Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A reading survey on adversarial machine learning: Adversarial attacks and their understanding

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.03363 v1 pith:PKODMDRG submitted 2023-08-07 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CR

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CR
keywords adversarialattackslearningnetworksneuralresearchmachinevulnerabilities
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep Learning has empowered us to train neural networks for complex data with high performance. However, with the growing research, several vulnerabilities in neural networks have been exposed. A particular branch of research, Adversarial Machine Learning, exploits and understands some of the vulnerabilities that cause the neural networks to misclassify for near original input. A class of algorithms called adversarial attacks is proposed to make the neural networks misclassify for various tasks in different domains. With the extensive and growing research in adversarial attacks, it is crucial to understand the classification of adversarial attacks. This will help us understand the vulnerabilities in a systematic order and help us to mitigate the effects of adversarial attacks. This article provides a survey of existing adversarial attacks and their understanding based on different perspectives. We also provide a brief overview of existing adversarial defences and their limitations in mitigating the effect of adversarial attacks. Further, we conclude with a discussion on the future research directions in the field of adversarial machine learning.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Leveraging Trustworthy AI for Automotive Security in Multi-Domain Operations: Towards a Responsive Human-AI Multi-Domain Task Force for Cyber Social Security

    cs.CR 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Larger Random Forest and Gradient Boosting ensembles increase the time needed for a ZOO black-box attack on a CAN bus IDS, while XGBoost shows no clear relationship.

Pith tools