Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

On The Concurrence of Layer-wise Preconditioning Methods and Provable Feature Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.01763 v1 pith:OZMXQ4JY submitted 2025-02-03 cs.LG math.OCstat.ML

On The Concurrence of Layer-wise Preconditioning Methods and Provable Feature Learning

classification cs.LG math.OCstat.ML
keywords preconditioninglayer-wisemethodslearningmathbfadamalgorithmsdemonstrate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Layer-wise preconditioning methods are a family of memory-efficient optimization algorithms that introduce preconditioners per axis of each layer's weight tensors. These methods have seen a recent resurgence, demonstrating impressive performance relative to entry-wise ("diagonal") preconditioning methods such as Adam(W) on a wide range of neural network optimization tasks. Complementary to their practical performance, we demonstrate that layer-wise preconditioning methods are provably necessary from a statistical perspective. To showcase this, we consider two prototypical models, linear representation learning and single-index learning, which are widely used to study how typical algorithms efficiently learn useful features to enable generalization. In these problems, we show SGD is a suboptimal feature learner when extending beyond ideal isotropic inputs $\mathbf{x} \sim \mathsf{N}(\mathbf{0}, \mathbf{I})$ and well-conditioned settings typically assumed in prior work. We demonstrate theoretically and numerically that this suboptimality is fundamental, and that layer-wise preconditioning emerges naturally as the solution. We further show that standard tools like Adam preconditioning and batch-norm only mildly mitigate these issues, supporting the unique benefits of layer-wise preconditioning.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Reassessing Muon for Matrix Factorization

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Muon's advantage over AdamW is problem-dependent: it loses or ties on plain low-rank factorization and completion but wins on nonnegative matrix factorization.

  2. Reassessing Muon for Matrix Factorization

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0

    A controlled benchmark of five matrix-factorization problems shows Muon's advantage over AdamW is problem-dependent: it loses or ties on factorization/completion and wins on NMF; learning-rate tuning reorders the methods.