Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 68 references

The Tachyon Chern-Simons action with a generic tachyon field, and baryons in V-QCD

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-07-31 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A general Tachyon-Chern-Simons action equates baryon number to the bulk instanton number for arbitrary quark masses.

desk verdict Solid, explicit construction of the generic-tachyon Chern-Simons term that finally lets V-QCD handle unequal quark masses; baryon number = superconnection instanton number follows cleanly. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.24915 v1 pith:QBHP5BBV submitted 2026-07-27 hep-th hep-phmath-phmath.MP

Jean-Loup Raymond , Matti Järvinen , Elias Kiritsis , Francesco Nitti , Edwan Préau This is my paper
classification hep-thhep-phmath-phmath.MP
keywords holographicQCDTachyon-Chern-SimonssuperconnectionbaryonsflavoranomaliesSkyrmemodelWess-Zumino-Witteninstantonnumber
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Holographic models of QCD need Chern-Simons terms to match global flavor anomalies, but those terms were previously known only when the tachyon (the bulk field dual to the quark bilinear) is proportional to a unitary matrix—essentially equal quark masses. This paper builds the Tachyon-Chern-Simons forms for a fully general complex tachyon matrix, covering unequal masses. With that action in hand, a baryon is realized as a bulk point defect where the tachyon ceases to be invertible; the boundary baryon number equals both the winding of a gauge-invariant three-form around the defect and the second Chern number of the superconnection in the bulk. The same construction yields a four-dimensional pion effective action that recovers the chiral Lagrangian, including the Skyrme term and the Wess-Zumino-Witten term with the correct color factor. A sympathetic reader cares because realistic QCD has flavor-dependent masses, and without the general topological term the holographic dual cannot consistently describe baryons or anomalies in that regime.

What carries the argument

Quillen’s superconnection and the homotopy path γ = I ∪ II ∪ III in the (a,b) plane of scaled gauge fields and tachyon; the path decomposes the five-form into a gauge-invariant bulk piece Ω⁰, a piece Ωᵇ localized on the non-invertible locus of the tachyon, and a closed topological piece Ωᶜ that generalizes the Witten term.

What would settle it

Construct a numerical baryon solution in the model with unequal quark masses and check whether the integrated boundary baryon charge equals minus one over four pi squared times the integral of the four-form part of the superconnection Chern character; a mismatch, or a nonzero infrared contribution to the flavor anomaly under the usual tachyon regularity condition, would falsify the claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For a generic complex tachyon matrix the Tachyon-Chern-Simons five-form, obtained from Quillen’s superconnection by a specific homotopy path, satisfies the descent equation from the Chern character, reduces to ordinary Chern-Simons when the tachyon vanishes, matches discrete symmetries and the QCD flavor anomaly with no infrared contribution, and implies that the baryon number of a massive-quark soliton equals both the defect winding of the gauge-invariant three-form and the bulk instanton number.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen integration path in superconnection space is the unique one that simultaneously kills infrared anomaly contributions and localizes the boundary piece on the non-invertible locus; other natural paths leave infrared boundary terms that would spoil anomaly matching unless extra infrared conditions are imposed by hand.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Baryon and baryon-lattice solutions can be constructed at nonzero, flavor-dependent quark masses.
  • Simplified models of nuclear matter, including hyperonic matter, become accessible once different quark masses are allowed.
  • The extent of inhomogeneous instabilities in dense holographic QCD can be mapped with the correct mass-dependent topological term.
  • Anomalous transport (chiral magnetic and related effects) can be studied systematically once the general Tachyon-Chern-Simons action is included.
  • The four-dimensional pion effective action is fixed to the chiral Lagrangian with Skyrme and Wess-Zumino-Witten terms normalized by the number of colors.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Once unequal masses are under control, the same defect classification by vanishing eigenvalues should organize multi-flavor solitons and their fusion rules.
  • The localization of topology on the non-invertible locus suggests that partial chiral restoration inside a baryon can be read off from which singular values of the tachyon vanish.
  • Extending the same superconnection construction to include curvature couplings would give a controlled holographic handle on mixed gauge-gravitational anomalies and the chiral vortical effect.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper constructs the Tachyon-Chern-Simons (TCS) 5-form for the V-QCD flavor sector with a generic complex matrix tachyon, using Quillen's superconnection formalism and a homotopy integral over a specific path γ = I∪II∪III in the (a,b) plane of rescaled superconnections. The resulting form Ω = Ω° + Ω^b + Ω^c is shown to obey the descent equation dΩ = χ(F), reduce to the ordinary CS form as T→0, transform correctly under P and C, reproduce the QCD flavor anomaly from the UV only, and (for T=0 on the non-invertible locus Z) localize a gauged-Witten piece on Z. The construction is applied to baryons at nonzero quark mass: the baryon number is shown to equal the winding of Ω°₃ around a point-like bulk tachyon defect and, via Stokes, the bulk superconnection instanton number N_B = -(1/4π²)∫χ(F)₄. A boundary pion effective action is derived and shown to reproduce the chiral Lagrangian with Skyrme and correctly normalized WZW terms.

Significance. If it holds, this removes a concrete, long-standing obstruction to flavor-anomaly-consistent holographic QCD with realistic, flavor-dependent quark masses. The strengths are structural rather than fitted: five external criteria (descent, CS limit, discrete symmetries, QCD anomaly, no IR term) fix the form with no free parameters; the T=τU results of [12] are recovered as a check; and the paper delivers a clean, falsifiable topological statement, N_B = -(1/4π²)∫_M χ(F)₄, equating baryon number with a superconnection second Chern number. The explicit L-operator and residue formulae (App. C) and the near-defect analysis (App. D) make the results usable and checkable by others.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.4, Eq. (3.36); §3.2 criteria 1-5; App. F.2] §3.2/§3.4, App. F: the text asserts the five criteria 'entirely fix Ω (up to a gauge choice)', but what is shown is existence (path γ works) plus failure of one alternative (γ_alt, App. C.1). Since App. F.2 proves different paths differ by exact forms, the ambiguity is precisely in boundary/cohomological data — the same data criteria 4–5 constrain. Please either show that any two paths satisfying criteria 1–5 yield the same UV anomaly and IR behavior, or soften the uniqueness claim. The statement should also acknowledge the choice f=exp in (3.28), since §1.2 notes residual freedom (four functions of τ in the T=τU case of [12]).
  2. [§4.3, Eqs. (4.59)-(4.69); §4.4 anomaly verification] The advertised 'general case' is not fully established for Ω^b. Eq. (4.59)-(4.60) is derived assuming T=0 on all of Z; for partial-rank defects (some σ_a≠0 on Z) the surviving non-trace terms (4.66), (4.69) and corner terms (4.61) are not computed, and §4.4 explicitly does not derive the descent equations for the enlarged set {d, dσ_a}, noting (4.88) misses dσ_a-exact pieces. The anomaly check (criterion 4) is thereby imported from [12], which assumed T=0 on Z. Either restrict the main claims accordingly (this covers the baryon application of §5) or complete the check for partial-rank defects.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§6.3, Eqs. (6.53)-(6.68)] The WZW normalization uses a distributional limit f(v)→δ(v) (6.64)-(6.66) and numerical support for the UV dominance of the integral (6.54). The O(m_q) corrections in (6.66) and the estimate (E.95) are welcome; please quantify the error in the N_c coefficient and state explicitly the GMOR-type relation for m_π² used in the second equality of (6.66).
  2. [§5.2, use of App. D] The key inputs that F_L, F_R vanish at r* and that the DBI term gives no defect contribution to N_B rest entirely on App. D. A short summary of the assumptions (tachyon behavior near the defect, finite-energy constraints, admissible exponents) in §5.2 would make the main-line argument self-contained.
  3. [§5.2, Eqs. (5.25)-(5.26)] The 'half-integer' statement in (5.26) follows from i/(48π²)∫Tr(A³) with A=iVdV† being half the standard winding 1/(24π²)∫Tr((VdV†)³)∈Z. Please make this normalization explicit; also confirm signs in the integration limits of (4.47) relative to (3.42) (ds from +∞ to 1).
  4. [§4.3, Eq. (4.59)] The symbol δ(T) in (4.59) is used for a matrix argument; please define it precisely, e.g. as ∏_a δ(σ_a) or via the dσ_a operators of (4.91), and state how it reduces to δ(τ)dτ in the T=τU case (4.26).
  5. [§4.3-§4.4] Since several central results (Ω^b formula, anomaly check, Ω^c cohomology statement on M−Z) assume T=0 on Z while others are fully generic, a short table or remark summarizing which results hold under which hypothesis on Z would substantially improve readability.
  6. [typography] Typographical: heading '4.1 TheT=τUcase' (missing space); 'interepreted' in App. C.4; 'integrant'→'integrand' in App. C.5; 'dτ 2 = 0' should read dτ∧dτ=0; Figure 1 would benefit from arrows indicating the direction of path III (b:∞→1).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: TCS is constructed from the superconnection Chern character under external QCD/anomaly constraints; baryon–instanton equality and the pion effective action are derived, not fitted or assumed.

full rationale

The load-bearing chain is constructive rather than definitional. The TCS form is obtained from Quillen’s superconnection via an explicit homotopy integral (Eqs. 3.30–3.42); the path γ is selected so that five external requirements hold (descent dΩ=χ(F), reduction to ordinary CS at T=0, discrete symmetries, UV QCD flavor anomaly, no IR anomaly contribution). Those requirements are inputs from QCD and string-inspired setup, not quantities fitted to the paper’s own outputs. Explicit formulae for Ω0, Ωb, Ωc are computed and checked to reduce to the known T=τU results of prior work; that is a consistency check, not a prediction forced by a fit. Baryon number NB=−(1/4π²)∫S³(r*) Ω0_3 and equality to the bulk second Chern number follow from Stokes and boundary analysis (Sec. 5), not from defining NB as the instanton number. The pion effective action (Sec. 6) is obtained by evaluating DBI+TCS on normalizable modes and recovers the chiral Lagrangian with the expected Nc-normalized WZW term—an independent check of normalization, not a circular rename. Self-citations to V-QCD and the special-case TCS supply model setup and benchmarks; they are not load-bearing uniqueness theorems that forbid alternatives by author fiat alone. Score 1 reflects only routine self-citation of the model framework, not circular derivation of the central claims.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on the superconnection Wess-Zumino starting point, five selection criteria for the TCS form, a specific homotopy path, IR regularity of the unitary part of the tachyon, and the V-QCD bulk action. No numerical free parameters are fitted; the construction is algebraic once those modeling choices are granted.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The topological flavor action is given by the superconnection Chern character SWZ = T4 ∫ C ∧ Str exp(iF) (or a mild deformation f(F)), inherited from D4-D4bar string constructions.
    Stated in Sec. 3.1 and used as the starting point for all descent; the paper notes that a fully first-principles 5d non-critical derivation is not available.
  • domain assumption The TCS form must satisfy the five criteria: dΩ=χ(F), reduce to ordinary CS at T=0, P1-odd and C-even, reproduce the UV QCD flavor anomaly, and contribute no IR boundary term.
    Sec. 3.2; these fix the path ambiguity up to exact forms.
  • domain assumption IR regularity: space-time derivatives of the unitary part U of the tachyon vanish in the deep IR so that Ω^c does not source an IR anomaly.
    Invoked in Sec. 3.2 and 4.4 to kill IR anomaly contributions.
  • domain assumption For point-like baryon defects the tachyon vanishes identically on Z (all singular values zero), so multi-dσ terms drop and Ω^b reduces to the gauged Witten form.
    Used in Sec. 4.3 and 5 to obtain the simple G4 expression and N_B formula.
  • standard math Standard differential geometry and Quillen superconnection identities (closedness of χ, graded cyclicity of Str, Stokes).
    Appendix A.2 and throughout Sec. 3-5.
invented entities (2)
  • Tachyon-Chern-Simons (TCS) forms Ω=Ω°+Ω^b+Ω^c for generic matrix tachyon independent evidence
    purpose: Provide the anomaly-consistent topological action when quark masses differ by flavor.
    Constructed explicitly via homotopy; reduces to known special cases. Independent handle is matching of QCD flavor anomalies and integer baryon charge.
  • Bulk point-like tachyon defects as carriers of baryon number at mq eq0
    purpose: Replace UV skyrmion winding (which becomes trivial when mq eq0 forces U o1 at the boundary) as the locus of baryon charge.
    Analogous to hard-wall constructions; charge equals instanton number. Falsifiable inside the model by solving the full EOM for the soliton.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Tachyon Chern-Simons action with a generic tachyon field, and baryons in V-QCD." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QBHP5BBV

@misc{pith2026260724915,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Tachyon Chern-Simons action with a generic tachyon field, and baryons in V-QCD},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QBHP5BBV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.24915}
}
read the original abstract

Consistency with global flavor anomalies requires the presence of Chern-Simons terms in holographic models of QCD. Such terms are analyzed in a setup arising in the holographic V-QCD model, where chiral symmetry breaking is implemented through the condensation of a complex scalar field, the tachyon. Using the superconnection formalism, the Tachyon-Chern-Simons terms are constructed explicitly in the general case, where the tachyon is any complex matrix in flavor space. This general case covers, among other things, backgrounds where different quark flavors have different masses. These new results are used to analyze the structure of the baryon solutions in the presence of nonzero quark masses. Expressions for the baryon number current and the total baryon number are found, and the baryon number is shown to be equal to the topological instanton number of the baryon solution. The effective four-dimensional pion action is analyzed and is shown to reproduce the chiral Lagrangian, including the Skyrme and Wess-Zumino-Witten terms.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.24915 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Illustration of the parameter space for superconnections ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Illustration of a defect configuration which requires keeping terms with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Contour C˜ in equation (C.31). The contour encircles counterclockwise the poles at u = −σ 2 a for every tachyon eigenvalue σa. After rearranging and doing the sums over ki , we find e iFs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p082_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 48 linked inside Pith

  1. [12]

    Tachyon-dependent Chern-Simons terms and the V-QCD baryon,

    M. J¨ arvinen, E. Kiritsis, F. Nitti and E. Pr´ eau,“Tachyon-dependent Chern-Simons terms and the V-QCD baryon,” JHEP12(2022), 160 ; [ArXiv:2209.05868] [hep-th]

    arXiv 2022

  2. [1]

    A PCAC puzzle:π 0 →γγin theσmodel,

    J. S. Bell and R. Jackiw,“A PCAC puzzle:π 0 →γγin theσmodel,” Nuovo Cim. A60, 47-61 (1969)

    1969

  3. [2]

    Axial vector vertex in spinor electrodynamics,

    S. L. Adler,“Axial vector vertex in spinor electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev.177, 2426-2438 (1969)

    1969

  4. [3]

    Anomalous Ward identities in spinor field theories,

    W. A. Bardeen,“Anomalous Ward identities in spinor field theories,” Phys. Rev. 184, 1848-1857 (1969)

    1969

  5. [4]

    Global Aspects of Current Algebra,

    E. Witten,“Global Aspects of Current Algebra,” Nucl. Phys. B223, 422-432 (1983)

    1983

  6. [5]

    Anomalous Spin 1 Meson Decays From the Gauged Wess-Zumino Term,

    H. Gomm, O. Kaymakcalan and J. Schechter,“Anomalous Spin 1 Meson Decays From the Gauged Wess-Zumino Term,” Phys. Rev. D30, 2345 (1984)

    1984

  7. [6]

    Anti de Sitter space and holography,

    E. Witten,“Anti de Sitter space and holography,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2, 253-291 (1998) [ArXiv:hep-th/9802150]

    arXiv 1998

  8. [7]

    Chiral symmetry breaking as open string tachyon condensation,

    R. Casero, E. Kiritsis and A. Paredes,“Chiral symmetry breaking as open string tachyon condensation,” Nuclear Physics B, Volume 787,(2007), 98-134

    2007

Show all 68 references
  1. [8]

    Baryons and branes in anti-de Sitter space,

    E. Witten,“Baryons and branes in anti-de Sitter space,” JHEP07, 006 (1998) [ArXiv:hep-th/9805112]

    1998 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Dense hadronic matter in holographic QCD,

    K. Y. Kim, S. J. Sin and I. Zahed,“Dense hadronic matter in holographic QCD,” J. Korean Phys. Soc.63, 1515-1529 (2013) [ArXiv:hep-th/0608046]

    2013 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Baryons from instantons in holographic QCD,

    H. Hata, T. Sakai, S. Sugimoto and S. Yamato,“Baryons from instantons in holographic QCD,” Prog. Theor. Phys.117(2007), 1157 ; [ArXiv:hep-th/0701280]

    2007 arXiv

  4. [13]

    Gravity Dual of Spatially Modulated Phase,

    S. Nakamura, H. Ooguri and C. S. Park,“Gravity Dual of Spatially Modulated Phase,” Phys. Rev. D81(2010), 044018 ; [ArXiv:0911.0679] [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  5. [14]

    Spatially Modulated Phase in Holographic Quark-Gluon Plasma,

    H. Ooguri and C. S. Park,“Spatially Modulated Phase in Holographic Quark-Gluon Plasma,” Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 061601 (2011) [ArXiv:1011.4144][hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  6. [15]

    Modulated instabilities and the AdS2 point in dense holographic matter,

    J. Cruz Rojas, T. Demircik and M. J¨ arvinen,“Modulated instabilities and the AdS2 point in dense holographic matter,” Phys. Rev. D111, no.4, 046017 (2025) [ArXiv:2405.02399][hep-th]. – 140 –

    2025 arXiv

  7. [16]

    Holography and Anomaly Matching for Resonances,

    D. T. Son and N. Yamamoto,“Holography and Anomaly Matching for Resonances,” [ArXiv:1010.0718] [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  8. [17]

    Vector-axial vector correlators in weak electric field and the holographic dynamics of the chiral condensate,

    I. Iatrakis and E. Kiritsis,“Vector-axial vector correlators in weak electric field and the holographic dynamics of the chiral condensate,” JHEP02(2012), 064 ; [ArXiv:1109.1282] [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  9. [18]

    Thermodynamics of dyonic black holes in minimal supergravity,

    R. G. Cai, L. Li and J. K. Zhao,“Thermodynamics of dyonic black holes in minimal supergravity,” [ArXiv:2410.00717][gr-qc]

    arXiv

  10. [19]

    Chern-Simons five-form and holographic baryons,

    P. H. C. Lau and S. Sugimoto,“Chern-Simons five-form and holographic baryons,” Phys. Rev. D95(2017) no.12, 126007 ; [ArXiv:1612.09503] [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  11. [20]

    Tachyon dynamics in open string theory,

    A. Sen,“Tachyon dynamics in open string theory,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A20(2005), 5513-5656; [ArXiv:hep-th/0410103]

    2005 arXiv

  12. [21]

    Dirac-Born-Infeld action on the tachyon kink and vortex,

    A. Sen,“Dirac-Born-Infeld action on the tachyon kink and vortex,” Phys. Rev. D 68, 066008 (2003) ; [ArXiv:hep-th/0303057]

    2003 arXiv

  13. [22]

    Holographic Models for QCD in the Veneziano Limit,

    M. J¨ arvinen and E. Kiritsis,“Holographic Models for QCD in the Veneziano Limit,” JHEP03(2012), 002 ; [ArXiv:1112.1261] [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  14. [23]

    Exploring improved holographic theories for QCD: Part I,

    U. Gursoy and E. Kiritsis,“Exploring improved holographic theories for QCD: Part I,”JHEP0802(2008) 032 [ArXiv:0707.1324][hep-th]; U. Gursoy, E. Kiritsis, F. Nitti,“Exploring improved holographic theories for QCD: Part II,”JHEP0802, 019 (2008) [ArXiv:0707.1349][hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  15. [24]

    Non-critical holography and four-dimensional CFT’s with fundamentals,

    F. Bigazzi, R. Casero, A. L. Cotrone, E. Kiritsis and A. Paredes,“Non-critical holography and four-dimensional CFT’s with fundamentals,” JHEP10, 012 (2005)

    2005

  16. [25]

    Superconnections and the Chern character

    D. Quillen,“Superconnections and the Chern character”, Topology, Volume 24, Issue 1,2(1985), 89-95

    1985

  17. [26]

    D-branes and K-theory,

    E. Witten,“D-branes and K-theory,” JHEP12(1998), 019 ; [ArXiv:hep-th/9810188]

    1998 arXiv

  18. [27]

    Ramond-Ramond couplings on Brane - anti-Brane systems,

    C. Kennedy and A. Wilkins,“Ramond-Ramond couplings on Brane - anti-Brane systems,” Phys. Lett. B464(1999), 206-212 ; [ArXiv:hep-th/9905195]

    1999 arXiv

  19. [28]

    Boundary string field theory of the D anti-D system,

    P. Kraus and F. Larsen,“Boundary string field theory of the D anti-D system,” Phys. Rev. D63(2001), 106004 ; [ArXiv:hep-th/0012198]

    2001 arXiv

  20. [29]

    Brane - anti-brane action from boundary string field theory,

    T. Takayanagi, S. Terashima and T. Uesugi,“Brane - anti-brane action from boundary string field theory,” JHEP03(2001), 019 ; [ArXiv:hep-th/0012210]

    2001 arXiv

  21. [30]

    Anomaly and superconnection,

    H. Kanno and S. Sugimoto,“Anomaly and superconnection,” PTEP2022(2022) no.1, 013B02; [ArXiv:2106.01591] [hep-th]. – 141 –

    2022 arXiv

  22. [31]

    Superconnections, anomalies and nonBPS brane charges,

    R. J. Szabo,“Superconnections, anomalies and nonBPS brane charges,”J. Geom. Phys.43(2002), 241-292 doi:10.1016/S0393-0440(02)00024-4 [arXiv:hep-th/0108043 [hep-th]]

    2002 arXiv

  23. [32]

    Baryon as dyonic instanton,

    A. Gorsky and A. Krikun,“Baryon as dyonic instanton,” Phys. Rev. D86(2012), 126005 [ArXiv:1206.4515][hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  24. [33]

    Baryon and chiral symmetry breaking in holographic QCD,

    A. Gorsky, S. B. Gudnason and A. Krikun,“Baryon and chiral symmetry breaking in holographic QCD,” Phys. Rev. D91(2015) no.12, 126008 [ArXiv:1503.04820][hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  25. [34]

    Three-flavor quark mass dependence of baryon spectra in holographic QCD,

    K. Hashimoto, N. Iizuka, T. Ishii and D. Kadoh,“Three-flavor quark mass dependence of baryon spectra in holographic QCD,” Phys. Lett. B691, 65-71 (2010) [ArXiv:0910.1179][hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  26. [35]

    Neutron electric dipole moment from gauge/string duality,

    L. Bartolini, F. Bigazzi, S. Bolognesi, A. L. Cotrone and A. Manenti,“Neutron electric dipole moment from gauge/string duality,” Phys. Rev. Lett.118, no.9, 091601 (2017) [ArXiv:1609.09513][hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  27. [36]

    Mass and isospin breaking effects in the Skyrme model and in holographic QCD,

    L. Bartolini, S. Bolognesi, S. B. Gudnason and T. Rainaldi,“Mass and isospin breaking effects in the Skyrme model and in holographic QCD,” Phys. Rev. D110, no.2, 026017 (2024) [ArXiv:2312.15404][hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  28. [37]

    Magnetic Monopoles in Unified Gauge Theories,

    G. ’t Hooft,“Magnetic Monopoles in Unified Gauge Theories,” Nucl. Phys. B79 (1974), 276-284

    1974

  29. [38]

    Low energy hadron physics in holographic QCD,

    T. Sakai and S. Sugimoto,“Low energy hadron physics in holographic QCD,” Prog. Theor. Phys.113(2005), 843-882 ; [ArXiv:hep-th/0412141]

    2005 arXiv

  30. [39]

    Chiral symmetry breaking from five dimensional spaces,

    L. Da Rold and A. Pomarol,“Chiral symmetry breaking from five dimensional spaces,” Nucl. Phys. B721, 79-97 (2005) [ArXiv:hep-ph/0501218]

    2005 arXiv

  31. [40]

    From the Sakai-Sugimoto Model to the Generalized Skyrme Model,

    L. Bartolini, S. Bolognesi and A. Proto,“From the Sakai-Sugimoto Model to the Generalized Skyrme Model,” Phys. Rev. D97, no.1, 014024 (2018) [ArXiv:1711.03873][hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  32. [41]

    Cold Nuclear Matter In Holographic QCD,

    M. Rozali, H. H. Shieh, M. Van Raamsdonk and J. Wu,“Cold Nuclear Matter In Holographic QCD,” JHEP01, 053 (2008) [ArXiv:0708.1322][hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  33. [42]

    From holography towards real-world nuclear matter,

    S. w. Li, A. Schmitt and Q. Wang,“From holography towards real-world nuclear matter,” Phys. Rev. D92, no.2, 026006 (2015) [ArXiv:1505.04886][hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  34. [43]

    Cool baryon and quark matter in holographic QCD,

    T. Ishii, M. J¨ arvinen and G. Nijs,“Cool baryon and quark matter in holographic QCD,” JHEP07(2019), 003 [ArXiv:1903.06169][hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  35. [44]

    Isospin asymmetry and neutron stars in holographic QCD in the Veneziano limit,

    L. Bartolini, S. B. Gudnason and M. J¨ arvinen,“Isospin asymmetry and neutron stars in holographic QCD in the Veneziano limit,” Phys. Rev. D111, no.10, 106021 (2025) [ArXiv:2504.01758][hep-ph]. – 142 –

    2025

  36. [45]

    Holographic baryons as quantum Hall droplets,

    F. Bigazzi, A. L. Cotrone, A. Olzi and J. L. Raymond,“Holographic baryons as quantum Hall droplets,” JHEP02(2026), 233 [ArXiv:2506.16205][hep-th]

    2026

  37. [46]

    Is holographic quark-gluon plasma homogeneous?,

    T. Demircik, N. Jokela, M. Jarvinen and A. Piispa,“Is holographic quark-gluon plasma homogeneous?,” Phys. Rev. D113, no.2, 026029 (2026) [ArXiv:2405.02392][hep-ph]

    2026 arXiv

  38. [47]

    Gravitational Anomaly and Transport,

    K. Landsteiner, E. Megias and F. Pena-Benitez,“Gravitational Anomaly and Transport,” Phys. Rev. Lett.107(2011), 021601 [ArXiv:1103.5006][hep-ph]

    2011 arXiv

  39. [48]

    Anomalous Transport from Kubo Formulae,

    K. Landsteiner, E. Megias and F. Pena-Benitez,“Anomalous Transport from Kubo Formulae,” Lect. Notes Phys.871(2013), 433-468 [ArXiv:1207.5808][hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  40. [49]

    The Chiral Magnetic Effect,

    K. Fukushima, D. E. Kharzeev and H. J. Warringa,“The Chiral Magnetic Effect,” Phys. Rev. D78(2008), 074033 [ArXiv:0808.3382][hep-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  41. [50]

    Hydrodynamics with Triangle Anomalies,

    D. T. Son and P. Surowka,“Hydrodynamics with Triangle Anomalies,” Phys. Rev. Lett.103(2009), 191601 [ArXiv:0906.5044][hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  42. [51]

    Relativistic Hydrodynamics with General Anomalous Charges,

    Y. Neiman and Y. Oz,“Relativistic Hydrodynamics with General Anomalous Charges,” JHEP03(2011), 023 [ArXiv:1011.5107][hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  43. [52]

    (Non)renormalization of Anomalous Conductivities and Holography,

    U. G¨ ursoy and A. Jansen,“(Non)renormalization of Anomalous Conductivities and Holography,” JHEP10, 092 (2014) [ArXiv:arXiv:1407.3282][hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  44. [53]

    Dynamical gauge fields and anomalous transport at strong coupling,

    A. D. Gallegos and U. G¨ ursoy,“Dynamical gauge fields and anomalous transport at strong coupling,” JHEP05, 001 (2019) [ArXiv:1806.07138][hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  45. [54]

    Chiral separation effect from holographic QCD,

    D. Gallegos, M. J¨ arvinen and E. Weitz,“Chiral separation effect from holographic QCD,” JHEP11, 051 (2024) [erratum: JHEP08, 041 (2025)] [ArXiv:2406.07617][hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  46. [55]

    Large N Expansion in Dual Models,

    G. Veneziano,“Large N Expansion in Dual Models,” Phys. Lett. B52(1974), 220-222

    1974

  47. [56]

    The Chern-Simons Diffusion Rate in Improved Holographic QCD,

    U. G¨ ursoy, I. Iatrakis, E. Kiritsis, F. Nitti and A. O’Bannon,“The Chern-Simons Diffusion Rate in Improved Holographic QCD,” JHEP02(2013), 119 ; [ArXiv:1212.3894] [hep-th]; D. Arean, I. Iatrakis, M. Jarvinen and E. Kiritsis,“CP-odd sector andθdynamics in holographic QCD,” Ph...

    2013 arXiv

  48. [57]

    Dissecting the string theory dual of QCD,

    E. Kiritsis,“Dissecting the string theory dual of QCD,”Fortsch. Phys.57(2009) 396 [ArXiv:0901.1772][hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  49. [58]

    Deconfinement and Gluon Plasma Dynamics in Improved Holographic QCD,

    U. Gursoy, E. Kiritsis, L. Mazzanti, F. Nitti,“Deconfinement and Gluon Plasma Dynamics in Improved Holographic QCD,”Phys. Rev. Lett.101(2008) 181601 [ArXiv:0804.0899][hep-th]; U. Gursoy, E. Kiritsis, L. Mazzanti, F. Nitti,“Holography and Thermodynamics of 5D Dilaton-gravity,”J...

    2008 arXiv

  50. [59]

    On nonAbelian generalization of Born-Infeld action in string theory,

    A. A. Tseytlin,“On nonAbelian generalization of Born-Infeld action in string theory,” Nucl. Phys. B501(1997), 41-52 [ArXiv:9701125][hep-th]

    1997

  51. [60]

    The nonAbelian Born-Infeld action at order F**6,

    A. Sevrin, J. Troost and W. Troost,“The nonAbelian Born-Infeld action at order F**6,” Nucl. Phys. B603(2001), 389-412 [ArXiv:0101192][hep-th]

    2001

  52. [61]

    V-QCD: Spectra, the dilaton and the S-parameter,

    D. Arean, I. Iatrakis, M. J¨ arvinen and E. Kiritsis,“V-QCD: Spectra, the dilaton and the S-parameter,” Phys. Lett. B720(2013), 219-223 ; [ArXiv:1211.6125] [hep-ph]; “The discontinuities of conformal transitions and mass spectra of V-QCD,” JHEP 11, 068 (2013) [ArXiv:1309.2286]...

    2013 arXiv

  53. [62]

    Holographic modeling of nuclear matter and neutron stars,

    M. J¨ arvinen,“Holographic modeling of nuclear matter and neutron stars,” Eur. Phys. J. C82, no.4, 282 (2022) [ArXiv:2110.08281] [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  54. [63]

    Lectures on Anomalies,

    A. Bilal,“Lectures on Anomalies,” [ArXiv:0802.0634][hep-th]

    arXiv

  55. [64]

    Confinement on the brane,

    O. Bergman, K. Hori and P. Yi,“Confinement on the brane,” Nucl. Phys. B580 (2000), 289-310; [ArXiv:0002223] [hep-th]

    2000

  56. [65]

    Static Properties of Nucleons in the Skyrme Model,

    G. S. Adkins, C. R. Nappi and E. Witten,“Static Properties of Nucleons in the Skyrme Model,” Nucl. Phys. B228(1983), 552

    1983

  57. [66]

    Current Algebra, Baryons, and Quark Confinement,

    E. Witten,“Current Algebra, Baryons, and Quark Confinement,” Nucl. Phys. B 223(1983), 433-444

    1983

  58. [67]

    Algebraic Study of Chiral Anomalies,

    J. Manes, R. Stora and B. Zumino,“Algebraic Study of Chiral Anomalies,” Commun. Math. Phys.102(1985), 157

    1985

  59. [68]

    Algebraic topology,

    A. Hatcher,“Algebraic topology,”Cambridge Univ. Press (2000)

    2000

  60. [69]

    Consistent and Covariant Anomalies in Gauge and Gravitational Theories,

    W. A. Bardeen and B. Zumino,“Consistent and Covariant Anomalies in Gauge and Gravitational Theories,” Nucl. Phys. B244(1984), 421-453 . – 144 –

    1984

Pith tools

Reviewed July 31, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.