REVIEW 2 cited by
Cross-lingual Pseudo-Projected Expectation Regularization for Weakly Supervised Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We consider a multilingual weakly supervised learning scenario where knowledge from annotated corpora in a resource-rich language is transferred via bitext to guide the learning in other languages. Past approaches project labels across bitext and use them as features or gold labels for training. We propose a new method that projects model expectations rather than labels, which facilities transfer of model uncertainty across language boundaries. We encode expectations as constraints and train a discriminative CRF model using Generalized Expectation Criteria (Mann and McCallum, 2010). Evaluated on standard Chinese-English and German-English NER datasets, our method demonstrates F1 scores of 64% and 60% when no labeled data is used. Attaining the same accuracy with supervised CRFs requires 12k and 1.5k labeled sentences. Furthermore, when combined with labeled examples, our method yields significant improvements over state-of-the-art supervised methods, achieving best reported numbers to date on Chinese OntoNotes and German CoNLL-03 datasets.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Modeling Named Entity Embedding Distribution into Hypersphere
Named entity words tend to lie in a single hypersphere in word embedding space, and this geometric model can be transferred across languages and used as an auxiliary feature for NER.
-
Open Named Entity Modeling from Embedding Distribution
Named entity embeddings are modeled as a fitted hypersphere per type, used for open detection, cross-lingual mapping, and as features giving small NER improvements.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.