REVIEW 4 cited by
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
CountQA: How Well Do MLLMs Count in the Wild?
read the original abstract
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) demonstrate remarkable fluency in understanding visual scenes, yet they exhibit a critical lack in a fundamental cognitive skill: object counting. This blind spot severely limits their reliability in real-world applications. To date, this capability has been largely unevaluated in complex scenarios, as existing benchmarks either feature sparse object densities or are confined to specific visual domains, failing to test models under realistic conditions. Addressing this gap, we introduce CountQA, a challenging new benchmark designed to probe this deficiency. Comprising over 1,500 question-answer pairs, CountQA features real-world images with high object density, clutter, and occlusion. We investigate this weakness by evaluating 15 prominent MLLMs on the CountQA benchmark and reveal that the top-performing model achieves a mere 42.9% accuracy, with performance declining as object counts rise. By providing a dedicated benchmark to diagnose and rectify this core weakness, CountQA paves the way for a new generation of MLLMs that are not only descriptively fluent but also numerically grounded and spatially aware. We will open-source the dataset and code upon paper acceptance to foster further research.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
HoloCount: A Holistic Visual Counting Benchmark for MLLMs
HoloCount is a three-tier visual counting benchmark showing that MLLMs fail systematically on analytical reasoning, high-density scenes, and linguistic prior conflicts, with even the best models dropping below 50% acc...
-
V-Zero: Answer-Label-Free On-Policy Distillation with Contrastive Evidence Gating for Fine-Grained Visual Reasoning
V-Zero trains MLLMs for visual reasoning without answer labels by gating on-policy distillation trajectories using contrastive evidence from relevant versus negative image crops.
-
Explicit Reasoning Makes Better Judges: A Systematic Study on Accuracy, Efficiency, and Robustness
Thinking LLMs achieve ~10 percentage points higher accuracy than non-thinking ones on RewardBench with under 2x compute overhead, outperforming augmentation strategies that cost over 8x more while also showing better ...
-
ABACUS: Adapting Unified Foundation Model for Bridging Image Count Understanding and Generation
ABACUS adapts a 3B unified foundation model using density-aware zooming, boundary-aware GRPO, and cycle-consistent self-critique to achieve SOTA on seven counting and generation benchmarks without task-specific training.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.