Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 21 cited by

TA-VLA: Elucidating the Design Space of Torque-aware Vision-Language-Action Models

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Grafting joint-torque readings onto a pretrained vision-language-action model — a single decoder token of torque history, plus future-torque prediction — raises contact-rich success from 0–5 to 15–18 of 20 trials.

desk verdict A real-robot study with large, plausible gains on contact-rich tasks; the central claim that torque's physical content drives the gains is not fully isolated, but this deserves peer review. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.07962 v1 pith:QEL74OMR submitted 2025-09-09 cs.RO

Zongzheng Zhang , Haobo Xu , Zhuo Yang , Chenghao Yue , Zehao Lin , Huan-ang Gao , Ziwei Wang , Hao Zhao This is my paper
classification cs.RO
keywords torque-awareVLAvision-language-actionmodelscontact-richmanipulationjointtorquefeedbackdiffusionpolicyimitationlearningsensorlessforceestimationaction-torqueprediction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks how to give a modern vision-language-action (VLA) robot model a sense of touch-by-proxy: joint torque readings that reveal whether a plug has seated, a button has pressed, or a handle has turned. It argues that the winning recipe is to feed torque into the action-generating decoder rather than the perception encoder, compress a window of torque history into a single token, and train the model to also predict the torque its own actions will produce. On five contact-rich tasks, the combined design raises success from near-failure (0–5 of 20 trials) to dependable (15–18 of 20), and it transfers to a second VLA architecture and a different robot arm. If right, this offers a parameter-light way to make existing VLA policies contact-aware without retraining from scratch or adding force sensors.

What carries the argument

Two mechanisms carry the argument. Physically, the Jacobian-transpose identity τ_ext = J^T(q) F_ext states that any external wrench at the end-effector projects into measurable joint torque, which is why motor-current torque readings alone can reveal contact state. Architecturally, the workhorse is a decoder-side torque token: an MLP adapter that flattens roughly two seconds of 7-joint torque history into one token appended to the noisy action/state input of the diffusion decoder, preserving the decoder's pretrained input pattern. The second mechanism is a unified action-torque diffusion objective, L_joint = L_action + β L_torque, where a single linear head outputs both action and torque chu

What would settle it

Train π0+obs with the exact same decoder adapter and history encoding but replace the torque stream with a randomly sampled or permuted signal of identical shape, and train π0+obj with an auxiliary target uncorrelated with contact (for example, predicting a constant or random noise) under the same joint diffusion loss. If either variant retains the 15–18/20 success rates on Button Pushing and Charger Plugging, the central claim that torque content drives the gains would be refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that joint torque—already available from motor currents, with no extra sensor—can be grafted onto pretrained VLA models according to three design rules. First, torque belongs in the denoising decoder, not the conditioning encoder, because torque and joint angles are both proprioceptive signals and the decoder is more sensitive to fine input variations; the paper supports this with HSIC dependence scores and noise-injection tests. Second, a history of torque frames should be flattened and encoded as a single token, since extra tokens disrupt the input pattern the decoder learned during pretraining. Third, the model should be trained to predict future torque jointl

Load-bearing premise

The gains are credited to the physical information contained in the torque signal, yet the paper never trains a control model on a well-formed but meaningless input of the same shape; without that ablation, extra parameters, the extra regression loss, or the changed input pattern could be carrying part of the improvement.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Contact-rich tasks that a strong VLA baseline fails outright (charger plugging 0/20, USB plugging 0/20) become solvable (17/20 each) with only a fine-tuning change to the pretrained model.
  • The same recipe — decoder-side single-token history plus joint action-torque diffusion — transfers to a different VLA (RDT: Button Pushing 4/20 to 16/20) and to a different robot arm (ROKAE SR charger insertion), so the design rules are not tied to one architecture.
  • Because torque is read from motor currents rather than external force sensors, the approach keeps the zero-extra-hardware property of sensorless force estimation.
  • The auxiliary torque prediction gives the policy an anticipatory ability: qualitative results show the model detects its own failed attempts from torque and retries, turning single-shot failures into completed tasks.
  • The added machinery is nearly free computationally: training and inference time for π0+obs+obj are comparable to the base π0 (about 94 ms versus 91 ms per inference step).

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper never trains on a well-formed but meaningless signal of identical shape, so the cleanest test of its central attribution is a control: feed the same decoder adapter a torque-shaped stream of random or permuted values, and train the same auxiliary head to predict an uncorrelated target. If success stays near 15–18 of 20, part of the gain is capacity or loss structure rather than torque co
  • The paper argues the auxiliary torque head builds a physically grounded latent but never measures that latent directly; a testable corollary is that per-trial prediction error on future torque should correlate with task success — if the trials the model mis-predicts are exactly the ones that fail, the grounding claim would be evidenced rather than inferred.
  • Compressing a history of any low-dimensional physical signal into a single decoder token suggests a general retrofit rule for pretrained VLAs; the same design could be tried for tactile, pressure, or IMU signals, where the argument about preserving the decoder's learned input pattern should apply equally.
  • The paper's own limitations note that torque estimates inherit motor calibration, sensor noise, and thermal drift; a deliberate noise-injection study on the torque input itself (rather than on tokens generally) would map how the gains degrade as those errors grow.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies how to inject joint-torque signals into pretrained vision-language-action (VLA) models, using π0 as the main testbed and RDT/ACT as additional baselines. It proposes a design space with three axes: where to fuse torque (encoder vs. decoder), how to encode torque history (single token vs. per-frame tokens), and whether to add future-torque prediction as an auxiliary diffusion objective. The central claims are: (i) decoder-side torque adapters beat encoder-side ones; (ii) a single token summarizing the full torque history is better than per-frame history tokens; and (iii) jointly predicting torque and actions further improves contact-rich manipulation. These claims are supported by real-robot experiments on 10 tasks, with large gains on contact-rich tasks (e.g., Button Pushing 5/20 to 18/20, Charger Plugging 0/20 to 17/20 for π0+obs+obj), and the approach is shown to transfer to RDT and to a different robot arm.

Significance. If the stated results hold, the paper would be a valuable design-space analysis for torque-aware VLA policies, with practical impact for contact-rich manipulation. The strengths are the breadth of real-robot experiments (10 tasks, multiple baselines), the inclusion of cross-model and cross-embodiment validation, and the fairly detailed appendix protocols (torque preprocessing, architecture specs, hyperparameter ablations). The contact-rich gains are large and consistent, which makes the phenomenon worth understanding. However, the paper's causal attribution of the gains to the physical content of torque is not yet established, because no experiment trains with an equally shaped but non-informative input or auxiliary target. The design choices and the auxiliary-loss weight are also selected on tasks that reappear in the final headline table, which inflates the apparent strength of the conclusions. With additional controls and a cleanly separated evaluation, the contribution could be significant; in its current form the central claim remains conditional.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 5 and Tables 2, 4, 5] The paper attributes the observed gains to torque's physical information, but it never trains with a well-formed but physically meaningless signal. Tables 2 and 4 only add random noise to existing tokens or extra noise tokens during evaluation; they do not control for the added MLP adapter and extra input token in π0+obs, or for the added output dimensions and auxiliary regression loss in π0+obj. In Table 5, π0+obj improves Button Pushing from 5/20 to 11/20 and Charger Plugging from 0/20 to 10/20 without any torque observation at all, so the gain could stem from added capacity or multi-task regularization rather than from torque content. Please add a control that preserves architecture and input statistics but removes torque semantics (e.g., random or shuffled proprioceptive tokens as observations, and a random regression target as the auxiliary loss), and report whether the gains persis
  2. [Tables 1, 3, 5 and Appendix A.9] The headline evaluation is partly circular. The decoder-vs-encoder and single-token-vs-multi-token design choices were selected on Button Pushing and Charger Plugging (Tables 1 and 3), and the loss weight β was tuned on Button Pushing (Table 9). The same two tasks then appear in the final headline Table 5. The large gains on those tasks are therefore at least partly a product of design and hyperparameter selection, and should not be counted at full strength as evidence for the design choices. Please hold out the tasks used for design selection from the final evaluation, or add additional contact-rich tasks that were not used in any design or hyperparameter decision.
  3. [Table 5 and Section 6.2] All success rates are single runs of 20 trials, with no confidence intervals, significance tests, or multiple seeds. Several comparisons that support the design conclusions are small (e.g., DePost vs. DePre in Table 1: 10/20 vs. 8/20 and 12/20 vs. 11/20; π0+obs+obj vs. π0+obs in Table 5). Please report binomial confidence intervals and, where feasible, multiple seeds or an exact significance test (e.g., Fisher's exact test) for the main comparisons, especially those with small absolute differences.
  4. [Section 5 and Table 9] The auxiliary-loss weight β is set in an ad hoc way: for π0+obj it is set to 1 after observing a plateau on Button Pushing, while for π0+obs+obj it is set to 0.1 because that maximized success on Button Pushing. This is a free parameter selected on the same task that appears in the main result, and its effect on other contact-rich tasks is unknown. Please either tie β to a principled criterion (e.g., scaling by loss magnitudes) or show that the headline conclusions are robust across a range of β on held-out tasks.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract lists 'First' and then 'Third' findings without a 'Second' finding. Add the missing ordinal.
  2. [Section 5] The equations defining L_action and L_torque are garbled in the typeset version; please re-typeset with proper equation numbering and clear notation for the flow-matching objectives.
  3. [Table 10] The caption reads 'Inference Time for Different Designs' but the table is an ablation of torque-history aggregation methods (MLP, RNN, attention). Correct the caption.
  4. [Author affiliation] The affiliation contains a typo: 'Univeristy' should be 'University'.
  5. [Section 6.5] The cross-embodiment experiment is presented qualitatively only. If trial counts are available, report them; at minimum state how many attempts were made and how many succeeded.
  6. [Section 4.1 / Figure 3] The HSIC analysis is based on a single task and a single trained model. It is useful as a qualitative diagnostic, but please state this limitation explicitly so readers do not over-interpret the heatmap as a general property.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper's central claims rest on direct ablations and external transfer experiments, not on definitional fits or load-bearing self-citations.

full rationale

Reviewing the derivation chain from Eq. (1)–(3) (torque as a contact indicator), through the encoder/decoder ablations (Tables 1, 3), the auxiliary torque loss (Sec. 5), and the final system (Table 5), I find no step where a claimed prediction is equivalent to its input by construction, and no load-bearing self-citation. The physics in Sec. 3 is a standard independent derivation: Eq. (2), τ_ext = J^T F_ext, directly implies that torque carries contact information; it does not assume the architectural conclusions of the paper. The three headline findings are supported by direct experimental comparisons: DePost vs. Enc/DePre (Table 1), single-token history vs. H-tokens (Table 3), and π0+obs+obj vs. π0 (Table 5). The HSIC and noise-perturbation analyses (Figure 3, Tables 2 and 4) are post-hoc explanations computed using the very model variants they rationalize, but they are not the evidence for the architectural ranking; the rankings come from task-success ablations. The absence of a non-informative torque control is a real causal-inference limitation, and the paper's Limitations section candidly notes reliance on motor-current torque estimation and uncertain scalability to other modalities, but neither constitutes circularity. Self-citations in Related Work are contextual and are not used to justify the torque-integration claims. The cross-model RDT transfer (Table 6) and cross-embodiment ROKAE experiments provide external checks that are independent of the values fitted on the initial two tasks. Overall, the paper is self-contained against external benchmarks and shows no specific reduction of a conclusion to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No genuinely new physical entities are introduced. The central claims rest on standard rigid-body dynamics, a domain assumption about motor-current torque estimation, a quasi-static contact-detection assumption, and the paper's own hypothesis about decoder input pattern fragility. Free parameters include the loss weight beta and the hand-chosen history window.

free parameters (2)
  • beta (auxiliary loss weight) = 1 for +obj, 0.1 for +obs+obj
    Selected by ablation on Button Pushing (Table 9); no theoretical justification; applied to all evaluated tasks.
  • torque history window = 10 frames over past 2 seconds
    Uniformly sampled 10 frames from the past 2 seconds (Appendix A.4); not ablated, chosen by hand.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Torque measured from motor currents via tau = k_t * i accurately reflects joint torque
    Introduced in Sec. 6.1; the Limitations section acknowledges calibration, sensor noise, and thermal drift, making this a load-bearing assumption.
  • standard math Standard rigid-body dynamics M(q)q_ddot + C(q,q_dot)q_dot + G(q) = tau_cmd + tau_ext and Jacobian transpose mapping tau_ext = J^T F_ext
    Sec. 3, Equations (1)-(3); standard robotics, not introduced ad hoc.
  • domain assumption Quasi-static simplification q_dot, q_ddot ≈ 0 for contact detection
    Appendix A.2.4; assumes low-velocity manipulation, which may fail in fast or dynamic contact.
  • ad hoc to paper Decoder input pattern completeness is necessary and extra tokens disrupt pretrained behavior
    Sec. 4.2 and Tables 2/4; introduced to explain why single-token history wins, supported only by random-token perturbation experiments on two tasks.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of TA-VLA: Elucidating the Design Space of Torque-aware Vision-Language-Action Models." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QEL74OMR

@misc{pith2026250907962,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: TA-VLA: Elucidating the Design Space of Torque-aware Vision-Language-Action Models},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QEL74OMR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.07962}
}
read the original abstract

Many robotic manipulation tasks require sensing and responding to force signals such as torque to assess whether the task has been successfully completed and to enable closed-loop control. However, current Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models lack the ability to integrate such subtle physical feedback. In this work, we explore Torque-aware VLA models, aiming to bridge this gap by systematically studying the design space for incorporating torque signals into existing VLA architectures. We identify and evaluate several strategies, leading to three key findings. First, introducing torque adapters into the decoder consistently outperforms inserting them into the encoder.Third, inspired by joint prediction and planning paradigms in autonomous driving, we propose predicting torque as an auxiliary output, which further improves performance. This strategy encourages the model to build a physically grounded internal representation of interaction dynamics. Extensive quantitative and qualitative experiments across contact-rich manipulation benchmarks validate our findings.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.07962 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Torque response of the 7-DoF arm during a charger-insertion task. Shaded [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Architectures for embedding torque signals. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Normalized HSIC values across hidden states from different modality input tokens. Better Input Alignment. Integrating torque signals τt into decoder outperforms placing it in encoder. Since τt and joint angles qt are both proprioceptive signals, fusing them during denoising better exploits their correlation, such as consistency and redundancy in contact-rich inter￾actions. To verify this, we conduct experiments to e… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Architectures for embedding torque history. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Architectures for Action-Torque Diffusion. Motivation. Current VLA policies treat modalities purely as observa￾tions, missing the opportunity to internalise the robot’s own interaction dynamics. Inspired by multi-task planning in autonomous driving [10] and by our find…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Future torque signal prediction for joints. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Visualization. (a) Button Pushing: First attempt fails due to misalignment; second suc￾ceeds. (b) Door Handle Turning: Initial turn fails; second opens the door. (c) 5 regular tasks. experiments on RDT [7] across both contact-rich and regular tasks. As shown in [PITH_…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Cross Embodiment Visualization. To evaluate the generalization capability of our method across different robotic embodiments, we conduct experiments on a ROKAE SR robotic arm. As shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Visualization of contact-rich tasks. The last column visualizes the torque response of some joints during the task. For each task, the first failed attempt is marked with a red arrow, and the final successful attempt is marked with a green arrow. Then: J(q) = [Jarm(q);…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Visualization of general tasks. (a) Bottle pick and place. (b) Liquid pouring. (c) Stacking cubes. (d) Push-to-position. (e) Opening a drawer. Subtracting G(q) yields the external component δτ ext, where only joints 1–6 are informative for contact detection. Large res…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Cross-Embodiment Task Execution: Charging Connector Insertion. (a) The robotic manipulator successfully inserts a fast-charging connector into the charging port. (b) The robotic manipulator inserts a slow-charging connector into the charging port. RTX 4090 GPU. All va…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Architecture of RDT+obs+obj model. To further assess the generalization capability of our torque-aware VLA model across different robotic embod￾iments, we conducted cross-embodiment experiments us￾ing the ROKAE SR robotic arm. Specifically, we trained the π0+obs+obj w…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Torque Signals motion (e.g., 20–36 timestamps in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_13.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 21 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. FM-VLA: Force-based Memory for Vision-Language-Action Models in Contact-Rich Manipulation

    cs.RO 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A vision-language-action robot policy that stores compressed wrist-force histories as memory tokens can count contact events that are visually ambiguous, achieving 83.3% average success across three tasks.

  2. LIBERO-Safety: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Physical and Semantic Safety in Vision-Language-Action Models

    cs.RO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    LIBERO-Safety supplies a scalable benchmark, data-generation pipeline, and 19,664-demonstration dataset that exposes a generalization-safety tension in current VLA models where diverse training improves collision avoi...

  3. Dexora: Open-source VLA for High-DoF Bimanual Dexterity

    cs.RO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Dexora is the first open-source VLA system for dual-arm dual-hand high-DoF manipulation, trained on 100K simulated and 10K real teleoperated trajectories with a discriminator-weighted diffusion policy, achieving 66.7%...

  4. AT-VLA: Adaptive Tactile Injection for Enhanced Feedback Reaction in Vision-Language-Action Models

    cs.RO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    AT-VLA proposes adaptive tactile injection and a dual-stream tactile reaction mechanism to enhance VLA models for contact-rich robotic manipulation with real-time responses.

  5. ${\pi}_{0.7}$: a Steerable Generalist Robotic Foundation Model with Emergent Capabilities

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    π₀.₇ is a steerable generalist robotic model that uses rich multimodal prompts including language, subgoal images, and performance metadata to achieve out-of-the-box generalization across tasks and robot bodies.

  6. Feeling the Unexpected: ResTacVLA for Contact-Rich Manipulation via Residual Tactile Representation

    cs.RO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    Residual tactile representations plus surprise-aware gating let VLA policies master contact-rich robot tasks that vision-only models fail.

  7. Never Too Late for Force: Accelerating VLA Post-Training with Reactive Force Injection

    cs.RO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Injecting recent end-effector force into a pretrained VLA through a zero-initialized reactive action expert plus online DAgger improves contact-rich manipulation over vision-only post-training.

  8. TouchWorld: A Predictive and Reactive Tactile Foundation Model for Dexterous Manipulation

    cs.RO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A hierarchical robot manipulation policy uses tactile sensing both as a predictive subgoal generator and as a high-frequency residual correction signal, achieving 65% success on six contact-rich dexterous tasks versus...

  9. LIBERO-Safety: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Physical and Semantic Safety in Vision-Language-Action Models

    cs.RO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Introduces LIBERO-Safety benchmark with parametric scenario generation and 19,664 collision-free demonstrations, then evaluates VLA models to reveal a generalization-safety tension.

  10. DAM-VLA: Decoupled Asynchronous Multimodal Vision Language Action model

    cs.RO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    DAM-VLA decouples per-modality temporal processing in vision-language-action models via latent buffers refreshed at sensor rates, achieving 95.2% average success versus 40.95% for synchronous baselines on seven real-w...

  11. TORL-VLA: Tactile Guided Online Reinforcement Learning for Contact-Rich Manipulation

    cs.RO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    TORL-VLA couples a tactile wrench-aware VLA policy with a lightweight online RL module and an intervention-censored critic to improve success and efficiency on contact-rich robotic tasks.

  12. Dream-Tac: A Unified Tactile World Action Model for Contact-Rich Robot Manipulation

    cs.RO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Dream-Tac unifies visual and tactile signals in a world action model using contact-gated fusion and attention bias, reporting 31.7% average action accuracy gains on six manipulation tasks.

  13. AT-VLA: Adaptive Tactile Injection for Enhanced Feedback Reaction in Vision-Language-Action Models

    cs.RO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    AT-VLA introduces adaptive tactile injection and a dual-stream tactile reaction mechanism to integrate real-time tactile feedback into pretrained VLA models for contact-rich robotic manipulation.

  14. DECO: Decoupled Multimodal Diffusion Transformer for Bimanual Dexterous Manipulation with a Plugin Tactile Adapter

    cs.RO 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A decoupled multimodal diffusion transformer with a LoRA tactile adapter improves real-world bimanual manipulation success by 21 percentage points over a diffusion-policy baseline; a new 50-hour tactile bimanual datas...

  15. HiF-VLA: Hindsight, Insight and Foresight through Motion Representation for Vision-Language-Action Models

    cs.RO 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    HiF-VLA improves long-horizon robotic manipulation by encoding past motion as hindsight priors and anticipating future motion through foresight reasoning inside a VLA framework.

  16. TouchWorld: A Predictive and Reactive Tactile Foundation Model for Dexterous Manipulation

    cs.RO 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.5 of 10

    A multi-timescale tactile hierarchy with subtask planning, tactile world-model goals, and residual refinement raises real-robot success by about 16–19 points over strong baselines on six contact-rich tasks.

  17. Advancing Omnimodal Embodied Agents from Isolated Skills to Everyday Physical Autonomy

    cs.RO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    OmniAct framework integrates planning, memory, and verification to enable persistent autonomy in omnimodal embodied agents, showing improved success and stable context in 40 real-world tasks.

  18. ImplicitRDP: An End-to-End Visual-Force Diffusion Policy with Structural Slow-Fast Learning

    cs.RO 2025-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A causal-attention diffusion policy that fuses slow vision with fast force feedback and predicts a virtual target outperforms hierarchical baselines on two contact-rich manipulation tasks.

  19. World Action Models: The Next Frontier in Embodied AI

    cs.RO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper introduces World Action Models as a new paradigm unifying predictive world modeling with action generation in embodied foundation models and provides a taxonomy of existing approaches.

  20. RLDX-1 Technical Report

    cs.RO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    RLDX-1 achieves 86.8% success on complex ALLEX humanoid manipulation tasks where prior VLAs reach only around 40%.

  21. RLDX-1 Technical Report

    cs.RO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    RLDX-1 outperforms frontier VLAs such as π0.5 and GR00T N1.6 on dexterous manipulation benchmarks, reaching 86.8% success on ALLEX humanoid tasks versus around 40% for the baselines.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages · cited by 17 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Likar and L

    N. Likar and L. ˇZlajpah. External joint torque-based estimation of contact information.Inter- national Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 11(7):107, 2014

    work page 2014

  2. [2]

    Shan and Q.-C

    S. Shan and Q.-C. Pham. Fine robotic manipulation without force/torque sensor.IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 9(2):1206–1213, 2023

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    X. Xu, L. Cheng, L. Miao, X. Zhou, J. Li, and Y . Ke. End-effector contact force estimation for the industrial robot in automated fiber placement processes with dynamic end-load variations. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 55:390–402, 2024

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    M. J. Kim, K. Pertsch, S. Karamcheti, T. Xiao, A. Balakrishna, S. Nair, R. Rafailov, E. Foster, G. Lam, P. Sanketi, et al. Openvla: An open-source vision-language-action model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.09246, 2024

    arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    O. M. Team, D. Ghosh, H. Walke, K. Pertsch, K. Black, O. Mees, S. Dasari, J. Hejna, T. Kreiman, C. Xu, et al. Octo: An open-source generalist robot policy.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.12213, 2024

    arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    Black, N

    K. Black, N. Brown, D. Driess, A. Esmail, M. Equi, C. Finn, N. Fusai, L. Groom, K. Hausman, B. Ichter, et al.π 0: A vision-language-action flow model for general robot control.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.24164, 2024

    arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    S. Liu, L. Wu, B. Li, H. Tan, H. Chen, Z. Wang, K. Xu, H. Su, and J. Zhu. Rdt-1b: a diffusion foundation model for bimanual manipulation.International Conference on Learning Representations, 2025

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    Intelligence, K

    P. Intelligence, K. Black, N. Brown, J. Darpinian, K. Dhabalia, D. Driess, A. Esmail, M. Equi, C. Finn, N. Fusai, et al.π 0.5: a vision-language-action model with open-world generalization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.16054, 2025

    arXiv 2025

Show all 53 references
  1. [9]

    Gretton, O

    A. Gretton, O. Bousquet, A. Smola, and B. Sch ¨olkopf. Measuring statistical dependence with hilbert-schmidt norms. InInternational conference on algorithmic learning theory, pages 63–

  2. [10]

    S. Shi, L. Jiang, D. Dai, and B. Schiele. Motion transformer with global intention localization and local movement refinement.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35: 6531–6543, 2022

    2022

  3. [11]

    T. Z. Zhao, V . Kumar, S. Levine, and C. Finn. Learning fine-grained bimanual manipulation with low-cost hardware.arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.13705, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Achiam, S

    J. Achiam, S. Adler, S. Agarwal, L. Ahmad, I. Akkaya, F. L. Aleman, D. Almeida, J. Altenschmidt, S. Altman, S. Anadkat, et al. Gpt-4 technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  5. [13]

    X. Bi, D. Chen, G. Chen, S. Chen, D. Dai, C. Deng, H. Ding, K. Dong, Q. Du, Z. Fu, et al. Deepseek llm: Scaling open-source language models with longtermism.arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.02954, 2024. 9

    2024 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Grattafiori, A

    A. Grattafiori, A. Dubey, A. Jauhri, A. Pandey, A. Kadian, A. Al-Dahle, A. Letman, A. Mathur, A. Schelten, A. Vaughan, et al. The llama 3 herd of models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.21783, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  7. [15]

    A. Yang, B. Yang, B. Zhang, B. Hui, B. Zheng, B. Yu, C. Li, D. Liu, F. Huang, H. Wei, et al. Qwen2. 5 technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.15115, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Hurst, A

    A. Hurst, A. Lerer, A. P. Goucher, A. Perelman, A. Ramesh, A. Clark, A. Ostrow, A. Welihinda, A. Hayes, A. Radford, et al. Gpt-4o system card.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.21276, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  9. [17]

    H. Liu, C. Li, Y . Li, and Y . J. Lee. Improved baselines with visual instruction tuning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 26296–26306, 2024

    2024

  10. [18]

    B. Li, Y . Zhang, D. Guo, R. Zhang, F. Li, H. Zhang, K. Zhang, P. Zhang, Y . Li, Z. Liu, et al. Llava-onevision: Easy visual task transfer.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.03326, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  11. [19]

    S. Bai, K. Chen, X. Liu, J. Wang, W. Ge, S. Song, K. Dang, P. Wang, S. Wang, J. Tang, et al. Qwen2. 5-vl technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.13923, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  12. [20]

    X. Liu, B. Tian, Z. Wang, R. Wang, K. Sheng, B. Zhang, H. Zhao, and G. Zhou. Delving into shape-aware zero-shot semantic segmentation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 2999–3009, 2023

    2023

  13. [21]

    P. Li, B. Tian, Y . Shi, X. Chen, H. Zhao, G. Zhou, and Y .-Q. Zhang. Toist: Task oriented instance segmentation transformer with noun-pronoun distillation.Advances in Neural Infor- mation Processing Systems, 35:17597–17611, 2022

    2022

  14. [22]

    K. Ding, B. Chen, Y . Su, H.-a. Gao, B. Jin, C. Sima, W. Zhang, X. Li, P. Barsch, H. Li, et al. Hint-ad: Holistically aligned interpretability in end-to-end autonomous driving.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.06702, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  15. [23]

    B. Jin, Y . Zheng, P. Li, W. Li, Y . Zheng, S. Hu, X. Liu, J. Zhu, Z. Yan, H. Sun, et al. Tod3cap: Towards 3d dense captioning in outdoor scenes. InEuropean Conference on Computer Vision, pages 367–384. Springer, 2024

    2024

  16. [24]

    J. Ho, A. Jain, and P. Abbeel. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models.Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:6840–6851, 2020

    2020

  17. [25]

    Van Den Oord, O

    A. Van Den Oord, O. Vinyals, et al. Neural discrete representation learning.Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017

    2017

  18. [26]

    Lipman, R

    Y . Lipman, R. T. Chen, H. Ben-Hamu, M. Nickel, and M. Le. Flow matching for generative modeling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.02747, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Zhang, X

    Z. Zhang, X. Li, S. Zou, G. Chi, S. Li, X. Qiu, G. Wang, G. Zheng, L. Wang, H. Zhao, et al. Chameleon: Fast-slow neuro-symbolic lane topology extraction.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.07485, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Q. Li, Y . Liang, Z. Wang, L. Luo, X. Chen, M. Liao, F. Wei, Y . Deng, S. Xu, Y . Zhang, et al. Cogact: A foundational vision-language-action model for synergizing cognition and action in robotic manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.19650, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Huang, S

    J. Huang, S. Yong, X. Ma, X. Linghu, P. Li, Y . Wang, Q. Li, S.-C. Zhu, B. Jia, and S. Huang. An embodied generalist agent in 3d world.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.12871, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  22. [30]

    X. Li, M. Liu, H. Zhang, C. Yu, J. Xu, H. Wu, C. Cheang, Y . Jing, W. Zhang, H. Liu, et al. Vision-language foundation models as effective robot imitators.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.01378, 2023. 10

    2023 arXiv

  23. [31]

    D. Qu, H. Song, Q. Chen, Y . Yao, X. Ye, Y . Ding, Z. Wang, J. Gu, B. Zhao, D. Wang, et al. Spatialvla: Exploring spatial representations for visual-language-action model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.15830, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  24. [32]

    J. Wen, Y . Zhu, J. Li, M. Zhu, Z. Tang, K. Wu, Z. Xu, N. Liu, R. Cheng, C. Shen, et al. Tinyvla: Towards fast, data-efficient vision-language-action models for robotic manipulation. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2025

    2025

  25. [33]

    Jiang, Y

    A. Jiang, Y . Gao, Z. Sun, Y . Wang, J. Wang, J. Chai, Q. Cao, Y . Heng, H. Jiang, Y . Dong, et al. Diffvla: Vision-language guided diffusion planning for autonomous driving.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.19381, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Chi, H.-a

    H. Chi, H.-a. Gao, Z. Liu, J. Liu, C. Liu, J. Li, K. Yang, Y . Yu, Z. Wang, W. Li, et al. Impromptu vla: Open weights and open data for driving vision-language-action models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.23757, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Zitkovich, T

    B. Zitkovich, T. Yu, S. Xu, P. Xu, T. Xiao, F. Xia, J. Wu, P. Wohlhart, S. Welker, A. Wahid, Q. Vuong, V . Vanhoucke, H. Tran, R. Soricut, A. Singh, J. Singh, P. Sermanet, P. R. San- keti, G. Salazar, M. S. Ryoo, K. Reymann, K. Rao, K. Pertsch, I. Mordatch, H. Michalewski, Y ....

    2023

  28. [36]

    Pertsch, K

    K. Pertsch, K. Stachowicz, B. Ichter, D. Driess, S. Nair, Q. Vuong, O. Mees, C. Finn, and S. Levine. Fast: Efficient action tokenization for vision-language-action models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.09747, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  29. [37]

    J. Liu, H. Chen, P. An, Z. Liu, R. Zhang, C. Gu, X. Li, Z. Guo, S. Chen, M. Liu, et al. Hy- bridvla: Collaborative diffusion and autoregression in a unified vision-language-action model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.10631, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Y . Chen, A. Sipos, M. Van der Merwe, and N. Fazeli. Visuo-tactile transformers for manipula- tion.arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.00121, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  31. [39]

    W. Liu, J. Wang, Y . Wang, W. Wang, and C. Lu. Forcemimic: Force-centric imitation learning with force-motion capture system for contact-rich manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.07554, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  32. [40]

    K. Ding, B. Chen, R. Wu, Y . Li, Z. Zhang, H.-a. Gao, S. Li, G. Zhou, Y . Zhu, H. Dong, et al. Preafford: Universal affordance-based pre-grasping for diverse objects and environments. In 2024 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pages 727...

    2024

  33. [41]

    Y . Hou, Z. Liu, C. Chi, E. Cousineau, N. Kuppuswamy, S. Feng, B. Burchfiel, and S. Song. Adaptive compliance policy: Learning approximate compliance for diffusion guided control. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.09309, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  34. [42]

    C. Chen, Z. Yu, H. Choi, M. Cutkosky, and J. Bohg. Dexforce: Extracting force- informed actions from kinesthetic demonstrations for dexterous manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.10356, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  35. [43]

    van den Bogert, M

    W. van den Bogert, M. Iyengar, and N. Fazeli. Built different: Tactile perception to overcome cross-embodiment capability differences in collaborative manipulation.arXiv e-prints, pages arXiv–2409, 2024. 11

    2024

  36. [44]

    Z. He, H. Fang, J. Chen, H.-S. Fang, and C. Lu. Foar: Force-aware reactive policy for contact- rich robotic manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.15753, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Aburub, C

    M. Aburub, C. C. Beltran-Hernandez, T. Kamijo, and M. Hamaya. Learning diffu- sion policies from demonstrations for compliant contact-rich manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.19235, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Huang, Y

    B. Huang, Y . Wang, X. Yang, Y . Luo, and Y . Li. 3d-vitac: Learning fine-grained manipulation with visuo-tactile sensing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.24091, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Kamijo, C

    T. Kamijo, C. C. Beltran-Hernandez, and M. Hamaya. Learning variable compliance control from a few demonstrations for bimanual robot with haptic feedback teleoperation system. In 2024 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pages 12663–12670...

    2024

  40. [48]

    H. Xue, J. Ren, W. Chen, G. Zhang, Y . Fang, G. Gu, H. Xu, and C. Lu. Reactive diffusion policy: Slow-fast visual-tactile policy learning for contact-rich manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.02881, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Y . Wu, Z. Chen, F. Wu, L. Chen, L. Zhang, Z. Bing, A. Swikir, A. Knoll, and S. Haddadin. Tacdiffusion: Force-domain diffusion policy for precise tactile manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.11047, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Kobayashi, M

    T. Kobayashi, M. Kobayashi, T. Buamanee, and Y . Uranishi. Bi-lat: Bilateral control-based imitation learning via natural language and action chunking with transformers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.01301, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  43. [51]

    K. Li, S. M. Wagh, N. Sharma, S. Bhadani, W. Chen, C. Liu, and P. Kormushev. Haptic- act: Bridging human intuition with compliant robotic manipulation via immersive vr.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.11925, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  44. [52]

    J. J. Liu, Y . Li, K. Shaw, T. Tao, R. Salakhutdinov, and D. Pathak. Factr: Force-attending curriculum training for contact-rich policy learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.17432, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  45. [53]

    MLPMLP!

    L. Beyer, A. Steiner, A. S. Pinto, A. Kolesnikov, X. Wang, D. Salz, M. Neumann, I. Alabdul- mohsin, M. Tschannen, E. Bugliarello, et al. Paligemma: A versatile 3b vlm for transfer.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.07726, 2024. 12 Elucidating the Design Space of Torque-aware Vision-Lan...

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.