REVIEW 2 cited by
Can Knowledge Graphs Reduce Hallucinations in LLMs? : A Survey
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Can Knowledge Graphs Reduce Hallucinations in LLMs? : A Survey
read the original abstract
The contemporary LLMs are prone to producing hallucinations, stemming mainly from the knowledge gaps within the models. To address this critical limitation, researchers employ diverse strategies to augment the LLMs by incorporating external knowledge, aiming to reduce hallucinations and enhance reasoning accuracy. Among these strategies, leveraging knowledge graphs as a source of external information has demonstrated promising results. In this survey, we comprehensively review these knowledge-graph-based augmentation techniques in LLMs, focusing on their efficacy in mitigating hallucinations. We systematically categorize these methods into three overarching groups, offering methodological comparisons and performance evaluations. Lastly, this survey explores the current trends and challenges associated with these techniques and outlines potential avenues for future research in this emerging field.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
MoG: Mixture of Experts for Graph-based Retrieval-Augmented Generation
MoG uses hub graphs for shared context and sparsely activates expert graphs with a topology-aware router, reporting over 20% relative gains on MuSiQue.
-
EHRAG: Bridging Semantic Gaps in Lightweight GraphRAG via Hybrid Hypergraph Construction and Retrieval
EHRAG constructs structural hyperedges from sentence co-occurrence and semantic hyperedges from entity embedding clusters, then applies hybrid diffusion plus topic-aware PPR to retrieve top-k documents, outperforming ...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.