REVIEW 1 cited by
The energy and scale dependence of $\hat{q}$ and the JET puzzle
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We present an attempt to probe the underlying structure of the quark-gluon plasma (QGP) at high resolution, based on the extracted jet transport coefficient $\hat{q}$. We argue that the exchanged momentum $k$ between the hard parton and the medium varies over a range of scales, and for $k\geq$ 1 GeV, $\hat{q}$ can be expressed in terms of a parton distribution function (PDF). Because the mass of a QGP constituent is unknown, we define a scaling variable $x_N$ to represent the ratio of the parton momentum to the momentum of a self-contained section of the plasma which has a mass of 1 GeV. This scaling variable is used to parametrize the QGP-PDF. Calculations, based on this reconstructed $\hat{q}$ are compared to data sensitive to the hardcore of jets $i.e.,$ the single hadron suppression in terms of the nuclear modification factor $R_{AA}$ and the azimuthal anisotropy parameter $v_{2}$, as a function of transverse momentum $p_{\mathrm{T}}$, centrality and energy of the collision. It is demonstrated that the scale evolution of the QGP-PDF is responsible for the reduction in the normalization of $\hat{q}$ between fits to Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collider (RHIC) and Large Hadron Collider (LHC) data; a puzzle, first discovered by the JET collaboration.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Extraction of jet-medium interaction details through jet substructure for inclusive and gamma-tagged jets
In JETSCAPE simulations, gamma-tagged jets reveal a genuine medium-induced broadening of quark-jet hard splittings, while the narrowing seen for inclusive jets is largely a selection bias from energy loss.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.