Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

LLM4Causal: Democratized Causal Tools for Everyone via Large Language Model

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.17122 v4 pith:ORAVZ32W submitted 2023-12-28 cs.CL cs.AIstat.ML

LLM4Causal: Democratized Causal Tools for Everyone via Large Language Model

classification cs.CL cs.AIstat.ML
keywords causallanguagellm4causaldataend-to-endfunctionlargeablation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown their success in language understanding and reasoning on general topics. However, their capability to perform inference based on user-specified structured data and knowledge in corpus-rare concepts, such as causal decision-making is still limited. In this work, we explore the possibility of fine-tuning an open-sourced LLM into LLM4Causal, which can identify the causal task, execute a corresponding function, and interpret its numerical results based on users' queries and the provided dataset. Meanwhile, we propose a data generation process for more controllable GPT prompting and present two instruction-tuning datasets: (1) Causal-Retrieval-Bench for causal problem identification and input parameter extraction for causal function calling and (2) Causal-Interpret-Bench for in-context causal interpretation. By conducting end-to-end evaluations and two ablation studies, we showed that LLM4Causal can deliver end-to-end solutions for causal problems and provide easy-to-understand answers, which significantly outperforms the baselines.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. NoisyCausal: A Benchmark for Evaluating Causal Reasoning Under Structured Noise

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    NoisyCausal benchmark tests LLMs on causal reasoning with structured noise, and a modular LLM-plus-causal-graph framework outperforms baselines while generalizing to Cladder.