Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Rank-N-Contrast: Learning Continuous Representations for Regression

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.01189 v2 pith:QSJJXWVP submitted 2022-10-03 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CV

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CV
keywords regressionrepresentationscontinuousrank-n-contrastbetterdataefficiencygeneralization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep regression models typically learn in an end-to-end fashion without explicitly emphasizing a regression-aware representation. Consequently, the learned representations exhibit fragmentation and fail to capture the continuous nature of sample orders, inducing suboptimal results across a wide range of regression tasks. To fill the gap, we propose Rank-N-Contrast (RNC), a framework that learns continuous representations for regression by contrasting samples against each other based on their rankings in the target space. We demonstrate, theoretically and empirically, that RNC guarantees the desired order of learned representations in accordance with the target orders, enjoying not only better performance but also significantly improved robustness, efficiency, and generalization. Extensive experiments using five real-world regression datasets that span computer vision, human-computer interaction, and healthcare verify that RNC achieves state-of-the-art performance, highlighting its intriguing properties including better data efficiency, robustness to spurious targets and data corruptions, and generalization to distribution shifts. Code is available at: https://github.com/kaiwenzha/Rank-N-Contrast.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Supervised Contrastive Learning for Ordinal Engagement Measurement

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A supervised contrastive ordinal classifier with time-series augmentation improves minority-class recall on DAiSEE, but not overall accuracy, and the best non-contrastive baseline nearly matches it.

  2. Revisiting LLMs as Zero-Shot Time-Series Forecasters: Small Noise Can Break Large Models

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Zero-shot LLM forecasters are more sensitive to noise and generally less accurate than single-shot linear models.

Pith tools