Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Selfless Sequential Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1806.05421 v5 pith:OSWC5LSU submitted 2018-06-14 stat.ML cs.AIcs.CVcs.LG

classification stat.MLcs.AIcs.CVcs.LG
keywords learningregularizersequentialsparsitytasksinhibitionneuronscapacity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Sequential learning, also called lifelong learning, studies the problem of learning tasks in a sequence with access restricted to only the data of the current task. In this paper we look at a scenario with fixed model capacity, and postulate that the learning process should not be selfish, i.e. it should account for future tasks to be added and thus leave enough capacity for them. To achieve Selfless Sequential Learning we study different regularization strategies and activation functions. We find that imposing sparsity at the level of the representation (i.e.~neuron activations) is more beneficial for sequential learning than encouraging parameter sparsity. In particular, we propose a novel regularizer, that encourages representation sparsity by means of neural inhibition. It results in few active neurons which in turn leaves more free neurons to be utilized by upcoming tasks. As neural inhibition over an entire layer can be too drastic, especially for complex tasks requiring strong representations, our regularizer only inhibits other neurons in a local neighbourhood, inspired by lateral inhibition processes in the brain. We combine our novel regularizer, with state-of-the-art lifelong learning methods that penalize changes to important previously learned parts of the network. We show that our new regularizer leads to increased sparsity which translates in consistent performance improvement %over alternative regularizers we studied on diverse datasets.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Optimizers Qualitatively Alter Solutions And We Should Leverage This

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Deep learning optimizers should be designed to induce desired solution properties, not just convergence speed; different optimizers demonstrably land in qualitatively different minima.

Pith tools