Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 3 cited by

Schott term in the binding energy for compact binaries on circular orbits at fourth post-Newtonian order

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper derives the 4PN pseudo-Schott term in the binding energy and shows that, expressed in terms of the observable waveform frequency, it exactly reproduces the conservative energy, confirming the 4.5PN phasing postulate.

desk verdict A careful PN calculation that finds a new non-vanishing 4PN pseudo-Schott term and confirms the 4.5PN phasing postulate, but the advanced-tail integration formula carries the weight and is not fully justified. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.13245 v2 pith:QN6CTU5M submitted 2025-04-17 gr-qc hep-th

David Trestini This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qchep-th MSC 83C2583C35 PACS 04.25.Nx04.30.-w
keywords post-NewtonianapproximationbindingenergySchotttermradiationreactiongravitationaltailscircularorbitsgravitational-wavephasingflux-balancelaw
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes that the binding energy used in the gravitational-wave flux-balance law for a circular compact binary is not simply the 4PN conservative energy. A radiation-reaction correction generated by gravitational tails, the 4PN pseudo-Schott term, must be added, and unlike the ordinary Schott terms at 2.5PN, 3.5PN, and 4.5PN, this term is not a total derivative and is hereditary, so it does not vanish on circular orbits. When the resulting energy and angular momentum are expressed in terms of the waveform frequency, the arbitrary slicing parameter drops out and the energy takes exactly the same functional form as the conservative energy in terms of the orbital frequency. This confirms the physical postulate used in the 4.5PN phasing computation and completes the derivation of that phasing. The derivation extends to all ten Poincaré invariants and yields thermodynamic first-law-type relations for the binding energy and angular momentum.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing objects are the dissipative 4PN tail acceleration of Eq. (2.4b), the advanced-time postadiabatic integration formula of Eq. (4.4), and the orbital-to-waveform frequency relation of Eq. (6.5). The postadiabatic formula extends the known retarded-time tail integrals to the artificially introduced advanced-time integrals that appear when the tail is split into conservative and dissipative pieces under time reversal; it is the only tool that makes the retarded-minus-advanced integrals and the doubly hereditary term in the pseudo-Schott energy nonvanishing at leading order. The frequency relation has coefficients identical to the circular-orbit pseudo-Schott term, which is why the slicing parameter $b_0$ cancels when the final energy is written in terms of the observable waveform frequency.

What would settle it

Evaluate the doubly hereditary integral in the energy pseudo-Schott term, Eq. (3.13a), on a quasicircular inspiral with an explicit convergent regulator, such as a smooth cutoff before the would-be merger time, and compare the result with Eq. (5.6a); if the advanced postadiabatic formula (4.4) is not reproduced, the central result fails. Alternatively, compute the circular-orbit binding energy directly from the Bondi mass at future null infinity in a numerical simulation accurate at 4PN and compare it with Eq. (6.3a).

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

At 4PN order, the dissipative half of the tail contribution to the equations of motion produces a correction to the conservative Poincaré invariants. The paper's central claim is that this correction, evaluated explicitly for circular orbits, has the form $E^{\rm 4PN}_{\rm diss} = -\frac{c^2 m \nu^2 y^5}{2}\left[\frac{128}{5}\ln\left(\frac{Gm}{c^2 b_0}\right) - \frac{192}{5}\ln y - \frac{128}{5}\gamma_E - \frac{256}{5}\ln 2 - \frac{32}{15}\right]$, with a companion angular-momentum term satisfying $E_{\rm diss} = \omega J_{\rm diss}$. This pseudo-Schott term is doubly hereditary: it contains integrals over both the past and the future history of the quadrupole moment, and it is not a total derivative. Adding it to the 4PN conservative energy and changing variables from the orbital frequency $y$ to the waveform frequency $x$ cancels the $b_0$ dependence, and the resulting binding energy is exactly the conservative energy with $y$ replaced by $x$. The author therefore claims that the physical postulate used in the 4.5PN phasing is derived rather than assumed, and that the same pattern holds for the angular momentum, linear momentum, and center-of-mass, with $dE/d\Omega_{22} = \Omega_{22}\, dJ/d\Omega_{22}$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the advanced-time postadiabatic integration formula (4.4), which is inferred from time-reflection symmetry and checked only by an integration-by-parts identity; if a proper convergent-integral derivation produces different signs or coefficients, the pseudo-Schott term and the claimed match would break down.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The published 4.5PN phasing is confirmed: the previously postulated equality between the binding energy in waveform frequency and the conservative energy in orbital frequency follows from the explicit computation of the pseudo-Schott term.
  • The frequency evolution obtained from the flux-balance law becomes independent of the spacetime foliation parameter $b_0$ at 4.5PN, resolving the ambiguity that motivated the postulate.
  • The same pseudo-Schott construction applies to angular momentum, linear momentum, and center-of-mass, so all ten Poincaré invariants are controlled at 4.5PN including dissipative corrections.
  • The orbital-frequency chirp and phase at 4.5PN, including black-hole horizon absorption, are obtained and are consistent with the waveform-frequency results.
  • The binding energy and angular momentum satisfy the first-law-type relation $dE/d\Omega_{22} = \Omega_{22}\, dJ/d\Omega_{22}$ in terms of the waveform frequency, a dissipative analogue of binary black-hole mechanics.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the pseudo-Schott term is real, then any 4PN-accurate waveform model that identifies the binding energy with the conservative energy will be systematically off at the level of the postadiabatic tail contribution, giving a concrete target for calibration against numerical simulations.
  • The advanced-time postadiabatic formula, once derived from a convergent regulator, could be checked by direct numerical integration of the full inspiral history; the same regulator would apply to the analogous hereditary corrections expected at higher PN orders from subleading tails.
  • The paper's proposed effective frequency, a flux-weighted combination of all radiative multipole frequencies, is a natural extension: at higher orders the (2,2)-mode waveform frequency may no longer be the unique observable that makes the binding energy match the conservative energy.
  • Small-mass-ratio perturbation calculations of the circular-orbit binding energy, with the appropriate value of $b_0$, would test directly whether the Bondi energy equals the binding energy rather than the conservative energy.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper computes the 4PN dissipative correction to the binding energy and angular momentum for circular compact binaries, starting from a split of the 4PN tail acceleration into conservative and dissipative pieces. The dissipative piece leads to a pseudo-Schott term that is doubly hereditary and nonvanishing on circular orbits. Using a postadiabatic integration formula extended to advanced-time tails, the author evaluates this term explicitly, re-expresses the result in terms of the waveform frequency variable x, and shows that the b0 dependence cancels and that the resulting binding energy has the same functional form in x as the conservative energy has in the orbital-frequency variable y. This is presented as a confirmation of the physical postulate used in the 4.5PN phasing computation of Blanchet et al. The paper also gives the corresponding angular-momentum relation, a thermodynamic first-law relation in the waveform frequency, and the 4.5PN orbital-frequency chirp and phasing, including horizon-absorption terms.

Significance. If the derivation is sound, this is an important result: it resolves a foliation-dependence issue in the 4.5PN phasing by deriving, rather than postulating, the relation between the binding energy and the waveform frequency. The computation is detailed, internally consistent, and the b0 cancellation in Sec. VI is explicitly demonstrated. The extension to angular momentum and the thermodynamic-type relation in Eq. (6.8) are valuable, and the self-consistency check in Sec. IV.B is a useful nontrivial test. The paper is also unusually candid in stating its main weakness. The central caveat is that the advanced-time postadiabatic formula, Eq. (4.4), which fixes the numerical content of the future-tail integrals, is not derived from a convergent integral or an explicit regulator; the author himself flags this in Sec. VIII. Because this formula is load-bearing for the main claim, the result is best viewed as conditional on a rigorous justification of Eq. (4.4) or a proof of regularization independence.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. IV.A, Eq. (4.4)] The advanced-time postadiabatic formula (4.4) is the load-bearing step of the calculation, but it is not derived from a convergent integral. The retarded case, Eq. (4.2), rests on the past falloff of the quadrupole moment, whereas the advanced case requires a future behavior that the PN inspiral model does not possess because the orbital frequency blows up at finite coalescence time. The paper states that the e-regulator route did not yield a clean derivation and that Eq. (4.4) is instead fixed by time-reflection symmetry. This formula feeds directly into the doubly hereditary integrals in Eq. (5.4a), hence into E_diss in Eq. (5.7a), and ultimately into the b0 cancellation in Sec. VI and the identity E(x)=E_cons(y) in Eq. (6.6). A different regularization of the future-tail integrals, compatible with time reflection, could shift E_diss by a finite 4PN term and alter the central conclusion. The author acknowledges this in Sec. VIII. I would like to see an independent derivation of Eq. (4.4), or an explicit regulator calculation showing that the final E_diss is finite and independent of the regularization prescription.
  2. [Sec. IV.B, Eq. (4.12)] The integration-by-parts check is presented as a strong consistency test, but it does not establish uniqueness of Eq. (4.4). The left-hand side of Eq. (4.6) is computed directly, while the right-hand side is evaluated using Eq. (4.4) together with the 2.5PN-accurate moments from Appendix A. The agreement shows that the proposed formula is consistent with one nontrivial identity built from the same multipolar moments and the same circular-orbit model. It does not exclude a different advanced-time prescription that also satisfies time-reflection symmetry and the same integration-by-parts identity but differs by a finite term at 4PN. Thus the check is a necessary condition, not a regularization-independent derivation, and it does not remove the ambiguity raised in the previous comment.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. I, Eq. (1.1)] There is a missing space in 'whereFE is the energy flux'; please fix the typo.
  2. [Sec. IV.A, Eq. (4.3)] The notation I^\pm_{\alpha,n} with a lower limit 0 is ambiguous because the integration variable and the argument t\pm\tau are not displayed. Please define the integral explicitly, for example with the integration variable and the upper limit stated.
  3. [Sec. VII.A] The text says that certain coefficients are put in bold font, but the displayed equations in the manuscript do not show any bold coefficients; either the typesetting is missing or the sentence should be removed.
  4. [References] Reference [23] is missing the 'arXiv:' prefix in '0911.4232 [gr-qc]'.
  5. [Sec. VIII, Eqs. (8.2)-(8.5)] The '?' over the equalities is an honest marker, but the text should explicitly state that the effective-frequency identities in Eqs. (8.2)-(8.5) are conjectures and are not used in the 4.5PN results of this paper.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the 4PN pseudo-Schott term is computed from the dissipative tail acceleration and the flux-balance residual, and the b0 cancellation and match with the [27,28] phasing postulate emerge from the algebra rather than being imposed.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained in the relevant sense: the pseudo-Schott term E_diss is not assumed to equal the difference between the conservative energy expressed in orbital frequency and the binding energy expressed in waveform frequency. Instead, it is assembled from (i) the dissipative tail acceleration (2.4b), (ii) the tail fluxes at infinity (3.10), and (iii) the flux-balance residual (3.11)-(3.12). The circular-orbit evaluation uses the postadiabatic integration formula (4.4), which is admittedly not derived from convergent future-tail integrals; the paper flags this explicitly in Sec. VIII: "One weakness of this work is the lack of a solid derivation of the postadiabatic formula obtained in Eq. (4.4)." That is a regularization/justification gap, not a circular reduction: the advanced-time formula is fixed by time-reflection symmetry and tested by integration by parts, and the target result, namely E(x) = E_cons(y) after using the frequency relation (6.5), is not used to determine any parameter of (4.4). The conservative energy, fluxes, and x-y frequency relation are imported from prior published work by the same group, but they are independent inputs with stated assumptions not containing the target equality; the b0 cancellation and the agreement with the earlier heuristic postulate appear only after carrying out the integrals. Therefore no step reduces by construction to its own output, and the correct circularity finding is a non-finding with score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 2 invented entities

No parameters are fitted to data: the arbitrary scale b0 cancels out of all observables, and the regularization of future-tail integrals is a convention rather than a fit. The load-bearing assumptions are the standard PN framework and flux-balance law, the specific time-reflection split of the tail acceleration (which introduces an ad hoc regularization), and the advanced-time postadiabatic integration formula (4.4) that the author acknowledges lacks a solid derivation.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Post-Newtonian expansion and flux-balance law for conservative plus dissipative dynamics
    The paper's computation of the pseudo-Schott term is built on the PN framework and on the flux-balance identity (3.5), which relates time derivatives of Poincare invariants to fluxes at null infinity.
  • ad hoc to paper Time-reflection split of the 4PN tail acceleration into conservative and dissipative pieces
    Eqs. (2.4a)-(2.4b) define the split; it requires advanced-time contributions that are ill-defined in the PN approximation (moments blow up at coalescence), regularized by a prescription that is stated but not uniquely fixed.
  • ad hoc to paper Advanced-time postadiabatic integration formula (4.4)
    This formula for integrals of moments over future times is obtained from the retarded formula by time reflection, not from a convergent-integral derivation; it is load-bearing for the doubly hereditary Schott term and is the paper's acknowledged weakness.
  • domain assumption Newtonian and 2.5PN-accurate expressions for the multipolar moments (Appendix A)
    The evaluation of the tail integrals for circular orbits uses these moment expressions from prior literature; any error in them would propagate to the Schott terms.
  • domain assumption Convergence of tail integrals in the past due to radiation-reaction-driven outspiral
    Used to justify evaluating the retarded tail integrals; standard in PN tail computations.
invented entities (2)
  • 4PN pseudo-Schott term in the binding energy and angular momentum independent evidence
    purpose: Reconciles the flux-balance law with the conservative Poincare invariants at 4PN by adding a hereditary dissipative contribution that does not vanish for circular orbits.
    The term is derived from known dissipative tail dynamics and the flux-balance identity, and it makes explicit predictions (Eqs. 5.7 and 6.5) that can be checked against self-force or numerical-relativity computations; it is not a free postulate.
  • Effective frequency Omega_eff (conjectured generalization)
    purpose: Proposed in Sec. VIII to extend the energy-frequency relation to higher PN orders as a weighted combination of mode frequencies.
    No independent handle yet; the paper explicitly marks it as a hypothesis with '?' signs, and it is not used in the main derivation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Schott term in the binding energy for compact binaries on circular orbits at fourth post-Newtonian order." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QN6CTU5M

@misc{pith2026250413245,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Schott term in the binding energy for compact binaries on circular orbits at fourth post-Newtonian order},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QN6CTU5M}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.13245}
}
abstract

The phasing for compact binary systems on circular orbits was obtained in arXiv:2304.11185 at fourth-and-a-half post-Newtonian (4.5PN) order thanks to two main ingredients: the 4PN conservative energy (associated to a nonradiative spacetime) in terms of the orbital frequency and the 4.5PN flux in terms of the waveform frequency (i.e., the half-frequency of the $(\ell,m)=(2,2)$ mode). When obtaining the phasing, a key physical postulate was made: the expression of the binding energy in terms of the waveform frequency was assumed to be identical to the expression of the conservative energy in terms of the orbital frequency. This postulate was necessary to ensure that the frequency evolution obtained through the flux-balance law (which involves the binding energy) was independent of the choice of spacetime foliation. In this work, I show that the binding energy entering the flux-balance law differs from the 4PN conservative energy by a 4PN pseudo-Schott term, associated with radiation-reaction effects due to gravitational tails. Unlike the usual Schott terms (at 2.5PN, 3.5PN and 4.5PN), the pseudo-Schott term is not a total derivative and is in fact hereditary, so it does not vanish for circular orbits. Remarkably, the binding energy thus obtained is in perfect agreement with the one obtained using the aforementioned physical postulate, which confirms that the 4.5PN phasing associated to the waveform frequency computed in arXiv:2304.11185 is indeed correct. This result is extended to the other Poincar\'e invariants, and `thermodynamic' relations between the binding energy and angular momentum are established. Finally, the chirp and phasing associated to the orbital frequency are presented at 4.5PN, including horizon-absorption effects.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Gravitational radiation reaction for compact binary systems at the fourth-and-a-half post-Newtonian order in harmonic coordinates

    gr-qc 2026-01 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The 4.5PN radiation-reaction acceleration of nonspinning compact binaries is derived in harmonic coordinates, including a dimensional-regularization pole, and is shown to satisfy flux-balance laws and Lorentz invariance.

  2. Post-adiabatic dynamics and waveform generation in self-force theory: an invariant pseudo-Hamiltonian framework

    gr-qc 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A pseudo-Hamiltonian reformulation of 1PA self-force dynamics yields local, invariant action-angle evolution equations and an embedded conservative Hamiltonian whose on-shell energy equals the first-law binding energy.

  3. Fixing the center-of-mass frame of numerical relativity waveforms using the post-Newtonian center-of-mass charge

    gr-qc 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A post-Newtonian model of the boosted center-of-mass charge makes BMS frame-fixing of nonprecessing, unequal-mass NR waveforms less sensitive to the fitting window, reducing parameter variance by up to ~25x.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Thus, we perform the time integra- tion as follows: Z ∞ 0 dρf y(t−ρ) = Z y 0 dy′ f(y′) dy′/dt, (5.5) where dy′/dt is given at the required order in Eq

    (5.4b) Then, we need to perform an integration with respect to time on this expression, but we notice that it only depends on time through x, which evolves on radiation- reaction timescales. Thus, we perform the time integra- tion as follows: Z ∞ 0 dρf y(t−ρ) = Z y 0 dy′ f(y′) dy′/dt, (5.5) where dy′/dt is given at the required order in Eq. (4.10). Using ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    128 5 ln Gm c2b0 − 192 5 ln(y)− 128 5 γE− 256 5 ln(2)− 32 15 # , (5.7a) Jcirc diss = Gm2ν2y7/2 c

    (5.6b) Adding it all together, I obtain finally Ecirc diss =−c2mν2y5 2 " 128 5 ln Gm c2b0 − 192 5 ln(y)− 128 5 γE− 256 5 ln(2)− 32 15 # , (5.7a) Jcirc diss = Gm2ν2y7/2 c " − 64 5 ln Gm c2b0 + 96 5 ln(y) + 64 5 γE + 128 5 ln(2) + 16 15 # . (5.7b) One immediately notices that these corrections satisfy at this order Ecirc diss =ωJ circ diss. (5.8) We shall s...

    work page 2016

  3. [3]

    Damour, P

    T. Damour, P. Jaranowski, and G. Sch¨ afer, Nonlocal-in- time action for the fourth post-Newtonian conservative dynamics of two-body systems, Phys. Rev. D 89, 064058 (2014), arXiv:1401.4548 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2014

  4. [4]

    Bini and T

    D. Bini and T. Damour, Analytical determination of the two-body gravitational interaction potential at the fourth post-Newtonian approximation, Phys. Rev. D 87, 121501(R) (2013), arXiv:1305.4884 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2013

  5. [6]

    Damour, P

    T. Damour, P. Jaranowski, and G. Sch¨ afer, On the conservative dynamics of two-body systems at the fourth post-Newtonian approximation of general relativ- ity, Phys. Rev. D 93, 084014 (2016), arXiv:1601.01283 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2016

  6. [7]

    Jaranowski and G

    P. Jaranowski and G. Sch¨ afer, Derivation of the local-in- time fourth post-Newtonian ADM Hamiltonian for spin- less compact binaries, Phys. Rev. D 92, 124043 (2015), arXiv:1508.01016 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2015

  7. [8]

    Damour, P

    T. Damour, P. Jaranowski, and G. Sch¨ afer, Fourth post- Newtonian effective one-body dynamics, Phys. Rev. D 91, 084024 (2015), arXiv:1502.07245 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2015

  8. [9]

    Bernard, L

    L. Bernard, L. Blanchet, A. Boh´ e, G. Faye, and S. Marsat, Dimensional regularization of the IR diver- gences in the Fokker action of point-particle binaries at the fourth post-Newtonian order, Phys. Rev. D 96, 104043 (2017), arXiv:1706.08480 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2017

Show all 72 references
  1. [10]

    Bernard, L

    L. Bernard, L. Blanchet, A. Boh´ e, G. Faye, and S. Marsat, Fokker action of nonspinning compact bina- ries at the fourth post-Newtonian approximation, Phys. Rev. D 93, 084037 (2016), arXiv:1512.02876 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  2. [11]

    Bernard, L

    L. Bernard, L. Blanchet, A. Boh´ e, G. Faye, and S. Marsat, Energy and periastron advance of compact binaries on circular orbits at the fourth post-Newtonian order, Phys. Rev. D 95, 044026 (2017), arXiv:1610.07934 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  3. [12]

    Foffa and R

    S. Foffa and R. Sturani, The dynamics of the gravita- tional two-body problem in the post-Newtonian approx- imation at quadratic order in the Newton’s constant, Phys. Rev. D 87, 064011 (2013), arXiv:1206.7087 [gr-qc]

    2013 arXiv

  4. [13]

    Bernard, L

    L. Bernard, L. Blanchet, G. Faye, and T. Marchand, Center-of-Mass Equations of Motion and Conserved In- tegrals of Compact Binary Systems at the Fourth Post- Newtonian Order, Phys. Rev. D 97, 044037 (2018), arXiv:1711.00283 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  5. [14]

    Foffa and R

    S. Foffa and R. Sturani, Tail terms in gravitational radi- ation reaction via effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D 87, 044056 (2012), arXiv:1111.5488 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  6. [15]

    Foffa, R

    S. Foffa, R. Porto, I. Rothstein, and R. Sturani, Con- servative dynamics of binary systems to fourth Post- Newtonian order in the EFT approach II: Renormal- ized Lagrangian, Phys. Rev. D 100, 024048 (2019), arXiv:1903.05118 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  7. [16]

    Foffa, P

    S. Foffa, P. Mastrolia, R. Sturani, and C. Sturm, Effec- tive field theory approach to the gravitational two-body dynamics at fourth post-Newtonian order and quintic in the Newton constant, Phys. Rev. D 95, 104009 (2017), arXiv:1612.00482 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  8. [17]

    Foffa and R

    S. Foffa and R. Sturani, Conservative dynamics of bi- nary systems to fourth Post-Newtonian order in the EFT approach I: Regularized Lagrangian, Phys. Rev. D 100, 024047 (2019), arXiv:1903.05113 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  9. [18]

    Iyer and C

    B. Iyer and C. Will, Post-Newtonian gravitational- radiation reaction for two-body systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 113 (1993)

    1993

  10. [19]

    Bl¨ umlein, A

    J. Bl¨ umlein, A. Maier, P. Marquard, and G. Sch¨ afer, Fourth post-Newtonian Hamiltonian dynamics of two- body systems from an effective field theory approach, Nucl. Phys. B 955, 115041 (2020), arXiv:2003.01692 [gr- qc]

    2020 arXiv

  11. [20]

    Burke and K

    W. Burke and K. Thorne, Gravitational Radiation Damping, in Relativity, edited by M. Carmeli, S. Fickler, and L. Witten (Plenum Press, New York and London,

  12. [21]

    K¨ onigsd¨ orffer, G

    C. K¨ onigsd¨ orffer, G. Faye, and G. Sch¨ afer, The bi- nary black-hole dynamics at the third-and-a-half post- Newtonian order in the ADM-formalism, Phys. Rev. D 68, 044004 (2003), astro-ph/0305048

    2003 arXiv

  13. [22]

    Iyer and C

    B. Iyer and C. Will, Post-Newtonian gravitational radia- tion reaction for two-body systems: Nonspinning bodies, Phys. Rev. D 52, 6882 (1995)

    1995

  14. [23]

    Pati and C

    M. Pati and C. Will, Post-Newtonian gravitational ra- diation and equations of motion via direct integration of the relaxed Einstein equations. II. Two-body equations of motion to second post-Newtonian order, and radiation- reaction to 3.5 post-Newtonian order, Phys. Rev. D 65...

    2002 arXiv

  15. [24]

    Blanchet, G

    L. Blanchet, G. Faye, and D. Trestini, Gravitational radi- ation reaction for compact binary systems at the fourth- and-a-half post-Newtonian order, Class. Quant. Grav. 42, 065015 (2025), arXiv:2407.18295 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  16. [25]

    Nissanke and L

    S. Nissanke and L. Blanchet, Gravitational radiation re- action in the equations of motion of compact binaries to 3.5 post-Newtonian order, Class. Quant. Grav. 22, 1007 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0412018

    2005 arXiv

  17. [26]

    Itoh, Third-and-a-half order post-Newtonian equa- tions of motion for relativistic compact binaries using the strong field point particle limit, Phys

    Y. Itoh, Third-and-a-half order post-Newtonian equa- tions of motion for relativistic compact binaries using the strong field point particle limit, Phys. Rev. D 80, 024003 (2009), 0911.4232 [gr-qc]

    2009 arXiv

  18. [27]

    Blanchet, G

    L. Blanchet, G. Faye, Q. Henry, F. Larrouturou, and D. Trestini, Gravitational-Wave Phasing of Quasicircular Compact Binary Systems to the Fourth-and-a-Half Post- Newtonian Order, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 121402 (2023), arXiv:2304.11185 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  19. [28]

    Gopakumar, B

    A. Gopakumar, B. R. Iyer, and S. Iyer, Second post- Newtonian gravitational radiation reaction for two-body systems: Nonspinning bodies, Phys. Rev. D 55, 6030 (1997), [Erratum: Phys. Rev. D 57, 6562 (1998)], arXiv:gr-qc/9703075

    1997 arXiv

  20. [29]

    A. K. Leibovich, B. A. Pardo, and Z. Yang, Radiation reaction for nonspinning bodies at 4.5PN in the effective field theory approach, Phys. Rev. D 108, 024017 (2023), arXiv:2302.11016 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  21. [30]

    Will and A

    C. Will and A. Wiseman, Gravitational radiation from compact binary systems: Gravitational waveforms and energy loss to second post-Newtonian order, Phys. Rev. D 54, 4813 (1996), arXiv:gr-qc/9608012 [gr-qc]

    1996 arXiv

  22. [31]

    Blanchet, G

    L. Blanchet, G. Faye, Q. Henry, F. Larrouturou, and D. Trestini, Gravitational-wave flux and quadrupole modes from quasicircular nonspinning compact binaries to the fourth post-Newtonian order, Phys. Rev. D 108, 064041 (2023), arXiv:2304.11186 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  23. [32]

    Amalberti, Z

    L. Amalberti, Z. Yang, and R. A. Porto, Gravitational radiation from inspiralling compact binaries to N3LO in 21 the effective field theory approach, Phys. Rev. D 110, 044046 (2024), arXiv:2406.03457 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  24. [33]

    Schott, On the motion of the Lorentz electron, Phil

    G. Schott, On the motion of the Lorentz electron, Phil. Mag. 6, 29, 49 (1915)

    1915

  25. [34]

    Le Tiec, L

    A. Le Tiec, L. Blanchet, and B. Whiting, The first law of binary black hole mechanics in general relativity and post-Newtonian theory, Phys. Rev. D 85, 064039 (2012), arXiv:1111.5378 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  26. [35]

    Arnowitt, S

    R. Arnowitt, S. Deser, and C. Misner, The dynamics of General Relativity, in An introduction to current re- search, edited by L. Witten (New York: Wiley, 1962)

    1962

  27. [36]

    A. M. Grant, K. Prabhu, and I. Shehzad, The Wald–Zoupas prescription for asymptotic charges at null infinity in general relativity, Class. Quant. Grav. 39, 085002 (2022), arXiv:2105.05919 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  28. [37]

    A. M. Grant, A. Le Tiec, and A. Pound, The first law of binary black hole mechanics with dissipation, in prep. (2025)

    2025

  29. [38]

    R. M. Wald and A. Zoupas, A General definition of ’con- served quantities’ in general relativity and other theories of gravity, Phys. Rev. D 61, 084027 (2000), arXiv:gr- qc/9911095

    2000

  30. [39]

    Larrouturou, Q

    F. Larrouturou, Q. Henry, L. Blanchet, and G. Faye, The quadrupole moment of compact binaries to the fourth post-Newtonian order: I. Non-locality in time and infra- red divergencies, Class. Quant. Grav. 39, 115007 (2022), arXiv:2110.02240 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  31. [40]

    R. A. Breuer and E. Rudolph, Radiation reaction and energy loss in the post-newtonian approximation of gen- eral relativity, General Relativity and Gravitation 13, 777 (1981)

    1981

  32. [41]

    Marchand, Q

    T. Marchand, Q. Henry, F. Larrouturou, S. Marsat, G. Faye, and L. Blanchet, The mass quadrupole mo- ment of compact binary systems at the fourth post- Newtonian order, Class. Quant. Grav. 37, 215006 (2020), arXiv:2003.13672 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  33. [42]

    Henry, G

    Q. Henry, G. Faye, and L. Blanchet, The current- type quadrupole moment and gravitational-wave mode (ℓ, m) = (2, 1) of compact binary systems at the third post-Newtonian order, Class. Quant. Grav. 38, 185004 (2021), arXiv:2105.10876 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  34. [43]

    Larrouturou, L

    F. Larrouturou, L. Blanchet, Q. Henry, and G. Faye, The quadrupole moment of compact binaries to the fourth post-Newtonian order: II. Dimensional regularization and renormalization, Class. Quant. Grav. 39, 115008 (2022), arXiv:2110.02243 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  35. [44]

    Blanchet, G

    L. Blanchet, G. Faye, and F. Larrouturou, The quadrupole moment of compact binaries to the fourth post-Newtonian order: from source to canonical moment, Class. Quant. Grav. 39, 195003 (2022), arXiv:2204.11293 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  36. [45]

    Blanchet, Radiative gravitational fields in general rel- ativity

    L. Blanchet, Radiative gravitational fields in general rel- ativity. II. Asymptotic behaviour at future null infinity, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 409, 383 (1987)

    1987

  37. [46]

    Trestini, F

    D. Trestini, F. Larrouturou, and L. Blanchet, The quadrupole moment of compact binaries to the fourth post-Newtonian order: relating the harmonic and ra- diative metrics, Class. Quant. Grav. 40, 055006 (2023), arXiv:2209.02719 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  38. [47]

    Trestini and L

    D. Trestini and L. Blanchet, Gravitational-wave tails of memory, Phys. Rev. D 107, 104048 (2023), arXiv:2301.09395 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  39. [48]

    Blanchet and T

    L. Blanchet and T. Damour, Hereditary effects in gravi- tational radiation, Phys. Rev. D 46, 4304 (1992)

    1992

  40. [49]

    S. L. Detweiler, Perspective on gravitational self-force analyses, Class. Quant. Grav. 22, S681 (2005), arXiv:gr- qc/0501004

    2005

  41. [50]

    Blanchet and T

    L. Blanchet and T. Damour, Tail Transported Temporal Correlations in the Dynamics of a Gravitating System, Phys. Rev. D 37, 1410 (1988)

    1988

  42. [51]

    Blanchet, Post-Newtonian Theory for Gravitational Waves, Living Rev

    L. Blanchet, Post-Newtonian Theory for Gravitational Waves, Living Rev. Rel. 17, 2 (2014), arXiv:1310.1528 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  43. [52]

    Blanchet, Time asymmetric structure of gravitational radiation, Phys

    L. Blanchet, Time asymmetric structure of gravitational radiation, Phys. Rev. D 47, 4392 (1993)

    1993

  44. [53]

    Blanchet, Gravitational radiation reaction and balance equations to post-Newtonian order, Phys

    L. Blanchet, Gravitational radiation reaction and balance equations to post-Newtonian order, Phys. Rev. D 55, 714 (1997), arXiv:gr-qc/9609049

    1997 arXiv

  45. [54]

    K. S. Thorne, Multipole Expansions of Gravitational Ra- diation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 52, 299 (1980)

    1980

  46. [55]

    C. R. Galley, A. K. Leibovich, R. A. Porto, and A. Ross, Tail effect in gravitational radiation reaction: Time non- locality and renormalization group evolution, Phys. Rev. D 93, 124010 (2016), arXiv:1511.07379 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  47. [56]

    Blanchet and A

    L. Blanchet and A. Le Tiec, First Law of Compact Binary Mechanics with Gravitational-Wave Tails, Class. Quant. Grav. 34, 164001 (2017), arXiv:1702.06839 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  48. [57]

    Blanchet and G

    L. Blanchet and G. Sch¨ afer, Gravitational wave tails and binary star systems, Class. Quant. Grav.10, 2699 (1993)

    1993

  49. [58]

    Blanchet and G

    L. Blanchet and G. Faye, Flux-balance equations for linear momentum and center-of-mass position of self- gravitating post-Newtonian systems, Class. Quant. Grav. 36, 085003 (2019), arXiv:1811.08966 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  50. [59]

    Comp` ere, R

    G. Comp` ere, R. Oliveri, and A. Seraj, The Poincar´ e and BMS flux-balance laws with application to binary sys- tems, JHEP 10, 116, arXiv:1912.03164 [gr-qc]

    1912 arXiv

  51. [60]

    Khairnar, L

    A. Khairnar, L. C. Stein, and M. Boyle, Approximate helical symmetry in compact binaries, Phys. Rev. D 111, 024072 (2025), arXiv:2410.16373 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  52. [61]

    K. G. Arun, L. Blanchet, B. R. Iyer, and M. S. S. Qu- sailah, The 2.5PN gravitational wave polarisations from inspiralling compact binaries in circular orbits, Class. Quant. Grav. 21, 3771 (2004), [Corrigendum: Class. Quant. Grav. 22, 3115 (2005)], arXiv:gr-qc/0404085

    2004 arXiv

  53. [62]

    Trestini, Gravitational radiation of compact binary systems in general relativity and in scalar-tensor theories , Ph.D

    D. Trestini, Gravitational radiation of compact binary systems in general relativity and in scalar-tensor theories , Ph.D. thesis, Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris, France, Sorbonne Universit´ e (2023), tel-04224762

    2023

  54. [63]

    Nagar and S

    A. Nagar and S. Akcay, Horizon-absorbed energy flux in circularized, nonspinning black-hole binaries and its effective-one-body representation, Phys. Rev. D 85, 044025 (2012), arXiv:1112.2840 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  55. [64]

    ¨Ozel and P

    F. ¨Ozel and P. Freire, Masses, Radii, and the Equation of State of Neutron Stars, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 54, 401 (2016), arXiv:1603.02698 [astro-ph.HE]

    2016 arXiv

  56. [65]

    1 +y −85 42− 11 42ν +y2 1087 1512− 512 216ν− 205 1512ν2 # +λ⟨iλj⟩

    for explicit expressions). Naturally, Ω eff coincides with the orbital frequency up to 3.5PN order, with Ω 22 up to 4.5PN, and becomes nontrivial beyond 5PN. As a matter of fact, preliminary work in Ref. [34] has shown that the proposed Ωeff of Eq. (8.5) succeeds in ex- tendin...

  57. [66]

    Taylor and E

    S. Taylor and E. Poisson, Nonrotating black hole in a post-Newtonian tidal environment, Phys. Rev. D 78, 084016 (2008), arXiv:0806.3052 [gr-qc]

    2008 arXiv

  58. [67]

    M. V. S. Saketh, Z. Zhou, S. Ghosh, J. Steinhoff, and D. Chatterjee, Investigating tidal heating in neutron stars via gravitational Raman scattering, Phys. Rev. D 110, 103001 (2024), arXiv:2407.08327 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  59. [68]

    Warburton, B

    N. Warburton, B. Wardell, D. Trestini, Q. Henry, 22 A. Pound, L. Blanchet, L. Durkan, G. Faye, and J. Miller, Comparison of 4.5PN and 2SF gravitational en- ergy fluxes from quasicircular compact binaries, (2024), arXiv:2407.00366 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  60. [69]

    Nagar, R

    A. Nagar, R. Gamba, P. Rettegno, V. Fantini, and S. Bernuzzi, Effective-one-body waveform model for non- circularized, planar, coalescing black hole binaries: The importance of radiation reaction, Phys. Rev. D 110, 084001 (2024), arXiv:2404.05288 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  61. [70]

    Nagar, D

    A. Nagar, D. Chiaramello, R. Gamba, S. Albanesi, S. Bernuzzi, V. Fantini, M. Panzeri, and P. Rettegno, Effective-one-body waveform model for noncircularized, planar, coalescing black hole binaries. II. High accuracy by improving logarithmic terms in resummations, Phys. Rev. D ...

    2025 arXiv

  62. [71]

    Fujita and B

    R. Fujita and B. R. Iyer, Spherical harmonic modes of 5.5 post-Newtonian gravitational wave polarisations and associated factorised resummed waveforms for a particle in circular orbit around a Schwarzschild black hole, Phys. Rev. D 82, 044051 (2010), arXiv:1005.2266 [gr-qc]

    2010 arXiv

  63. [72]

    Pound, B

    A. Pound, B. Wardell, N. Warburton, and J. Miller, Second-Order Self-Force Calculation of Gravitational Binding Energy in Compact Binaries, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 021101 (2020), arXiv:1908.07419 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  64. [73]

    Lewis, T

    J. Lewis, T. Kakehi, A. Pound, and T. Tanaka, Post- adiabatic dynamics and waveform generation in self- force theory: an invariant pseudo-Hamiltonian frame- work, (2025), arXiv:2507.08081 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.