pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.12636 · v2 · pith:QLIWG4IWnew · submitted 2026-06-10 · ✦ hep-th · astro-ph.CO· gr-qc· quant-ph

Quantum Stochastic Inflation

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 08:31 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th astro-ph.COgr-qcquant-ph
keywords stochastic inflationopen quantum systemsGKLS master equationde Sitter spaceWigner functionFokker-Planck equationcoarse-grainingLindblad operator
0
0 comments X

The pith

Coarse-graining a de Sitter patch by tracing newly-entering modes produces the Fokker-Planck equation of stochastic inflation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper formulates stochastic inflation as the reduced dynamics of an open quantum system consisting of a fixed physical-size patch. New comoving modes that enter the patch at each time step become entangled with the bulk and are traced over, generating a non-unitary evolution. For a free test field in de Sitter this evolution is of GKLS form, driven by an effective Hamiltonian and one non-Hermitian Lindblad operator. The Wigner-Weyl transform of the resulting master equation recovers the Fokker-Planck equation that governs the classical phase-space distribution in stochastic inflation. In the light-field regime this further reduces to the overdamped Starobinsky equation, while heavy fields remain nearly pure.

Core claim

The central claim is that the stochastic dynamics of a free scalar field in de Sitter space arises as the open-system evolution of a one-mode Fock space representing the coarse-grained patch. Redefining the patch incorporates new modes that entangle with the existing ones; tracing them out produces GKLS dynamics whose Wigner function obeys the identical Fokker-Planck equation used in the classical formulation of stochastic inflation. Diffusion and Hubble friction therefore share the same quantum origin in a single Lindblad channel.

What carries the argument

The non-unitary GKLS master equation obtained by tracing over the entangled mode created when the coarse-grained patch is redefined at each time step.

If this is right

  • The Wigner function of the bulk density matrix satisfies the same Fokker-Planck equation as the classical probability distribution in stochastic inflation.
  • An overdamped reduction in the light-field regime reproduces Starobinsky's slow-roll Fokker-Planck equation.
  • Heavy fields remain close to pure underdamped states, precluding a classical stochastic description.
  • Unravelings of the GKLS equation into stochastic Schrödinger equations correspond to continuous measurements of the traced mode and connect to Langevin formulations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the traced modes carry negligible back-reaction, similar open-system reductions may justify the use of stochastic equations for other super-Hubble perturbations.
  • The framework implies that classicality in inflation arises from decoherence due to mode entanglement rather than from an external environment.
  • Extending the construction to interacting fields would require checking whether the Lindblad form survives or new channels appear.

Load-bearing premise

The coarse-grained field and momentum in a fixed physical-size patch form a canonical pair on a one-mode Fock space, and tracing the entangled mode from patch redefinition produces a valid non-unitary evolution without significant back-reaction.

What would settle it

An explicit calculation of the back-reaction from the traced degrees of freedom showing that it modifies the bulk Hamiltonian or Lindblad operator at leading order, or a direct comparison of the derived friction term with the known Hubble friction for varying patch sizes.

read the original abstract

We formulate stochastic inflation in an open quantum system framework. The field coarse-grained in a patch of fixed physical size, and the total momentum of that patch, form a canonical pair and act on a one-mode Fock space which we identify as the "bulk". At each time step, new comoving modes join the coarse-grained patch and the bulk has to be redefined. This redefinition produces an entangled mode that is traced over, yielding a non-unitary evolution equation for the bulk's density matrix. For a free test field in de Sitter, one obtains GKLS dynamics, generated by an effective Hamiltonian and a single non-Hermitian Lindblad operator, hence diffusion and Hubble friction originate from the same quantum channel. The Wigner-Weyl transform of the GKLS equation leads to a Fokker-Planck equation for the Wigner function, which matches the one that applies to the classical phase-space distribution of stochastic inflation. We also provide several schemes under which one can unravel the GKLS dynamics into stochastic Schrodinger equations when continuous measurements of the decoupled mode are performed, making contact with Langevin formulations of stochastic inflation. In the light-field regime, an additional overdamped reduction can be performed by integrating out the momentum variable in the Wigner distribution, leading to Starobinsky's slow-roll Fokker-Planck equation. In that regime, the purity of the patch is strongly suppressed. In contrast, for heavy fields, field diffusion is suppressed and the coarse-grained patch remains close to a pure underdamped oscillator, which prevents a classical stochastic treatment.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper formulates stochastic inflation within an open quantum system framework. The coarse-grained field and its conjugate momentum in a fixed physical-size patch are treated as a canonical pair acting on a one-mode Fock space ('bulk'). Redefining this bulk at each time step incorporates new comoving modes, producing an entangled mode that is traced over to generate a non-unitary evolution for the bulk density matrix. For a free test field in de Sitter, this yields GKLS dynamics generated by an effective Hamiltonian and a single non-Hermitian Lindblad operator. The Wigner-Weyl transform of the resulting master equation reproduces the classical Fokker-Planck equation of stochastic inflation. The work also provides unravelings into stochastic Schrödinger equations and discusses overdamped reductions for light fields (recovering Starobinsky's slow-roll equation) versus underdamped behavior for heavy fields, including purity suppression in the light regime.

Significance. If the central derivation holds, the result supplies a quantum-mechanical origin for the stochastic terms in inflation, demonstrating that Hubble friction and diffusion arise from the same quantum channel without introducing free parameters. This bridges QFT in curved spacetime with classical stochastic approaches and opens a route to controlled quantum corrections or interacting extensions. The explicit construction of the single-Lindblad GKLS form, the matching to the known Fokker-Planck equation, and the purity analysis for light versus heavy fields constitute clear strengths. The parameter-free recovery of the classical limit is a notable feature.

major comments (2)
  1. [Derivation of GKLS dynamics (abstract and main derivation section)] The load-bearing step is the claim that redefining the one-mode bulk at each time step and tracing the entangled mode produces exactly Markovian GKLS dynamics with one effective Hamiltonian and precisely one non-Hermitian Lindblad operator (abstract and the section deriving the master equation). Because the coarse-graining operators at successive times involve linear combinations of different mode sets, the reduced dynamics could in principle contain memory kernels or additional dissipators; the manuscript must show explicitly that these corrections vanish in the continuum limit and that back-reaction from the traced mode remains negligible, otherwise the single-channel GKLS form and the subsequent exact match to the classical Fokker-Planck equation are not guaranteed.
  2. [Wigner-Weyl transform section] § on the Wigner-Weyl transform and Fokker-Planck matching: the assertion that the transform of the GKLS equation exactly reproduces the classical phase-space distribution of stochastic inflation assumes that the Wigner function of the reduced bulk density matrix corresponds directly to the classical probability distribution. A brief discussion of the validity of this identification (including any ħ corrections or ordering ambiguities) would be required to confirm that the matching is not merely formal.
minor comments (2)
  1. [GKLS equation presentation] The explicit form of the non-Hermitian Lindblad operator in terms of creation and annihilation operators should be written out once the GKLS equation is obtained, to make the single-channel structure immediately verifiable.
  2. [Setup section] Notation for the time-dependent coarse-graining operators and the physical-size patch radius could be introduced with a short table or diagram to clarify the successive redefinitions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading, positive assessment of the work's significance, and constructive comments. We respond to each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Derivation of GKLS dynamics (abstract and main derivation section)] The load-bearing step is the claim that redefining the one-mode bulk at each time step and tracing the entangled mode produces exactly Markovian GKLS dynamics with one effective Hamiltonian and precisely one non-Hermitian Lindblad operator (abstract and the section deriving the master equation). Because the coarse-graining operators at successive times involve linear combinations of different mode sets, the reduced dynamics could in principle contain memory kernels or additional dissipators; the manuscript must show explicitly that these corrections vanish in the continuum limit and that back-reaction from the traced mode remains negligible, otherwise the single-channel GKLS form and the subsequent exact match to the classical Fokker-Planck equation are not guaranteed.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit demonstration of the Markovian limit is essential. The derivation in the manuscript proceeds by evolving the joint system over an infinitesimal interval Δt under the free de Sitter Hamiltonian and then performing the mode redefinition, which entangles the new comoving mode with the bulk; tracing over that mode yields the GKLS generator with a single non-Hermitian Lindblad operator. Potential memory kernels arise only at O((Δt)^2) and are discarded in the continuum limit Δt → 0. Back-reaction is absent for the free field because the traced mode begins in the Bunch-Davies vacuum and the entanglement is linear. To make this fully transparent we will expand the derivation section with an explicit expansion of the reduced map to second order in Δt, confirming that non-Markovian contributions vanish. This revision will not alter the central claim but will strengthen the supporting steps. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Wigner-Weyl transform section] § on the Wigner-Weyl transform and Fokker-Planck matching: the assertion that the transform of the GKLS equation exactly reproduces the classical phase-space distribution of stochastic inflation assumes that the Wigner function of the reduced bulk density matrix corresponds directly to the classical probability distribution. A brief discussion of the validity of this identification (including any ħ corrections or ordering ambiguities) would be required to confirm that the matching is not merely formal.

    Authors: We appreciate the suggestion. For the free quadratic theory considered here the Wigner-Weyl transform maps the GKLS master equation exactly onto the classical Fokker-Planck equation; there are no ħ corrections to the drift or diffusion coefficients because the underlying Hamiltonian is linear. The symmetric ordering built into the Wigner function eliminates operator-ordering ambiguities. We will insert a concise paragraph in the Wigner-Weyl section stating these facts and noting that ħ corrections would appear only for interacting fields, which lie outside the present scope. This addition will clarify that the matching is not merely formal within the free-field setting of the paper. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation proceeds from standard open-system QM rules to classical FP equation

full rationale

The paper starts from the definition of the bulk as a one-mode Fock space for the coarse-grained field and momentum, then applies the standard procedure of tracing an entangled mode produced by patch redefinition at each time step. This yields a non-unitary evolution that is shown to take GKLS form for a free de Sitter field; the Wigner-Weyl transform then produces the Fokker-Planck equation. No equation reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-citation, or renamed input; the matching to classical stochastic inflation is an output of the calculation rather than an input. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard quantum mechanics applied to a free scalar in de Sitter space together with the modeling choice that the coarse-grained patch behaves as an isolated one-mode system whose environment is the traced entangled modes.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Quantum mechanics on Fock space for the coarse-grained field and momentum
    The bulk is identified as a one-mode Fock space with canonical pair.
  • domain assumption Free test field in de Sitter background
    The explicit GKLS form is derived for a free field in de Sitter.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5822 in / 1643 out tokens · 26998 ms · 2026-06-27T08:31:53.997083+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Starobinsky,Stochastic de Sitter (inflationary) stage in the early Universe,Lect

    A.A. Starobinsky,Stochastic de Sitter (inflationary) stage in the early Universe,Lect. Notes Phys.246 (1986) 107

  2. [2]

    Nambu and M

    Y. Nambu and M. Sasaki,Stochastic Stage of an Inflationary Universe Model,Phys. Lett. B205(1988) 441

  3. [3]

    Starobinsky and J

    A.A. Starobinsky and J. Yokoyama,Equilibrium state of a self-interacting scalar field in the De Sitter background,Phys. Rev. D50(1994) 6357 [arXiv:astro-ph/9407016]

  4. [4]

    Grain and V

    J. Grain and V. Vennin,Stochastic inflation in phase space: Is slow roll a stochastic attractor?,JCAP 2017(2017) 045 [arXiv:1703.00447]

  5. [5]

    Quantum Diffusion and Large Primordial Perturbations from Inflation

    V. Vennin and D. Wands,Quantum diffusion and large primordial perturbations from inflation, in Primordial Black Holes, pp. 201–227, Springer (2025), DOI:10.1007/978-981-97-8887-3_8 [arXiv:2402.12672]

  6. [6]

    Polarski and A.A

    D. Polarski and A.A. Starobinsky,Semiclassicality and decoherence of cosmological perturbations,Class. Quant. Grav.13(1996) 377 [arXiv:gr-qc/9504030]

  7. [7]

    Kiefer, D

    C. Kiefer, D. Polarski and A.A. Starobinsky,Quantum to classical transition for fluctuations in the early universe,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D07(1998) 455 [arXiv:gr-qc/9802003]

  8. [8]

    Martin and V

    J. Martin and V. Vennin,Obstructions to Bell CMB Experiments,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 063501 [arXiv:1706.05001]

  9. [9]

    Brandenberger, R

    R.H. Brandenberger, R. Laflamme and M. Mijic,Classical Perturbations From Decoherence of Quantum Fluctuations in the Inflationary Universe,Mod. Phys. Lett. A5(1990) 2311

  10. [10]

    Lombardo and F.D

    F. Lombardo and F.D. Mazzitelli,Coarse graining and decoherence in quantum field theory,Phys. Rev. D53(1996) 2001 [arXiv:hep-th/9508052]

  11. [11]

    Calzetta and B.L

    E. Calzetta and B.L. Hu,Quantum fluctuations, decoherence of the mean field, and structure formation in the early universe,Phys. Rev. D52(1995) 6770 [arXiv:gr-qc/9505046]

  12. [12]

    Lombardo and D

    F.C. Lombardo and D. Lopez Nacir,Decoherence during inflation: The Generation of classical inhomogeneities,Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 063506 [arXiv:gr-qc/0506051]

  13. [13]

    Burgess, R

    C.P. Burgess, R. Holman and D. Hoover,Decoherence of inflationary primordial fluctuations,Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 063534 [arXiv:astro-ph/0601646]. – 24 –

  14. [14]

    Sharman and G.D

    J.W. Sharman and G.D. Moore,Decoherence due to the Horizon after Inflation,JCAP11(2007) 020 [arXiv:0708.3353]

  15. [15]

    Martin and V

    J. Martin and V. Vennin,Observational constraints on quantum decoherence during inflation,JCAP05 (2018) 063 [arXiv:1801.09949]

  16. [16]

    Martin and V

    J. Martin and V. Vennin,Non Gaussianities from Quantum Decoherence during Inflation,JCAP06 (2018) 037 [arXiv:1805.05609]

  17. [17]

    Martin, A

    J. Martin, A. Micheli and V. Vennin,Discord and decoherence,JCAP04(2022) 051 [arXiv:2112.05037]

  18. [18]

    Burgess, R

    C.P. Burgess, R. Holman, G. Kaplanek, J. Martin and V. Vennin,Minimal decoherence from inflation, JCAP07(2023) 022 [arXiv:2211.11046]

  19. [19]

    Martin and V

    J. Martin and V. Vennin,Real-space entanglement of quantum fields,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 085012 [arXiv:2106.14575]

  20. [20]

    Martin and V

    J. Martin and V. Vennin,Real-space entanglement in the Cosmic Microwave Background,JCAP10 (2021) 036 [arXiv:2106.15100]

  21. [21]

    Espinosa-Portal´ es and V

    L. Espinosa-Portal´ es and V. Vennin,Real-space Bell inequalities in de Sitter,JCAP07(2022) 037 [arXiv:2203.03505]

  22. [22]

    Agullo, B

    I. Agullo, B. Bonga and P. Ribes-Metidieri,Inflation does not create entanglement in local observables, Class. Quant. Grav.43(2026) 01LT01 [arXiv:2409.16366]

  23. [23]

    Ribes-Metidieri, I

    P. Ribes-Metidieri, I. Agullo and B. Bonga,Entanglement and correlations between local observables in de Sitter spacetime,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 065001 [arXiv:2511.17382]

  24. [24]

    Agullo, E

    I. Agullo, E. Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez, S. Nadal-Gisbert, P. Ribes-Metidieri and K. Yamaguchi,Correlation and Entanglement partners in Gaussian systems,arXiv:2512.11055

  25. [25]

    Martin and V

    J. Martin and V. Vennin,Quantum Discord of Cosmic Inflation: Can we Show that CMB Anisotropies are of Quantum-Mechanical Origin?,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 023505 [arXiv:1510.04038]

  26. [26]

    Green and R.A

    D. Green and R.A. Porto,Signals of a Quantum Universe,Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020) 251302 [arXiv:2001.09149]

  27. [27]

    Launay, G.I

    Y.L. Launay, G.I. Rigopoulos and E.P.S. Shellard,Quantitative classicality in cosmological interactions during inflation,JCAP05(2025) 071 [arXiv:2412.16143]

  28. [28]

    Ireland and V

    A. Ireland and V. Vennin,When inflationary perturbations refuse to classicalise: the role of non-Gaussianity in Wigner negativity,arXiv:2601.22219

  29. [29]

    Gorini, A

    V. Gorini, A. Kossakowski and E.C.G. Sudarshan,Completely positive dynamical semigroups of N-level systems,J. Math. Phys.17(1976) 821

  30. [30]

    Lindblad,On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups,Commun

    G. Lindblad,On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups,Commun. Math. Phys.48(1976) 119

  31. [31]

    Schlosshauer,Decoherence: and the quantum-to-classical transition, Springer Science & Business Media (2007), 10.1007/978-3-540-35775-9

    M.A. Schlosshauer,Decoherence: and the quantum-to-classical transition, Springer Science & Business Media (2007), 10.1007/978-3-540-35775-9

  32. [32]

    Wiseman and G.J

    H.M. Wiseman and G.J. Milburn,Quantum Measurement and Control, Cambridge University Press (2009), 10.1017/CBO9780511813948

  33. [33]

    Estimating the

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The theory of open quantum systems, Oxford University Press (2002), 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199213900.001.0001

  34. [34]

    Burgess, R

    C.P. Burgess, R. Holman, G. Tasinato and M. Williams,EFT Beyond the Horizon: Stochastic Inflation and How Primordial Quantum Fluctuations Go Classical,JHEP03(2015) 090 [arXiv:1408.5002]. – 25 –

  35. [35]

    Colas, J

    T. Colas, J. Grain and V. Vennin,Benchmarking the cosmological master equations,Eur. Phys. J. C82 (2022) 1085 [arXiv:2209.01929]

  36. [36]

    Colas, J

    T. Colas, J. Grain and V. Vennin,Quantum recoherence in the early universe,EPL142(2023) 69002 [arXiv:2212.09486]

  37. [37]

    Goldman, N

    S. Goldman, N. Lashkari and R.G. Leigh,A Lindbladian for exact renormalization of density operators in QFT,arXiv:2410.16582

  38. [38]

    Colas, J

    T. Colas, J. Grain, G. Kaplanek and V. Vennin,In-in formalism for the entropy of quantum fields in curved spacetimes,JCAP08(2024) 047 [arXiv:2406.17856]

  39. [39]

    Burgess, T

    C.P. Burgess, T. Colas, R. Holman, G. Kaplanek and V. Vennin,Cosmic Purity Lost: Perturbative and Resummed Late-Time Inflationary Decoherence,JCAP08(2024) 042 [arXiv:2403.12240]

  40. [40]

    Beneke, P

    M. Beneke, P. Hager and A.F. Sanfilippo,Quantum correction to the diffusion term in stochastic inflation from composite-operator matching in Soft de Sitter Effective Theory,arXiv:2604.14283

  41. [41]

    C´ espedes and T

    S. C´ espedes and T. Colas,Stochastic inflation from a non-equilibrium renormalization group, arXiv:2605.11096

  42. [42]

    Lopez and N

    F. Lopez and N. Bartolo,Quantum signatures and decoherence during inflation from deep subhorizon perturbations,arXiv:2503.23150

  43. [43]

    Ag¨ u´ ı Salcedo, T

    S. Ag¨ u´ ı Salcedo, T. Colas, P. Suman, B. Zhang, J. Fergusson and E.P.S. Shellard,Primordial non-gaussianity constraints on dissipative inflation,arXiv:2603.13473

  44. [44]

    Akama and C

    S. Akama and C. Lin,Bypassing the Lyth Bound with Entangled Gravitons: Primordial Signatures and Late-Time Noise,arXiv:2602.20734

  45. [45]

    Tokuda and T

    J. Tokuda and T. Tanaka,Statistical nature of infrared dynamics on de Sitter background,JCAP02 (2018) 014 [arXiv:1708.01734]

  46. [46]

    Tokuda and T

    J. Tokuda and T. Tanaka,Can all the infrared secular growth really be understood as increase of classical statistical variance?,JCAP11(2018) 022 [arXiv:1806.03262]

  47. [47]

    Gorbenko and L

    V. Gorbenko and L. Senatore,λϕ 4 in dS,arXiv:1911.00022

  48. [48]

    C´ espedes, A.-C

    S. C´ espedes, A.-C. Davis and D.-G. Wang,On the IR divergences in de Sitter space: loops, resummation and the semi-classical wavefunction,JHEP04(2024) 004 [arXiv:2311.17990]

  49. [49]

    Green and K

    D. Green and K. Gupta,Quantum Walks and Exact RG in de Sitter Space,arXiv:2512.13842

  50. [50]

    Boddy, S.M

    K.K. Boddy, S.M. Carroll and J. Pollack,How Decoherence Affects the Probability of Slow-Roll Eternal Inflation,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 023539 [arXiv:1612.04894]

  51. [51]

    Haba,Stabilization of Starobinsky–Vilenkin stochastic inflation by an environmental noise,Int

    Z. Haba,Stabilization of Starobinsky–Vilenkin stochastic inflation by an environmental noise,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D28(2019) 1950085 [arXiv:1802.00841]

  52. [52]

    Haba,Stochastic inflation with quantum and thermal noise,Eur

    Z. Haba,Stochastic inflation with quantum and thermal noise,Eur. Phys. J. C78(2018) 596 [arXiv:1802.09577]

  53. [53]

    Weenink and T

    J. Weenink and T. Prokopec,On decoherence of cosmological perturbations and stochastic inflation, arXiv:1108.3994

  54. [54]

    Li,Stochastic inflation as an open quantum system,Phys

    Y.-Z. Li,Stochastic inflation as an open quantum system,Phys. Rev. Lett.136(2026) 071501 [arXiv:2507.02070]

  55. [55]

    Li,Stochastic inflation as an open quantum system II: open effective field theory and stochastic matching,arXiv:2605.21929

    Y.-Z. Li,Stochastic inflation as an open quantum system II: open effective field theory and stochastic matching,arXiv:2605.21929. – 26 –

  56. [56]

    Lesgourgues, D

    J. Lesgourgues, D. Polarski and A.A. Starobinsky,Quantum to classical transition of cosmological perturbations for nonvacuum initial states,Nucl. Phys. B497(1997) 479 [arXiv:gr-qc/9611019]

  57. [57]

    Kiefer and D

    C. Kiefer and D. Polarski,Emergence of classicality for primordial fluctuations: Concepts and analogies, Annalen Phys.7(1998) 137 [arXiv:gr-qc/9805014]

  58. [58]

    Haag,Local Quantum Physics: Fields, Particles, Algebras, Texts and Monographs in Physics, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2 ed

    R. Haag,Local Quantum Physics: Fields, Particles, Algebras, Texts and Monographs in Physics, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2 ed. (1996), 10.1007/978-3-642-61458-3

  59. [59]

    Fewster and K

    C.J. Fewster and K. Rejzner,Algebraic Quantum Field Theory – an introduction,arXiv:1904.04051

  60. [60]

    Salopek and J.R

    D.S. Salopek and J.R. Bond,Nonlinear evolution of long-wavelength metric fluctuations in inflationary models,Phys. Rev. D42(1990) 3936

  61. [61]

    Sasaki and E.D

    M. Sasaki and E.D. Stewart,A General analytic formula for the spectral index of the density perturbations produced during inflation,Prog. Theor. Phys.95(1996) 71 [arXiv:astro-ph/9507001]

  62. [62]

    Wands, K.A

    D. Wands, K.A. Malik, D.H. Lyth and A.R. Liddle,A New approach to the evolution of cosmological perturbations on large scales,Phys. Rev. D62(2000) 043527 [arXiv:astro-ph/0003278]

  63. [63]

    Lyth and D

    D.H. Lyth and D. Wands,Conserved cosmological perturbations,Phys. Rev. D68(2003) 103515 [arXiv:astro-ph/0306498]

  64. [64]

    Rigopoulos and E.P.S

    G.I. Rigopoulos and E.P.S. Shellard,The separate universe approach and the evolution of nonlinear superhorizon cosmological perturbations,Phys. Rev. D68(2003) 123518 [arXiv:astro-ph/0306620]

  65. [65]

    Lyth and Y

    D.H. Lyth and Y. Rodriguez,The Inflationary prediction for primordial non-Gaussianity,Phys. Rev. Lett.95(2005) 121302 [arXiv:astro-ph/0504045]

  66. [66]

    Caldeira and A.J

    A.O. Caldeira and A.J. Leggett,Path integral approach to quantum brownian motion,Physica A: Statistical mechanics and its Applications121(1983) 587

  67. [67]

    Wigner,On the quantum correction for thermodynamic equilibrium,Phys

    E. Wigner,On the quantum correction for thermodynamic equilibrium,Phys. Rev.40(1932) 749

  68. [68]

    Christie, J

    R. Christie, J. Eastman, R. Schubert and E.-M. Graefe,Quantum-jump vs stochastic Schr¨ odinger dynamics for Gaussian states with quadratic Hamiltonians and linear Lindbladians,Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical55(2022) 455302 [arXiv:2203.11530]

  69. [69]

    https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4939-1323-7

    G.A. Pavliotis,Stochastic Processes and Applications: Diffusion Processes, the Fokker–Planck and Langevin Equations, vol. 60 ofTexts in Applied Mathematics, Springer, New York, NY (2014), 10.1007/978-1-4939-1323-7

  70. [70]

    Christie, J

    R. Christie, J. Joo, G. Kaplanek, V. Vennin and D. Wands,Cosmic lockdown: When decoherence saves the universe from tunneling,arXiv:2512.14204. – 27 – A Derivation of Stochastic-Inflation GKLS Dynamics This appendix is a technical and self-contained derivation of the effective one-mode Hamiltonian for the bulk part of the bulk-boundary dynamics and the one...

  71. [71]

    The moving-cutoff step is formulated as a redefinition process over an infinitesimal interval dN. At e-foldN, the infrared field lives in the Fock space FN =F |k|<kσ(N) =F ∥ N ⊗ F ⊥ N .(A.1) HereF ∥ N is the homogeneous one-mode Fock space on which ˆQN , ˆPN act, whileF ⊥ N collects the orthog- onal infrared combinations. The density matrix ˆρN used in th...