Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Statistical Complexity of Quantum Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.11617 v2 pith:PQDDWUFH submitted 2023-09-20 quant-ph cs.ITmath-phmath.ITmath.MPstat.ML

classification quant-phcs.ITmath-phmath.ITmath.MPstat.ML
keywords quantumlearningdatacomplexityclassicalcopyextensiveinformation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent years have seen significant activity on the problem of using data for the purpose of learning properties of quantum systems or of processing classical or quantum data via quantum computing. As in classical learning, quantum learning problems involve settings in which the mechanism generating the data is unknown, and the main goal of a learning algorithm is to ensure satisfactory accuracy levels when only given access to data and, possibly, side information such as expert knowledge. This article reviews the complexity of quantum learning using information-theoretic techniques by focusing on data complexity, copy complexity, and model complexity. Copy complexity arises from the destructive nature of quantum measurements, which irreversibly alter the state to be processed, limiting the information that can be extracted about quantum data. For example, in a quantum system, unlike in classical machine learning, it is generally not possible to evaluate the training loss simultaneously on multiple hypotheses using the same quantum data. To make the paper self-contained and approachable by different research communities, we provide extensive background material on classical results from statistical learning theory, as well as on the distinguishability of quantum states. Throughout, we highlight the differences between quantum and classical learning by addressing both supervised and unsupervised learning, and we provide extensive pointers to the literature.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Measurement incompatibility in Bayesian multiparameter quantum estimation

    quant-ph 2025-11 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Measurement incompatibility at most doubles the minimum mean-square loss in Bayesian multiparameter quantum estimation, relative to the symmetric-posterior-mean bound.

  2. On the Generalization of Adversarially Trained Quantum Classifiers

    quant-ph 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    For adversarially trained quantum classifiers, the excess sample complexity over standard training vanishes with input dimension for rotation embeddings under classical attacks, scales at least linearly for amplitude ...

  3. Quantum Information Processing, Sensing and Communications: Their Myths, Realities and Futures

    quant-ph 2024-12 conditional novelty 1.0 of 10

    A broad review of quantum error correction, error mitigation, machine learning, radar, and QKD, concluding with a staged roadmap toward a quantum-secured internet.

Pith tools