Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Statistically-informed deep learning for gravitational wave parameter estimation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1903.01998 v4 pith:PT4ZJ6UP submitted 2019-03-05 gr-qc astro-ph.HEcs.AIcs.LGstat.ML

classification gr-qcastro-ph.HEcs.AIcs.LGstat.ML
keywords textttlearningmodelsomegaposteriordistributionsneuralresults
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We introduce deep learning models to estimate the masses of the binary components of black hole mergers, $(m_1,m_2)$, and three astrophysical properties of the post-merger compact remnant, namely, the final spin, $a_f$, and the frequency and damping time of the ringdown oscillations of the fundamental $\ell=m=2$ bar mode, $(\omega_R, \omega_I)$. Our neural networks combine a modified $\texttt{WaveNet}$ architecture with contrastive learning and normalizing flow. We validate these models against a Gaussian conjugate prior family whose posterior distribution is described by a closed analytical expression. Upon confirming that our models produce statistically consistent results, we used them to estimate the astrophysical parameters $(m_1,m_2, a_f, \omega_R, \omega_I)$ of five binary black holes: $\texttt{GW150914}, \texttt{GW170104}, \texttt{GW170814}, \texttt{GW190521}$ and $\texttt{GW190630}$. We use $\texttt{PyCBC Inference}$ to directly compare traditional Bayesian methodologies for parameter estimation with our deep-learning-based posterior distributions. Our results show that our neural network models predict posterior distributions that encode physical correlations, and that our data-driven median results and 90$\%$ confidence intervals are similar to those produced with gravitational wave Bayesian analyses. This methodology requires a single V100 $\texttt{NVIDIA}$ GPU to produce median values and posterior distributions within two milliseconds for each event. This neural network, and a tutorial for its use, are available at the $\texttt{Data and Learning Hub for Science}$.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Unified remnant models for aligned-spin, precessing, and eccentric binary black hole mergers

    gr-qc 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    New analytic fits, gwModelRemS/P, predict remnant mass, spin, luminosity, and kick for black hole mergers from equal mass to q=1000, with a neural-flow model for precessing kicks.

  2. Identifying lensed gravitational waves with physics-informed posterior learning

    gr-qc 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Fusing a simulation-trained common-source mass posterior with waveform features raises lensed-event detection efficiency from 20.8% to 35.2% at 1% false-positive rate and lowers the SNR for 50% efficiency from 45.3 to 33.5.

Pith tools