REVIEW 6 cited by
SciSage: A Multi-Agent Framework for High-Quality Scientific Survey Generation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
SciSage: A Multi-Agent Framework for High-Quality Scientific Survey Generation
read the original abstract
The rapid growth of scientific literature demands robust tools for automated survey-generation. However, current large language model (LLM)-based methods often lack in-depth analysis, structural coherence, and reliable citations. To address these limitations, we introduce SciSage, a multi-agent framework employing a reflect-when-you-write paradigm. SciSage features a hierarchical Reflector agent that critically evaluates drafts at outline, section, and document levels, collaborating with specialized agents for query interpretation, content retrieval, and refinement. We also release SurveyScope, a rigorously curated benchmark of 46 high-impact papers (2020-2025) across 11 computer science domains, with strict recency and citation-based quality controls. Evaluations demonstrate that SciSage outperforms state-of-the-art baselines (LLM x MapReduce-V2, AutoSurvey), achieving +1.73 points in document coherence and +32% in citation F1 scores. Human evaluations reveal mixed outcomes (3 wins vs. 7 losses against human-written surveys), but highlight SciSage's strengths in topical breadth and retrieval efficiency. Overall, SciSage offers a promising foundation for research-assistive writing tools.
Forward citations
Cited by 6 Pith papers
-
Externalizing Research Synthesis and Validation in AI Scientists through a Research Harness
Xcientist externalizes research synthesis and validation in AI scientists via contract-governed artifacts to maintain traceable trajectories and avoid claim drift across three domains.
-
Externalizing Research Synthesis and Validation in AI Scientists through a Research Harness
Xcientist is a research harness that externalizes an AI scientist's literature grounding, idea evolution, experiments, and repairs into auditable artifacts, demonstrated on memory, traffic forecasting, and PDE-solving tasks.
-
DeepSurvey: Enhancing Analytical Depth and Citation Reliability in Automated Survey Generation
DeepSurvey introduces an agentic system for automated survey generation that improves depth through full-text keynotes, cross-paper clustering, and code analysis, while boosting citation reliability via graph expansio...
-
Paper Circle: An Open-source Multi-agent Research Discovery and Analysis Framework
Paper Circle is an open-source multi-agent system that retrieves papers via offline and online sources, applies multi-criteria scoring and diversity ranking, and converts papers into typed knowledge graphs for structu...
-
ScaffoldAgent: Utility-Guided Dynamic Outline Optimization for Open-Ended Deep Research
ScaffoldAgent improves long-form report generation by modeling outline evolution as expansion, contraction, and revision guided by a utility function estimating downstream value.
-
AutoResearch AI: Towards AI-Powered Research Automation for Scientific Discovery
A survey organizing AI-powered research automation into five workflow stages, defining AutoResearch and Vibe Research, and proposing five evaluation dimensions while noting domain-conditioned limits on autonomy.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.