REVIEW 3 cited by
Two Failures of Self-Consistency in the Multi-Step Reasoning of LLMs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Two Failures of Self-Consistency in the Multi-Step Reasoning of LLMs
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved widespread success on a variety of in-context few-shot tasks, but this success is typically evaluated via correctness rather than consistency. We argue that self-consistency is an important criteria for valid multi-step reasoning in tasks where the solution is composed of the answers to multiple sub-steps. We propose two types of self-consistency that are particularly important for multi-step reasoning -- hypothetical consistency (a model's ability to predict what its output would be in a hypothetical other context) and compositional consistency (consistency of a model's final outputs when intermediate sub-steps are replaced with the model's outputs for those steps). We demonstrate that multiple variants of the GPT-3/-4 models exhibit poor consistency rates across both types of consistency on a variety of tasks.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Empirical Bayes Conformal Prediction for Vision and Language Models
Empirical Bayes conformal prediction converts score variability into r-value nonconformity scores that preserve target coverage while reducing inclusion of high-variance false candidates in image classification, CLIP ...
-
A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agents
A survey of LLM-based autonomous agents that proposes a unified framework for their construction and reviews applications in social science, natural science, and engineering along with evaluation methods and future di...
-
When LLM Rationales Become User-Facing: Effects on Trust Perception, Decision-Making, and Gaze Behaviors
Two linked user studies find that LLM rationale correctness and certainty framing affect trust and decision confidence while presentation format does not, and incorrect rationales increase gaze attention and pupil size.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.