    S. U. Chung, SPIN FORMALISMS 10.5170/CERN-1971-008 (1971)

    1971 doi

  2. [8]

    R. D. Pisarski, Scattering Amplitudes in Hot Gauge Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1129 (1989)

    1989

  3. [9]

    Braaten and R

    E. Braaten and R. D. Pisarski, Soft Amplitudes in Hot Gauge Theories: A General Analysis, Nucl. Phys. B 337, 569 (1990)

    1990

  4. [10]

    D. T. Son, Superconductivity by long range color magnetic interaction in high density quark matter, Phys. Rev. D 59, 094019 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9812287

    1999 arXiv

  5. [11]

    Sch¨ afer, The Kohn-Luttinger effect in gauge theories, Phys

    T. Sch¨ afer, The Kohn-Luttinger effect in gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D 74, 054009 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0606026

    2006 arXiv

  6. [12]

    Kumamoto and S

    M. Kumamoto and S. Reddy, Kohn-Luttinger effect in dense matter and its implications for neutron stars, Phys. Rev. C 110, 025804 (2024), arXiv:2405.12243 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  7. [13]

    Fujimoto, Renormalization-group approach to Kohn-Luttinger superconductivity: Ampli- fication of the pairing gap from ℓ4 to ℓ, Phys

    Y. Fujimoto, Renormalization-group approach to Kohn-Luttinger superconductivity: Ampli- fication of the pairing gap from ℓ4 to ℓ, Phys. Rev. B 111, 184510 (2025), arXiv:2502.01169 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    2025 arXiv

  8. [14]

    V. A. Miransky and I. A. Shovkovy, Spontaneous symmetry breaking with abnormal number of Nambu-Goldstone bosons and kaon condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 111601 (2002), arXiv:hep- ph/0108178

    2002

  9. [15]

    Sch¨ afer, D

    T. Sch¨ afer, D. T. Son, M. A. Stephanov, D. Toublan, and J. J. M. Verbaarschot, Kaon condensation and Goldstone’s theorem, Phys. Lett. B 522, 67 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0108210

    2001 arXiv

  10. [16]

    Watanabe and H

    H. Watanabe and H. Murayama, Unified Description of Nambu-Goldstone Bosons without Lorentz Invariance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 251602 (2012), arXiv:1203.0609 [hep-th]. 23

    2012 arXiv

  11. [17]

    Hidaka, Counting rule for Nambu-Goldstone modes in nonrelativistic systems, Phys

    Y. Hidaka, Counting rule for Nambu-Goldstone modes in nonrelativistic systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 091601 (2013), arXiv:1203.1494 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  12. [18]

    N. J. Evans, S. D. H. Hsu, and M. Schwetz, An Effective field theory approach to color super- conductivity at high quark density, Nucl. Phys. B 551, 275 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9808444

    1999 arXiv

  13. [19]

    N. J. Evans, S. D. H. Hsu, and M. Schwetz, Nonperturbative couplings and color supercon- ductivity, Phys. Lett. B 449, 281 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9810514

    1999 arXiv

  14. [20]

    Sch¨ afer and F

    T. Sch¨ afer and F. Wilczek, High density quark matter and the renormalization group in QCD with two and three flavors, Phys. Lett. B 450, 325 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9810509

    1999 arXiv

  15. [21]

    S. D. H. Hsu and M. Schwetz, Magnetic interactions, the renormalization group and color superconductivity in high density QCD, Nucl. Phys. B572, 211 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/9908310

    2000 arXiv

  16. [23]

    M. G. Alford, J. A. Bowers, J. M. Cheyne, and G. A. Cowan, Single color and single flavor color superconductivity, Phys. Rev. D 67, 054018 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0210106

    2003 arXiv

  17. [24]

    M. G. Alford and G. A. Cowan, Single-flavor and two-flavor pairing in three-flavor quark matter, J. Phys. G 32, 511 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0512104

    2006 arXiv

  18. [25]

    M. G. Alford, K. Rajagopal, and F. Wilczek, Color flavor locking and chiral symmetry breaking in high density QCD, Nucl. Phys. B 537, 443 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9804403

    1999 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Fujimoto, Interplay between the weak-coupling results and the lattice data in dense QCD, (2024), arXiv:2408.12514 [hep-ph]

    Y. Fujimoto, Interplay between the weak-coupling results and the lattice data in dense QCD, (2024), arXiv:2408.12514 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  20. [27]

    B. S. Chandrasekhar, a Note on the Maximum Critical Field of High-Field Superconductors, Applied Physics Letters 1, 7 (1962)

    1962

  21. [28]

    A. M. Clogston, Upper Limit for the Critical Field in Hard Superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 9, 266 (1962)

    1962

  22. [29]

    Rajagopal and F

    K. Rajagopal and F. Wilczek, Enforced electrical neutrality of the color flavor locked phase, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3492 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0012039

    2001 arXiv

  23. [30]

    M. G. Alford, K. Rajagopal, S. Reddy, and F. Wilczek, The Minimal CFL nuclear interface, Phys. Rev. D 64, 074017 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0105009

    2001 arXiv

  24. [31]

    Marquard, A

    P. Marquard, A. V. Smirnov, V. A. Smirnov, and M. Steinhauser, Quark Mass Relations to Four-Loop Order in Perturbative QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 142002 (2015), arXiv:1502.01030 [hep-ph]. 24

    2015 arXiv

  25. [32]

    W. E. Brown, J. T. Liu, and H.-c. Ren, On the perturbative nature of color superconductivity, Phys. Rev. D 61, 114012 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/9908248

    2000 arXiv

  26. [33]

    W. E. Brown, J. T. Liu, and H.-c. Ren, The Transition temperature to the superconducting phase of QCD at high baryon density, Phys. Rev. D62, 054016 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/9912409

    2000 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Wang and D

    Q. Wang and D. H. Rischke, How the quark selfenergy affects the color superconducting gap, Phys. Rev. D 65, 054005 (2002), arXiv:nucl-th/0110016

    2002 arXiv

  28. [35]

    M. G. Alford, A. Haber, and Z. Zhang, Beyond modified Urca: The nucleon width approx- imation for flavor-changing processes in dense matter, Phys. Rev. C 110, L052801 (2024), arXiv:2406.13717 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  29. [36]

    M. G. Alford, J. A. Bowers, and K. Rajagopal, Crystalline color superconductivity, Phys. Rev. D 63, 074016 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0008208

    2001 arXiv

  30. [37]

    J. A. Bowers and K. Rajagopal, The Crystallography of color superconductivity, Phys. Rev. D 66, 065002 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0204079

    2002 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Casalbuoni and G

    R. Casalbuoni and G. Nardulli, Inhomogeneous superconductivity in condensed matter and QCD, Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 263 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0305069

    2004 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Anglani, R

    R. Anglani, R. Casalbuoni, M. Ciminale, N. Ippolito, R. Gatto, M. Mannarelli, and M. Rug- gieri, Crystalline color superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 509 (2014), arXiv:1302.4264 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  33. [40]

    Shovkovy and M

    I. Shovkovy and M. Huang, Gapless two flavor color superconductor, Phys. Lett. B 564, 205 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0302142

    2003 arXiv

  34. [41]

    Giannakis and H.-C

    I. Giannakis and H.-C. Ren, Chromomagnetic instability and the LOFF state in a two flavor color superconductor, Phys. Lett. B 611, 137 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0412015

    2005 arXiv

  35. [42]

    Huang and I

    M. Huang and I. A. Shovkovy, Screening masses in neutral two-flavor color superconductor, Phys. Rev. D 70, 094030 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0408268

    2004 arXiv

  36. [43]

    Casalbuoni, R

    R. Casalbuoni, R. Gatto, M. Mannarelli, G. Nardulli, and M. Ruggieri, Meissner masses in the gCFL phase of QCD, Phys. Lett. B 605, 362 (2005), [Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 615, 297 (2005)], arXiv:hep-ph/0410401

    2005 arXiv

  37. [44]

    Fukushima, Analytical and numerical evaluation of the Debye and Meissner masses in dense neutral three-flavor quark matter, Phys

    K. Fukushima, Analytical and numerical evaluation of the Debye and Meissner masses in dense neutral three-flavor quark matter, Phys. Rev. D 72, 074002 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0506080

    2005 arXiv

  38. [45]

    K. Iida, T. Matsuura, M. Tachibana, and T. Hatsuda, Melting pattern of diquark condensates in quark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 132001 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0312363. 25

    2004 arXiv

  39. [46]

    K. Iida, T. Matsuura, M. Tachibana, and T. Hatsuda, Thermal phase transitions and gapless quark spectra in quark matter at high density, Phys. Rev. D 71, 054003 (2005), arXiv:hep- ph/0411356

    2005

  40. [47]

    M. L. Bellac, Thermal Field Theory , Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cam- bridge University Press, 2011)

    2011

  41. [48]

    Laine and A

    M. Laine and A. Vuorinen, Basics of Thermal Field Theory , Vol. 925 (Springer, 2016) arXiv:1701.01554 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  42. [49]

    D. A. Varshalovich, A. N. Moskalev, and V. K. Khersonskii, Quantum Theory of Angular Mo- mentum: Irreducible Tensors, Spherical Harmonics, Vector Coupling Coefficients, 3nj Symbols (World Scientific Publishing Company, 1988)

    1988

  43. [50]

    M. G. Alford, K. Rajagopal, and F. Wilczek, QCD at finite baryon density: Nucleon droplets and color superconductivity, Phys. Lett. B 422, 247 (1998), arXiv:hep-ph/9711395

    1998 arXiv

  44. [51]

    Navas et al

    S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024)

    2024

  45. [53]

    B. C. Barrois, NONPERTURBATIVE EFFECTS IN DENSE QUARK MATTER, Other the- sis (1979)

    1979

  46. [54]

    R. Rapp, T. Sch¨ afer, E. V. Shuryak, and M. Velkovsky, Diquark Bose condensates in high density matter and instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 53 (1998), arXiv:hep-ph/9711396

    1998 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Fujimoto, K

    Y. Fujimoto, K. Fukushima, and W. Weise, Continuity from neutron matter to two- flavor quark matter with 1S0 and 3P2 superfluidity, Phys. Rev. D 101, 094009 (2020), arXiv:1908.09360 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Fujimoto and M

    Y. Fujimoto and M. Nitta, Non-Abelian Alice strings in two-flavor dense QCD, Phys. Rev. D 103, 054002 (2021), arXiv:2011.09947 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Fujimoto and M

    Y. Fujimoto and M. Nitta, Vortices penetrating two-flavor quark-hadron continuity, Phys. Rev. D 103, 114003 (2021), arXiv:2102.12928 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Fujimoto and M

    Y. Fujimoto and M. Nitta, Topological confinement of vortices in two-flavor dense QCD, JHEP 09, 192, arXiv:2103.15185 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  51. [59]

    A. S. Schwarz, FIELD THEORIES WITH NO LOCAL CONSER V ATION OF THE ELEC- TRIC CHARGE, Nucl. Phys. B 208, 141 (1982). 26

    1982

  52. [60]

    M. G. Alford, K. Benson, S. R. Coleman, J. March-Russell, and F. Wilczek, The Interac- tions and Excitations of Nonabelian Vortices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 1632 (1990), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 65, 668 (1990)]

    1990

  53. [61]

    Sch¨ afer, Quark hadron continuity in QCD with one flavor, Phys

    T. Sch¨ afer, Quark hadron continuity in QCD with one flavor, Phys. Rev. D62, 094007 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/0006034

    2000 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Buballa, J

    M. Buballa, J. Hosek, and M. Oertel, Anisotropic admixture in color superconducting quark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 182002 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0204275

    2003 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Schmitt, Q

    A. Schmitt, Q. Wang, and D. H. Rischke, When the transition temperature in color supercon- ductors is not like in BCS theory, Phys. Rev. D 66, 114010 (2002), arXiv:nucl-th/0209050

    2002 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Schmitt, The Ground state in a spin-one color superconductor, Phys

    A. Schmitt, The Ground state in a spin-one color superconductor, Phys. Rev. D 71, 054016 (2005), arXiv:nucl-th/0412033

    2005 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Schmitt, Q

    A. Schmitt, Q. Wang, and D. H. Rischke, Electromagnetic Meissner effect in spin one color superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 242301 (2003), arXiv:nucl-th/0301090

    2003 arXiv

  58. [66]

    X. Wang, H. Malekzadeh, and I. A. Shovkovy, Non-leptonic weak processes in spin-one color superconducting quark matter, Phys. Rev. D 81, 045021 (2010), arXiv:0912.3851 [hep-ph]

    2010 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Wang and I

    X. Wang and I. A. Shovkovy, Bulk viscosity of spin-one color superconducting strange quark matter, Phys. Rev. D 82, 085007 (2010), arXiv:1006.1293 [hep-ph]

    2010 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Sogabe and Y

    N. Sogabe and Y. Yin, Berry Curvature and Spin-One Color Superconductivity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 171903 (2025), arXiv:2411.08005 [nucl-th]

    2025 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Hoffberg, A

    M. Hoffberg, A. E. Glassgold, R. W. Richardson, and M. Ruderman, Anisotropic Superfluidity in Neutron Star Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 24, 775 (1970)

    1970

  62. [70]

    Tamagaki, Superfluid State in Neutron Star Matter

    R. Tamagaki, Superfluid State in Neutron Star Matter. I. Generalized Bogoliubov Transfor- mation and Existence of 3P2 Gap at High Density, Prog. Theor. Phys. 44, 905 (1970)

    1970

  63. [71]

    Sch¨ afer and F

    T. Sch¨ afer and F. Wilczek, Continuity of quark and hadron matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 3956 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9811473

    1999 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.