Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

SAIF: A Sparse Autoencoder Framework for Interpreting and Steering Instruction Following of Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.11356 v1 pith:Q3CCEY5Z submitted 2025-02-17 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CL
keywords instructionfollowingdemonstrateinstructionslatentsmodelsbehaviorcrucial
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The ability of large language models (LLMs) to follow instructions is crucial for their practical applications, yet the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. This paper presents a novel framework that leverages sparse autoencoders (SAE) to interpret how instruction following works in these models. We demonstrate how the features we identify can effectively steer model outputs to align with given instructions. Through analysis of SAE latent activations, we identify specific latents responsible for instruction following behavior. Our findings reveal that instruction following capabilities are encoded by a distinct set of instruction-relevant SAE latents. These latents both show semantic proximity to relevant instructions and demonstrate causal effects on model behavior. Our research highlights several crucial factors for achieving effective steering performance: precise feature identification, the role of final layer, and optimal instruction positioning. Additionally, we demonstrate that our methodology scales effectively across SAEs and LLMs of varying sizes.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Where Steering Signals Come From: Activation Source Selection in Activation Steering

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Activation steering works best when the signal comes from the state where the model is about to produce the target behavior, not from text that already shows it.

  2. Patches of Nonlinearity: Instruction Vectors in Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Instruction-following in LLMs is mediated by localized, linearly separable 'instruction vectors' that behave superadditively and appear to select task-specific circuits in later layers.

  3. Turning the Spell Around: Lightweight Alignment Amplification via Rank-One Safety Injection

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    ROSI bakes the refusal direction into a model's weight matrices via a rank-one update, raising refusal and jailbreak robustness with minimal measured utility cost.

Pith tools