Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 105 references

Uniqueness of null-local modular flow

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that in the vacuum sector of massless Klein-Gordon theory, any modular flow that is local on a causal diamond's past null boundary is exactly the vacuum's own flow.

desk verdict Useful construction, but the headline uniqueness theorem rests on an unproved fixed-point claim about vacuum modular flow — send it out, but demand the gap be closed. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.20678 v1 pith:PNAHK6IH submitted 2026-07-22 hep-th gr-qcmath-phmath.MP

Gautam Satishchandran , Jonathan Sorce This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thgr-qcmath-phmath.MP MSC 81T0546L1046L55
keywords modularflownull-localcausaldiamondKlein-GordontheoryConnescocycleGaussianstatesexcitabilityvacuumsector
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to prove that 'instantaneously local' modular flow on a null slice is far more constrained than on a spacelike slice: in massless Klein-Gordon theory in a Minkowski causal diamond, any state or weight whose modular flow on the past null boundary is a geometric, angle-preserving diffeomorphism must be the vacuum state itself, up to rescaling. The authors first construct, for every sufficiently regular future-directed angle-preserving flow, a Gaussian state that has that flow as its modular flow, so the class is nonempty. They then prove that no two distinct such states are mutually excitable by local operators, and use the Connes cocycle to upgrade this to a uniqueness statement for arbitrary faithful normal semifinite weights. Why it matters: explicit modular operators are rare in quantum field theory, and the conjectured existence of many slice-local modular flows would have made modular theory applicable to generic subregions; this paper shows that on null slices ultraviolet universality instead forces uniqueness.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing objects are the Gaussian states ωψ defined by the two-point kernel −(1/4π)δ_{S^{D−2}}/(ρ1−ρ2−iε)^2 in the flow-adapted coordinate ρ (equation (3.21)); KMS uniqueness guarantees that the chosen diffeomorphism is the modular flow. The obstruction is the excitability operator Qψ|ψ′−1, whose kernel is proportional to δ_{S^{D−2}} on the transverse sphere and hence cannot be Hilbert-Schmidt unless zero. The Connes cocycle w_{τψ|ωvac}(s) then converts any candidate weight into a Gaussian state of this family, forcing the cocycle to be scalar via the asserted ergodicity of vacuum modular flow.

What would settle it

Find, in the causal diamond algebra of the massless vacuum, a single non-scalar operator invariant under the vacuum modular flow; then the Connes cocycle argument of Section 5 cannot force the cocycle to be a scalar, and a nontrivial null-local weight may exist. Alternatively, compute the Hilbert-Schmidt norm of Qψ|ψ′−1 on the angular subspace and check whether the claimed delta-function divergence actually occurs for two distinct regular flows.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 5.1: for D≥3, if τψ is any faithful, normal, semifinite weight on the causal diamond algebra in the vacuum sector whose modular flow on the past null boundary is an angle-preserving diffeomorphism ψs, then τψ = e^c ωvac. The proof route is as follows: the vacuum itself has geometrically local modular flow, generated by 2πu(1−u)∂u on the past null boundary. Any weight with another null-local flow would generate, via the Connes cocycle, a one-parameter family of Gaussian states in the vacuum sector whose two-point function has exactly the form of the family constructed in Section 3. Lemma 4.1 shows that only the vacuum member of that family lies in the vacuum secto

Load-bearing premise

The proof hinges on the unproved assertion that the vacuum modular flow is ergodic on the diamond algebra—only scalar multiples of the identity are invariant—and on the asserted proportionality of Qψ|ψ′−1 to a delta function on the transverse sphere with infinite trace; if either premise fails, the uniqueness theorem collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For D≥3, no two distinct Gaussian states in the constructed family can be excited from one another using local operators in the causal diamond.
  • No non-vacuum Gaussian state with null-local modular flow can be realized in the global vacuum sector.
  • The uniqueness extends beyond states: any faithful normal semifinite weight in the vacuum sector with angle-preserving null-local modular flow is proportional to the vacuum weight.
  • The construction yields, for any sufficiently regular angle-preserving future-directed flow, a legitimate algebraic state with that flow as modular flow—so the result is a uniqueness theorem for an a priori nonempty family.
  • For massive scalars, Maxwell fields, and gravitons, analogous states exist but are not restrictions of the vacuum; whether they lie in the physical vacuum sector is left open.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the fixed-point/ergodicity assertion in Section 5 is false—modular zero modes are known in other free-field settings—the conclusion τψ = e^c ωvac would not follow; the theorem's scope is therefore narrower than its statement.
  • The same excitability logic suggests a testable split for massive scalars: massless-vacuum null-local flow should be excitable out of the massive vacuum in low dimensions, while power-law angular singularities make excitability doubtful in higher dimensions—mirroring known spatial-slice results.
  • In curved backgrounds, the construction generalizes to sufficiently small diamonds via conformal-vacuum-type states; the open question is whether the resulting null-local-flow states are Hadamard, which the present argument does not settle.
  • Because the result relies on the singular short-distance structure on the null boundary—every point is at zero distance from the diamond's edge—it is plausible that uniqueness is a generic feature of null slices, not a special property of free massless scalars.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies modular flows that are local on the past null boundary C− of a causal diamond in massless Klein-Gordon theory. In §3 the authors write down explicit Gaussian states whose two-point function is a flow-adapted conformal transform of the vacuum kernel, and verify commutation relations, positivity, and KMS; this yields states whose modular flow is a prescribed reparametrization of the null generators. In §4 they use the excitability criterion of [81] to argue that distinct such Gaussian states are not locally excitable from one another, and hence that within the vacuum sector only the vacuum is realized among these states. In §5 they use the Connes cocycle to extend the uniqueness claim to arbitrary faithful normal semifinite weights, concluding that the only null-local modular weight in the vacuum sector is the vacuum. Appendices sketch extensions to massive fields, Maxwell fields, and gravitons.

Significance. If correct, the paper gives a striking rigidity result for null-local modular flow and an explicit construction of Gaussian states implementing a class of diffeomorphic modular flows. The explicit construction and the direct CCR/KMS checks in §3.2 are genuine strengths, and the overall strategy—using excitability theory to rule out non-vacuum flows in the vacuum sector—is well motivated. However, two operator-theoretic steps that are load-bearing for the paper's main theorem are asserted rather than proved, and a third reduction step needs explicit verification. The main uniqueness claim is therefore not established as written.

major comments (3)
  1. [§5, immediately after Eq. (5.11)] The proof of Theorem 5.1 uses the assertion that the vacuum modular flow is 'ergodic' in the sense that only scalar multiples of the identity are invariant. No proof or citation is given. Geometricity of a modular automorphism group does not imply triviality of its fixed-point algebra, and free-field settings admit modular zero modes and nontrivial centralizers (cf. refs. [11,66]). If a non-scalar unitary u lies in the fixed-point algebra, the cocycle w_{τψ|ωvac}(s) could be u ζ(s), and the argument from Eq. (5.11) to Eq. (5.18) would not go through. This is a load-bearing gap for Theorem 5.1.
  2. [§4.2, Eq. (4.18)] The claim that Q_{ψ|ψ′}−1 is proportional to δ_{S^{D−2}} and hence has infinite trace is not established. The Hilbert-Schmidt classification of operators that are diagonal in a continuous direct integral is not settled by formal delta-function traces. One needs a rigorous identification of Q_{ψ|ψ′} on K_{μψ}, a proof that the kernel form is the one asserted, and a proof that a nonzero operator of this diagonal type cannot satisfy condition (4.6). This is load-bearing for Lemma 4.1 and for the vacuum-sector uniqueness argument.
  3. [§5, Eq. (5.10)] To apply Lemma 4.1 to the vector state |Ω_s>, that state must belong to the Gaussian family constructed in §3.2, which is defined under the regularity condition (3.24). The proof derives the two-point function (5.10) but does not verify that the induced diffeomorphism χ_s satisfies (3.24). Since §5 explicitly says that regularity is not imposed, the reduction to the Gaussian family is incomplete.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and §1] The abstract says 'any sufficiently regular future-directed vector field', but §3.2 only constructs flows generated by χ(u,x⊥)∂_u, leaving the transverse sphere coordinates fixed. Please state the restricted class explicitly in the abstract and introduction.
  2. [Eq. (3.36)] The 'frequency-space' expression contains dη1 dη2; this appears to be a typo for dρ1 dρ2.
  3. [§4.2] The sentence 'we do not actually need to check boundedness' is confusing because the kernel formula for Q assumes that Q is a bounded operator. Clarify that failure of the domination condition already implies non-excitability, and the kernel analysis is conditional.
  4. [References] The 'centralizer theorem' is cited to an unpublished preprint by one of the authors. If the theorem is used in a load-bearing way, please provide a published or independently verifiable source, or state and prove the needed version.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Proof of Theorem 5.1 assumes the vacuum flow's fixed-point algebra is trivial, a premise implied by the theorem itself; Gaussian-sector uniqueness is non-circular.

  1. other [Section 5, after Eq. (5.11) and before Eq. (5.12)]
    "A classic result known as the centralizer theorem— see e.g. [89, appendix B.3] for a simple proof — then implies that the cocycle operator must be fixed by vacuum modular flow. Since the vacuum modular flow is geometric in the diamond, it is “ergodic” in the sense that the only operator invariant under the flow are scalar multiples of the identity. This gives wτψ|ωvac(s) = ζ(s), ζ(s) ∈ U(1)."

    The scalar-cocycle step is made to rest on the assertion that the vacuum flow has trivial fixed-point algebra, which is not proved or cited. That assertion is a corollary of the theorem being proved: if a non-scalar unitary u were fixed by the vacuum flow, the state ω_u(a)=⟨uΩ|a|uΩ⟩ would be a state in Hvac with the same modular flow; Theorem 5.1 would then force ω_u=ωvac, hence uΩ∝Ω and u=1 by separating. So the proof assumes a special case of its own conclusion to rule out all other weights; no independent argument is given.

full rationale

The main construction is not circular: Section 3 defines ωψ by an explicit two-point function and independently verifies positivity, the CCR, and the KMS condition against the chosen flow; the modular-flow identification uses the KMS uniqueness theorem, so the desired flow is not smuggled into the state. Lemma 4.1 and §4.2 are applications of the excitability criterion from [81]; although [81] is self-cited (J. Sorce is a coauthor), it is a parameter-free theorem about Gaussian states and is not calibrated to the target uniqueness result, so under the stated rules it counts as independent support rather than circularity. The Connes-cocycle steps (5.3)–(5.11) legitimately show that the cocycle-generated states lie in the Section 3 family and hence equal the vacuum by Section 4.3. The genuine question-begging occurs at (5.12): the proof assumes that the vacuum modular flow is 'ergodic' with trivial fixed-point algebra. No proof or citation is given, and this premise is itself a consequence of Theorem 5.1—if a nontrivial fixed unitary existed, its vector state would have the same modular flow and violate the theorem. Thus the weight-uniqueness theorem partially reduces to assuming a special case of its own conclusion. The §4.2 delta/trace argument is heuristic and the ergodicity assertion is also a correctness risk, but the only circular reduction is the fixed-point step.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fitted numerical parameters are introduced; the arbitrary diffeomorphism ψs is a label for a family of states, not a data-fitted constant. The main imported baggage is the excitability theory of [81] (self-cited, not reproduced) and an unproved ergodicity claim about vacuum modular flow. No new particles, forces, dimensions, or conservation laws are postulated.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Tomita-Takesaki modular theory, KMS uniqueness theorem, and existence of the Connes cocycle for FNS weights.
    Used throughout Section 2.3 to identify modular flows of constructed states and to build |Ω_s> from the cocycle.
  • domain assumption Excitability characterization of Gaussian states from [81]: excitability is equivalent to boundedness of Q_{ψ|ψ′}, trivial kernel, and the Hilbert-Schmidt condition (4.6).
    Lemma 4.1 is proved entirely through this criterion. The criterion is a prior result coauthored by J. Sorce and is not reproduced or machine-checked in this paper.
  • standard math Reeh-Schlieder property of the vacuum.
    Section 4.3 uses it to identify H_{ωvac} with the global vacuum sector H_vac.
  • domain assumption The flows are angle-preserving: ψ_s acts as u ↦ ψ_s(u,x⊥), leaving x⊥ fixed, with generator χ(u,x⊥)∂_u.
    Section 3.2, Eq. (3.18). The construction and theorems do not cover vector fields with angular components, despite the abstract's broader wording.
  • ad hoc to paper The vacuum modular flow on the causal diamond is 'ergodic': the only operators invariant under it are scalar multiples of the identity.
    Section 5, after Eq. (5.11). This unproved assertion is used to conclude the cocycle is scalar. It is load-bearing for Theorem 5.1 and not obviously true given known modular zero modes in other settings.
  • domain assumption Regularity condition (3.24): u^{(D-2)/2}(ρ,x⊥) is square-integrable at ρ→−∞.
    Needed for finiteness of the constructed ωψ. The authors note it is mild and later remove it in Theorem 5.1.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Uniqueness of null-local modular flow." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PNAHK6IH

@misc{pith2026260720678,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Uniqueness of null-local modular flow},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PNAHK6IH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.20678}
}
read the original abstract

In arXiv:2306.01837, it was conjectured that one can engineer a large class of quantum field theory states for which the modular flow on a spacelike slice is "instantaneously local." Here we show that on null slices, such flows are highly constrained; ultraviolet universality essentially requires null-local modular flow to be unique. Concretely, we study massless Klein-Gordon theory in Minkowski spacetime, and construct, for any sufficiently regular future-directed vector field on the past null boundary of a causal diamond, a state that has this vector field as its instantaneous modular flow. We then show by explicit computation that no two distinct states in this class can be realized in the same local Hilbert space. Using a more abstract argument, we also show that in the vacuum sector of the theory, the only null-local modular flow in a causal diamond is provided by the vacuum state itself. We also comment on the construction of null-local modular flow for massive scalars, free Maxwell fields, free gravitons, and in curved backgrounds.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

105 extracted references · 80 linked inside Pith

  1. [81]

    Caminiti, F

    J. Caminiti, F. Capeccia, and J. Sorce,Excitability in quantum field theory, arXiv:2604.19861

    arXiv

  2. [1]

    Witten,APS Medal for Exceptional Achievement in Research: Invited article on entanglement properties of quantum field theory,Rev

    E. Witten,APS Medal for Exceptional Achievement in Research: Invited article on entanglement properties of quantum field theory,Rev. Mod. Phys.90(2018), no. 4 045003, [arXiv:1803.04993]

    arXiv 2018

  3. [2]

    Sorce,An intuitive construction of modular flow,JHEP12(2023) 079, [arXiv:2309.16766]

    J. Sorce,An intuitive construction of modular flow,JHEP12(2023) 079, [arXiv:2309.16766]

    arXiv 2023

  4. [3]

    Casini,Relative entropy and the Bekenstein bound,Class

    H. Casini,Relative entropy and the Bekenstein bound,Class. Quant. Grav.25(2008) 205021, [arXiv:0804.2182]

    arXiv 2008

  5. [4]

    Bousso, H

    R. Bousso, H. Casini, Z. Fisher, and J. Maldacena,Proof of a Quantum Bousso Bound, Phys. Rev. D90(2014), no. 4 044002, [arXiv:1404.5635]

    arXiv 2014

  6. [5]

    Bousso, H

    R. Bousso, H. Casini, Z. Fisher, and J. Maldacena,Entropy on a null surface for interacting quantum field theories and the Bousso bound,Phys. Rev. D91(2015), no. 8 084030, [arXiv:1406.4545]

    arXiv 2015

  7. [6]

    Cardy and E

    J. Cardy and E. Tonni,Entanglement hamiltonians in two-dimensional conformal field theory,J. Stat. Mech.1612(2016), no. 12 123103, [arXiv:1608.01283]

    arXiv 2016

  8. [7]

    Hollands and K

    S. Hollands and K. Sanders,Entanglement measures and their properties in quantum field theory,arXiv:1702.04924

    arXiv

Show all 105 references
  1. [8]

    Casini, E

    H. Casini, E. Teste, and G. Torroba,Modular Hamiltonians on the null plane and the Markov property of the vacuum state,J. Phys. A50(2017), no. 36 364001, [arXiv:1703.10656]

    2017 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Casini, E

    H. Casini, E. Testé, and G. Torroba,Markov Property of the Conformal Field Theory Vacuum and the a Theorem,Phys. Rev. Lett.118(2017), no. 26 261602, [arXiv:1704.01870]. 12Sinces bA bB =s ab(e bA)a(e bB)b is regular at the tip, we havesAB ∼O(u 2)nearu= 0(see footnote 11). – 32 –

    2017 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Lashkari,Constraining Quantum Fields using Modular Theory,JHEP01(2019) 059, [arXiv:1810.09306]

    N. Lashkari,Constraining Quantum Fields using Modular Theory,JHEP01(2019) 059, [arXiv:1810.09306]

    2019 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Lashkari,Modular zero modes and sewing the states of QFT,JHEP21(2020) 189, [arXiv:1911.11153]

    N. Lashkari,Modular zero modes and sewing the states of QFT,JHEP21(2020) 189, [arXiv:1911.11153]

    2020 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Furuya, N

    K. Furuya, N. Lashkari, M. Moosa, and S. Ouseph,Information loss, mixing and emergent type III1 factors,JHEP08(2023) 111, [arXiv:2305.16028]

    2023 arXiv

  6. [13]

    van Luijk, A

    L. van Luijk, A. Stottmeister, R. F. Werner, and H. Wilming,Relativistic Quantum Fields Are Universal Entanglement Embezzlers,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024), no. 26 261602

    2024

  7. [14]

    Faulkner, R

    T. Faulkner, R. G. Leigh, O. Parrikar, and H. Wang,Modular Hamiltonians for Deformed Half-Spaces and the Averaged Null Energy Condition,JHEP09(2016) 038, [arXiv:1605.08072]

    2016 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Balakrishnan, T

    S. Balakrishnan, T. Faulkner, Z. U. Khandker, and H. Wang,A General Proof of the Quantum Null Energy Condition,JHEP09(2019) 020, [arXiv:1706.09432]

    2019 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Ceyhan and T

    F. Ceyhan and T. Faulkner,Recovering the QNEC from the ANEC,Commun. Math. Phys. 377(2020), no. 2 999–1045, [arXiv:1812.04683]

    2020 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Hollands and R

    S. Hollands and R. Longo,A New Proof of the QNEC,arXiv:2503.04651

  11. [18]

    D. L. Jafferis, A. Lewkowycz, J. Maldacena, and S. J. Suh,Relative entropy equals bulk relative entropy,JHEP06(2016) 004, [arXiv:1512.06431]

    2016 arXiv

  12. [19]

    X. Dong, D. Harlow, and A. C. Wall,Reconstruction of Bulk Operators within the Entanglement Wedge in Gauge-Gravity Duality,Phys. Rev. Lett.117(2016), no. 2 021601, [arXiv:1601.05416]

    2016 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Faulkner and A

    T. Faulkner and A. Lewkowycz,Bulk locality from modular flow,JHEP07(2017) 151, [arXiv:1704.05464]

    2017 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Faulkner, M

    T. Faulkner, M. Li, and H. Wang,A modular toolkit for bulk reconstruction,JHEP04 (2019) 119, [arXiv:1806.10560]

    2019 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Jefferson,Comments on black hole interiors and modular inclusions,SciPost Phys.6 (2019), no

    R. Jefferson,Comments on black hole interiors and modular inclusions,SciPost Phys.6 (2019), no. 4 042, [arXiv:1811.08900]

    2019 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Chen,Pulling Out the Island with Modular Flow,JHEP03(2020) 033, [arXiv:1912.02210]

    Y. Chen,Pulling Out the Island with Modular Flow,JHEP03(2020) 033, [arXiv:1912.02210]

    2020 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Faulkner,The holographic map as a conditional expectation,arXiv:2008.04810

    T. Faulkner,The holographic map as a conditional expectation,arXiv:2008.04810

    2008 arXiv

  18. [25]

    D. L. Jafferis and L. Lamprou,Inside the hologram: reconstructing the bulk observer’s experience,JHEP03(2022) 084, [arXiv:2009.04476]

    2022 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Levine, A

    A. Levine, A. Shahbazi-Moghaddam, and R. M. Soni,Seeing the entanglement wedge, JHEP06(2021) 134, [arXiv:2009.11305]

    2021 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Leutheusser and H

    S. Leutheusser and H. Liu,Causal connectability between quantum systems and the black hole interior in holographic duality,Phys. Rev. D108(2023), no. 8 086019, [arXiv:2110.05497]

    2023 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Gao and L

    P. Gao and L. Lamprou,Seeing behind black hole horizons in SYK,JHEP06(2022) 143, [arXiv:2111.14010]

    2022 arXiv

  22. [29]

    S. A. W. Leutheusser and H. Liu,Emergent Times in Holographic Duality,Phys. Rev. D 108(2023), no. 8 086020, [arXiv:2112.12156]. – 33 –

    2023 arXiv

  23. [30]

    de Boer, D

    J. de Boer, D. L. Jafferis, and L. Lamprou,On black hole interior reconstruction, singularities and the emergence of time,arXiv:2211.16512

    arXiv

  24. [31]

    Leutheusser and H

    S. Leutheusser and H. Liu,Subregion-subalgebra duality: emergence of space and time in holography,arXiv:2212.13266

    arXiv

  25. [32]

    Engelhardt and H

    N. Engelhardt and H. Liu,Algebraic ER=EPR and complexity transfer,JHEP07(2024) 013, [arXiv:2311.04281]

    2024 arXiv

  26. [33]

    Gao,Modular flow in JT gravity and entanglement wedge reconstruction,JHEP06 (2024) 151, [arXiv:2402.18655]

    P. Gao,Modular flow in JT gravity and entanglement wedge reconstruction,JHEP06 (2024) 151, [arXiv:2402.18655]

    2024 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Parrikar, H

    O. Parrikar, H. Rajgadia, V. Singh, and J. Sorce,Relational bulk reconstruction from modular flow,JHEP07(2024) 138, [arXiv:2403.02377]

    2024 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Gesteau and H

    E. Gesteau and H. Liu,Toward stringy horizons,arXiv:2408.12642

    arXiv

  29. [36]

    Witten,Gravity and the crossed product,JHEP10(2022) 008, [arXiv:2112.12828]

    E. Witten,Gravity and the crossed product,JHEP10(2022) 008, [arXiv:2112.12828]

    2022 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Chandrasekaran, R

    V. Chandrasekaran, R. Longo, G. Penington, and E. Witten,An algebra of observables for de Sitter space,JHEP02(2023) 082, [arXiv:2206.10780]

    2023 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Chandrasekaran, G

    V. Chandrasekaran, G. Penington, and E. Witten,Large N algebras and generalized entropy,JHEP04(2023) 009, [arXiv:2209.10454]

    2023 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Penington and E

    G. Penington and E. Witten,Algebras and States in JT Gravity,arXiv:2301.07257

    arXiv

  33. [40]

    Sorce,Notes on the type classification of von Neumann algebras,Rev

    J. Sorce,Notes on the type classification of von Neumann algebras,Rev. Math. Phys.36 (2024), no. 02 2430002, [arXiv:2302.01958]

    2024

  34. [41]

    D. K. Kolchmeyer,von Neumann algebras in JT gravity,JHEP06(2023) 067, [arXiv:2303.04701]

    2023 arXiv

  35. [42]

    Jensen, J

    K. Jensen, J. Sorce, and A. J. Speranza,Generalized entropy for general subregions in quantum gravity,JHEP12(2023) 020, [arXiv:2306.01837]

    2023 arXiv

  36. [43]

    Ali Ahmad and R

    S. Ali Ahmad and R. Jefferson,Crossed product algebras and generalized entropy for subregions,SciPost Phys. Core7(2024) 020, [arXiv:2306.07323]

    2024 arXiv

  37. [44]

    Kudler-Flam, S

    J. Kudler-Flam, S. Leutheusser, and G. Satishchandran,Generalized black hole entropy is von Neumann entropy,Phys. Rev. D111(2025), no. 2 025013, [arXiv:2309.15897]

    2025 arXiv

  38. [45]

    Kudler-Flam, S

    J. Kudler-Flam, S. Leutheusser, A. A. Rahman, G. Satishchandran, and A. J. Speranza,A covariant regulator for entanglement entropy: proofs of the Bekenstein bound and QNEC, arXiv:2312.07646

    arXiv

  39. [46]

    Akers and J

    C. Akers and J. Sorce,Relative State Counting for Semiclassical Black Holes,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024), no. 20 201601, [arXiv:2404.16098]

    2024 arXiv

  40. [47]

    Faulkner and A

    T. Faulkner and A. J. Speranza,Gravitational algebras and the generalized second law, JHEP11(2024) 099, [arXiv:2405.00847]

    2024 arXiv

  41. [48]

    Kudler-Flam, S

    J. Kudler-Flam, S. Leutheusser, and G. Satishchandran,Algebraic Observational Cosmology,arXiv:2406.01669

    arXiv

  42. [49]

    Chen and G

    C.-H. Chen and G. Penington,A clock is just a way to tell the time: gravitational algebras in cosmological spacetimes,arXiv:2406.02116

    arXiv

  43. [50]

    D. K. Kolchmeyer and H. Liu,Chaos and the Emergence of the Cosmological Horizon, arXiv:2411.08090. – 34 –

    arXiv

  44. [51]

    Penington and E

    G. Penington and E. Witten,Algebras and states in super-JT gravity,arXiv:2412.15549

    arXiv

  45. [52]

    Sorce,A classical model for semiclassical state-counting,arXiv:2501.16437

    J. Sorce,A classical model for semiclassical state-counting,arXiv:2501.16437

    arXiv

  46. [53]

    M. S. Klinger, J. Kudler-Flam, and G. Satishchandran,Generalized Entropy is von Neumann Entropy II: The complete symmetry group and edge modes,arXiv:2601.07910

  47. [54]

    J. J. Bisognano and E. H. Wichmann,On the Duality Condition for a Hermitian Scalar Field,J. Math. Phys.16(1975) 985–1007

    1975

  48. [55]

    J. J. Bisognano and E. H. Wichmann,On the Duality Condition for Quantum Fields,J. Math. Phys.17(1976) 303–321

    1976

  49. [56]

    G. L. Sewell,Quantum fields on manifolds: PCT and gravitationally induced thermal states, Annals Phys.141(1982) 201–224

    1982

  50. [57]

    A. C. Wall,A proof of the generalized second law for rapidly changing fields and arbitrary horizon slices,Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 104049, [arXiv:1105.3445]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 87, 069904 (2013)]

    2012 arXiv

  51. [58]

    P. D. Hislop and R. Longo,Modular Structure of the Local Algebras Associated With the Free Massless Scalar Field Theory,Commun. Math. Phys.84(1982) 71

    1982

  52. [59]

    Casini, M

    H. Casini, M. Huerta, and R. C. Myers,Towards a derivation of holographic entanglement entropy,JHEP05(2011) 036, [arXiv:1102.0440]

    2011 arXiv

  53. [60]

    M. B. Fröb,Modular Hamiltonian for de Sitter diamonds,JHEP12(2023) 074, [arXiv:2308.14797]

    2023 arXiv

  54. [61]

    H. J. Borchers and J. Yngvason,Modular groups of quantum fields in thermal states,J. Math. Phys.40(1999) 601–624, [math-ph/9805013]

    1999 arXiv

  55. [62]

    G. Wong, I. Klich, L. A. Pando Zayas, and D. Vaman,Entanglement Temperature and Entanglement Entropy of Excited States,JHEP12(2013) 020, [arXiv:1305.3291]

    2013 arXiv

  56. [63]

    Caminiti, F

    J. Caminiti, F. Capeccia, L. Ciambelli, and R. C. Myers,Geometric modular flows in 2d CFT and beyond,arXiv:2502.02633

    arXiv

  57. [64]

    Casini and M

    H. Casini and M. Huerta,Reduced density matrix and internal dynamics for multicomponent regions,Class. Quant. Grav.26(2009) 185005, [arXiv:0903.5284]

    2009 arXiv

  58. [65]

    Longo, P

    R. Longo, P. Martinetti, and K.-H. Rehren,Geometric modular action for disjoint intervals and boundary conformal field theory,Rev. Math. Phys.22(2010) 331–354, [arXiv:0912.1106]

    2010 arXiv

  59. [66]

    Klich, D

    I. Klich, D. Vaman, and G. Wong,Entanglement Hamiltonians for chiral fermions with zero modes,Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017), no. 12 120401, [arXiv:1501.00482]

    2017 arXiv

  60. [67]

    Hollands,On the modular operator of multi-component regions in chiral CFT,Commun

    S. Hollands,On the modular operator of multi-component regions in chiral CFT,Commun. Math. Phys.384(2021), no. 2 785–828, [arXiv:1904.08201]

    2021 arXiv

  61. [68]

    Blanco and G

    D. Blanco and G. Pérez-Nadal,Modular Hamiltonian of a chiral fermion on the torus, Phys. Rev. D100(2019), no. 2 025003, [arXiv:1905.05210]

    2019 arXiv

  62. [69]

    Fries and I

    P. Fries and I. A. Reyes,Entanglement Spectrum of Chiral Fermions on the Torus,Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019), no. 21 211603, [arXiv:1905.05768]

    2019 arXiv

  63. [70]

    Erdmenger, P

    J. Erdmenger, P. Fries, I. A. Reyes, and C. P. Simon,Resolving modular flow: a toolkit for free fermions,JHEP12(2020) 126, [arXiv:2008.07532]. – 35 –

    2020 arXiv

  64. [71]

    Cadamuro, M

    D. Cadamuro, M. B. Fröb, and G. Pérez-Nadal,Modular Hamiltonian and modular flow of massless fermions on a cylinder,arXiv:2406.19360

    arXiv

  65. [72]

    Keyl,Remarks on the relation between causality and quantum fields,Class

    M. Keyl,Remarks on the relation between causality and quantum fields,Class. Quant. Grav. 10(1993) 2353–2362

    1993

  66. [73]

    Sorce,Analyticity and the Unruh effect: a study of local modular flow,JHEP24(2024) 040, [arXiv:2403.18937]

    J. Sorce,Analyticity and the Unruh effect: a study of local modular flow,JHEP24(2024) 040, [arXiv:2403.18937]

    2024 arXiv

  67. [74]

    W. G. Unruh,Notes on black-hole evaporation,Physical Review D14(1976), no. 4 870

    1976

  68. [75]

    Dimock and B

    J. Dimock and B. S. Kay,Classical and Quantum Scattering Theory for Linear Scalar Fields on the Schwarzschild Metric. 1.,Annals Phys.175(1987) 366

    1987

  69. [76]

    Dappiaggi, V

    C. Dappiaggi, V. Moretti, and N. Pinamonti,Rigorous construction and Hadamard property of the Unruh state in Schwarzschild spacetime,arXiv e-prints(July, 2009) arXiv:0907.1034, [arXiv:0907.1034]

    2009 arXiv

  70. [77]

    Gérard, D

    C. Gérard, D. Häfner, and M. Wrochna,The Unruh state for massless fermions on Kerr spacetime and its Hadamard property,arXiv:2008.10995

    2008 arXiv

  71. [78]

    Brum and S

    M. Brum and S. E. Jorás,Hadamard state in Schwarzschild-de Sitter spacetime,Class. Quant. Grav.32(2015), no. 1 015013, [arXiv:1405.7916]

    2015 arXiv

  72. [79]

    Hollands, R

    S. Hollands, R. M. Wald, and J. Zahn,Quantum instability of the Cauchy horizon in Reissner–Nordström–deSitter spacetime,Class. Quant. Grav.37(2020), no. 11 115009, [arXiv:1912.06047]

    2020 arXiv

  73. [80]

    C. K. M. Klein,Construction of the Unruh State for a Real Scalar Field on the Kerr-de Sitter Spacetime,Annales Henri Poincare24(2023), no. 7 2401–2442, [arXiv:2206.05073]

    2023 arXiv

  74. [82]

    R. T. Powers and E. Stormer,Free states of the canonical anticommutation relations, Commun. Math. Phys.16(1970) 1–33

    1970

  75. [83]

    Van Daele,Quasi-equivalence of quasi-free states on the weyl algebra,Commun

    A. Van Daele,Quasi-equivalence of quasi-free states on the weyl algebra,Commun. Math. Phys.21(1971) 171–191

    1971

  76. [84]

    Araki,On quasifree states of the canonical commutation relations: II.,

    H. Araki,On quasifree states of the canonical commutation relations: II.,

  77. [85]

    Araki and S

    H. Araki and S. Yamagami,On quasi-equivalence of quasifree states of the canonical commutation relations,Publications of the Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences18 (1982), no. 2 703–758

    1982

  78. [86]

    R. M. Wald,Quantum Field Theory in Curved Space-Time and Black Hole Thermodynamics. Chicago Lectures in Physics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1995

    1995

  79. [87]

    Hollands and R

    S. Hollands and R. M. Wald,Quantum fields in curved spacetime,Phys. Rept.574(2015) 1–35, [arXiv:1401.2026]

    2015 arXiv

  80. [88]

    American Mathematical Soc., 2000

    Conway, John B,A course in operator theory. American Mathematical Soc., 2000

    2000

  81. [89]

    Sorce,Continuum canonical purifications,arXiv:2512.17014

    J. Sorce,Continuum canonical purifications,arXiv:2512.17014

  82. [90]

    Haag,Local Quantum Physics

    R. Haag,Local Quantum Physics. Theoretical and Mathematical Physics. Springer, Berlin, 1996

    1996

  83. [91]

    Takesaki,Theory of operator algebras II, vol

    M. Takesaki,Theory of operator algebras II, vol. 125. Springer, 2003. – 36 –

    2003

  84. [92]

    Hollands,Aspects of quantum field theory in curved spacetime,University of York Ph.D

    S. Hollands,Aspects of quantum field theory in curved spacetime,University of York Ph.D. Thesis(2000)

    2000

  85. [93]

    Reeh and S

    H. Reeh and S. Schlieder,Bemerkungen zur unitäräquivalenz von lorentzinvarianten feldern, Nuovo Cim.22(1961), no. 5 1051–1068

    1961

  86. [94]

    Caminiti, F

    J. Caminiti, F. Capeccia, and J. Sorce,Excitability of Gaussian states with VEVs, arXiv:2606.23779

    arXiv

  87. [95]

    D. W. Janssen and R. Verch,Hadamard states on spherically symmetric characteristic surfaces, the semi-classical Einstein equations and the Hawking effect,Class. Quant. Grav. 40(2023), no. 4 045002, [arXiv:2209.00577]

    2023 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Verch,Local definiteness, primarity and quasiequivalence of quasifree Hadamard quantum states in curved space-time,Commun

    R. Verch,Local definiteness, primarity and quasiequivalence of quasifree Hadamard quantum states in curved space-time,Commun. Math. Phys.160(1994) 507–536

    1994

  89. [97]

    J. P. Eckmann and J. Froehlich,Unitary equivalence of local algebras in the quasifree representation,Ann. Inst. H. Poincare Phys. Theor. A20(1974), no. 2 201–209

    1974

  90. [98]

    Conti and G

    R. Conti and G. Morsella,Quasi-free Isomorphisms of Second Quantization Algebras and Modular Theory,Math. Phys. Anal. Geom.27(2024), no. 2 8, [arXiv:2305.07606]

    2024 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Buchholz and R

    D. Buchholz and R. Verch,Scaling algebras and renormalization group in algebraic quantum field theory. ii. instructive examples,Reviews in Mathematical Physics10(1998) 775–800, [hep-th/9708095]

    1998 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Dappiaggi, N

    C. Dappiaggi, N. Pinamonti, and M. Porrmann,Local causal structures, Hadamard states and the principle of local covariance in quantum field theory,Commun. Math. Phys.304 (2011) 459–498, [arXiv:1001.0858]

    2011 arXiv

  93. [101]

    F. G. Friedlander,The wave equation on a curved space-time, vol. 2. Cambridge university press, 1975

    1975

  94. [102]

    Donnelly and S

    W. Donnelly and S. B. Giddings,Diffeomorphism-invariant observables and their nonlocal algebra,Phys. Rev. D93(2016), no. 2 024030, [arXiv:1507.07921]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 94, 029903 (2016)]

    2016 arXiv

  95. [103]

    Donnelly and L

    W. Donnelly and L. Freidel,Local subsystems in gauge theory and gravity,JHEP09(2016) 102, [arXiv:1601.04744]

    2016 arXiv

  96. [104]

    Goeller, P

    C. Goeller, P. A. Hoehn, and J. Kirklin,Diffeomorphism-invariant observables and dynamical frames in gravity: reconciling bulk locality with general covariance, arXiv:2206.01193

    arXiv

  97. [105]

    Hollands and R

    S. Hollands and R. M. Wald,Stability of Black Holes and Black Branes,Commun. Math. Phys.321(2013) 629–680, [arXiv:1201.0463]. – 37 –

    2013 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.