REVIEW 2 cited by
MEOW: MEMOry Supervised LLM Unlearning Via Inverted Facts
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
MEOW: MEMOry Supervised LLM Unlearning Via Inverted Facts
read the original abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) can memorize sensitive information, raising concerns about potential misuse. LLM Unlearning, a post-hoc approach to remove this information from trained LLMs, offers a promising solution to mitigate these risks. However, previous practices face three key challenges: 1. Utility: successful unlearning often causes catastrophic collapse on unrelated tasks. 2. Efficiency: many methods either involve adding similarly sized models, which slows down unlearning or inference, or require retain data that are difficult to obtain. 3. Robustness: even effective methods may still leak data via extraction techniques. To address these challenges, we propose MEOW, a simple yet effective gradient descent-based unlearning method. Specifically, we use an offline LLM to generate a set of inverted facts. Then, we design a new metric, MEMO, to quantify memorization in LLMs. Finally, based on the signals provided by MEMO, we select the most appropriate set of inverted facts and finetune the model based on them. We evaluate MEOW on the commonly used unlearn benchmark, ToFU, with Llama2-7B-Chat and Phi-1.5B, and test it on both NLU and NLG tasks. Results demonstrate significant improvement of MEOW in forget quality without substantial loss in model utility. Meanwhile, MEOW does not exhibit significant degradation in NLU or NLG capabilities, and there is even a slight improvement in NLU performance.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Wisdom is Knowing What not to Say: Hallucination-Free LLMs Unlearning via Attention Shifting
Attention-Shifting uses importance-aware suppression on unlearning data and retention enhancement on retained data via dual-loss optimization to achieve selective unlearning with better utility preservation than prior...
-
Position: The Term "Machine Unlearning" Is Overused in LLMs
Machine unlearning should be restricted to dataset-defined deletion achieving retraining equivalence, while other LLM tasks require separate terminology and evaluation baselines.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.