Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

RobustX: Robust Counterfactual Explanations Made Easy

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.13751 v1 pith:PE6DHQQG submitted 2025-02-19 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords methodsgenerationrobustrobustnessrobustxchangescounterfactualevaluation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The increasing use of Machine Learning (ML) models to aid decision-making in high-stakes industries demands explainability to facilitate trust. Counterfactual Explanations (CEs) are ideally suited for this, as they can offer insights into the predictions of an ML model by illustrating how changes in its input data may lead to different outcomes. However, for CEs to realise their explanatory potential, significant challenges remain in ensuring their robustness under slight changes in the scenario being explained. Despite the widespread recognition of CEs' robustness as a fundamental requirement, a lack of standardised tools and benchmarks hinders a comprehensive and effective comparison of robust CE generation methods. In this paper, we introduce RobustX, an open-source Python library implementing a collection of CE generation and evaluation methods, with a focus on the robustness property. RobustX provides interfaces to several existing methods from the literature, enabling streamlined access to state-of-the-art techniques. The library is also easily extensible, allowing fast prototyping of novel robust CE generation and evaluation methods.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CEL: Comprehensive Counterfactual Explanations Library and Benchmark

    cs.LG 2026-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    CEL is a unified library and evaluation protocol benchmarking 14 counterfactual explanation methods on 18 datasets, but the submitted manuscript lacks the code, metrics, and supplementary results needed to support its...

  2. Argumentative Ensembling for Robust Recourse under Model Multiplicity

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A bipolar-argumentation framework jointly selects models and counterfactuals so that returned counterfactuals are valid on all selected models, at the cost of majority voting.

Pith tools