Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Representation Surgery for Multi-Task Model Merging

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.02705 v2 pith:QQQFFIM4 submitted 2024-02-05 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CV

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CV
keywords representationmodelmergedsurgerymergingmodulebiasdistribution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Multi-task learning (MTL) compresses the information from multiple tasks into a unified backbone to improve computational efficiency and generalization. Recent work directly merges multiple independently trained models to perform MTL instead of collecting their raw data for joint training, greatly expanding the application scenarios of MTL. However, by visualizing the representation distribution of existing model merging schemes, we find that the merged model often suffers from the dilemma of representation bias. That is, there is a significant discrepancy in the representation distribution between the merged and individual models, resulting in poor performance of merged MTL. In this paper, we propose a representation surgery solution called "Surgery" to reduce representation bias in the merged model. Specifically, Surgery is a lightweight task-specific module that takes the representation of the merged model as input and attempts to output the biases contained in the representation from the merged model. We then designed an unsupervised optimization objective that updates the Surgery module by minimizing the distance between the merged model's representation and the individual model's representation. Extensive experiments demonstrate significant MTL performance improvements when our Surgery module is applied to state-of-the-art (SOTA) model merging schemes.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. When Data-Free Knowledge Distillation Meets Non-Transferable Teacher: Escaping Out-of-Distribution Trap is All You Need

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Data-free distillation from non-transferable teachers fails because synthesized samples drift toward the OOD domain; ATEsc separates ID-like from OOD-like samples via adversarial robustness and improves distillation.

  2. The Future of Continual Learning in the Era of Foundation Models: Three Key Directions

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Continual learning should pivot from weight-update-based methods to continual compositionality and orchestration of foundation models and agents.

Pith tools