pith. sign in

arxiv: 2408.14792 · v3 · pith:PURUFNFEnew · submitted 2024-08-27 · 💻 cs.CY · cs.AI· cs.CL

Measuring Human Contribution in AI-Assisted Content Generation

classification 💻 cs.CY cs.AIcs.CL
keywords humanai-assistedcontentcontributiongenerationgenerativeinformationmeasuring
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

With the growing prevalence of generative artificial intelligence (AI), an increasing amount of content is no longer exclusively generated by humans but by generative AI models with human guidance. This shift presents notable challenges for the delineation of originality due to the varying degrees of human contribution in AI-assisted works. This study raises the research question of measuring human contribution in AI-assisted content generation and introduces a framework to address this question that is grounded in information theory. By calculating mutual information between human input and AI-assisted output relative to self-information of AI-assisted output, we quantify the proportional information contribution of humans in content generation. Our experimental results demonstrate that the proposed measure effectively discriminates between varying degrees of human contribution across multiple creative domains. We hope that this work lays a foundation for measuring human contributions in AI-assisted content generation in the era of generative AI.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. When to Ask a Question: Understanding Communication Strategies in Generative AI Tools

    cs.GT 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A tradeoff model shows generative AI can reduce bias against diverse preferences by strategically eliciting information instead of always inferring from majority patterns.