REVIEW 1 cited by
A fast centrality-meter for heavy-ion collisions at the CBM experiment
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
A new method of event characterization based on Deep Learning is presented. The PointNet models can be used for fast, online event-by-event impact parameter determination at the CBM experiment. For this study, UrQMD and the CBM detector simulation are used to generate Au+Au collision events at 10 AGeV which are then used to train and evaluate PointNet based architectures. The models can be trained on features like the hit position of particles in the CBM detector planes, tracks reconstructed from the hits or combinations thereof. The Deep Learning models reconstruct impact parameters from 2-14 fm with a mean error varying from -0.33 to 0.22 fm. For impact parameters in the range of 5-14 fm, a model which uses the combination of hit and track information of particles has a relative precision of 4-9 % and a mean error of -0.33 to 0.13 fm. In the same range of impact parameters, a model with only track information has a relative precision of 4-10 % and a mean error of -0.18 to 0.22 fm. This new method of event-classification is shown to be more accurate and less model dependent than conventional methods and can utilize the performance boost of modern GPU processor units.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Machine learning the impact parameter in heavy-ion collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 4 and 11 GeV: a cross-check study with UrQMD, AMPT, and JAM
A LightGBM model trained on pion observables from one transport model predicts impact parameters in Au+Au collisions at 4 and 11 GeV with 0.2-0.4 fm error, generalizing to data from other models where polynomial fits fail.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.