Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Constraints on DBI dark energy with chameleon mechanism

T0 review · 4 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Fitting the DBI dark energy model to current cosmological data drives the quartic self-interaction to zero and finds no phantom-divide crossing, leaving the model mildly disfavored compared to ΛCDM.

desk verdict The abstract describes a plausible constraints paper for DBI dark energy with a chameleon, but the submitted full text is an unrelated graph clustering paper, so there is no analysis to referee yet. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.05436 v2 pith:PFZ5YWEP submitted 2025-08-07 astro-ph.CO gr-qc

Burin Gumjudpai , Nandan Roy , John Ward This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.COgr-qc PACS 95.36.+x
keywords DBIdarkenergychameleonmechanismcosmologicalconstraintsPantheonPlusDESIDR2phantomdivideΛCDMcomparisonequationofstate
topics Dark Energy
open problems Dark Energy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tests whether a Dirac-Born-Infeld scalar field, with an anti-de Sitter throat and an optional chameleon coupling, can explain cosmic acceleration. Fitting the model to Pantheon Plus, DES Y5, DESI DR2, and a compressed Planck likelihood, the authors find that the quartic self-interaction parameter is consistent with zero, leaving only an upper bound, while the warp parameter and chameleon coupling are driven to one-sided constraints. The equation of state never crosses the phantom divide under the assumed forms, and the model is mildly disfavored by the Akaike Information Criterion relative to ΛCDM despite a negligible improvement in chi-squared. The upshot is that this particular DBI construction gains no statistical advantage over a cosmological constant.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is the DBI Lagrangian with an AdS warp factor $f(\varphi)=\lambda/\varphi^4$ and a quadratic-plus-quartic potential $V(\varphi)=m_0^2\varphi^2+m_1^2\varphi^4$, optionally augmented by a chameleon coupling $\beta$ to matter. The background equations are solved and fitted to the four likelihoods via Markov-chain Monte Carlo, and the model is compared to $\Lambda$CDM using $\Delta\mathrm{AIC}$. The warp factor sets the throat geometry, the potential controls the field dynamics and its self-interaction, and the chameleon coupling alters the effective mass; together these determine whether the equation of state crosses $w=-1$ and whether the parameters are separately measura

What would settle it

A future survey that detects a high-significance phantom crossing ($w<-1$) in any redshift bin would falsify this model class under the assumed potential and warp factor. Alternatively, a measurement requiring $m_1>0$ at more than $2\sigma$ would contradict the upper bound found here.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that combining current data with the assumed warp factor $f(\varphi)=\lambda/\varphi^4$ and potential $V(\varphi)=m_0^2\varphi^2+m_1^2\varphi^4$ yields a DBI dark energy model whose mean quartic self-interaction is $m_1\simeq 0$ (only an upper bound), whose warp parameter is $\eta \ge 0$, and whose chameleon coupling is $\beta \le 0$, with no phantom-divide crossing. Although the DBI model improves $\Delta\chi^2$ slightly relative to $\Lambda$CDM, the $\Delta\mathrm{AIC}$ indicates that the model is mildly disfavored in both the chameleon and non-chameleon cases. The authors frame these as constraints on the specific functional forms rather than on DBI dark energ

Load-bearing premise

The results are conditional on the assumed forms of the warp factor $f(\varphi)=\lambda/\varphi^4$ and potential $V=m_0^2\varphi^2+m_1^2\varphi^4$, plus the chosen parameterization of the chameleon coupling; other choices could shift the constraints and the no-phantom-crossing conclusion.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The quartic self-interaction of the DBI field is not required by current data; the potential is effectively quadratic.
  • The no-phantom-crossing result implies this model cannot produce the $w < -1$ regime sometimes favored by cosmological probes.
  • The mild $\Delta\mathrm{AIC}$ disfavoring means adding DBI parameters (and the chameleon coupling) is not rewarded statistically by Pantheon Plus, DES Y5, DESI DR2, and compressed Planck.
  • The constraints $\eta \ge 0$ and $\beta \le 0$ are one-sided, indicating the data push these parameters to the prior edges rather than measuring them.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The one-sided constraints on $\eta$ and $\beta$ are the classic signature of a prior-bound effect: the posterior piles up at the boundary, so the actual values are not measured; a flat prior starting at negative values could change these 'constraints'.
  • Applying the same likelihood stack to other throat geometries (e.g., power-law $f \propto \varphi^n$) could reveal whether the no-crossing conclusion is generic or an artefact of the chosen AdS form.
  • The $m_1 \approx 0$ upper bound makes contact with thawing quintessence: if the quartic term is indeed absent, the DBI field behaves like a canonical scalar with a nearly quadratic potential in the relevant regime.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. The abstract claims to constrain a Dirac-Born-Infeld (DBI) dark energy model, with and without a chameleon mechanism, using Pantheon Plus, DES Y5, DESI DR2, and compressed Planck likelihoods. The reported results are: a self-interaction parameter consistent with zero (m1 ≈ 0, upper bound only), warp parameter η ≥ 0, chameleon coupling β ≤ 0, no phantom-divide crossing under the assumed warp and potential, and a mild preference for ΛCDM over DBI based on ΔAIC despite a negligible Δχ² improvement. However, the full text supplied is an unrelated paper on online sparsification of bipartite-like clusters. No cosmological equations, datasets, likelihoods, priors, MCMC chains, or model-comparison computations are present. Consequently, every quantitative claim in the abstract is unverifiable from the submitted material.

Significance. If the constraints were rigorously derived, the result that this specific DBI model does not improve over ΛCDM would be a useful negative data point in the dark-energy model-comparison literature, and the upper bound on the self-interaction could inform model-building. However, since the submitted manuscript contains none of the analysis, the significance cannot be assessed. There are no machine-checked proofs, reproducible code, or falsifiable predictions in the submitted material. The one-sided constraints and the no-crossing statement are also prone to being artifacts of the chosen functional form and prior boundaries, as detailed below.

major comments (4)
  1. [Full Text (pp. 1–19)] The body of the manuscript is not the cosmology paper described in the abstract; it is an unrelated graph-clustering paper. None of the DBI action, chameleon coupling, likelihoods, priors, sampler settings, chains, or ΔAIC calculations appear anywhere in the submitted text. This is a load-bearing omission: the abstract's central claims cannot be checked, reproduced, or even located. The manuscript as submitted is not a coherent paper about DBI dark energy.
  2. [Abstract] All headline constraints are one-sided or inequality-shaped: m1 ≈ 0 with an upper bound, η ≥ 0, and β ≤ 0. Without reporting prior ranges and posterior shapes, these are exactly the signature of posterior mass pressed against prior boundaries. The chameleon coupling β ≤ 0 is especially concerning because the standard chameleon mechanism usually considers β ≥ 0; a negative coupling may reflect a sign convention or a degeneracy rather than a data-driven constraint. Please provide the priors and posterior distributions, and clarify the sign convention.
  3. [Abstract] The statement 'No crossing of the phantom divide is observed under the assumed form of the warp factor and potential' is conditional on f(φ)=λ/φ⁴ and V(φ)=m0²φ²+m1²φ⁴. If this particular functional form kinematically forbids w crossing −1, then the conclusion is predetermined by the model choice, not an empirical finding. The authors should analyze the phase-space kinematics of the model or test a broader class of warp factors and potentials before making a general claim about phantom-divide crossing.
  4. [Abstract] The model comparison claim is not quantitatively meaningful as stated: 'slightly better fit' and 'negligible improvement' are vague, and no ΔAIC or Δχ² values are reported. A proper comparison requires the number of free parameters, effective degrees of freedom, and the actual information-criterion values. Without these, the claim that DBI is 'mildly disfavored' relative to ΛCDM cannot be evaluated.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The datasets (Pantheon Plus, DES Y5, DESI DR2, compressed Planck) are named but not referenced; if a full paper exists, it should include the relevant data releases and analysis choices.
  2. [Abstract] The parameters m1, m0, λ, η, β are not defined in the abstract; if this is intended as a standalone summary, each parameter should be identified.
  3. [Title/Full Text] The title and abstract describe a cosmology paper, but the body is a graph-clustering paper; this mismatch must be resolved.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found; the paper honestly reports fitted constraints rather than predictions or derivations.

full rationale

The available manuscript text (the abstract) describes an observational constraints analysis: parameters of a DBI dark energy model with and without a chameleon mechanism are fitted to Pantheon Plus, DES Y5, DESI DR2, and compressed Planck likelihoods. The reported results—m1≈0 (upper bound), η≥0, β≤0, and no phantom-divide crossing—are presented as fitting outcomes, not as predictions derived from the model. The statement about no phantom crossing is explicitly qualified as holding 'under the assumed form of the warp factor and potential,' which is an acknowledged conditionality rather than a hidden reduction. There are no citations, no imported uniqueness theorems, no renaming of known results, and no fitted quantity relabeled as a prediction. The supplied 'full text' is a different manuscript on graph sparsification, so no equation-level derivation chain from the DBI paper is available to inspect; however, the abstract alone exhibits no circular step. The limitations that the reader or skeptic note (e.g., prior-edge effects, form-dependence of the conclusion) are standard model-dependence concerns, not circularity. Therefore no circularity score is warranted.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Ledger reflects an abstract-only review. The paper contributes a parameter fit; all headline results are fitted values or inequalities. Model forms and data choices come from prior literature; no new entities are invented. The main unstated load-bearing choices are the functional forms of f(φ) and V(φ), the chameleon parameterization, and non-binding priors.

free parameters (6)
  • m1 = posterior mean ≈ 0; upper bound only
    Self-interaction coupling in V(φ) = m0²φ² + m1²φ⁴; the paper's headline constraint.
  • m0 = not reported in abstract
    Quadratic mass scale of the potential; fitted to the data.
  • λ = not reported in abstract
    AdS throat scale in f(φ) = λ/φ⁴; fitted.
  • η (warp parameter) = η ≥ 0
    Fitted; abstract reports only the inequality, consistent with prior-edge truncation.
  • β (chameleon coupling) = β ≤ 0
    Fitted; abstract reports only the inequality, consistent with prior-edge truncation.
  • cosmological background parameters (Ωm, H0, etc.) = not reported in abstract
    Standard parameters sampled alongside the model; not itemized in the abstract.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The DBI action with AdS throat f(φ) = λ/φ⁴ and potential V(φ) = m0²φ² + m1²φ⁴ describes dark energy
    Stated in the abstract ('We consider an AdS throat of the form...'); all constraints and the no-phantom-crossing result are conditional on these forms.
  • domain assumption The chameleon coupling and warp parameterization (β, η) as implemented captures the chameleon mechanism
    The boundary results β ≤ 0 and η ≥ 0 depend on how the coupling is parameterized; not specified in the abstract.
  • domain assumption Priors on m1, β, η are broad enough that boundary posterior values reflect the data
    The headline inequalities are the classic signature of posterior mass at prior boundaries; the abstract does not state whether priors are non-binding.
  • domain assumption Pantheon Plus, DES Y5, DESI DR2, and compressed Planck likelihoods are correctly implemented and mutually consistent
    Every constraint inherits the systematics of these releases; unverifiable from the abstract.
  • standard math Standard Friedmann-Robertson-Walker background equations for a DBI field apply
    Standard cosmological setup implicitly invoked by any such constraint analysis.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Constraints on DBI dark energy with chameleon mechanism." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PFZ5YWEP

@misc{pith2026250805436,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Constraints on DBI dark energy with chameleon mechanism},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PFZ5YWEP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.05436}
}
abstract

In this work, we investigate the Dirac--Born--Infeld (DBI) scalar field model with and without the inclusion of the chameleon mechanism in light of the latest cosmological observations. We constrain the model using data from Pantheon Plus, DES Y5, DESI DR2, and the compressed Planck likelihood. We consider an AdS throat of the form $f(\phi) = \lambda / \phi^4$ and a potential $V(\phi) = m_0^2 \phi^2 + m_1^2 \phi^4$. Our analysis shows that, for both cases, the mean value $m_1 \simeq 0$ suggests that the DBI field may lack significant self-interaction, with only an upper bound on $m_1$. The warp parameter is constrained to $\eta \geq 0$, while the chameleon coupling satisfies $\beta \leq 0$. No crossing of the phantom divide is observed under the assumed form of the warp factor and potential. We perform a statistical model comparison using the $\Delta \mathrm{AIC}$ relative to the $\Lambda$CDM model. Although the DBI model provides a slightly better fit to the data in terms of $\Delta \chi^2$, the improvement is negligible. Consequently, the DBI model is mildly disfavored for both the cases compared to the $\Lambda$CDM model.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Observational Constraints on $f(Q,T)$ Gravity in the Presence of DBI-Essence Scalar Field

    gr-qc 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    Derives background solutions for linear f(Q,T)=αQ+βT plus DBI field and reports MCMC posteriors from Hubble, BAO, and SNIa data that are consistent with late-time constraints.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [2]

    Aghanim et al

    author author N. Aghanim et al. ( collaboration Planck ),\ 10.1051/0004-6361/201833910 journal journal Astron. Astrophys. \ volume 641 ,\ pages A6 ( year 2020 ) ,\ note [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)] ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1807.06209 arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    arXiv 2020

  2. [3]

    Padmanabhan ,\ 10.1016/S0370-1573(03)00120-0 journal journal Phys

    author author T. Padmanabhan ,\ 10.1016/S0370-1573(03)00120-0 journal journal Phys. Rept. \ volume 380 ,\ pages 235 ( year 2003 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0212290 arXiv:hep-th/0212290 NoStop

    arXiv 2003

  3. [4]

    Verde , author T

    author author L. Verde , author T. Treu , \ and\ author A. G. \ Riess ,\ 10.1038/s41550-019-0902-0 journal journal Nature Astron. \ volume 3 ,\ pages 891 ( year 2019 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1907.10625 arXiv:1907.10625 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    arXiv 2019

  4. [5]

    Alam et al

    author author S. Alam et al. ( collaboration BOSS ),\ 10.1093/mnras/stx721 journal journal Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. \ volume 470 ,\ pages 2617 ( year 2017 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1607.03155 arXiv:1607.03155 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    arXiv 2017

  5. [6]

    Joudaki et al

    author author S. Joudaki et al. ,\ 10.1051/0004-6361/201936154 journal journal Astron. Astrophys. \ volume 638 ,\ pages L1 ( year 2020 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1906.09262 arXiv:1906.09262 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    arXiv 2020

  6. [7]

    author author A. G. \ Riess et al. ,\ 10.3847/0004-637X/826/1/56 journal journal Astrophys. J. \ volume 826 ,\ pages 56 ( year 2016 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1604.01424 arXiv:1604.01424 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    arXiv 2016

  7. [8]

    author author A. G. \ Riess , author S. Casertano , author W. Yuan , author L. M. \ Macri , \ and\ author D. Scolnic ,\ 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1422 journal journal Astrophys. J. \ volume 876 ,\ pages 85 ( year 2019 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1903.07603 arXiv:1903.07603 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    arXiv 2019

  8. [9]

    author author K. C. \ Wong et al. ( collaboration H0LiCOW ),\ 10.1093/mnras/stz3094 journal journal Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. \ volume 498 ,\ pages 1420 ( year 2020 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1907.04869 arXiv:1907.04869 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    arXiv 2020

Show all 87 references
  1. [10]

    author author W. L. \ Freedman et al. ,\ 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2f73 journal journal Astrophys. J. \ volume 882 ,\ pages 34 ( year 2019 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1907.05922 arXiv:1907.05922 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    2019 arXiv

  2. [11]

    author author A. G. \ Adame et al. ( collaboration DESI ),\ 10.1088/1475-7516/2025/02/021 journal journal JCAP \ volume 02 ,\ pages 021 ( year 2025 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.03002 arXiv:2404.03002 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    2025 arXiv

  3. [12]

    Calderon et al

    author author R. Calderon et al. ( collaboration DESI ),\ @noop \ ( year 2024 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.04216 arXiv:2405.04216 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    2024 arXiv

  4. [13]

    Abdul Karim et al

    author author M. Abdul Karim et al. ( collaboration DESI ),\ @noop \ ( year 2025 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.14738 arXiv:2503.14738 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    2025 arXiv

  5. [14]

    author author A. G. \ Adame et al. ( collaboration DESI ),\ @noop \ ( year 2024 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.12021 arXiv:2411.12021 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    2024 arXiv

  6. [15]

    Lodha et al

    author author K. Lodha et al. ( collaboration DESI ),\ @noop \ ( year 2025 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.14743 arXiv:2503.14743 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    2025 arXiv

  7. [16]

    author author T. M. C. \ Abbott et al. ( collaboration DES ),\ 10.3847/2041-8213/ad6f9f journal journal Astrophys. J. Lett. \ volume 973 ,\ pages L14 ( year 2024 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.02929 arXiv:2401.02929 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    arXiv

  8. [17]

    author author E. J. \ Copeland , author M. Sami , \ and\ author S. Tsujikawa ,\ 10.1142/S021827180600942X journal journal Int. J. Mod. Phys. \ volume D15 ,\ pages 1753 ( year 2006 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0603057 arXiv:hep-th/0603057 [hep-th] NoStop

    2006 arXiv

  9. [18]

    Padmanabhan ,\ 10.1063/1.2399577 journal journal AIP Conf

    author author T. Padmanabhan ,\ 10.1063/1.2399577 journal journal AIP Conf. Proc. \ volume 861 ,\ pages 179 ( year 2006 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0603114 arXiv:astro-ph/0603114 NoStop

    2006 arXiv

  10. [19]

    Amendola \ and\ author S

    author author L. Amendola \ and\ author S. Tsujikawa ,\ @noop title Dark Energy : Theory and Observations \ ( publisher Cambridge University Press ,\ year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015

  11. [20]

    Clifton , author P

    author author T. Clifton , author P. G. \ Ferreira , author A. Padilla , \ and\ author C. Skordis ,\ 10.1016/j.physrep.2012.01.001 journal journal Phys. Rept. \ volume 513 ,\ pages 1 ( year 2012 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1106.2476 arXiv:1106.2476 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    2012 arXiv

  12. [21]

    Bamba , author S

    author author K. Bamba , author S. Capozziello , author S. Nojiri , \ and\ author S. D. \ Odintsov ,\ 10.1007/s10509-012-1181-8 journal journal Astrophys. Space Sci. \ volume 342 ,\ pages 155 ( year 2012 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1205.3421 arXiv:1205.3421 [gr-qc] NoStop

    2012 arXiv

  13. [22]

    Roy , author S

    author author N. Roy , author S. Goswami , \ and\ author S. Das ,\ 10.1016/j.dark.2022.101037 journal journal Phys. Dark Univ. \ volume 36 ,\ pages 101037 ( year 2022 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2201.09306 arXiv:2201.09306 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    2022

  14. [23]

    Banerjee , author H

    author author A. Banerjee , author H. Cai , author L. Heisenberg , author E. O. \ Colg\'ain , author M. M. \ Sheikh-Jabbari , \ and\ author T. Yang ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.L081305 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 103 ,\ pages L081305 ( year 2021 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/...

    2021 arXiv

  15. [24]

    \ Lee , author W

    author author B.-H. \ Lee , author W. Lee , author E. O. \ Colg\'ain , author M. M. \ Sheikh-Jabbari , \ and\ author S. Thakur ,\ 10.1088/1475-7516/2022/04/004 journal journal JCAP \ volume 04 ,\ pages 004 ( year 2022 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2202.03906 arXiv:2202.03906 [astr...

    2022 arXiv

  16. [25]

    Krishnan , author E

    author author C. Krishnan , author E. O. \ Colg\'ain , author M. M. \ Sheikh-Jabbari , \ and\ author T. Yang ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.103509 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 103 ,\ pages 103509 ( year 2021 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2011.02858 arXiv:2011.02858 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    2021 arXiv

  17. [26]

    Das , author M

    author author S. Das , author M. Banerjee , \ and\ author N. Roy ,\ 10.1088/1475-7516/2019/08/024 journal journal JCAP \ volume 08 ,\ pages 024 ( year 2019 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1903.02288 arXiv:1903.02288 [gr-qc] NoStop

    2019 arXiv

  18. [27]

    Joyce , author B

    author author A. Joyce , author B. Jain , author J. Khoury , \ and\ author M. Trodden ,\ 10.1016/j.physrep.2014.12.002 journal journal Physics Reports \ volume 568 ,\ pages 1 ( year 2015 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1407.0059 arXiv:1407.0059 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    2014 arXiv

  19. [28]

    Khoury \ and\ author A

    author author J. Khoury \ and\ author A. Weltman ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.69.044026 journal journal Physical Review D \ volume 69 ,\ pages 044026 ( year 2004 a ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0309411 arXiv:astro-ph/0309411 [astro-ph] NoStop

    2004 arXiv

  20. [29]

    Khoury \ and\ author A

    author author J. Khoury \ and\ author A. Weltman ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.171104 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 93 ,\ pages 171104 ( year 2004 b ) NoStop

    2004 doi

  21. [30]

    Khoury \ and\ author A

    author author J. Khoury \ and\ author A. Weltman ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.69.044026 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 69 ,\ pages 044026 ( year 2004 c ) NoStop

    2004 doi

  22. [31]

    Brax , author C

    author author P. Brax , author C. van de Bruck , author A.-C. \ Davis , author J. Khoury , \ and\ author A. Weltman ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.70.123518 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 70 ,\ pages 123518 ( year 2004 a ) NoStop

    2004 doi

  23. [32]

    author author D. F. \ Mota \ and\ author D. J. \ Shaw ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.75.063501 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 75 ,\ pages 063501 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    2007 doi

  24. [33]

    Burrage \ and\ author J

    author author C. Burrage \ and\ author J. Sakstein ,\ 10.1007/s41114-018-0011-x journal journal Living Rev. Relativ. \ volume 21 ,\ pages 1 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018 doi

  25. [34]

    Brax , author C

    author author P. Brax , author C. van de Bruck , author A.-C. \ Davis , author J. Khoury , \ and\ author A. Weltman ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.70.123518 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 70 ,\ pages 123518 ( year 2004 b ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0408415 arXiv:astro-ph/04...

    2004 arXiv

  26. [35]

    author author A. L. \ Erickcek , author N. Barnaby , author C. Burrage , \ and\ author Z. Huang ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.89.084074 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 89 ,\ pages 084074 ( year 2014 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1310.5149 arXiv:1310.5149 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    2014 arXiv

  27. [36]

    author author A. L. \ Erickcek , author N. Barnaby , author C. Burrage , \ and\ author Z. Huang ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.171101 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 110 ,\ pages 171101 ( year 2013 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1304.0009 arXiv:1304.0009 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    2013 arXiv

  28. [37]

    Banerjee , author R

    author author A. Banerjee , author R. K. \ Jain , \ and\ author B. M. \ Mandal ,\ 10.1088/1475-7516/2018/11/028 journal journal JCAP \ volume 2018 ,\ pages 028 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018 doi

  29. [38]

    Damour \ and\ author A

    author author T. Damour \ and\ author A. M. \ Polyakov ,\ 10.1016/0550-3213(94)90143-0 journal journal Nucl. Phys. B \ volume 423 ,\ pages 532 ( year 1994 ) NoStop

    1994 doi

  30. [39]

    Padilla , author E

    author author A. Padilla , author E. Platts , author D. Stefanyszyn , author A. Walters , author A. Weltman , \ and\ author T. Wilson ,\ 10.1088/1475-7516/2016/03/058 journal journal JCAP \ volume 03 ,\ pages 058 ( year 2016 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1511.05761 arXiv:1511.0576...

    2016 arXiv

  31. [40]

    Silverstein \ and\ author D

    author author E. Silverstein \ and\ author D. Tong ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.70.103505 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 70 ,\ pages 103505 ( year 2004 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0310221 arXiv:hep-th/0310221 NoStop

    2004 arXiv

  32. [41]

    Alishahiha , author E

    author author M. Alishahiha , author E. Silverstein , \ and\ author D. Tong ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.70.123505 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 70 ,\ pages 123505 ( year 2004 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0404084 arXiv:hep-th/0404084 NoStop

    2004 arXiv

  33. [44]

    Chen ,\ @noop journal journal Phys

    author author X. Chen ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 72 ,\ pages 123518 ( year 2005 b ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0507053 astro-ph/0507053 NoStop

    2005 arXiv

  34. [49]

    author author J. E. \ Lidsey \ and\ author I. Huston ,\ 10.1088/1475-7516/2007/07/002 journal journal Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics \ volume 2007 ,\ pages 002 ( year 2007 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:0705.0240 arXiv:arXiv:0705.0240 [hep-th] NoStop

    2007 arXiv

  35. [50]

    Baumann \ and\ author L

    author author D. Baumann \ and\ author L. McAllister ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.75.123508 journal journal Physical Review D \ volume 75 ,\ pages 123508 ( year 2007 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0610285 hep-th/0610285 NoStop

    2007 arXiv

  36. [51]

    Alabidi \ and\ author J

    author author L. Alabidi \ and\ author J. E. \ Lidsey ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.78.103519 journal journal Physical Review D \ volume 78 ,\ pages 103519 ( year 2008 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:0807.2181 arXiv:arXiv:0807.2181 [astro-ph] NoStop

    2008 arXiv

  37. [52]

    Cheng , author Q.-G

    author author C. Cheng , author Q.-G. \ Huang , \ and\ author Y.-Z. \ Ma ,\ 10.1088/1475-7516/2013/07/018 journal journal Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics \ volume 2013 ,\ pages 018 ( year 2013 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1303.4497 arXiv:arXiv:1303.4497 [astr...

    2013 arXiv

  38. [53]

    Huston , author J

    author author I. Huston , author J. E. \ Lidsey , author S. Thomas , \ and\ author J. Ward ,\ 10.1088/1475-7516/2008/05/016 journal journal Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics \ volume 2008 ,\ pages 016 ( year 2008 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:0802.0398 arXiv:arX...

    2008 arXiv

  39. [54]

    Ahn , author C

    author author C. Ahn , author C. Kim , \ and\ author E. V. \ Linder ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.80.123016 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 80 ,\ pages 123016 ( year 2009 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/0909.2637 arXiv:0909.2637 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    2009 arXiv

  40. [55]

    author author M. R. \ Garousi , author M. Sami , \ and\ author S. Tsujikawa ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.71.083005 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 71 ,\ pages 083005 ( year 2005 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0412002 arXiv:hep-th/0412002 NoStop

    2005 arXiv

  41. [57]

    Ahn , author C

    author author C. Ahn , author C. Kim , \ and\ author E. V. \ Linder ,\ 10.1016/j.physletb.2009.12.069 journal journal Phys. Lett. B \ volume 684 ,\ pages 181 ( year 2010 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/0904.3328 arXiv:0904.3328 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    2009 arXiv

  42. [58]

    author author E. J. \ Copeland , author S. Mizuno , \ and\ author M. Shaeri ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.81.123501 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 81 ,\ pages 123501 ( year 2010 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.2881 arXiv:1003.2881 [hep-th] NoStop

    2010 arXiv

  43. [59]

    Rezazadeh , author S

    author author K. Rezazadeh , author S. Asadzadeh , author K. Fahimi , author K. Karami , \ and\ author A. Mehrabi ,\ 10.1016/j.aop.2020.168299 journal journal Annals Phys. \ volume 422 ,\ pages 168299 ( year 2020 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2001.07920 arXiv:2001.07920 [gr-qc] NoStop

    2020

  44. [60]

    Suo , author X

    author author X. Suo , author X. Kang , \ and\ author H. Shan ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.108.123506 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 108 ,\ pages 123506 ( year 2023 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.04394 arXiv:2307.04394 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    2023 arXiv

  45. [61]

    author author A. R. \ Liddle \ and\ author D. H. \ Lyth ,\ 10.1017/CBO9781139175180 title Cosmological inflation and large scale structure \ ( year 2000 ) NoStop

    doi

  46. [62]

    Reiss et al

    author author A. Reiss et al. ,\ @noop journal journal Astron. J \ volume 116 ,\ pages 1009 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

    1998

  47. [63]

    author author A. G. \ Riess et al. ( collaboration Supernova Search Team ),\ https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1086/300499 journal journal Astron. J. \ volume 116 ,\ pages 1009 ( year 1998 b ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9805201 arXiv:astro-ph/9805201 NoStop

    1998 arXiv

  48. [64]

    Scolnic et al

    author author D. Scolnic et al. ,\ 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8b7a journal journal Astrophys. J. \ volume 938 ,\ pages 113 ( year 2022 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.03863 arXiv:2112.03863 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    2022 arXiv

  49. [65]

    author author A. G. \ Riess , author L. Breuval , author W. Yuan , author S. Casertano , author L. M. \ Macri , author J. B. \ Bowers , author D. Scolnic , author T. Cantat-Gaudin , author R. I. \ Anderson , \ and\ author M. C. \ Reyes ,\ 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8f24 journal journ...

    2022 doi

  50. [66]

    Brout et al

    author author D. Brout et al. ,\ 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8e04 journal journal Astrophys. J. \ volume 938 ,\ pages 110 ( year 2022 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2202.04077 arXiv:2202.04077 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    2022 arXiv

  51. [67]

    author author A. G. \ Riess et al. ,\ 10.3847/2041-8213/ac5c5b journal journal Astrophys. J. Lett. \ volume 934 ,\ pages L7 ( year 2022 b ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.04510 arXiv:2112.04510 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    arXiv

  52. [68]

    Chen , author Q.-G

    author author L. Chen , author Q.-G. \ Huang , \ and\ author K. Wang ,\ 10.1088/1475-7516/2019/02/028 journal journal JCAP \ volume 02 ,\ pages 028 ( year 2019 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1808.05724 arXiv:1808.05724 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    2019 arXiv

  53. [69]

    author author P. S. \ Corasaniti \ and\ author A. Melchiorri ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.77.103507 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 77 ,\ pages 103507 ( year 2008 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/0711.4119 arXiv:0711.4119 [astro-ph] NoStop

    2008 arXiv

  54. [70]

    Elgaroy \ and\ author T

    author author O. Elgaroy \ and\ author T. Multamaki ,\ 10.1051/0004-6361:20077292 journal journal Astron. Astrophys. \ volume 471 ,\ pages 65 ( year 2007 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0702343 arXiv:astro-ph/0702343 NoStop

    2007 arXiv

  55. [71]

    Grana, Phys

    M. Grana, Phys. Rep. 423 , 91 (2006)

    2006

  56. [72]

    Silverstein and D

    E. Silverstein and D. Tong, Phys.\ Rev.\ D 70 , 103505 (2004); M. Alishahiha, E. Silverstein and D. Tong, Phys.\ Rev.\ D 70 , 123505 (2004)

    2004

  57. [73]

    Kecskemeti, J

    S. Kecskemeti, J. Maiden, G. Shiu and B. Underwood, JHEP 0609 , 076 (2006); X. Chen, Phys.\ Rev.\ D 71 , 063506 (2005); X. Chen, Phys.\ Rev.\ D 72 , 123518 (2005); J. Ward, JHEP 0712 , 045 (2007); X. Chen, JCAP 0812 , 009 (2008); F. Gmeiner and C. D. White, JCAP 0802 , 012 (20...

    2006

  58. [74]

    Gumjudpai and J

    B. Gumjudpai and J. Ward, Phys.\ Rev.\ D 80 , 023528 (2009) [arXiv:0904.0472 [astro-ph.CO]]. Martin:2008xw

    2009 arXiv

  59. [77]

    Kecskemeti, J

    S. Kecskemeti, J. Maiden, G. Shiu and B. Underwood, JHEP 0609 , 076 (2006) [arXiv:hep-th/0605189]. Easson:2007dh

    2006 arXiv

  60. [78]

    D. A. Easson, R. Gregory, D. F. Mota, G. Tasinato and I. Zavala, JCAP 0802 , 010 (2008) [arXiv:0709.2666 [hep-th]]. Chen:2004gc

    2008 arXiv

  61. [79]

    Chen, Phys.\ Rev.\ D 71 , 063506 (2005) [arXiv:hep-th/0408084]

    X. Chen, Phys.\ Rev.\ D 71 , 063506 (2005) [arXiv:hep-th/0408084]. Ward:2007gs

    2005 arXiv

  62. [80]

    Ward, JHEP 0712 , 045 (2007) [arXiv:0711.0760 [hep-th]]

    J. Ward, JHEP 0712 , 045 (2007) [arXiv:0711.0760 [hep-th]]. Chen:2008hz

    2007 arXiv

  63. [81]

    Chen, arXiv:0807.3191 [hep-th]

    X. Chen, arXiv:0807.3191 [hep-th]. Gmeiner:2007uw

    arXiv

  64. [82]

    Gmeiner and C

    F. Gmeiner and C. D. White, JCAP 0802 , 012 (2008) [arXiv:0710.2009 [hep-th]]. Avgoustidis:2006zp

    2008 arXiv

  65. [83]

    Avgoustidis, D

    A. Avgoustidis, D. Cremades and F. Quevedo, Gen.\ Rel.\ Grav.\ 39 , 1203 (2007) [arXiv:hep-th/0606031]. Avgoustidis:2008zu

    2007 arXiv

  66. [84]

    Avgoustidis and I

    A. Avgoustidis and I. Zavala, arXiv:0810.5001 [hep-th]. Thomas:2007sj

    arXiv

  67. [85]

    Thomas and J

    S. Thomas and J. Ward, Phys.\ Rev.\ D 76 , 023509 (2007) [arXiv:hep-th/0702229]. Thomas:2005fe

    2007 arXiv

  68. [86]

    Thomas and J

    S. Thomas and J. Ward, JHEP 0610 , 039 (2006) [arXiv:hep-th/0508085]. Becker:2007ui

    2006 arXiv

  69. [87]

    Becker, L

    M. Becker, L. Leblond and S. E. Shandera, Phys.\ Rev.\ D 76 , 123516 (2007) [arXiv:0709.1170 [hep-th]]. Kobayashi:2007hm

    2007 arXiv

  70. [88]

    Kobayashi, S

    T. Kobayashi, S. Mukohyama and S. Kinoshita, JCAP 0801 , 028 (2008) [arXiv:0708.4285 [hep-th]]. Mukohyama:2007ig

    2008 arXiv

  71. [89]

    Mukohyama, arXiv:0706.3214 [hep-th]

    S. Mukohyama, arXiv:0706.3214 [hep-th]. Silverstein:2008sg

    arXiv

  72. [90]

    Silverstein and A

    E. Silverstein and A. Westphal, Phys.\ Rev.\ D 78 , 106003 (2008) [arXiv:0803.3085 [hep-th]]

    2008 arXiv

  73. [91]

    McAllister, E

    L. McAllister, E. Silverstein and A. Westphal, arXiv:0808.0706 [hep-th]. Leblond:2008gg

    arXiv

  74. [92]

    Leblond and S

    L. Leblond and S. Shandera, JCAP 0808 , 007 (2008) [arXiv:0802.2290 [hep-th]]. Martin:2008xw

    2008 arXiv

  75. [93]

    Martin and M

    J. Martin and M. Yamaguchi, Phys.\ Rev.\ D 77 , 123508 (2008) [arXiv:0801.3375 [hep-th]]

    2008 arXiv

  76. [94]

    Z. K. Guo and N. Ohta, JCAP 0804 , 035 (2008) [arXiv:0803.1013 [hep-th]]

    2008 arXiv

  77. [95]

    Is the Hubble tension a hint of AdS phase around recombination?

    @ARTICLE 2020PhRvD.101h3507Y, author = Ye , Gen and Piao , Yun-Song , title = " Is the Hubble tension a hint of AdS phase around recombination? ", journal = , keywords = Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology, High Energ...

    2020 arXiv

  78. [96]

    Chabanier, Sol\`ene and Millea, Marius and Palanque-Delabrouille, Nathalie

    @article 2019MNRAS.489.2247C, author = "Chabanier, Sol\`ene and Millea, Marius and Palanque-Delabrouille, Nathalie", title = " Matter power spectrum: from Ly forest to CMB scales ", eprint = "1905.08103", archivePrefix = "arXiv", primaryClass = "astro-ph.CO", reportNumber = "V...

    1905 arXiv

  79. [100]

    2106.02963

    @article dinda2021cosmic, title= Cosmic expansion parametrization: Implication for curvature and H _ 0 tension , author= Bikash R. Dinda , eprint = "2106.02963", archivePrefix = "arXiv", primaryClass = "astro-ph.CO", reportNumber = "TIFR/TH/21-18", doi = "10.1103/PhysRevD.105....

    2022 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.