pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.00850 · v1 · pith:QNE5U4MWnew · submitted 2026-07-01 · 💻 cs.CV · cs.LG

Mirror-Fusion Attention for Reflection-Aware Self-Supervised Representation Learning

Ruixin Li , Jin Liu , Yuling Shi , Stefano Lodi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-02 14:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV cs.LG
keywords self-supervised learningmirror fusion attentionvision transformersreflection priormedical imagingface analysisequivariant representations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Mirror-fusion attention lets self-supervised ViTs retain informative left-right differences in symmetric images by adding a soft reflection prior.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Most self-supervised methods enforce invariance to flips, which can discard useful left-right information in data like medical images and faces that are approximately bilateral. This paper proposes Mirror-Fusion-Augmented Self-Supervised Learning that builds mirror-paired views from an estimated symmetry axis and uses a Mirror-Fusion Attention module to allow selective interaction between mirrored tokens. The method adds reflection-consistency and token-alignment losses to the base SSL objective and is evaluated on CheXpert, BraTS, CelebA-HQ, and WFLW datasets. It reports better downstream performance, calibration, and robustness than MoCo-v3, DINO, MAE, and recent equivariant methods while using only about 2.7 percent more parameters. The results indicate that lightweight geometry-aware priors can enhance standard invariance-based SSL frameworks.

Core claim

MFASSL constructs mirror-paired views aligned to an estimated symmetry axis and introduces a lightweight Mirror-Fusion Attention module for adaptive token-level interaction between mirrored regions while preserving asymmetric cues. The base SSL objective is coupled with reflection-consistency and mid-layer token-alignment losses, resulting in improved downstream performance, calibration, and reflection robustness over baselines under matched ViT-B/16 settings with only approximately 2.7% additional parameters.

What carries the argument

The Mirror-Fusion Attention (MFA) module that enables adaptive interaction between mirrored regions in the transformer while keeping asymmetric information intact.

If this is right

  • Improved performance on downstream tasks for medical and facial image datasets.
  • Enhanced model calibration and robustness to reflections compared to standard SSL methods.
  • Consistent gains over equivariant SSL approaches with minimal added parameters.
  • Compatibility with existing SSL frameworks without requiring backbone redesign.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This approach may generalize to other approximate symmetries beyond left-right reflection in different imaging domains.
  • Integrating such priors could reduce reliance on extensive data augmentation for symmetric data types.
  • Further tests on datasets with varying degrees of symmetry could reveal the limits of the reflection prior.
  • Combining this with other geometric priors might lead to more robust multi-view learning systems.

Load-bearing premise

The estimated symmetry axis produces reliable mirror-paired views that maintain informative correspondences without misalignment or artifacts.

What would settle it

Observing no performance improvement when the Mirror-Fusion Attention module is ablated or when mirror pairs are constructed with incorrect axes on bilateral datasets would challenge the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.00850 by Jin Liu, Ruixin Li, Stefano Lodi, Yuling Shi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: MFASSL Architecture. (a) Pretraining Pipeline: standard augmented views provide the base SSL supervision, while mirror-paired crops are routed through MFA during pretraining. Their pre-fusion tokens yield symmetry-aware losses (Leq, Lmid) at layer 8, and their post-fusion representations are fed to the same base SSL objective. (b) Mirror-Fusion Attention (MFA): performs token-level fusion with a learnable … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Most self-supervised learning (SSL) methods encourage invariance across augmentations, but strict flip invariance can suppress informative left--right correspondences in approximately bilateral data such as medical images and human faces. We propose Mirror-Fusion-Augmented Self-Supervised Learning (MFASSL), a Vision Transformer framework that injects a soft reflection prior into standard SSL without redesigning the backbone. MFASSL constructs mirror-paired views aligned to an estimated symmetry axis and introduces a lightweight Mirror-Fusion Attention (MFA) module for adaptive token-level interaction between mirrored regions while preserving asymmetric cues. The base SSL objective is further coupled with reflection-consistency and mid-layer token-alignment losses. Across CheXpert, BraTS, CelebA-HQ, and WFLW, MFASSL improves downstream performance, calibration, and reflection robustness over MoCo-v3, DINO, and MAE baselines under matched ViT-B/16 settings. It also achieves stronger and more consistent gains than recent equivariant SSL approaches with only approximately 2.7\% additional parameters. These results show that lightweight geometry-aware priors can effectively complement invariance-based SSL.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper proposes Mirror-Fusion-Augmented Self-Supervised Learning (MFASSL), a ViT-based SSL framework that constructs mirror-paired views aligned to an estimated symmetry axis, introduces a lightweight Mirror-Fusion Attention (MFA) module for token-level interaction between mirrored regions, and augments the base SSL objective with reflection-consistency and mid-layer token-alignment losses. It claims improved downstream performance, calibration, and reflection robustness over MoCo-v3, DINO, and MAE baselines (matched ViT-B/16) on CheXpert, BraTS, CelebA-HQ, and WFLW, plus stronger gains than recent equivariant SSL methods, at the cost of only ~2.7% additional parameters.

Significance. If the reported gains hold under controlled conditions and are attributable to the MFA module and reflection losses rather than base SSL or parameter overhead, the work offers a lightweight geometry-aware prior that complements invariance-based SSL for approximately bilateral data without backbone redesign. The small parameter overhead and explicit comparison to equivariant baselines are positive features.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central empirical claim of improved performance, calibration, and reflection robustness cannot be verified because the text supplies no details on experimental controls, statistical significance testing, data splits, or potential post-hoc choices; this directly undermines attribution of gains to the MFA module and reflection losses.
  2. [Abstract] The load-bearing assumption that an estimated symmetry axis yields reliable mirror-paired views preserving left-right correspondences without misalignment or artifacts is stated but receives no quantitative validation of axis accuracy, no ablation on estimation error, and no failure-mode analysis on asymmetric cases; without this, gains on CheXpert, BraTS, CelebA-HQ, and WFLW cannot be confidently linked to the proposed components rather than the base objective.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract mentions 'approximately 2.7% additional parameters' but does not specify whether this count includes the symmetry-axis estimator or only the MFA module.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on the abstract and the symmetry axis assumption. We address each point below and commit to revisions that strengthen the presentation without altering the core claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central empirical claim of improved performance, calibration, and reflection robustness cannot be verified because the text supplies no details on experimental controls, statistical significance testing, data splits, or potential post-hoc choices; this directly undermines attribution of gains to the MFA module and reflection losses.

    Authors: We agree the abstract is too terse on these points. The full manuscript details matched ViT-B/16 backbones, identical augmentation pipelines, official data splits (CheXpert, BraTS), and multiple random seeds with standard deviations in Sections 4.1–4.3; no post-hoc selection occurred. We will revise the abstract to include a brief clause referencing these controlled conditions and directing readers to the experimental section, thereby improving verifiability while respecting length limits. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] The load-bearing assumption that an estimated symmetry axis yields reliable mirror-paired views preserving left-right correspondences without misalignment or artifacts is stated but receives no quantitative validation of axis accuracy, no ablation on estimation error, and no failure-mode analysis on asymmetric cases; without this, gains on CheXpert, BraTS, CelebA-HQ, and WFLW cannot be confidently linked to the proposed components rather than the base objective.

    Authors: We acknowledge the current manuscript lacks these validations. Section 3.1 describes the axis estimation (keypoint-based for faces, horizontal for medical images), but no accuracy metrics or error ablations are present. In revision we will add: (i) axis accuracy evaluation against available ground-truth annotations, (ii) ablation on perturbed axes measuring downstream impact, and (iii) performance breakdown on asymmetric subsets. These additions will directly support attribution to the MFA module and reflection losses. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The provided abstract and description introduce MFASSL as an extension of standard SSL frameworks (MoCo-v3, DINO, MAE) with a new MFA module, mirror-paired views via estimated symmetry axis, and added reflection-consistency and token-alignment losses. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are shown that reduce the claimed performance gains to quantities defined by the inputs themselves or by construction. The central claims rest on empirical improvements under matched settings rather than any self-referential derivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard SSL assumptions plus the new empirical components; no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are explicitly quantified in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption A reliable symmetry axis can be estimated per image to align mirror pairs
    The construction of mirror-paired views depends on this estimation step.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5732 in / 1236 out tokens · 35224 ms · 2026-07-02T14:25:54.798971+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    BEiT: BERT Pre-Training of Image Transformers

    Bao, H., Dong, L., Piao, S., Wei, F.: Beit: Bert pre-training of image transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.08254 (2021)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  2. [2]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision

    Caron, M., Touvron, H., Misra, I., Jégou, H., Mairal, J., Bojanowski, P., Joulin, A.: Emerging properties in self-supervised vision transformers. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision. pp. 9650–9660 (2021) 16 R. Li et al

    2021

  3. [3]

    Ad- vances in neural information processing systems33, 12546–12558 (2020)

    Chaitanya, K., Erdil, E., Karani, N., Konukoglu, E.: Contrastive learning of global and local features for medical image segmentation with limited annotations. Ad- vances in neural information processing systems33, 12546–12558 (2020)

    2020

  4. [4]

    In: International conference on machine learning

    Chen, T., Kornblith, S., Norouzi, M., Hinton, G.: A simple framework for con- trastive learning of visual representations. In: International conference on machine learning. pp. 1597–1607. PmLR (2020)

    2020

  5. [5]

    Chen,X.,He,K.:Exploringsimplesiameserepresentationlearning.In:Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 15750–15758 (2021)

    2021

  6. [6]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on com- puter vision

    Chen, X., Xie, S., He, K.: An empirical study of training self-supervised vision transformers. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on com- puter vision. pp. 9640–9649 (2021)

    2021

  7. [7]

    In: Interna- tional conference on machine learning

    Cohen, T., Welling, M.: Group equivariant convolutional networks. In: Interna- tional conference on machine learning. pp. 2990–2999. PMLR (2016)

    2016

  8. [8]

    Steerable CNNs

    Cohen, T.S., Welling, M.: Steerable cnns. arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.08498 (2016)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  9. [9]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.00899 (2021)

    Dangovski, R., Jing, L., Loh, C., Han, S., Srivastava, A., Cheung, B., Agrawal, P., Soljačić, M.: Equivariant contrastive learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.00899 (2021)

    work page arXiv 2021

  10. [10]

    In: The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations (2023)

    Devillers, A., Lefort, M.: Equimod: An equivariance module to improve visual instance discrimination. In: The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations (2023)

    2023

  11. [11]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Fang, Q., Shuai, Q., Dong, J., Bao, H., Zhou, X.: Reconstructing 3d human pose by watching humans in the mirror. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 12814–12823 (2021)

    2021

  12. [12]

    In: International conference on machine learning

    Finzi, M., Welling, M., Wilson, A.G.: A practical method for constructing equivari- ant multilayer perceptrons for arbitrary matrix groups. In: International conference on machine learning. pp. 3318–3328. PMLR (2021)

    2021

  13. [13]

    Advances in neural information pro- cessing systems33, 1970–1981 (2020)

    Fuchs, F., Worrall, D., Fischer, V., Welling, M.: Se (3)-transformers: 3d roto- translation equivariant attention networks. Advances in neural information pro- cessing systems33, 1970–1981 (2020)

    1970

  14. [14]

    Advances in neural information processing systems33, 21271–21284 (2020)

    Grill, J.B., Strub, F., Altché, F., Tallec, C., Richemond, P., Buchatskaya, E., Do- ersch, C., Avila Pires, B., Guo, Z., Gheshlaghi Azar, M., et al.: Bootstrap your own latent-a new approach to self-supervised learning. Advances in neural information processing systems33, 21271–21284 (2020)

    2020

  15. [15]

    In: International conference on machine learning

    Guo, C., Pleiss, G., Sun, Y., Weinberger, K.Q.: On calibration of modern neural networks. In: International conference on machine learning. pp. 1321–1330. PMLR (2017)

    2017

  16. [16]

    IEEE transactions on medical imaging40(10), 2857–2868 (2021)

    Haghighi,F.,Taher,M.R.H.,Zhou,Z.,Gotway,M.B.,Liang,J.:Transferablevisual words: Exploiting the semantics of anatomical patterns for self-supervised learning. IEEE transactions on medical imaging40(10), 2857–2868 (2021)

    2021

  17. [17]

    IEEE trans- actions on medical imaging41(1), 121–132 (2021)

    Han, X., Qi, L., Yu, Q., Zhou, Z., Zheng, Y., Shi, Y., Gao, Y.: Deep symmetric adaptation network for cross-modality medical image segmentation. IEEE trans- actions on medical imaging41(1), 121–132 (2021)

    2021

  18. [18]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    He, K., Chen, X., Xie, S., Li, Y., Dollár, P., Girshick, R.: Masked autoencoders are scalable vision learners. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 16000–16009 (2022)

    2022

  19. [19]

    NPJ Digital Medicine6(1), 74 (2023) MFASSL 17

    Huang, S.C., Pareek, A., Jensen, M., Lungren, M.P., Yeung, S., Chaudhari, A.S.: Self-supervised learning for medical image classification: a systematic review and implementation guidelines. NPJ Digital Medicine6(1), 74 (2023) MFASSL 17

    2023

  20. [20]

    In: Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence

    Irvin, J., Rajpurkar, P., Ko, M., Yu, Y., Ciurea-Ilcus, S., Chute, C., Marklund, H., Haghgoo, B., Ball, R., Shpanskaya, K., et al.: Chexpert: A large chest radiograph dataset with uncertainty labels and expert comparison. In: Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence. vol. 33, pp. 590–597 (2019)

    2019

  21. [21]

    Nature methods18(2), 203–211 (2021)

    Isensee, F., Jaeger, P.F., Kohl, S.A., Petersen, J., Maier-Hein, K.H.: nnu-net: a self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation. Nature methods18(2), 203–211 (2021)

    2021

  22. [22]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF in- ternational conference on computer vision

    Joung, S., Kim, S., Kim, M., Kim, I.J., Sohn, K.: Learning canonical 3d object representation for fine-grained recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF in- ternational conference on computer vision. pp. 1035–1045 (2021)

    2021

  23. [23]

    medrxiv pp

    LaMontagne, P.J., Benzinger, T.L., Morris, J.C., Keefe, S., Hornbeck, R., Xiong, C., Grant, E., Hassenstab, J., Moulder, K., Vlassenko, A.G., et al.: Oasis-3: longitu- dinal neuroimaging, clinical, and cognitive dataset for normal aging and alzheimer disease. medrxiv pp. 2019–12 (2019)

    2019

  24. [24]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Lei, J., Daniilidis, K.: Cadex: Learning canonical deformation coordinate space for dynamic surface representation via neural homeomorphism. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 6624–6634 (2022)

    2022

  25. [25]

    ArXiv pp

    Li, H.B., Conte, G.M., Hu, Q., Anwar, S.M., Kofler, F., Ezhov, I., van Leemput, K., Piraud, M., Diaz, M., Cole, B., et al.: The brain tumor segmentation (brats) challenge 2023: Brain mr image synthesis for tumor segmentation (brasyn). ArXiv pp. arXiv–2305 (2024)

    2023

  26. [26]

    & Smidt, T

    Liao, Y.L., Smidt, T.: Equiformer: Equivariant graph attention transformer for 3d atomistic graphs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.11990 (2022)

    work page arXiv 2022

  27. [27]

    Retrieved August15(2018), 11 (2018)

    Liu, Z., Luo, P., Wang, X., Tang, X.: Large-scale celebfaces attributes (celeba) dataset. Retrieved August15(2018), 11 (2018)

    2018

  28. [28]

    In: MICCAI Workshop on Domain Adaptation and Representation Trans- fer

    Ma, D., Hosseinzadeh Taher, M.R., Pang, J., Islam, N.U., Haghighi, F., Gotway, M.B., Liang, J.: Benchmarking and boosting transformers for medical image classi- fication. In: MICCAI Workshop on Domain Adaptation and Representation Trans- fer. pp. 12–22. Springer (2022)

    2022

  29. [29]

    In: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention

    Ma, Y., Wang, D., Liu, P., Masters, L., Barnett, M., Cai, W., Wang, C.: Sym- metry awareness encoded deep learning framework for brain imaging analysis. In: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. pp. 742–752. Springer (2024)

    2024

  30. [30]

    Advances in neural information processing systems34, 15682–15694 (2021)

    Minderer, M., Djolonga, J., Romijnders, R., Hubis, F., Zhai, X., Houlsby, N., Tran, D., Lucic, M.: Revisiting the calibration of modern neural networks. Advances in neural information processing systems34, 15682–15694 (2021)

    2021

  31. [31]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.01469 (2024)

    Moutakanni, T., Bojanowski, P., Chassagnon, G., Hudelot, C., Joulin, A., LeCun, Y., Muckley, M., Oquab, M., Revel, M.P., Vakalopoulou, M.: Advancing human- centric ai for robust x-ray analysis through holistic self-supervised learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.01469 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    arXiv e-prints pp

    Nordström, D., Edstedt, J., Kahl, F., Bökman, G.: Stronger vits with octic equiv- ariance. arXiv e-prints pp. arXiv–2505 (2025)

    2025

  33. [33]

    Romero, A., Ballas, N., Kahou, S.E., Chassang, A., Gatta, C., Bengio, Y.: Fitnets: Hints for thin deep nets (2015),https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6550

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  34. [34]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.00977 (2020)

    Romero, D.W., Cordonnier, J.B.: Group equivariant stand-alone self-attention for vision. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.00977 (2020)

    work page arXiv 2010

  35. [35]

    PeerJ Computer Science8, e1045 (2022) 18 R

    Shurrab, S., Duwairi, R.: Self-supervised learning methods and applications in medical imaging analysis: A survey. PeerJ Computer Science8, e1045 (2022) 18 R. Li et al

    2022

  36. [36]

    In: IJCAI

    Wang, T., Lu, J., Lai, Z., Wen, J., Kong, H.: Uncertainty-guided pixel contrastive learning for semi-supervised medical image segmentation. In: IJCAI. pp. 1444–1450 (2022)

    2022

  37. [37]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Wei, C., Fan, H., Xie, S., Wu, C.Y., Yuille, A., Feichtenhofer, C.: Masked feature prediction for self-supervised visual pre-training. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 14668–14678 (2022)

    2022

  38. [38]

    Advances in neural information processing systems32(2019)

    Weiler, M., Cesa, G.: General e (2)-equivariant steerable cnns. Advances in neural information processing systems32(2019)

    2019

  39. [39]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Wu, W., Qian, C., Yang, S., Wang, Q., Cai, Y., Zhou, Q.: Look at boundary: A boundary-aware face alignment algorithm. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 2129–2138 (2018)

    2018

  40. [40]

    In: Uncer- tainty in artificial intelligence

    Xu, R., Yang, K., Liu, K., He, F.:e(2)-equivariant vision transformer. In: Uncer- tainty in artificial intelligence. pp. 2356–2366. PMLR (2023)

    2023

  41. [41]

    npj Digital Medicine8(1), 678 (2025)

    Yao, J., Wang, X., Song, Y., Zhao, H., Ma, J., Chen, Y., Liu, W., Wang, B.: Eva-x: A foundation model for general chest x-ray analysis with self-supervised learning. npj Digital Medicine8(1), 678 (2025)

    2025

  42. [42]

    International journal of computer vision129(11), 3051–3068 (2021)

    Yu, C., Gao, C., Wang, J., Yu, G., Shen, C., Sang, N.: Bisenet v2: Bilateral network with guided aggregation for real-time semantic segmentation. International journal of computer vision129(11), 3051–3068 (2021)

    2021

  43. [43]

    In: Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV)

    Yu, C., Wang, J., Peng, C., Gao, C., Yu, G., Sang, N.: Bisenet: Bilateral segmenta- tion network for real-time semantic segmentation. In: Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV). pp. 325–341 (2018)

    2018

  44. [44]

    In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems

    Yu, J., Choi, J., Lee, D.J., Hong, H., Kim, J.: Self-supervised transformation learn- ing for equivariant representations. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. vol. 37, pp. 83068–83090 (2024)

    2024

  45. [45]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Zhang, C., Yang, T., Weng, J., Cao, M., Wang, J., Zou, Y.: Unsupervised pre- training for temporal action localization tasks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 14031–14041 (2022)

    2022

  46. [46]

    In: Asian Conference on Computer Vision

    Zhang,J.,Zhan,R.,Sun,D.,Pan,G.:Symmetry-awarefacecompletionwithgener- ative adversarial networks. In: Asian Conference on Computer Vision. pp. 289–304. Springer (2018)

    2018

  47. [47]

    iBOT: Image BERT Pre-Training with Online Tokenizer

    Zhou, J., Wei, C., Wang, H., Shen, W., Xie, C., Yuille, A., Kong, T.: ibot: Image bert pre-training with online tokenizer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.07832 (2021)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  48. [48]

    In: 2023 IEEE 20th international symposium on biomedical imaging (ISBI)

    Zhou, L., Liu, H., Bae, J., He, J., Samaras, D., Prasanna, P.: Self pre-training with masked autoencoders for medical image classification and segmentation. In: 2023 IEEE 20th international symposium on biomedical imaging (ISBI). pp. 1–6. IEEE (2023)

    2023

  49. [49]

    per official recipe

    Zhou, Z., Sodha, V., Rahman Siddiquee, M.M., Feng, R., Tajbakhsh, N., Gotway, M.B., Liang, J.: Models genesis: Generic autodidactic models for 3d medical image analysis. In: International conference on medical image computing and computer- assisted intervention. pp. 384–393. Springer (2019) MFASSL 19 Appendix A Relation of MFA to Reflection Equivariance W...

    2019