REVIEW 2 cited by
Dual-View Visual Contextualization for Web Navigation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Automatic web navigation aims to build a web agent that can follow language instructions to execute complex and diverse tasks on real-world websites. Existing work primarily takes HTML documents as input, which define the contents and action spaces (i.e., actionable elements and operations) of webpages. Nevertheless, HTML documents may not provide a clear task-related context for each element, making it hard to select the right (sequence of) actions. In this paper, we propose to contextualize HTML elements through their "dual views" in webpage screenshots: each HTML element has its corresponding bounding box and visual content in the screenshot. We build upon the insight -- web developers tend to arrange task-related elements nearby on webpages to enhance user experiences -- and propose to contextualize each element with its neighbor elements, using both textual and visual features. The resulting representations of HTML elements are more informative for the agent to take action. We validate our method on the recently released Mind2Web dataset, which features diverse navigation domains and tasks on real-world websites. Our method consistently outperforms the baseline in all the scenarios, including cross-task, cross-website, and cross-domain ones.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
ProactiveVA: Proactive Visual Analytics with LLM-Based UI Agent
An LLM-based UI agent monitors visual analytics interactions, detects when users struggle, infers their intent, and proactively provides context-aware guidance.
-
Software Engineering for and with GUI Agent
A survey of 336 GUI-agent papers finds rapid growth alongside weak engineering support for recovery, human oversight, maintainability, and privacy, and calls for lifecycle-centered testing and governance.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.