pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.15273 · v1 · pith:PRYPKNUFnew · submitted 2026-05-14 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA · astro-ph.CO

A stellar bar hidden in an extreme gas-rich disk galaxy at z=4.055

Leindert A. Boogaard , Luca Costantin , Thor Tepper-Garc\'ia , Joss Bland-Hawthorn , Jacqueline A. Hodge , Cheng-Lin Liao , Mahmoud Hamed , Luis Colina
show 9 more authors
Fabian Walter Oscar Agertz Arjan Bik Alejandro Crespo G\'omez Emanuele Daddi Georgios E. Magdis Pablo G. P\'erez-Gonz\'alez Hannah \"Ubler Axel Weiss
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 15:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.CO
keywords stellar barhigh-redshift galaxygas-rich diskJWSTgalaxy evolutionz=4GN20
0
0 comments X

The pith

A stellar bar has formed in a gas-rich disk galaxy at z=4.055, showing bars can develop rapidly despite high gas content.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The classical model holds that stellar bars arise through slow secular processes in gas-poor, star-dominated disks. This paper reports the detection of a stellar bar inside GN20, a star-forming disk galaxy at redshift 4.055 that is baryon-dominated yet has roughly 75 percent of its baryons locked in gas. Simultaneous JWST imaging and spectroscopy of stars, gas, and dust establish the bar's presence and the mass fractions. The finding directly contradicts the expectation that abundant gas should suppress or delay bar formation. It therefore requires theorists to reconsider how bars can drive structural evolution and quenching so soon after the Big Bang.

Core claim

The detection of a stellar bar in GN20 demonstrates that gas-rich disks do support rapid stellar bar formation in the early Universe.

What carries the argument

The stellar bar identified in GN20 via JWST imaging of the stellar light distribution, supported by baryon and gas mass fractions measured from combined stellar, gas, and dust observations.

If this is right

  • Gas-rich disks at high redshift can form stellar bars on short timescales.
  • Bars may provide an early mechanism for redistributing angular momentum and driving gas inflows.
  • This process could contribute to rapid galaxy assembly and quenching within the first 1.5 billion years.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Models of early galaxy evolution may need to allow bar instabilities to grow even when gas dominates the baryonic mass.
  • The same mechanism could explain other JWST detections of early bars in apparently gas-rich systems.
  • Bars in gas-rich disks might accelerate the conversion of gas into stars and thereby hasten quenching.

Load-bearing premise

The central structure is correctly identified as a stellar bar and the reported baryon and gas mass fractions are accurate.

What would settle it

Kinematic maps or higher-resolution imaging that show the central feature is not a rotating bar, or revised mass measurements that place the gas fraction well below 50 percent, would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.15273 by Alejandro Crespo G\'omez, Arjan Bik, Axel Weiss, Cheng-Lin Liao, Emanuele Daddi, Fabian Walter, Georgios E. Magdis, Hannah \"Ubler, Jacqueline A. Hodge, Joss Bland-Hawthorn, Leindert A. Boogaard, Luca Costantin, Luis Colina, Mahmoud Hamed, Oscar Agertz, Pablo G. P\'erez-Gonz\'alez, Thor Tepper-Garc\'ia.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Structure of GN20. (a) JWST/NIRCam false-color image of the gas-rich starburst galaxy GN20 at redshift z=4.055. North is up and east is left. (b) The 7 kpc stellar bar in the disk at rest-frame 1.1 µm light traced by JWST/MIRI, indicated by ellipses of constant brightness. (c) High-resolution sub-mm observations from the NOrthern Extended Millimeter Array (NOEMA) at rest-frame 220 µm reveal the dust extend… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Stellar bar identification. The ellipticity and position angle of the stellar light isophotes at rest-frame 1.1 µm show a clear signature of a stellar bar of approximately 2.8 ± 0.1 kpc in projected semi-major axis length (3.5 ± 0.1 kpc deprojected), corresponding to 7.0 ± 0.2 kpc full deprojected length, that is independently confirmed by Fourier analysis; see § 3). The ellipticity (ϵ) and position angle … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Predicted timescales of stellar bar formation. Theoretical simulations of bar formation in the context of large gas fractions from (J. Bland-Hawthorn et al. 2024, 2025; T. Tepper-Garc´ıa et al. 2024) produce galaxies with a striking resemblance to GN20, featuring a bars and asymmetric spiral arm structure, driven by baryon sloshing (J. Bland-Hawthorn et al. 2025, snapshot at fgas = 40% shown). For baryon-d… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Stellar bar identification at multiple wavelenghts. Isophotal analysis of the stellar bar (same as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Stellar bar identification in Fourier space. Two dominant modes are identified (Am/A0 > 0.2), which correspond to the NE spiral arm (m = 1) and the stellar bar (m = 2). Bar N Core Bar S [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Spectral energy distribution model of GN20. The best-fit SED model from MAGPHYS with the total, core, northern bar, and southern bar are shown in the black, red, green, and cyan curve, respectively. The inset shows the regions on a 2′′ × 2 ′′ NIRCam/F444W cutout. a D. Calzetti et al. (2000) dust law, delayed-τ SFH, and including an AGN component using J. Fritz et al. (2006) and nebular emission templates f… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Morphology of GN20-like simulated barred galaxies. Multiple projections of stellar bars forming in simulated gas-rich disk galaxies at different gas fractions (T. Tepper-Garc´ıa et al. 2024; J. Bland-Hawthorn et al. 2024, 2025). In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Stellar bar length evolution in cosmological simu￾lations. Bar radius as function of simulation time, as derived via the Dehnen/Fourier method (see § 3). The GN20 bar radius (Rbar/ϕ2 , derived consistently) matches most closely with the simulations with high gas fractions (fgas = 60% and 40%). tions for a positive feedback loop operating on instabil￾ities seeded by a noisy, self-gravitating distribution. W… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The classical picture for the formation of stellar bars -- key dynamical drivers of the evolution of galaxies -- is through secular evolution of instability in gas poor, stellar-dominated disks. The detection with the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) of stellar bars and spiral arms in galaxies at early cosmic times has thus challenged LambdaCDM-based expectations, which recent studies reconcile by suggesting that these galaxies are baryon-dominated and have already consumed most of their gas. Yet, a paradox arises, as early galaxies are expected to be increasingly rich in gas, which is generally considered to prevent or slow down stellar bar formation. Here, we show the detection of a stellar bar in GN20, a gas-rich star-forming disk galaxy at a redshift of z=4.055, only 1.5 billion years after the Big Bang. Simultaneous observations of the stars, gas, and dust reveal that GN20 is indeed baryon-dominated (over dark matter; 70+/-30%), but the baryonic mass is largely in the form of gas (75+/-25%). This discovery demonstrates that gas-rich disks do support rapid stellar bar formation in the early Universe, motivating a new theoretical perspective on bar formation in gas-rich systems, and providing a potential new mechanism for very early galaxy assembly and quenching.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the detection of a stellar bar in the gas-rich star-forming disk galaxy GN20 at z=4.055 using JWST NIRCam imaging, combined with simultaneous constraints on stars, gas, and dust. It claims the galaxy is baryon-dominated (70±30% over dark matter) with baryonic mass largely gaseous (75±25%), demonstrating that extreme gas-rich conditions do not prevent rapid stellar bar formation in the early Universe and motivating revised theoretical models.

Significance. If the bar identification and mass fractions hold, the result would be significant for galaxy evolution studies: it provides direct observational evidence that stellar bars can form rapidly in gas-dominated systems at z>4, challenging the classical secular-evolution picture and existing simulation expectations that high gas fractions suppress bars. The use of joint stellar-gas-dust fitting from JWST data is a strength that enables the extreme gas-fraction claim.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (Bar detection and morphology): The identification of the central elongated feature as a stellar bar formed by disk instability lacks explicit quantitative criteria (e.g., ellipse-fit ellipticity thresholds, Fourier m=2 amplitude, or comparison to mock images), and no kinematic confirmation such as non-circular velocity fields or orbit modeling is reported; given the clumpy high-z morphology, this leaves open the possibility that the structure is a transient clump or interaction remnant rather than a stable bar.
  2. [§4] §4 (Mass fraction derivation): The reported baryon dominance (70±30%) and gas fraction within baryons (75±25%) are derived from simultaneous fitting, but the error budget, degeneracy handling between stellar, gas, and dust components, and sensitivity to assumptions (e.g., IMF or dust model) are not detailed; the large uncertainties mean the gas fraction could plausibly be ~50%, which would reduce tension with models expecting bars to form more readily below ~60-70% gas and weaken the 'extreme gas-rich' claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figure 2] Figure 2 caption: The scale bar and orientation relative to the disk major axis should be stated explicitly to aid visual assessment of the bar alignment.
  2. [Introduction] Introduction: A brief reference to the most recent (post-2023) JWST bar detections at z>2 would better contextualize the novelty relative to the cited works.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed comments, which have prompted us to strengthen the quantitative support for our claims. We address each major point below and outline the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: §3 (Bar detection and morphology): The identification of the central elongated feature as a stellar bar formed by disk instability lacks explicit quantitative criteria (e.g., ellipse-fit ellipticity thresholds, Fourier m=2 amplitude, or comparison to mock images), and no kinematic confirmation such as non-circular velocity fields or orbit modeling is reported; given the clumpy high-z morphology, this leaves open the possibility that the structure is a transient clump or interaction remnant rather than a stable bar.

    Authors: We agree that the original manuscript would benefit from more explicit quantitative criteria for the bar identification. In the revised version we will add ellipse-fitting results that show the radial ellipticity profile and position-angle behavior expected for a bar, together with a Fourier m=2 amplitude measurement. We will also include a direct comparison of the observed morphology to mock NIRCam images generated from hydrodynamic simulations of gas-rich, high-redshift disks that contain stable bars. These additions will help distinguish the feature from a transient clump. Kinematic confirmation via non-circular motions or orbit modeling is not possible with the available broadband imaging data; we will explicitly note this limitation while emphasizing that the morphological signatures, combined with the previously reported rotating molecular-gas disk, remain consistent with a bar. revision: partial

  2. Referee: §4 (Mass fraction derivation): The reported baryon dominance (70±30%) and gas fraction within baryons (75±25%) are derived from simultaneous fitting, but the error budget, degeneracy handling between stellar, gas, and dust components, and sensitivity to assumptions (e.g., IMF or dust model) are not detailed; the large uncertainties mean the gas fraction could plausibly be ~50%, which would reduce tension with models expecting bars to form more readily below ~60-70% gas and weaken the 'extreme gas-rich' claim.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the error budget and degeneracy analysis were insufficiently detailed. In the revision we will expand the methods section to describe the joint fitting procedure, the treatment of degeneracies between stellar, gas and dust components, and the results of sensitivity tests to IMF choice and dust models. These tests indicate that the gas fraction remains above ~60% for the majority of plausible parameter combinations, although the large uncertainties are real. We will present the full posterior distributions and will moderate the wording around 'extreme gas-rich' to reflect the range of allowed values while retaining the central conclusion that the system is still gas-dominated enough to challenge existing bar-formation expectations. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Kinematic confirmation of the bar (non-circular velocity fields or orbit modeling) cannot be provided because the observations consist solely of broadband NIRCam imaging; no integral-field spectroscopy is available for GN20.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in observational detection report

full rationale

The paper is an observational report of a JWST-detected stellar bar in GN20 at z=4.055, with baryon and gas mass fractions presented as direct measurements from simultaneous stellar-gas-dust fitting (70+/-30% baryon-dominated, 75+/-25% gas). No derivation chain, equations, or predictions are described that reduce by construction to fitted inputs, self-definitions, or self-citation load-bearing steps. The central claim follows from external imaging and mass estimation data without internal circular reduction, making this a standard non-circular observational finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on observational mass fraction estimates and the assumption that the detected feature qualifies as a stellar bar; these are not derived from first principles but from data interpretation.

free parameters (2)
  • baryon dominance fraction = 70+/-30%
    Estimated at 70+/-30% from simultaneous star, gas, and dust observations
  • gas fraction of baryons = 75+/-25%
    Estimated at 75+/-25% indicating baryonic mass is largely gas
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Stellar bars form via secular evolution in gas-poor stellar-dominated disks
    Invoked in the abstract as the classical picture creating the paradox with gas-rich early galaxies.
  • domain assumption The central structure detected by JWST is a stellar bar
    Based on imaging of stars, gas, and dust in the abstract description of the detection.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5844 in / 1514 out tokens · 86758 ms · 2026-05-19T15:51:01.271994+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

100 extracted references · 100 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    2000, A&A, 361, 841

    Prieto, M. 2000, A&A, 361, 841

    work page 2000

  2. [2]

    W., et al

    Amvrosiadis, A., Lange, S., Nightingale, J. W., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 537, 1163, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf048

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf048 2025

  3. [3]

    and Heintz, K

    Aravena, M., Heintz, K., Dessauges-Zavadsky, M., et al. 2024, A&A, 682, A24, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347281

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347281 2024

  4. [4]

    and Labiano, Alvaro and Álvarez-Márquez, Javier and Patapis, Polychronis and Kavanagh, Patrick J

    Argyriou, I., Glasse, A., Law, D. R., et al. 2023, A&A, 675, A111, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346489

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346489 2023

  5. [5]

    Athanassoula, E., Machado, R. E. G., & Rodionov, S. A. 2013, MNRAS, 429, 1949, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sts452

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sts452 2013

  6. [6]

    , keywords =

    Athanassoula, E., & Misiriotis, A. 2002, MNRAS, 330, 35, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05028.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05028.x 2002

  7. [7]

    M., Koo, D

    Barro, G., Faber, S. M., Koo, D. C., et al. 2017, ApJ, 840, 47, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6b05

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa6b05 2017

  8. [8]

    , keywords =

    Battisti, A. J., Cunha, E. d., Shivaei, I., & Calzetti, D. 2020, ApJ, 888, 108, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5fdd

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab5fdd 2020

  9. [9]

    2017, A&A, 597, A85, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526749

    Leroy, A. 2017, A&A, 597, A85, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526749

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526749 2017

  10. [10]

    2024, A&A, 686, A3, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348845

    Bik, A., ´Alvarez-M´ arquez, J., Colina, L., et al. 2024, A&A, 686, A3, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348845

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348845 2024

  11. [11]

    2008, Galactic Dynamics: Second Edition

    Binney, J., & Tremaine, S. 2008, Galactic Dynamics: Second Edition

    work page 2008

  12. [12]

    2024, ApJ, 968, 86, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4118

    Federrath, C. 2024, ApJ, 968, 86, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4118

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad4118 2024

  13. [13]

    2023, ApJ, 947, 80, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acc469

    Freeman, K. 2023, ApJ, 947, 80, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acc469

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acc469 2023

  14. [14]

    , keywords =

    Bland-Hawthorn, J., Tepper-Garcia, T., Agertz, O., et al. 2025, ApJ, 994, 22, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae0931

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae0931 2025

  15. [15]

    Blitz, L., & Spergel, D. N. 1991, ApJ, 379, 631, doi: 10.1086/170535 B¨ oker, T., Arribas, S., L¨ utzgendorf, N., et al. 2022, A&A, 661, A82, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142589

    work page doi:10.1086/170535 1991

  16. [16]

    A., Decarli, R., Walter, F., et al

    Boogaard, L. A., Decarli, R., Walter, F., et al. 2023, ApJ, 945, 111, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acb4f0

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acb4f0 2023

  17. [17]

    A., Walter, F., Weiß, A., et al

    Boogaard, L. A., Walter, F., Weiß, A., et al. 2026, ApJ, 996, 19, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae14eb

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae14eb 2026

  18. [18]

    2015, PASP, 127, 612, doi: 10.1086/682254

    Bouchet, P., Garc´ ıa-Mar´ ın, M., Lagage, P.-O., et al. 2015, PASP, 127, 612, doi: 10.1086/682254

    work page doi:10.1086/682254 2015

  19. [19]

    R., Smartt, S

    Bournaud, F., Combes, F., & Semelin, B. 2005, MNRAS, 364, L18, doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2005.00096.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2005.00096.x 2005

  20. [20]

    2020, astropy/photutils: 1.0.0, 1.0.0 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.4044744

    Bradley, L., Sip˝ ocz, B., Robitaille, T., et al. 2020, astropy/photutils: 1.0.0, 1.0.0 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.4044744

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.4044744 2020

  21. [21]

    2003, MNRAS, 344, 1000, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06897.x

    Bruzual, G., & Charlot, S. 2003, MNRAS, 344, 1000, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06897.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06897.x 2003

  22. [22]

    2023, JWST Calibration Pipeline, 1.13.1 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10407298

    Bushouse, H., Eisenhamer, J., Dencheva, N., et al. 2023, JWST Calibration Pipeline, 1.13.1 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10407298

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.10407298 2023

  23. [23]

    M., Cuomo, V., et al

    Buttitta, C., Corsini, E. M., Cuomo, V., et al. 2022, A&A, 664, L10, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244297

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244297 2022

  24. [24]

    C., et al

    Calzetti, D., Armus, L., Bohlin, R. C., et al. 2000, ApJ, 533, 682, doi: 10.1086/308692

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/308692 2000

  25. [25]

    L., Hodge, J., Walter, F., et al

    Carilli, C. L., Hodge, J., Walter, F., et al. 2011, ApJL, 739, L33, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/739/1/L33

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/739/1/l33 2011

  26. [26]

    L., Daddi, E., Riechers, D., et al

    Carilli, C. L., Daddi, E., Riechers, D., et al. 2010, ApJ, 714, 1407, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/714/2/1407

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/714/2/1407 2010

  27. [27]

    C., McLure, R

    Carnall, A. C., McLure, R. J., Dunlop, J. S., et al. 2023, Nature, 619, 716, doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06158-6

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06158-6 2023

  28. [28]

    Galactic Stellar and Substellar Initial Mass Function

    Chabrier, G. 2003, PASP, 115, 763, doi: 10.1086/376392

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/376392 2003

  29. [29]

    2017, ApJS, 233, 19, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aa97da

    Chang, Y.-Y., Le Floc’h, E., Juneau, S., et al. 2017, ApJS, 233, 19, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aa97da

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aa97da 2017

  30. [30]

    Charlot, S., & Fall, S. M. 2000, ApJ, 539, 718, doi: 10.1086/309250

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/309250 2000

  31. [31]

    2023, A&A, 673, L6, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346535

    Colina, L., Crespo G´ omez, A.,´Alvarez-M´ arquez, J., et al. 2023, A&A, 673, L6, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346535

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346535 2023

  32. [32]

    2013, A&A, 558, A124, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322288

    Combes, F., Garc´ ıa-Burillo, S., Casasola, V., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A124, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322288

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322288 2013

  33. [33]

    , keywords =

    Costantin, L., P´ erez-Gonz´ alez, P. G., M´ endez-Abreu, J., et al. 2021, ApJ, 913, 125, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abef72

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abef72 2021

  34. [34]

    G., Guo, Y., et al

    Costantin, L., P´ erez-Gonz´ alez, P. G., Guo, Y., et al. 2023, Nature, 623, 499, doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06636-x 16

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06636-x 2023

  35. [35]

    A., et al

    Costantin, L., Gillman, S., Boogaard, L. A., et al. 2025, A&A, 699, A360, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451330 Crespo G´ omez, A., Colina, L.,´Alvarez-M´ arquez, J., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, A325, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449750 da Cunha, E., Charlot, S., & Elbaz, D. 2008, MNRAS, 388, 1595, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13535.x da Cunha, E., Walter, F., Smail,...

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451330 2025

  36. [36]

    2009, ApJ, 694, 1517, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/694/2/1517 de Graaff, A., Setton, D

    Daddi, E., Dannerbauer, H., Stern, D., et al. 2009, ApJ, 694, 1517, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/694/2/1517 de Graaff, A., Setton, D. J., Brammer, G., et al. 2025, Nature Astronomy, 9, 280, doi: 10.1038/s41550-024-02424-3 de Vaucouleurs, G. 1964, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 20, The Galaxy and the Magellanic Clouds, ed. F. J. Kerr, 195

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/694/2/1517 2009

  37. [37]

    , keywords =

    Debattista, V. P., Corsini, E. M., & Aguerri, J. A. L. 2002, MNRAS, 332, 65, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05269.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05269.x 2002

  38. [38]

    P., Mayer, L., Carollo, C

    Debattista, V. P., Mayer, L., Carollo, C. M., et al. 2006, ApJ, 645, 209, doi: 10.1086/504147

    work page doi:10.1086/504147 2006

  39. [39]

    2016, ApJ, 833, 69, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/833/1/69

    Decarli, R., Walter, F., Aravena, M., et al. 2016, ApJ, 833, 69, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/833/1/69

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/833/1/69 2016

  40. [40]

    2019, ApJ, 882, 138, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab30fe

    Decarli, R., Walter, F., G´ onzalez-L´ opez, J., et al. 2019, ApJ, 882, 138, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab30fe

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab30fe 2019

  41. [41]

    2023, MNRAS, 518, 2712, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3184 Dudzeviˇ ci¯ ut˙ e, U., Smail, I., Swinbank, A

    Dehnen, W., Semczuk, M., & Sch¨ onrich, R. 2023, MNRAS, 518, 2712, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3184 Dudzeviˇ ci¯ ut˙ e, U., Smail, I., Swinbank, A. M., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 494, 3828, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa769

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3184 2023

  42. [42]

    2006, MNRAS, 366, 575, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09884.x

    Erwin, P. 2005, MNRAS, 364, 283, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09560.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09560.x 2005

  43. [43]

    B., Frogel, J

    Eskridge, P. B., Frogel, J. A., Pogge, R. W., et al. 2000, AJ, 119, 536, doi: 10.1086/301203

    work page doi:10.1086/301203 2000

  44. [44]

    J., et al

    Ferreira, L., Adams, N., Conselice, C. J., et al. 2022, ApJL, 938, L2, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac947c

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac947c 2022

  45. [45]

    Fragkoudi, F., Grand, R. J. J., Pakmor, R., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 538, 1587, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf389

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf389 2025

  46. [46]

    J., Osmond, J

    Fritz, J., Franceschini, A., & Hatziminaoglou, E. 2006, MNRAS, 366, 767, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.09866.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.09866.x 2006

  47. [47]

    S., B´ edorf, J., Baba, J., & Portegies Zwart, S

    Fujii, M. S., B´ edorf, J., Baba, J., & Portegies Zwart, S. 2018, MNRAS, 477, 1451

    work page 2018

  48. [48]

    P., Mather , J

    Gardner, J. P., Mather, J. C., Abbott, R., et al. 2023, PASP, 135, 068001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/acd1b5 G´ eron, T., Smethurst, R. J., Dickinson, H., et al. 2025, ApJ, 987, 74, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/add7d0

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/acd1b5 2023

  49. [49]

    L., et al

    Guo, Y., Jogee, S., Finkelstein, S. L., et al. 2023, ApJL, 945, L10, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acacfb

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acacfb 2023

  50. [50]

    2025, ApJ, 985, 181, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adc8a7

    Guo, Y., Jogee, S., Wise, E., et al. 2025, ApJ, 985, 181, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adc8a7

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adc8a7 2025

  51. [51]

    A., Carilli, C

    Hodge, J. A., Carilli, C. L., Walter, F., et al. 2012, ApJ, 760, 11, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/760/1/11

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/760/1/11 2012

  52. [52]

    A., Riechers, D., Decarli, R., et al

    Hodge, J. A., Riechers, D., Decarli, R., et al. 2015, ApJL, 798, L18, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/798/1/L18

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/798/1/l18 2015

  53. [53]

    A., Smail, I., Walter, F., et al

    Hodge, J. A., Smail, I., Walter, F., et al. 2019, ApJ, 876, 130, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1846

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab1846 2019

  54. [54]

    2025, Nature, 641, 861, doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-08914-2

    Huang, S., Kawabe, R., Umehata, H., et al. 2025, Nature, 641, 861, doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-08914-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-025-08914-2 2025

  55. [55]

    G., Angeloudi, E., et al

    Huertas-Company, M., Iyer, K. G., Angeloudi, E., et al. 2024, A&A, 685, A48, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346800

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346800 2024

  56. [56]

    Inoue, A. K. 2011, MNRAS, 415, 2920, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18906.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18906.x 2011

  57. [57]

    The Near-Infrared Spectrograph (NIRSpec) on the James Webb Space Telescope I. Overview of the instrument and its capabilities

    Jakobsen, P., Ferruit, P., Alves de Oliveira, C., et al. 2022, A&A, 661, A80, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142663

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142663 2022

  58. [58]

    Jedrzejewski, R. I. 1987, MNRAS, 226, 747, doi: 10.1093/mnras/226.4.747

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/226.4.747 1987

  59. [59]

    D., Rix, H.-W., et al

    Jogee, S., Barazza, F. D., Rix, H.-W., et al. 2004, ApJL, 615, L105, doi: 10.1086/426138

    work page doi:10.1086/426138 2004

  60. [60]

    Johnson, H. M. 1957, AJ, 62, 19, doi: 10.1086/107441

    work page doi:10.1086/107441 1957

  61. [61]

    S., Ho, L

    Kalita, B. S., Ho, L. C., Silverman, J. D., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.04163, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2512.04163

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.04163 2025

  62. [62]

    Kormendy, J., & Kennicutt, Jr., R. C. 2004, ARA&A, 42, 603, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.42.053102.134024

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.42.053102.134024 2004

  63. [63]

    2012, ApJ, 757, 60, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/60 Le Conte, Z

    Kraljic, K., Bournaud, F., & Martig, M. 2012, ApJ, 757, 60, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/60 Le Conte, Z. A., Gadotti, D. A., Ferreira, L., et al. 2025, MNRAS, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf2010

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/757/1/60 2012

  64. [64]

    M., Fraternali, F., et al

    Lelli, F., Di Teodoro, E. M., Fraternali, F., et al. 2021, Science, 371, 713, doi: 10.1126/science.abc1893

    work page doi:10.1126/science.abc1893 2021

  65. [65]

    2024, ApJ, 976, 70, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7fee

    Li, J., Da Cunha, E., Gonz´ alez-L´ opez, J., et al. 2024, ApJ, 976, 70, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7fee

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad7fee 2024

  66. [66]

    2007, ApJ, 659, 1176, doi: 10.1086/512355

    Marinova, I., & Jogee, S. 2007, ApJ, 659, 1176, doi: 10.1086/512355

    work page doi:10.1086/512355 2007

  67. [67]

    2006, ApJ, 637, 214, doi: 10.1086/498338 Men´ endez-Delmestre, K., Sheth, K., Schinnerer, E., Jarrett, T

    Martinez-Valpuesta, I., Shlosman, I., & Heller, C. 2006, ApJ, 637, 214, doi: 10.1086/498338 Men´ endez-Delmestre, K., Sheth, K., Schinnerer, E., Jarrett, T. H., & Scoville, N. Z. 2007, ApJ, 657, 790, doi: 10.1086/511025

    work page doi:10.1086/498338 2006

  68. [68]

    X., Kanekar, N., & Rafelski, M

    Neeleman, M., Prochaska, J. X., Kanekar, N., & Rafelski, M. 2020, Nature, 581, 269, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2276-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2276-y 2020

  69. [69]

    1990, ApJ, 357, 71, doi: 10.1086/168892

    Ohta, K., Hamabe, M., & Wakamatsu, K.-I. 1990, ApJ, 357, 71, doi: 10.1086/168892

    work page doi:10.1086/168892 1990

  70. [70]

    , keywords =

    Pacifici, C., Iyer, K. G., Mobasher, B., et al. 2023, ApJ, 944, 141, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acacff

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acacff 2023

  71. [71]

    R., & Pringle, J

    Padilla, N. D., & Strauss, M. A. 2008, MNRAS, 388, 1321, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13480.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13480.x 2008

  72. [72]

    J., et al

    Pastras, S., Genzel, R., Tacconi, L. J., et al. 2025, A&A, 704, A329, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202555430 17

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555430 2025

  73. [73]

    2013, pynbody: N-Body/SPH analysis for python,, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1305.002 http://ascl.net/1305.002

    Pontzen, A., Roˇ skar, R., Stinson, G., & Woods, R. 2013, pynbody: N-Body/SPH analysis for python,, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1305.002 http://ascl.net/1305.002

    work page 2013

  74. [74]

    2006, MNRAS, 366, 575, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09884.x

    Pope, A., Borys, C., Scott, D., et al. 2005, MNRAS, 358, 149, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08759.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08759.x 2005

  75. [75]

    J., Osmond, J

    Pope, A., Scott, D., Dickinson, M., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 370, 1185, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10575.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10575.x 2006

  76. [76]

    A., James, R

    Raha, N., Sellwood, J. A., James, R. A., & Kahn, F. D. 1991, Nature, 352, 411, doi: 10.1038/352411a0

    work page doi:10.1038/352411a0 1991

  77. [77]

    S., et al

    Reddish, J., Kraljic, K., Petersen, M. S., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 512, 160, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac494

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac494 2022

  78. [78]

    A., Pope, A., Daddi, E., et al

    Riechers, D. A., Pope, A., Daddi, E., et al. 2014, ApJ, 786, 31, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/786/1/31

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/786/1/31 2014

  79. [79]

    A., Pavesi, R., Sharon, C

    Riechers, D. A., Pavesi, R., Sharon, C. E., et al. 2019, ApJ, 872, 7, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aafc27

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aafc27 2019

  80. [80]

    o ker , J. Bouwman , L. Colina , A. Glasse , K. D. Gordon , T. P. Greene , M. G \

    Rieke, G. H., Wright, G. S., B¨ oker, T., et al. 2015, PASP, 127, 584, doi: 10.1086/682252

    work page doi:10.1086/682252 2015

Showing first 80 references.