Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Survey on Natural Language Processing for Fake News Detection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1811.00770 v2 pith:QELUTPOI submitted 2018-11-02 cs.CL cs.AI

A Survey on Natural Language Processing for Fake News Detection

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords fakenewsdetectionbeencontentdescribelanguagenatural
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Fake news detection is a critical yet challenging problem in Natural Language Processing (NLP). The rapid rise of social networking platforms has not only yielded a vast increase in information accessibility but has also accelerated the spread of fake news. Thus, the effect of fake news has been growing, sometimes extending to the offline world and threatening public safety. Given the massive amount of Web content, automatic fake news detection is a practical NLP problem useful to all online content providers, in order to reduce the human time and effort to detect and prevent the spread of fake news. In this paper, we describe the challenges involved in fake news detection and also describe related tasks. We systematically review and compare the task formulations, datasets and NLP solutions that have been developed for this task, and also discuss the potentials and limitations of them. Based on our insights, we outline promising research directions, including more fine-grained, detailed, fair, and practical detection models. We also highlight the difference between fake news detection and other related tasks, and the importance of NLP solutions for fake news detection.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Context Engineering for Trustworthiness: Rescorla Wagner Steering Under Mixed and Inappropriate Contexts

    cs.CL 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0

    LLMs amplify the least-dominant context, so one bad sentence among twenty good ones distorts answers; joint judgment-and-answer fine-tuning (RW-Steering) stabilizes response quality across contamination levels from 0% to 95%.