pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.27251 · v1 · pith:RUQFVKEAnew · submitted 2026-06-25 · 💻 cs.RO · cs.AI

Advancing Omnimodal Embodied Agents from Isolated Skills to Everyday Physical Autonomy

Junhao Shi , Zezheng Huai , Siyin Wang , Jia Chen , Yubang Wang , Zhaoye Fei , Hechang Chen , Jingjing Gong
show 2 more authors
Xipeng Qiu Yu-Gang Jiang
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 04:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO cs.AI
keywords embodied agentsrobotic autonomyhierarchical architecturemultimodal plannerIoT coordinationlong-horizon tasksvisual verificationpersistent autonomy
0
0 comments X

The pith

OmniAct shows that a hierarchical asynchronous architecture with separated planning, memory, and verification enables persistent embodied agents to handle long-horizon cyber-physical tasks.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that building robots that can operate persistently in real environments requires coordinating physical actions like manipulation with digital tools like APIs and IoT devices, while recovering from failures over long periods. Current approaches handle planning, memory, and execution separately or in monolithic models that lose coherence. OmniAct proposes an integrated framework with a multimodal planner, compressed memory system, and visual verification engine to address this. If correct, this would allow mid-sized models to perform complex everyday tasks reliably without exploding computational costs. The evaluation on 40 real tasks demonstrates these benefits.

Core claim

OmniAct integrates a multimodal semantic planner for skill routing across unified action spaces, an adaptive hierarchical memory with event-boundary-driven compression for sub-linear context growth, and an asynchronous visual preemption engine that closes the semantic loop during physical execution, resulting in consistent improvements in end-to-end success across all complexity levels on 40 real-world long-horizon tasks.

What carries the argument

OmniAct framework, which uses a hierarchical asynchronous architecture separating planning, memory, and verification to unify cyber and physical actions.

If this is right

  • Consistent improvements in end-to-end success across all complexity levels on 40 tasks involving two robotic platforms and four IoT devices.
  • Near-flat token consumption over more than 100k accumulated interaction tokens.
  • Elevation of mid-scale open-weight models to proprietary-level performance.
  • Autonomous recovery from physical failures through the verification engine.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the architecture generalizes, similar hierarchical designs could apply to other agent systems facing context degradation in long interactions.
  • Testing on tasks with more IoT devices or different robot types would reveal the limits of the unified action space.
  • The approach suggests that explicit memory compression at event boundaries is key to maintaining coherence, which could be tested by comparing to linear context methods.

Load-bearing premise

Persistent autonomy requires an explicit hierarchical asynchronous architecture with separation of planning, memory, and verification rather than a monolithic model.

What would settle it

Demonstrating that a single integrated VLM or VLA model achieves similar or better success rates and token efficiency on the same set of 40 long-horizon tasks without the proposed separation of components.

read the original abstract

Building persistent embodied agents in unstructured environments demands unified orchestration of heterogeneous tools spanning both cyber (APIs, IoT) and physical (manipulation, navigation) domains, coupled with autonomous recovery from physical failures that inevitably arise over extended operation. Existing systems treat these as separate problems: VLM-based planners lack a unified cyber-physical action space, agent frameworks accumulate unbounded context that degrades temporal coherence, and VLA policies execute open-loop without detecting their own failures. We argue that persistent autonomy requires not a monolithic model but a hierarchical asynchronous architecture with explicit separation of planning, memory, and verification. To this end, we present OmniAct, a framework integrating a multimodal semantic planner for skill routing across unified action spaces, an adaptive hierarchical memory with event-boundary-driven compression for sub-linear context growth, and an asynchronous visual preemption engine that closes the semantic loop during physical execution. Across 40 real-world long-horizon tasks on two robotic platforms coordinating four IoT devices, OmniAct achieves consistent improvements in end-to-end success across all complexity levels, maintains near-flat token consumption over under 100k+ accumulated interaction tokens, and elevates mid-scale open-weight models to proprietary-level performance.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents OmniAct, a framework for advancing omnimodal embodied agents toward persistent autonomy in unstructured environments. It argues that existing systems treat planning, memory, and verification as separate problems and proposes a hierarchical asynchronous architecture with a multimodal semantic planner for skill routing, an adaptive hierarchical memory with event-boundary-driven compression, and an asynchronous visual preemption engine for closing the semantic loop. The framework is evaluated on 40 real-world long-horizon tasks involving two robotic platforms and four IoT devices, claiming consistent success rate improvements across complexity levels, near-flat token consumption over extended interactions, and performance parity between mid-scale open-weight models and proprietary systems.

Significance. If the reported empirical results are supported by rigorous baselines, statistical analysis, and reproducible methods, this work could significantly advance the field of embodied AI by demonstrating a practical architecture for unified cyber-physical agent orchestration that maintains efficiency and reliability over long horizons. The focus on sub-linear context growth and autonomous failure recovery addresses critical bottlenecks in current agent frameworks.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The abstract states performance gains on 40 tasks but supplies no baselines, statistical details, error bars, or exclusion criteria; full methods and results sections are required to evaluate whether the data support the claims of consistent improvements across complexity levels.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The central argument that persistent autonomy requires an explicit hierarchical asynchronous architecture with separation of planning, memory, and verification (rather than monolithic models or VLM/VLA extensions) is load-bearing but presented without visible comparative experiments or ablations to substantiate the necessity of this separation.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The phrasing 'maintains near-flat token consumption over under 100k+ accumulated interaction tokens' is ambiguous and should be clarified to specify the exact range and measurement of token accumulation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed feedback on the abstract and the load-bearing claims. We address both points below and will revise the manuscript to improve clarity and substantiation while preserving the core contributions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The abstract states performance gains on 40 tasks but supplies no baselines, statistical details, error bars, or exclusion criteria; full methods and results sections are required to evaluate whether the data support the claims of consistent improvements across complexity levels.

    Authors: The full manuscript provides these details in the Experiments section (baselines against prior VLM/VLA and agent frameworks), Results (success rates with error bars across complexity tiers, statistical significance tests), and task selection criteria. The abstract was kept concise per venue norms. We will revise the abstract to incorporate a one-sentence summary of key baselines, aggregate success improvements, and note the presence of error bars and exclusion criteria. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central argument that persistent autonomy requires an explicit hierarchical asynchronous architecture with separation of planning, memory, and verification (rather than monolithic models or VLM/VLA extensions) is load-bearing but presented without visible comparative experiments or ablations to substantiate the necessity of this separation.

    Authors: The 40-task evaluation demonstrates end-to-end gains and sub-linear context growth relative to non-hierarchical baselines, supporting the architecture's value. Direct ablations isolating the separation of planning/memory/verification versus monolithic or tightly-coupled VLM/VLA extensions are not explicitly reported. We will add targeted ablation experiments in the revised version to quantify the contribution of each component. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; empirical claims rest on experimental outcomes

full rationale

The paper advances a framework (OmniAct) via an architectural argument for hierarchical separation of planning, memory, and verification, backed by reported success rates and token metrics across 40 real-world tasks. No equations, parameter fits, self-citations, or uniqueness theorems appear in the provided text that would reduce any central claim to its own inputs by construction. The derivation chain is self-contained as an empirical proposal rather than a self-referential reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 1 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract, the central addition is the named OmniAct architecture; no explicit free parameters, mathematical axioms, or new physical entities are described.

invented entities (1)
  • OmniAct framework no independent evidence
    purpose: Provides unified orchestration via multimodal semantic planner, adaptive hierarchical memory, and asynchronous visual preemption engine
    The framework is introduced as the solution to the stated limitations of existing systems.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5772 in / 1197 out tokens · 36828 ms · 2026-06-26T04:49:27.945515+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages · 6 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    A survey on vision-language-action models for embodied AI

    Yueen Ma, Zixing Song, Yuzheng Zhuang, Jianye Hao, and Irwin King. A survey on vision-language-action models for embodied AI. CoRR, abs/2405.14093, 2024

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    World action models: The next frontier in embodied ai, 2026

    Siyin Wang, Junhao Shi, Zhaoyang Fu, Xinzhe He, Feihong Liu, Chenchen Yang, Yikang Zhou, Zhaoye Fei, Jingjing Gong, Jinlan Fu, Mike Zheng Shou, Xuanjing Huang, Xipeng Qiu, and Yu-Gang Jiang. World action models: The next frontier in embodied ai, 2026. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.12090

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  3. [3]

    IEEE Access11, 28490–28505 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS

    Kento Kawaharazuka, Jihoon Oh, Jun Yamada, Ingmar Posner, and Yuke Zhu. Vision-language-action models for robotics: A review towards real-world applications. IEEE Access, 13:162467–162504, 2025. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS. 2025.3609980

    work page doi:10.1109/access 2025

  4. [4]

    Aligning cyber space with physical world: A comprehensive survey on embodied ai, 2025

    Yang Liu, Weixing Chen, Yongjie Bai, Xiaodan Liang, Guanbin Li, Wen Gao, and Liang Lin. Aligning cyber space with physical world: A comprehensive survey on embodied ai, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.06886

    arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    Do as i can, not as i say: Grounding language in robotic affordances, 2022

    Michael Ahn, Anthony Brohan, Noah Brown, Yevgen Chebotar, Omar Cortes, Byron David, Chelsea Finn, Chuyuan Fu, Keerthana Gopalakrishnan, Karol Hausman, Alex Herzog, Daniel Ho, Jasmine Hsu, Julian Ibarz, Brian Ichter, Alex Irpan, Eric Jang, Rosario Jauregui Ruano, Kyle Jeffrey , Sally Jesmonth, Nikhil J Joshi, Ryan Julian, Dmitry Kalashnikov , Yuheng Kuang,...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  6. [6]

    Code as policies: Language model programs for embodied control, 2023

    Jacky Liang, Wenlong Huang, Fei Xia, Peng Xu, Karol Hausman, Brian Ichter, Pete Florence, and Andy Zeng. Code as policies: Language model programs for embodied control, 2023. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.07753

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    Inner monologue: Embodied reasoning through planning with language models

    Wenlong Huang, Fei Xia, Ted Xiao, Harris Chan, Jacky Liang, Pete Florence, Andy Zeng, Jonathan T ompson, Igor Mordatch, Yevgen Chebotar, et al. Inner monologue: Embodied reasoning through planning with language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.05608, 2022

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  8. [8]

    Narasimhan, and Yuan Cao

    Shunyu Yao, Jeffrey Zhao, Dian Yu, Nan Du, Izhak Shafran, Karthik R. Narasimhan, and Yuan Cao. React: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2023, Kigali, Rwanda, May 1-5, 2023. OpenReview.net, 2023. URL https://openreview. net/forum?id=WE_vluYUL-X

    2023

  9. [9]

    Reflexion: lan- guage agents with verbal reinforcement learning

    Noah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan, and Shunyu Yao. Reflexion: lan- guage agents with verbal reinforcement learning. In Alice Oh, Tristan Naumann, Amir Globerson, Kate Saenko, Moritz Hardt, and Sergey Levine, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Sys...

    2023

  10. [10]

    Voyager: Input-adaptive algebraic transformations for high-performance graph neural networks

    Yangjie Zhou, Wenting Shen, Jingwen Leng, Shuwen Lu, Zihan Liu, Weihao Cui, Zhendong Zhang, Wencong Xiao, Baole Ai, Yong Li, Wei Lin, Deze Zeng, Yun Liang, Quan Chen, Ning Liu, and Minyi Guo. Voyager: Input-adaptive algebraic transformations for high-performance graph neural networks. In Lieven Eeckhout, Georgios Smaragdakis, Katai Liang, Adrian Sampson, ...

    work page doi:10.1145/3676642.3736121 2025

  11. [11]

    MemGPT: Towards LLMs as Operating Systems

    Charles Packer, Vivian Fang, Shishir G. Patil, Kevin Lin, Sarah Wooders, and Joseph E. Gonzalez. Memgpt: T owards llms as operating systems. CoRR, abs/2310.08560, 2023. doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.2310.08560. URL https://doi.org/ 10.48550/arXiv.2310.08560

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.08560 2023

  12. [12]

    Anthony Brohan, Noah Brown, Justice Carbajal, Yevgen Chebotar, Xi Chen, Krzysztof Choromanski, Tianli Ding, Danny Driess, Avinava Dubey , Chelsea Finn, Pete Florence, Chuyuan Fu, Montse Gonzalez Arenas, Keerthana Gopalakrishnan, Kehang Han, Karol Hausman, Alexander Herzog, Jasmine Hsu, Brian Ichter, Alex Irpan, Nikhil J. Joshi, Ryan Julian, Dmitry Kalashn...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.15818 2023

  13. [13]

    Sanketi, Quan Vuong, Thomas Kollar, Benjamin Burchfiel, Russ Tedrake, Dorsa Sadigh, Sergey Levine, Percy Liang, and Chelsea Finn

    Moo Jin Kim, Karl Pertsch, Siddharth Karamcheti, Ted Xiao, Ashwin Balakrishna, Suraj Nair, Rafael Rafailov , Ethan Paul Foster, Pannag R. Sanketi, Quan Vuong, Thomas Kollar, Benjamin Burchfiel, Russ Tedrake, Dorsa Sadigh, Sergey Levine, Percy Liang, and Chelsea Finn. Openvla: An open-source vision-language-action model. In Pulkit Agrawal, Oliver Kroemer, ...

    2024

  14. [14]

    $\pi_0$: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Control

    Kevin Black, Noah Brown, Danny Driess, Adnan Esmail, Michael Equi, Chelsea Finn, Niccolo Fusai, Lachy Groom, Karol Hausman, Brian Ichter, Szymon Jakubczak, Tim Jones, Liyiming Ke, Sergey Levine, Adrian Li-Bell, Mohith Mothukuri, Suraj Nair, Karl Pertsch, Lucy Xiaoyang Shi, James Tanner, Quan Vuong, Anna Walling, Haohuan Wang, and Ury Zhilinsky. π 0: A vis...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.24164 2024

  15. [15]

    Physical Intelligence, Kevin Black, Noah Brown, James Darpinian, Karan Dhabalia, Danny Driess, Adnan Esmail, Michael Equi, Chelsea Finn, Niccolo Fusai, Manuel Y . Galliker, Dibya Ghosh, Lachy Groom, Karol Hausman, Brian Ichter, Szymon Jakubczak, Tim Jones, Liyiming Ke, Devin LeBlanc, Sergey Levine, Adrian Li-Bell, Mohith Mothukuri, Suraj Nair, Karl Pertsc...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.16054 2025

  16. [16]

    Roboomni: Proactive robot manipulation in omni-modal context

    Siyin Wang, Jinlan Fu, Feihong Liu, Xinzhe He, Huangxuan Wu, Junhao Shi, Kexin Huang, Zhaoye Fei, Jingjing Gong, Zuxuan Wu, Yu-Gang Jiang, See-Kiong Ng, Tat-Seng Chua, and Xipeng Qiu. Roboomni: Proactive robot manipulation in omni-modal context. CoRR, abs/2510.23763, 2025. doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.2510.23763. URL https: //doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.23763

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.23763 2025

  17. [17]

    7433–7439

    Jacky Liang, Wenlong Huang, Fei Xia, Peng Xu, Karol Hausman, Brian Ichter, Pete Florence, and Andy Zeng. Code as policies: Language model programs for embodied control. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA 2023, London, UK, May 29 - June 2, 2023, pages 9493–9500. IEEE, 2023. doi: 10.1109/ICRA48891. 2023.10160591. URL https://d...

    work page doi:10.1109/icra48891 2023

  18. [18]

    ImmFusion: Robust mmWave-RGB Fusion for 3D Human Body Reconstruction in All Weather Conditions,

    Ishika Singh, Valts Blukis, Arsalan Mousavian, Ankit Goyal, Danfei Xu, Jonathan Tremblay , Dieter Fox, Jesse Thoma- son, and Animesh Garg. Progprompt: Generating situated robot task plans using large language models. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA 2023, London, UK, May 29 - June 2, 2023, pages 11523–11530. IEEE, 2023. do...

    work page doi:10.1109/icra48891.2023.10161317 2023

  19. [19]

    Inner monologue: Embodied reasoning through planning with language models

    Wenlong Huang, Fei Xia, Ted Xiao, Harris Chan, Jacky Liang, Pete Florence, Andy Zeng, Jonathan T ompson, Igor Mordatch, Yevgen Chebotar, Pierre Sermanet, T omas Jackson, Noah Brown, Linda Luu, Sergey Levine, Karol Haus- man, and Brian Ichter. Inner monologue: Embodied reasoning through planning with language models. In Karen Liu, Dana Kulic, and Jeffrey I...

    2022

  20. [20]

    Danny Driess, Fei Xia, Mehdi S. M. Sajjadi, Corey Lynch, Aakanksha Chowdhery , Brian Ichter, Ayzaan Wahid, Jonathan T ompson, Quan Vuong, Tianhe Yu, Wenlong Huang, Yevgen Chebotar, Pierre Sermanet, Daniel Duck- worth, Sergey Levine, Vincent Vanhoucke, Karol Hausman, Marc T oussaint, Klaus Greff, Andy Zeng, Igor Mor- datch, and Pete Florence. Palm-e: An em...

    2023

  21. [21]

    World-aware planning narratives enhance large vision-language model planner.CoRR, abs/2506.21230, 2025

    Junhao Shi, Zhaoye Fei, Siyin Wang, Qipeng Guo, Jingjing Gong, and Xipeng Qiu. World-aware planning narratives enhance large vision-language model planner.CoRR, abs/2506.21230, 2025. doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.2506.21230. URL https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.21230. 11

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.21230 2025

  22. [22]

    Live: Learning video llm with stream- ing speech transcription at scale

    Yuheng Ji, Huajie Tan, Jiayu Shi, Xiaoshuai Hao, Yuan Zhang, Hengyuan Zhang, Pengwei Wang, Mengdi Zhao, Yao Mu, Pengju An, Xinda Xue, Qinghang Su, Huaihai Lyu, Xiaolong Zheng, Jiaming Liu, Zhongyuan Wang, and Shanghang Zhang. Robobrain: A unified brain model for robotic manipulation from abstract to concrete. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and ...

    work page doi:10.1109/cvpr52734.2025.00168 2025

  23. [23]

    Robobrain 2.0 technical report, 2025

    BAAI RoboBrain Team, Mingyu Cao, Huajie Tan, Yuheng Ji, Xiansheng Chen, Minglan Lin, Zhiyu Li, Zhou Cao, Pengwei Wang, Enshen Zhou, Yi Han, Yingbo Tang, Xiangqi Xu, Wei Guo, Yaoxu Lyu, Yijie Xu, Jiayu Shi, Mengfei Du, Cheng Chi, Mengdi Zhao, Xiaoshuai Hao, Junkai Zhao, Xiaojie Zhang, Shanyu Rong, Huaihai Lyu, Zhengliang Cai, Yankai Fu, Ning Chen, Bolun Zha...

    arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    RT-H: action hierarchies using language

    Suneel Belkhale, Tianli Ding, Ted Xiao, Pierre Sermanet, Quan Vuong, Jonathan T ompson, Yevgen Chebotar, De- bidatta Dwibedi, and Dorsa Sadigh. RT-H: action hierarchies using language. In Dana Kulic, Gentiane Venture, Kostas E. Bekris, and Enrique Coronado, editors, Robotics: Science and Systems XX, Delft, The Netherlands, July 15-19, 2024, 2024. doi: 10....

    work page doi:10.15607/rss.2024.xx.049 2024

  25. [25]

    BC-Z: zero-shot task generalization with robotic imitation learning

    Eric Jang, Alex Irpan, Mohi Khansari, Daniel Kappler, Frederik Ebert, Corey Lynch, Sergey Levine, and Chelsea Finn. BC-Z: zero-shot task generalization with robotic imitation learning. In Aleksandra Faust, David Hsu, and Gerhard Neumann, editors, Conference on Robot Learning, 8-11 November 2021, London, UK, Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages ...

    2021

  26. [26]

    Anthony Brohan, Noah Brown, Justice Carbajal, Yevgen Chebotar, Joseph Dabis, Chelsea Finn, Keerthana Gopalakr- ishnan, Karol Hausman, Alexander Herzog, Jasmine Hsu, Julian Ibarz, Brian Ichter, Alex Irpan, T omas Jackson, Sally Jesmonth, Nikhil J. Joshi, Ryan Julian, Dmitry Kalashnikov , Yuheng Kuang, Isabel Leal, Kuang-Huei Lee, Sergey Levine, Yao Lu, Uts...

    work page doi:10.15607/rss.2023.xix.025 2023

  27. [27]

    VIMA: general robot manipulation with multimodal prompts

    Yunfan Jiang, Agrim Gupta, Zichen Zhang, Guanzhi Wang, Yongqiang Dou, Yanjun Chen, Li Fei-Fei, Anima Anandkumar, Yuke Zhu, and Linxi Fan. VIMA: general robot manipulation with multimodal prompts. CoRR, abs/2210.03094, 2022. doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.2210.03094. URL https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2210.03094

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.03094 2022

  28. [28]

    A gener- alist agent, 2022

    Scott Reed, Konrad Zolna, Emilio Parisotto, Sergio Gomez Colmenarejo, Alexander Novikov , Gabriel Barth-Maron, Mai Gimenez, Yury Sulsky , Jackie Kay , Jost T obias Springenberg, T om Eccles, Jake Bruce, Ali Razavi, Ashley Ed- wards, Nicolas Heess, Yutian Chen, Raia Hadsell, Oriol Vinyals, Mahyar Bordbar, and Nando de Freitas. A gener- alist agent, 2022. U...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  29. [29]

    Octo: An Open-Source Generalist Robot Policy

    Dibya Ghosh, Homer Rich Walke, Karl Pertsch, Kevin Black, Oier Mees, Sudeep Dasari, Joey Hejna, T obias Kreiman, Charles Xu, Jianlan Luo, You Liang Tan, Lawrence Yunliang Chen, Quan Vuong, Ted Xiao, Pannag R. Sanketi, Dorsa Sadigh, Chelsea Finn, and Sergey Levine. Octo: An open-source generalist robot policy. In Dana Kulic, Gentiane Venture, Kostas E. Bek...

    work page doi:10.15607/rss.2024.xx.090 2024

  30. [30]

    FAST: Efficient Action Tokenization for Vision-Language-Action Models

    Karl Pertsch, Kyle Stachowicz, Brian Ichter, Danny Driess, Suraj Nair, Quan Vuong, Oier Mees, Chelsea Finn, and Sergey Levine. FAST : efficient action tokenization for vision-language-action models. CoRR, abs/2501.09747, 2025. doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.2501.09747. URL https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2501.09747

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.09747 2025

  31. [31]

    RDT-1B: a diffusion foundation model for bimanual manipulation

    Songming Liu, Lingxuan Wu, Bangguo Li, Hengkai Tan, Huayu Chen, Zhengyi Wang, Ke Xu, Hang Su, and Jun Zhu. RDT-1B: a diffusion foundation model for bimanual manipulation. In The Thirteenth International 12 Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2025, Singapore, April 24-28, 2025. OpenReview.net, 2025. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=yAzN4tz7oI

    2025

  32. [32]

    3d- vla: A 3d vision-language-action generative world model

    Haoyu Zhen, Xiaowen Qiu, Peihao Chen, Jincheng Yang, Xin Yan, Yilun Du, Yining Hong, and Chuang Gan. 3d- vla: A 3d vision-language-action generative world model. In Ruslan Salakhutdinov , Zico Kolter, Katherine A. Heller, Adrian Weller, Nuria Oliver, Jonathan Scarlett, and Felix Berkenkamp, editors, Forty-first International Conference on Machine Learning...

    2024

  33. [33]

    TA-VLA: elucidating the design space of torque-aware vision-language-action models

    Zongzheng Zhang, Haobo Xu, Zhuo Yang, Chenghao Yue, Zehao Lin, Huan-ang Gao, Ziwei Wang, and Hao Zhao. TA-VLA: elucidating the design space of torque-aware vision-language-action models. CoRR, abs/2509.07962, 2025. doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.2509.07962. URL https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.07962

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.07962 2025

  34. [34]

    The Volterra Stein–Stein model with stochastic interest rates.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.01716, 2025

    Jialei Huang, Shuo Wang, Fanqi Lin, Yihang Hu, Chuan Wen, and Yang Gao. Tactile-vla: Unlocking vision-language- action model’s physical knowledge for tactile generalization. CoRR, abs/2507.09160, 2025. doi: 10.48550/ARXIV. 2507.09160. URL https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.09160

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv 2025

  35. [35]

    Egoplan-bench2: A benchmark for multimodal large language model planning in real-world scenarios, 2025

    Lu Qiu, Yi Chen, Yuying Ge, Yixiao Ge, Ying Shan, and Xihui Liu. Egoplan-bench2: A benchmark for multimodal large language model planning in real-world scenarios, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.04447. 13 Appendix Appendix Contents A Limitations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 B...

    arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    6 ) 2: while TOKENS ( E ) < B do 3: T∼T; ℓ∼U (

    6, 1. 6 ) 2: while TOKENS ( E ) < B do 3: T∼T; ℓ∼U (

  37. [37]

    5, 1. 5 ) ·α cL0; 4: e← ( SAMPLE ( T, ℓ ) , t, irrelevant ) 5: E←E∪{e}; t←t Δt 6: end while 7: E←SORTBYTIME ( E ) // Stage 2: Online memory consolidation 8: M←∅ 9: for e∈Edo 10: M←MEMORYBACKEND ( M, e ) 11: end for 12: returnM T o evaluate whether the visual monitor can serve as an execution-level supervisor rather than a passive visual captioner, we cons...

  38. [38]

    At task start, you may receive one initial scene summary for grounding

  39. [39]

    On every planning step, you receive the current observation image

  40. [40]

    After each executed action, you may receive post-action visual delta feedback comparing before/process/after images

  41. [41]

    Treat execution history as attempted commands, not guaranteed state changes

  42. [42]

    Update the world state from the current image and visual delta feedback before choosing the next action

  43. [43]

    current_step_analysis

    Return exactly one next step, or next_step:null when the task is complete. Allowed actions: - speak(message) - store_memory(content, scope, category) - control_light(action, device, brightness) - play_audio(action, audio_type, track, volume) - web_search(url, query) - set_home_mode(device, option_id, option_text) - pick_and_place(item_name, source, target...