Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Exploring the Role of Large Language Models in Cybersecurity: A Systematic Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.15622 v2 pith:QHVCDPLZ submitted 2025-04-22 cs.CR

Exploring the Role of Large Language Models in Cybersecurity: A Systematic Survey

classification cs.CR
keywords cybercybersecuritysurveythreatsattackcyberattacksexploringfield
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

With the rapid development of technology and the acceleration of digitalisation, the frequency and complexity of cyber security threats are increasing. Traditional cybersecurity approaches, often based on static rules and predefined scenarios, are struggling to adapt to the rapidly evolving nature of modern cyberattacks. There is an urgent need for more adaptive and intelligent defence strategies. The emergence of Large Language Model (LLM) provides an innovative solution to cope with the increasingly severe cyber threats, and its potential in analysing complex attack patterns, predicting threats and assisting real-time response has attracted a lot of attention in the field of cybersecurity, and exploring how to effectively use LLM to defend against cyberattacks has become a hot topic in the current research field. This survey examines the applications of LLM from the perspective of the cyber attack lifecycle, focusing on the three phases of defense reconnaissance, foothold establishment, and lateral movement, and it analyzes the potential of LLMs in Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) tasks. Meanwhile, we investigate how LLM-based security solutions are deployed and applied in different network scenarios. It also summarizes the internal and external risk issues faced by LLM during its application. Finally, this survey also points out the facing risk issues and possible future research directions in this domain.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Rectified Schr\"odinger Bridge Matching for Few-Step Visual Navigation

    cs.RO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    RSBM exploits velocity field invariance across regularization levels to achieve over 94% cosine similarity and 92% success in visual navigation using only 3 integration steps.

  2. Agentic SABRE: An Uncertainty-Aware Neuro-Symbolic Multi-Agent Framework for Adaptive Ransomware Detection

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    An uncertainty-aware multi-agent framework fuses semantic and behavioural ransomware signals via risk and uncertainty thresholds, reducing false escalations at equal recall while preserving calibrated triage.

  3. From Incomplete Architecture to Quantified Risk: Multimodal LLM-Driven Security Assessment for Cyber-Physical Systems

    cs.CR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    ASTRAL applies multimodal LLMs with prompt chaining and few-shot learning to synthesize CPS architectures from disparate sources, enabling adaptive threat identification and quantitative risk estimation, as supported ...

  4. Rectified Schr\"odinger Bridge Matching for Few-Step Visual Navigation

    cs.RO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Rectified Schrödinger Bridge Matching uses ε-invariant velocity structure and a learned prior so generative navigation policies reach ~94% cosine similarity and 92% success in three integration steps without distillation.