Pith. sign in

REVIEW 8 cited by

AIOpsLab: A Holistic Framework to Evaluate AI Agents for Enabling Autonomous Clouds

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.06706 v1 pith:ORFEDFSX submitted 2025-01-12 cs.AI cs.DCcs.MAcs.SE

AIOpsLab: A Holistic Framework to Evaluate AI Agents for Enabling Autonomous Clouds

classification cs.AI cs.DCcs.MAcs.SE
keywords agentsaiopsaiopslabframeworkoperationaltaskscloudcomplex
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

AI for IT Operations (AIOps) aims to automate complex operational tasks, such as fault localization and root cause analysis, to reduce human workload and minimize customer impact. While traditional DevOps tools and AIOps algorithms often focus on addressing isolated operational tasks, recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) and AI agents are revolutionizing AIOps by enabling end-to-end and multitask automation. This paper envisions a future where AI agents autonomously manage operational tasks throughout the entire incident lifecycle, leading to self-healing cloud systems, a paradigm we term AgentOps. Realizing this vision requires a comprehensive framework to guide the design, development, and evaluation of these agents. To this end, we present AIOPSLAB, a framework that not only deploys microservice cloud environments, injects faults, generates workloads, and exports telemetry data but also orchestrates these components and provides interfaces for interacting with and evaluating agents. We discuss the key requirements for such a holistic framework and demonstrate how AIOPSLAB can facilitate the evaluation of next-generation AIOps agents. Through evaluations of state-of-the-art LLM agents within the benchmark created by AIOPSLAB, we provide insights into their capabilities and limitations in handling complex operational tasks in cloud environments.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 8 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Pooled Leaderboards Hide System-Specific Winners: A Reporting-Protocol Audit of Offline Root-Cause Analysis Benchmarks

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Pooled top-1 accuracy rankings in RCA benchmarks do not reliably identify per-subsystem winners, as pairwise comparisons across 11 subsystems show effects of both signs and leave-one-system-out selection incurs regret...

  2. GSAR: Typed Grounding for Hallucination Detection and Recovery in Multi-Agent LLMs

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    GSAR is a grounding-evaluation framework for multi-agent LLMs that uses a four-way claim typology, evidence-weighted asymmetric scoring, and tiered recovery decisions to detect and mitigate hallucinations.

  3. Ambig-IaC: Multi-level Disambiguation for Interactive Cloud Infrastructure-as-Code Synthesis

    cs.SE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Ambig-IaC detects structural disagreements in LLM-generated IaC candidates across three hierarchical axes to produce clarification questions, improving structure and attribute accuracy by 18.4% and 25.4% on a new 300-...

  4. DBA-Bench: A Production-Fidelity Benchmark for LLM-Based Database Operations Agents

    cs.DB 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A production-fidelity benchmark finds that LLM database-operation agents achieve at most 17.9% safe recovery versus 93.4% for human DBAs.

  5. OpsLLM: Construction of Large Language Model for Software Operations with Multi-stage Learning

    cs.LG 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0

    OpsLLM's pipeline (HITL data curation, SFT, GRPO RL with a domain process reward model) improves LLM accuracy on software-operations QA and RCA, especially on in-distribution root-cause-analysis tasks.

  6. ARBITER: Guarded Agentic Control for SLO-Oriented Kubernetes Remediation

    cs.DC 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    ARBITER separates SLO remediation planning (deterministic rules or an LLM) from deterministic guarded execution over a finite typed Kubernetes-action set, and rolls back bad images and targets downstream critical-path...

  7. OpsLLM: Construction of Large Language Model for Software Operations with Multi-stage Learning

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    OpsLLM outperforms general LLMs on software operations QA and RCA tasks through human-in-the-loop data curation, supervised fine-tuning, and domain-specific reinforcement learning.

  8. OpsLLM: Construction of Large Language Model for Software Operations with Multi-stage Learning

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    OpsLLM is a domain-specific LLM for software ops QA and RCA built with human-curated data, SFT, and RL using a domain process reward model, showing accuracy gains of 0.2-5.7% on QA and 2.7-70.3% on RCA over general LLMs.