Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A Standardized Machine-readable Dataset Documentation Format for Responsible AI

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.16883 v1 pith:ONZAVRSJ submitted 2024-06-04 cs.IR cs.AIcs.CYcs.DBcs.LG

classification cs.IRcs.AIcs.CYcs.DBcs.LG
keywords croissant-raidocumentationmetadataformatresponsibledatadatasetdatasets
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Data is critical to advancing AI technologies, yet its quality and documentation remain significant challenges, leading to adverse downstream effects (e.g., potential biases) in AI applications. This paper addresses these issues by introducing Croissant-RAI, a machine-readable metadata format designed to enhance the discoverability, interoperability, and trustworthiness of AI datasets. Croissant-RAI extends the Croissant metadata format and builds upon existing responsible AI (RAI) documentation frameworks, offering a standardized set of attributes and practices to facilitate community-wide adoption. Leveraging established web-publishing practices, such as Schema.org, Croissant-RAI enables dataset users to easily find and utilize RAI metadata regardless of the platform on which the datasets are published. Furthermore, it is seamlessly integrated into major data search engines, repositories, and machine learning frameworks, streamlining the reading and writing of responsible AI metadata within practitioners' existing workflows. Croissant-RAI was developed through a community-led effort. It has been designed to be adaptable to evolving documentation requirements and is supported by a Python library and a visual editor.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. TEDI: Trustworthy and Ethical Dataset Indicators to Analyze and Compare Dataset Documentation

    cs.CY 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new 143-indicator rubric applied to 114 human-voice datasets shows that documentation of consent, privacy, and harmful content is rare, and that scraping yields scale at the cost of documented ethical practices.

  2. Data-Centric Safety and Ethical Measures for Data and AI Governance

    cs.CY 2025-06 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A conceptual framework that maps dataset safety practices to six stages of the AI lifecycle, synthesizing existing documentation and red-teaming recommendations.

Pith tools