REVIEW 3 cited by
When is Importance Weighting Correction Needed for Covariate Shift Adaptation?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This paper investigates when the importance weighting (IW) correction is needed to address covariate shift, a common situation in supervised learning where the input distributions of training and test data differ. Classic results show that the IW correction is needed when the model is parametric and misspecified. In contrast, recent results indicate that the IW correction may not be necessary when the model is nonparametric and well-specified. We examine the missing case in the literature where the model is nonparametric and misspecified, and show that the IW correction is needed for obtaining the best approximation of the true unknown function for the test distribution. We do this by analyzing IW-corrected kernel ridge regression, covering a variety of settings, including parametric and nonparametric models, well-specified and misspecified settings, and arbitrary weighting functions.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Nonparametric Goodness-of-fit Testing under Covariate Shift
Truncated importance-weighted kernel ridge regression with multiplier bootstrap yields valid L2(Q) confidence balls for nonparametric goodness-of-fit under covariate shift.
-
Spectral Algorithms in Misspecified Regression: Convergence under Covariate Shift
Weighted spectral algorithms under covariate shift achieve minimax rates for bounded density ratios and near-optimal rates under truncation, including misspecified targets.
-
Computational Efficiency under Covariate Shift in Kernel Ridge Regression
Nyström-approximated importance-weighted kernel ridge regression achieves the same optimal excess-risk rates as the full method under covariate shift, with sublinear time and memory costs.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.