Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Weak-to-Strong Search: Align Large Language Models via Searching over Small Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.19262 v3 pith:PEW4HTIJ submitted 2024-05-29 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords largemodelsmodellanguagetextttsearchsmallweak-to-strong
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Large language models are usually fine-tuned to align with human preferences. However, fine-tuning a large language model can be challenging. In this work, we introduce $\textit{weak-to-strong search}$, framing the alignment of a large language model as a test-time greedy search to maximize the log-probability difference between small tuned and untuned models while sampling from the frozen large model. This method serves both as (1) a compute-efficient model up-scaling strategy that avoids directly tuning the large model and as (2) an instance of weak-to-strong generalization that enhances a strong model with weak test-time guidance. Empirically, we demonstrate the flexibility of weak-to-strong search across different tasks. In controlled-sentiment generation and summarization, we use tuned and untuned $\texttt{gpt2}$s to improve the alignment of large models without additional training. Crucially, in a more difficult instruction-following benchmark, AlpacaEval 2.0, we show that reusing off-the-shelf small models (e.g., $\texttt{zephyr-7b-beta}$ and its untuned version) can improve the length-controlled win rates of both white-box and black-box large models against $\texttt{gpt-4-turbo}$ (e.g., $34.4\% \rightarrow 37.9\%$ for $\texttt{Llama-3-70B-Instruct}$ and $16.0\% \rightarrow 20.1\%$ for $\texttt{gpt-3.5-turbo-instruct}$), despite the small models' low win rates $\approx 10.0\%$.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Off-the-Shelf LLMs as Process Scorers: Training-Free Alternative to PRMs for Mathematical Reasoning

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Chunk-Level Guided Generation uses off-the-shelf large LLMs to score fixed-length chunks from small models via likelihoods, matching trained PRM performance on math benchmarks without reward-model training.

  2. Process Reinforcement through Implicit Rewards

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    PRIME enables online process reward model updates in LLM RL using implicit rewards from rollouts and outcome labels, yielding 15.1% average gains on reasoning benchmarks and surpassing a stronger instruct model with 1...

  3. Trust Functions: Near-Lossless Weak-to-Strong Generalization by Learning When to Trust the Weak Teacher

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Trust functions filter unreliable weak labels to enable near-lossless weak-to-strong generalization and iterative chaining.

Pith tools