Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Algorithmic Foundations of Empirical X-risk Minimization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2206.00439 v6 pith:QSL52EUU submitted 2022-06-01 cs.LG cs.AImath.OCstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AImath.OCstat.ML
keywords optimizationnon-convexobjectivesalgorithmicalgorithmslearninglossesx-risk
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

This manuscript introduces a new optimization framework for machine learning and AI, named {\bf empirical X-risk minimization (EXM)}. X-risk is a term introduced to represent a family of compositional measures or objectives, in which each data point is compared with a large number of items explicitly or implicitly for defining a risk function. It includes surrogate objectives of many widely used measures and non-decomposable losses, e.g., AUROC, AUPRC, partial AUROC, NDCG, MAP, precision/recall at top $K$ positions, precision at a certain recall level, listwise losses, p-norm push, top push, global contrastive losses, etc. While these non-decomposable objectives and their optimization algorithms have been studied in the literature of machine learning, computer vision, information retrieval, and etc, optimizing these objectives has encountered some unique challenges for deep learning. In this paper, we present recent rigorous efforts for EXM with a focus on its algorithmic foundations and its applications. We introduce a class of algorithmic techniques for solving EXM with smooth non-convex objectives. We formulate EXM into three special families of non-convex optimization problems belonging to non-convex compositional optimization, non-convex min-max optimization and non-convex bilevel optimization, respectively. For each family of problems, we present some strong baseline algorithms and their complexities, which will motivate further research for improving the existing results. Discussions about the presented results and future studies are given at the end. Efficient algorithms for optimizing a variety of X-risks are implemented in the LibAUC library at \url{www.libauc.org}.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Exact Reformulation and Optimization for Direct Metric Optimization in Binary Imbalanced Classification

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    A continuous exact reformulation lets precision, recall, and F-beta metrics be optimized with gradient methods, avoiding smooth surrogate losses.

  2. Nonconvex Decentralized Stochastic Bilevel Optimization under Heavy-Tailed Noise

    cs.LG 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper introduces D-NSVRGDA, a decentralized normalized variance-reduced method for nonconvex bilevel optimization, and proves the first convergence rate under heavy-tailed noise without gradient clipping.

  3. FairPOT: Balancing AUC Performance and Fairness with Proportional Optimal Transport

    cs.LG 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    FairPOT selectively transports the top-lambda quantile of risk scores via optimal transport to balance AUC fairness against overall AUC performance, including partial AUC extensions.

  4. Preserving AUC Fairness in Learning with Noisy Protected Groups

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A distributionally robust AUC-fairness method with TV-distance bounds that preserves group fairness when protected-group labels are noisy.

Pith tools