Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Meta-Learners for Few-Shot Weakly-Supervised Medical Image Segmentation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.06912 v1 pith:PB4VVC3H submitted 2023-05-11 cs.CV cs.LGcs.NE

Meta-Learners for Few-Shot Weakly-Supervised Medical Image Segmentation

classification cs.CV cs.LGcs.NE
keywords segmentationmeta-learnerstasksfew-shotimagemeta-learninganalysisdomain
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Most uses of Meta-Learning in visual recognition are very often applied to image classification, with a relative lack of works in other tasks {such} as segmentation and detection. We propose a generic Meta-Learning framework for few-shot weakly-supervised segmentation in medical imaging domains. We conduct a comparative analysis of meta-learners from distinct paradigms adapted to few-shot image segmentation in different sparsely annotated radiological tasks. The imaging modalities include 2D chest, mammographic and dental X-rays, as well as 2D slices of volumetric tomography and resonance images. Our experiments consider a total of 9 meta-learners, 4 backbones and multiple target organ segmentation tasks. We explore small-data scenarios in radiology with varying weak annotation styles and densities. Our analysis shows that metric-based meta-learning approaches achieve better segmentation results in tasks with smaller domain shifts in comparison to the meta-training datasets, while some gradient- and fusion-based meta-learners are more generalizable to larger domain shifts.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.