REVIEW 4 cited by
From Training-Free to Adaptive: Empirical Insights into MLLMs' Understanding of Detection Information
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Despite the impressive capabilities of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) in integrating text and image modalities, challenges remain in accurately interpreting detailed visual elements. Vision detection models excel at recognizing fine-grained image details, prompting researchers to use them to enhance MLLMs. One effective strategy is to infuse detection information in text format, which has proven simple and effective. However, most studies utilize this method without training, leaving the potential of adaptive training largely unexplored. Adaptive training could significantly enhance MLLMs' comprehension of unique inputs while filtering out irrelevant information. This paper addresses the crucial question: How does training impact MLLMs' understanding of infused textual detection information? We systematically experiment with various representative models to evaluate the effects of training-free, retraining, and fine-tuning strategies. We also examine the influence of training on MLLMs' original abilities and the interchangeability of detection models. Our findings indicate that fine-tuning a pre-trained MLLM to incorporate textual detection information delivers superior results compared to training-free and retraining methods, improving performance by 6.71% across 10 widely recognized benchmarks. Furthermore, fine-tuning enables MLLMs to retain performance enhancements even when detection models are swapped, indicating improved understanding of formatted textual data. We release our codes to support further exploration of fusion strategies for vision detection models and the enhancement of MLLMs' fine-grained multimodal capabilities.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
DetailMaster: Can Your Text-to-Image Model Handle Long Prompts?
Introduces DetailMaster, a 4,116-prompt benchmark with fine-grained evaluation of long-prompt text-to-image generation, finding that state-of-the-art models achieve only about 50% accuracy on attribute binding and spa...
-
VaLiD: Mitigating the Hallucination of Large Vision Language Models by Visual Layer Fusion Contrastive Decoding
VaLiD mitigates LVLM hallucination by entropy-weighted fusion of early visual layers in contrastive decoding.
-
Panther: Illuminate the Sight of Multimodal LLMs with Instruction-Guided Visual Prompts
Panther improves multimodal LLMs by converting the user's text question into visual prompts that steer a frozen image encoder toward instruction-relevant regions, gaining about 2 to 3 points on several VQA benchmarks ...
-
Socratic Questioning: Learn to Self-guide Multimodal Reasoning in the Wild
A self-questioning training and inference framework for lightweight multimodal LLMs is claimed to reduce hallucinations and improve zero-shot visual reasoning.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.