Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

DevSecOps in Robotics

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2003.10402 v3 pith:PADVJAQA submitted 2020-03-23 cs.RO cs.CR

classification cs.ROcs.CR
keywords roboticsdevsecopssecuritydescribedevelopmentintroducepracticesquality
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Quality in software is often understood as "execution according to design purpose" whereas security means that "software will not put data or computing systems at risk of unauthorized access." There seems to be a connection between these two aspects but, how do we integrate both of them in the robotics development cycle? In this article we introduce DevSecOps in Robotics, a set of best practices designed to help roboticists implant security deep in the heart of their development and operations processes. First, we briefly describe DevOps, introduce the value added with DevSecOps and describe and illustrate how these practices may be implemented in the robotics field. We finalize with a discussion on the relationship between security, quality and safety, open problems and future research questions.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. SoK: Cybersecurity Assessment of Humanoid Ecosystem

    cs.CR 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A seven-layer humanoid security model with a 39x35 risk-weighted scoring method, demonstrated on Pepper, G1 EDU, and Digit.

Pith tools