Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 6 minor 272 references

The paper argues that dense, per-frame intermediate representations—subtasks, object and gripper boxes, affordances, grasp poses, motion traces—produced at scale with human review, improve embodied reasoning, action execution, and world-mod

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 14:35 UTC pith:QU7QVVS7

load-bearing objection A large, genuinely useful dataset and a plausible world-model conditioning recipe; the headline claims run ahead of the evidence because annotation accuracy is unaudited and the strongest world-model numbers are oracle-conditioned. the 5 major comments →

arxiv 2607.18709 v2 pith:QU7QVVS7 submitted 2026-07-21 cs.RO

RoboInter1.5: A Holistic Intermediate Representation Suite for Embodied World Modeling and Robotic Manipulation

Ziqin Wang , Hao Li , Weijun Wang , Junhao Cai , Jia Zeng , Yilun Chen , Jiangmiao Pang , Si Liu This is my paper
classification cs.RO
keywords intermediate representationsrobotic manipulationworld modelsvision-language-action modelsembodied VQAdataset annotationplan-then-executevideo diffusion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

RoboInter1.5 is a bid to make intermediate representations—structured labels that sit between raw video and raw actions—the load-bearing interface for robot learning. The paper assembles 230k manipulation episodes annotated per frame with more than ten label types, then trains three families of models on them: a VLM planner for spatial and temporal question answering, a plan-then-execute VLA for control, and a video-diffusion world model for future-frame prediction. Its central claim is that these labels are not just interpretable side information but actively regularize low-level actions and constrain world-model rollouts. Evidence includes a world-model PSNR jump from 18.26 to 21.05 when action conditioning is replaced by intermediate representations, and closed-loop out-of-distribution success rising from 38.3% to 58.3% when the executor is initialized from the planner. A sympathetic reader would say the work is trying to establish that one shared annotation schema can simultaneously strengthen reasoning, control, and simulation.

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that a unified suite of dense intermediate representations, synchronized with executed actions across 230k episodes and 571 scenes, makes embodied models better at all three things they are asked to do: understand manipulation scenes, execute manipulation policies, and simulate future world states. The strongest evidence is in the world model: conditioning a 14B video-diffusion model on rendered segmentation masks and gripper traces instead of raw action sequences raises PSNR from 18.26 to 21.05 and cuts LPIPS from 0.171 to 0.102, and the gain grows with prediction horizon. On the control side, decoupling planning from execution and feeding the exec

What carries the argument

The central object is RoboInter-Data, a per-frame annotated corpus of 230k manipulation episodes with ten-plus label types—subtasks, primitive skills, object and gripper boxes, segmentation masks, affordances, grasp poses, contact points, motion traces—all synchronized with actions and two camera views. Around it sit three constructions that carry the argument: RoboInter-VQA, which converts those labels into roughly 2.2 million spatial and temporal QA pairs; F-CoT, a flexible chain-of-thought that feeds planner outputs into the executor in textual or visual form; and RoboInter-CV, which renders object-point trajectories and gripper traces onto a blank canvas to serve as visually encoded cont

Load-bearing premise

The result depends on the automatically generated, human-reviewed labels being accurate enough to serve as ground truth; the paper reports no inter-annotator agreement or audited error rates, so every downstream gain inherits whatever noise and bias the annotation pipeline has.

What would settle it

Take a random sample of, say, 1,000 episodes and have two independent annotators re-label all ten annotation types with the same tool; if agreement on grasp poses, affordances, and contact frames is near chance, the benchmark gains are likely inflated by label bias. Similarly, a held-out set labeled entirely by a second independent team would settle whether the VQA and world-model gains replicate.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the central claim holds, future manipulation datasets should include dense per-frame labels as a standard component rather than just instructions and actions.
  • Intermediate-conditioned world models should replace action-only conditioning for long-horizon simulation; the fidelity gap widens as prediction horizon grows.
  • Explicit, decoupled plan-then-execute architectures are likely to beat implicit end-to-end designs on out-of-distribution tasks, because they give the executor actionable geometric priors.
  • The planner trained on this corpus transfers to external embodied reasoning benchmarks, suggesting the learned representations generalize beyond the original scenes.
  • World-model-predicted latent features can serve as actionable inputs to a VLA policy, narrowing the gap to ground-truth latent features.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the same annotation schema could serve as a shared token vocabulary across embodiments; if traces, boxes, and affordances are defined in image space, a policy trained on one robot may transfer to another with only the low-level executor retrained.
  • Editorial inference: the paper's noise-injection training on intermediate controls hints that planner-generated imperfect controls are enough; a testable extension is to measure how much annotation noise the system tolerates before world-model gains disappear.
  • Editorial inference: because the world model accepts rendered control videos, it may be possible to optimize plans by back-propagating through the world model over the control video, effectively turning the planner into a differentiable simulator—this is not explored in the paper.
  • Editorial inference: if annotation errors are systematic (for example, biased grasp poses), the reported gains partly measure the annotation pipeline rather than the representations themselves; independent audits would separate those effects.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper presents RoboInter1.5, a suite of dense, per-frame intermediate representations for robotic manipulation, built on a 230k-episode dataset with ten-plus annotation types, a VQA benchmark (RoboInter-VQA), a VLM planner (RoboInter-VLM), plan-then-execute VLA variants (RoboInter-VLA), and an intermediate-representation-conditioned world model (RoboInter-World). The central claim is that these dense, human-verified intermediate representations improve embodied reasoning, action execution, and world-model fidelity, with the strongest reported results being large VQA gains over zero-shot generalists, an OOD closed-loop success improvement from 38.3% to 58.3% on a Franka arm, and a world-model PSNR improvement from 18.26 to 21.05 when conditioning on rendered traces and masks instead of raw actions.

Significance. If the annotation quality and the empirical gains hold, this is a valuable resource and a useful conceptual contribution: it unifies reasoning, control, and world modeling around a single intermediate-representation interface, and it reports results on third-party benchmarks, a real-robot closed-loop study, and oracle-versus-planner control protocols. Strengths include the breadth of annotation types, the explicit construction of control videos, multiple VLA paradigms, and evaluation across model scales. However, the load-bearing premise—that the automatically generated, human-reviewed labels are accurate enough to serve as ground truth for 230k episodes—is not directly measured, and several headline numerical claims lack error bars or significance tests. The resource is likely to be useful regardless, but the strength of the as-stated claims exceeds what the evidence currently supports.

major comments (5)
  1. [§3.1, Fig. 2, A.2] The dataset-quality claim rests on an unmeasured annotation error rate. The pipeline combines SAM2 tracking, estimated calibration matrices, gripper detection, and ChatGPT pre-annotations, with human review described only as 'inspection'. No inter-annotator agreement, audit subset, or per-type error statistics are reported; calibration details are deferred to RoboInter1.0. Since grasp boxes, contact points, traces, and placement proposals all derive from the 2D end-effector at the contact frame, calibration or frame-offset errors propagate into every downstream annotation. All VQA, OLS, PSNR, and closed-loop results are evaluated on splits from the same annotated corpora, so unknown label noise is confounded with the claimed benefits. Please provide an independent audit: a random sample of episodes re-annotated by multiple annotators, with per-type agreement/error rates and a calibration
  2. [§5.3, Fig. 7] The closed-loop claim that RoboInter-IC-E2E improves OOD success from 38.3% to 58.3% is reported without error bars, confidence intervals, trial-level logs, or statistical tests. The caption says results come from 15 ID and 15 OOD trials per task; with four tasks and binary outcomes, the standard error of a 58.3% success proportion from 15 trials is about 12.7 percentage points, so the 20-point gap is not obviously significant. Please report exact trial counts, per-task Wilson intervals, and a significance test (e.g., permutation or Fisher's exact test) over the full trial set.
  3. [§5.5, Table 10] The claim that RoboInter-World latent features yield 'consistent and substantial gains' is not supported at the 55K training step: OLS@0.03 improves from 22.09 to 22.17 (+0.08 percentage points) and OLS@0.05 from 35.74 to 35.97 (+0.23). These differences are within plausible noise, especially since no repeated seeds or confidence intervals are reported, and the I2V-baseline comparison itself changes sign across thresholds. Please report seed variance, confidence intervals, or additional checkpoints, and soften the conclusion accordingly.
  4. [§3.2, §5.1, Table 3] The RoboInter-VQA benchmark is constructed from the same annotation pipeline that trains RoboInter-VLM, so the large margins over zero-shot generalists (e.g., 76.1% vs 46.6% on object grounding) are partly by construction: the model is fine-tuned on the exact annotation schema used to generate the test questions. This does not invalidate the benchmark, but it means Table 3 does not independently validate annotation quality or generalization to a different annotation distribution. A human ceiling, an external annotation benchmark, or a cross-corpus test split would strengthen the claim that the representations themselves are accurate and transferable.
  5. [§5.4, Tables 6–9] World-model results are reported as single numbers without error bars or repeated-seed variance. Many comparisons are small (e.g., Table 8: Seg 20.38 vs Seg+Trace 20.43 at 1.3B; Table 9: planner-control 20.17 vs action 18.26 at 14B but with no spread). The large PSNR gains from Inter over Action are encouraging, but the manuscript should state the number of seeds, standard deviations, or confidence intervals so the reader can distinguish real improvements from checkpoint or tuning noise.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Table 2] The column header 'CO-CO' appears to be a typo for 'COCO'; please check the benchmark name and caption.
  2. [Table 3 caption] The caption says 'ACC@IOU>0.1' for spatial generation, but several entries are '–' and the threshold is not applied consistently across model rows. Clarify the evaluation protocol for missing entries.
  3. [Figure 5] The x-axis is labeled 'Training Steps (log scale)' with ticks at 1k, 5k, 10k, and 20k, but the text says curves run to 40k steps. Add the 40k tick or adjust the caption.
  4. [A.2] The appendix states 'For detailed appendix content, please refer to RoboInter1.0.' Since the present paper is presented as a standalone suite, essential details such as calibration estimation, annotation tool workflows, and prompt templates should either be included or the dependency on the previous report should be made explicit in the main text.
  5. [§4.3, Eq. (2)] In Eq. (2), the flow-matching target v_t and the clean future latent y are used without explicit definitions. Please define them and state the noise schedule used.
  6. [§3.3] RoboInter-CV is described as containing 65k clip-level samples from 16.9k episodes, but RoboInter-Data contains 230k episodes. Clarify what fraction of episodes survives the filtering and why; this affects the representativeness of the world-model training set.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Oracle-control world-model evaluation partially answers itself; core claims still have independent support.

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Section 4.3 (Control Protocol; Eqs. 1-2), Table 6]
    "In the oracle-control protocol, control videos are rendered from ground-truth annotations, measuring the upper-bound utility of high-quality intermediate representations."

    Under Eqs. (1)-(2), the control video u is rendered from future-annotation traces and masks, while the optimization target y is the future video latent of the same episode. The oracle-conditioned 'prediction' therefore has the future's spatial structure already in its input; the reported 18.26→21.05 PSNR gain over action-only conditioning partly reflects this leak. The paper transparently labels this an upper bound and supplies a planner-control variant (Table 9) that also beats action-only, so the circularity is partial and not the sole basis of the world-model claim.

full rationale

The suite's central claims are not globally circular. RoboInter-Data is a dataset resource; its annotations are produced by the described semi-automatic pipeline, not derived from the downstream models. The VLM is evaluated both on RoboInter-VQA (a held-out split of the same annotation pool, which is a standard supervised evaluation rather than a circular reduction) and on third-party benchmarks (Table 2: Where2Place, RoboRefIt, RoboVQA, RefCOCO), which provide external signal. The VLA closed-loop gains are measured on real-world ID/OOD tasks against OpenVLA/Pi-0 baselines, and the world-model improvement is reproduced under planner-control (Table 9), where the controls are predicted rather than taken from ground truth. The main caveats are auditability, not circularity: §3.1 reports no inter-annotator agreement or per-type error rates, and A.2 defers substantial methodology to the self-cited RoboInter1.0 report; these undermine verification of the 'high fidelity' claim but do not equate the derivations to their inputs. The one by-construction element is the oracle-control protocol, scored above.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper's central claims rest on one big empirical bet — that the annotation pipeline yields accurate ground truth at 230k-episode scale — plus standard ML training assumptions. There are no derived physical parameters; free parameters are hand-chosen filtering thresholds, sampling densities, evaluation thresholds, and an unspecified perturbation schedule. No new physical entities are postulated; the 'control video' is a rendering of existing annotations, not a new theoretical entity.

free parameters (4)
  • RoboInter-CV clip-filtering thresholds
    Frame-level validity masks and discard rules (non-trivial object mask, non-empty trace, no valid anchor frame, overly short sequences) are hand-chosen; they determine which 65k clips enter world-model training.
  • Control-video point sampling density
    'Uniformly sampling points within object bounding boxes or segmentation masks' — the density is unspecified and directly affects conditioning strength.
  • OLS error thresholds (@0.1, @0.05, @0.03, @0.01)
    Open-loop score thresholds are arbitrary discretizations; conclusions shift across thresholds (e.g., @0.01 flips some rankings), and the mean over them is the headline.
  • Stochastic perturbation schedule for planner-control robustness
    Introduced to close the train/test gap between teacher-forced and planner-generated controls; strength and timing are unspecified and not ablated.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Human-reviewed automated annotations (SAM2 tracking, estimated calibration, ChatGPT pre-annotation) are accurate at 230k-episode scale
    §3.1 'Annotations & Check with RoboInter-Tool'; no inter-annotator agreement, audit subset, or error-rate statistics are provided.
  • domain assumption OpenX/RH20T/DROID teleoperated episodes provide sufficient diversity for the generalization claims
    The dataset is assembled from these corpora; 'zero-shot' claims are evaluated on held-out episodes from the same sources (§5.4, Figure 8).
  • standard math Standard VLM, VAE, and diffusion training assumptions hold (cross-entropy, flow-matching objective)
    Eq. (1)–(2), §4.3; no new mathematical machinery is introduced.
  • domain assumption Open-loop score correlates with closed-loop success
    The paper itself documents an inversion: EC-E2E beats IC-E2E open-loop but loses in-distribution closed-loop (§5.2 vs §5.3), weakening this proxy.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 28821 in / 15766 out tokens · 146202 ms · 2026-08-01T14:35:01.961968+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Existing robot datasets remain expensive to curate, embodiment-specific, and insufficiently annotated with the fine-grained structure required for generalizable reasoning, execution, or long-horizon environment dynamics simulation. Building on our prior work, RoboInter1.0, we present RoboInter1.5, an extended and holistic suite of intermediate representations for both robotic manipulation and embodied world modeling. RoboInter1.5 provides a unified resource of data, benchmarks, and models centered on dense manipulation-oriented intermediate representations. Specifically, RoboInter-Data contains over 230k manipulation episodes across 571 scenes with dense per-frame annotations covering more than ten types of intermediate representations, including subtasks, primitive skills, object and gripper grounding, segmentation, affordance, grasp poses, contact points, motion traces, etc. Built upon these annotations, RoboInter-VQA introduces spatial and temporal embodied VQA tasks to benchmark and improve the intermediate-representation reasoning capabilities of our RoboInter-VLM. RoboInter-VLA further studies how such representations benefit action execution through implicit, explicit, and modular plan-then-execute paradigms. To better model the physical world, we further introduce RoboInter-World, which leverages intermediate representations as structured conditioning signals for controllable prediction of future world states. Extensive evaluations demonstrate that RoboInter1.5 provides a unified spatiotemporal scaffolding for intermediate representations. Rather than treating intermediate representations merely as interpretable signals, RoboInter1.5 conceptualizes them as a bidirectional interface that both regularizes low-level action spaces and constrains the latent rollouts of open-world physical simulators.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.18709 by Hao Li, Jiangmiao Pang, Jia Zeng, Junhao Cai, Si Liu, Weijun Wang, Yilun Chen, Ziqin Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: RoboInter1.5 manipulation suite includes annotation tools, annotated data, a curated VQA dataset, and their applications in VLMs, VLAs, and World Models. RoboInter provides a dataset with over 230k episodes and 10+ types of intermediate representation annotations, named RoboInter￾Data; VLMs trained on the curated embodied VQA dataset covering 29 spatial- and temporal-level categories, named RoboInter-VLM; … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Overview of RoboInter-Data and RoboInter-VQA. We annotate 230k manipulation episodes with 10 types of intermediate representation annotations through Data Collection and Annotation & Check. A large-scale, diverse set of VQA spanning spatial and temporal dimensions is further constructed. Statistics of raw episodes and curated VQA are also provided. world settings. In addition, we study world modeling based… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Framework of RoboInter-VLA. Our model follows a plan-then-execute paradigm with a VLM-based Planner and an Executor. The Planner exhibits enhanced understanding and generation for manipulation, strong general grounding abilities, and robust perception across diverse scenes. The Executor shares the VLM backbone with the Planner. Three variants are supported, and intermediate representations in Flexible Chai… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Overview of RoboInter-World. The mask latent is employed to encode temporal information, explicitly distinguishing between historical/current states and future contents. The control video is encoded into control latents, which are subsequently concatenated with the input latents along the channel dimension. Concurrently, conditioning latents (when available), comprising language instructions and robot acti… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Open-loop evaluation in TableTop setting. We show the curve of OLS@0.05 from 1k to 40k training steps. We mainly report the five variances of RoboInter-VLA. any pretrained VLM from Planner, performing action learning only; (b-e).RoboInter-IC-E2E, EC-E2E, Te-Modular and Im-Modular are stated in Section.4.2; (f).Oracle+Executor: not end-to-end, both training and inference are guided by GT intermediate repres… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Inference cases. For the Visual Motion Planning, RoboInter-VLM accurately infers the ac￾tion direction of the gripper, demonstrating a strong understanding of spatial relations. For the Subtask Planning, given a video input, RoboInter-VLM can reason about the underlying task intention. grounded representations (Object Box, Gripper Box, and Affordance) yield substantially larger gains by providing finer-gra… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Real-World experiments. The top charts present results from 15 in-distribution (ID) and 15 out-of-distribution (OOD) trials. The bottom panel illustrates the OOD test setup. Notably, the performance drop from ID to OOD reflects each model’s generalization under distribution shift, where EC-E2E outperforms IC-E2E and exhibits a smaller ID→OOD degradation (8.3% vs. 19.0%), showing the consistent conclusion w… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Qualitative comparison in two representative zero-shot, long-horizon scenarios from the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Additional real-world ID and OOD validation. (Left) Tool Inserting: a precision ID task requiring accurate contact handling and slot alignment. (Right) Object Sorting: an OOD task that tests language-guided generalization using novel objects and containers. To further disentangle in-distribution (ID) and out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization, we introduce two additional real-world tasks that emphasize d… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Chain of thought of RoboInter-VLA. Two representative examples (used in RoboInter-EC￾E2E and RoboInter-Modular) are shown. The upper example involves a sequence of manipulation behaviors, including picking, placing, and pushing, while the lower one focuses on a pick-and-place task. RoboInter-VLA predicts and utilizes structured chain-of-thought representations consisting of subtasks, primitive skills, gri… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

272 extracted references · 134 linked inside Pith

  1. [5]

    Q. Bu, J. Cai, L. Chen, X. Cui, Y. Ding, S. Feng, S. Gao, X. He, X. Hu, X. Huang, et al. Agibot world colosseo: A large-scale manipulation platform for scalable and intelligent embodied systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.06669, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  2. [6]

    J. Cen, C. Yu, H. Yuan, Y. Jiang, S. Huang, J. Guo, X. Li, Y. Song, H. Luo, F. Wang, D. Zhao, and H. Chen. Worldvla: Towards autoregressive action world model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.21539, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.21539

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  3. [7]

    X. Chen, Y. Chen, Y. Fu, N. Gao, J. Jia, W. Jin, H. Li, Y. Mu, J. Pang, Y. Qiao, et al. Internvla-m1: A spatially guided vision-language-action framework for generalist robot policy. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.13778, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  4. [8]

    Z. Chen, Z. Shi, X. Lu, L. He, S. Qian, Z. Yin, W. Ouyang, J. Shao, Y. Qiao, C. Lu, et al. Rh20t-p: A primitive-level robotic dataset towards composable generalization agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.19622, 2024

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  5. [9]

    R. Chu, Y. He, Z. Chen, S. Zhang, X. Xu, B. Xia, D. Wang, H. Yi, X. Liu, H. Zhao, et al. Wan-move: Motion-controllable video generation via latent trajectory guidance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.08765, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  6. [10]

    R. Chu, Y. He, Z. Chen, S. Zhang, X. Xu, D. WANG, H. Yi, X. Liu, H. Zhao, Y. Liu, et al. Wan-move: Motion-controllable video generation via latent trajectory guidance. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 38: 0 404--432, 2026

    2026

  7. [11]

    R. Dang, J. Guo, B. Hou, S. Leng, K. Li, X. Li, J. Liu, Y. Mao, Z. Wang, Y. Yuan, et al. Rynnbrain: Open embodied foundation models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.14979, 2026

    arXiv 2026

  8. [12]

    S. Deng, M. Yan, S. Wei, H. Ma, Y. Yang, J. Chen, Z. Zhang, T. Yang, X. Zhang, H. Cui, et al. Graspvla: a grasping foundation model pre-trained on billion-scale synthetic action data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.03233, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  9. [13]

    Y. Du, M. Yang, B. Dai, H. Dai, O. Nachum, J. B. Tenenbaum, D. Schuurmans, and P. Abbeel. Learning universal policies via text‐guided video generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.00111, 2023. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.00111

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  10. [14]

    A. O. et al. Open X-E mbodiment: Robotic learning datasets and RT-X models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.08864, 2023

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  11. [15]

    H. Fang, M. Zhang, H. Dong, W. Li, Z. Wang, Q. Zhang, X. Tian, Y. Hu, and H. Li. Robix: A unified model for robot interaction, reasoning and planning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.01106, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  12. [18]

    C. Gao, Z. Liu, Z. Chi, J. Huang, X. Fei, Y. Hou, Y. Zhang, Y. Lin, Z. Fang, Z. Jiang, et al. Vla-os: Structuring and dissecting planning representations and paradigms in vision-language-action models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.17561, 2025 a

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  13. [19]

    N. Gao, Y. Chen, S. Yang, X. Chen, Y. Tian, H. Li, H. Huang, H. Wang, T. Wang, and J. Pang. Genmanip: Llm-driven simulation for generalizable instruction-following manipulation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 12187--12198, 2025 b

    2025

  14. [20]

    S. Gao, W. Liang, K. Zheng, A. Malik, S. Ye, S. Yu, W.-C. Tseng, Y. Dong, K. Mo, C.-H. Lin, et al. Dreamdojo: A generalist robot world model from large-scale human videos. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.06949, 2026

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  15. [22]

    P. Guo, X. Wei, Y. Hu, B. Yang, D. Liu, F. Huang, et al. Emma-x: an em-like multilingual pre-training algorithm for cross-lingual representation learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36: 0 10116--10144, 2023

    2023

  16. [23]

    Y. Guo, L. X. Shi, J. Chen, and C. Finn. Ctrl-world: A controllable generative world model for robot manipulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.10125, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  17. [24]

    C. Hou, K. Wu, J. Liu, Z. Che, D. Wu, F. Liao, G. Li, J. He, Q. Feng, Z. Jin, et al. Robomind 2.0: A multimodal, bimanual mobile manipulation dataset for generalizable embodied intelligence. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.24653, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  18. [26]

    Huang, X

    H. Huang, X. Chen, Y. Chen, H. Li, X. Han, Z. Wang, T. Wang, J. Pang, and Z. Zhao. Roboground: Robotic manipulation with grounded vision-language priors. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 22540--22550, 2025

    2025

  19. [27]

    Huang, I

    S. Huang, I. Ponomarenko, Z. Jiang, X. Li, X. Hu, P. Gao, H. Li, and H. Dong. Manipvqa: Injecting robotic affordance and physically grounded information into multi-modal large language models. In 2024 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pages 7580--7587. IEEE, 2024 b

    2024

  20. [30]

    C.-Y. Hung, N. Majumder, H. Deng, L. Renhang, Y. Ang, A. Zadeh, C. Li, D. Herremans, Z. Wang, and S. Poria. Nora-1.5: A vision-language-action model trained using world model-and action-based preference rewards. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.14659, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  21. [31]

    Intelligence, K

    P. Intelligence, K. Black, N. Brown, J. Darpinian, K. Dhabalia, D. Driess, A. Esmail, M. Equi, C. Finn, N. Fusai, et al. pi-0.5: a vision-language-action model with open-world generalization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.16054, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  22. [32]

    Intelligence, B

    P. Intelligence, B. Ai, A. Amin, R. Aniceto, A. Balakrishna, G. Balke, K. Black, G. Bokinsky, S. Cao, T. Charbonnier, et al. _ 0.7 : a steerable generalist robotic foundation model with emergent capabilities. arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.15483, 2026

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  23. [33]

    Y. Ji, H. Tan, J. Shi, X. Hao, Y. Zhang, H. Zhang, P. Wang, M. Zhao, Y. Mu, P. An, et al. Robobrain: A unified brain model for robotic manipulation from abstract to concrete. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 1724--1734, 2025

    2025

  24. [36]

    M. J. Kim, Y. Gao, T.-Y. Lin, Y.-C. Lin, Y. Ge, G. Lam, P. Liang, S. Song, M.-Y. Liu, C. Finn, et al. Cosmos policy: Fine-tuning video models for visuomotor control and planning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.16163, 2026

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  25. [37]

    L. Kou, F. Ni, Y. Zheng, P. Han, J. Liu, H. Cui, R. Liu, and J. Hao. Roboannotatorx: A comprehensive and universal annotation framework for accurate understanding of long-horizon robot demonstration. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 10353--10363, 2025

    2025

  26. [38]

    Kuang, S

    Z. Kuang, S. Cai, H. He, Y. Xu, H. Li, L. J. Guibas, and G. Wetzstein. Collaborative video diffusion: Consistent multi-video generation with camera control. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37: 0 16240--16271, 2024

    2024

  27. [40]

    H. Li, Y. Li, Y. Yang, J. Cao, Z. Zhu, X. Cheng, and L. Chen. Dispose: Disentangling pose guidance for controllable human image animation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.09349, 2024 b

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  28. [43]

    L. Li, Q. Zhang, Y. Luo, S. Yang, R. Wang, F. Han, M. Yu, Z. Gao, N. Xue, X. Zhu, et al. Causal world modeling for robot control. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.21998, 2026 b

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  29. [45]

    Q. Li, Z. Xing, R. Wang, H. Zhang, Q. Dai, and Z. Wu. Magicmotion: Controllable video generation with dense-to-sparse trajectory guidance. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 12112--12123, 2025 b

    2025

  30. [47]

    X. Li, X. He, L. Zhang, M. Wu, X. Li, and Y. Liu. A comprehensive survey on world models for embodied ai. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.16732, 2025 c

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  31. [48]

    Y. Li, Y. Deng, J. Zhang, J. Jang, M. Memmel, R. Yu, C. R. Garrett, F. Ramos, D. Fox, A. Li, et al. Hamster: Hierarchical action models for open-world robot manipulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.05485, 2025 d

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  32. [49]

    Liang, Y

    J. Liang, Y. Fan, K. Zhang, R. Timofte, L. Van Gool, and R. Ranjan. Movideo: Motion-aware video generation with diffusion model. In European conference on computer vision, pages 56--74. Springer, 2024

    2024

  33. [50]

    Y. Liao, P. Zhou, S. Huang, D. Yang, S. Chen, Y. Jiang, Y. Hu, J. Cai, S. Liu, J. Luo, et al. Genie envisioner: A unified world foundation platform for robotic manipulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.05635, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  34. [51]

    F. Lin, R. Nai, Y. Hu, J. You, J. Zhao, and Y. Gao. Onetwovla: A unified vision-language-action model with adaptive reasoning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.11917, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.11917

    arXiv 2025

  35. [52]

    T.-Y. Lin, M. Maire, S. Belongie, J. Hays, P. Perona, D. Ramanan, P. Doll \'a r, and C. L. Zitnick. Microsoft coco: Common objects in context. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 740--755. Springer, 2014

    2014

  36. [53]

    F. Liu, K. Fang, P. Abbeel, and S. Levine. Moka: Open-vocabulary robotic manipulation through mark-based visual prompting. In First Workshop on Vision-Language Models for Navigation and Manipulation at ICRA 2024, 2024

    2024

  37. [54]

    Y. Lou, Y. Ye, Y. Fu, J. Cen, X. Chi, Y. Lyu, P. Jia, S. Han, Z. Lu, and S. Zhang. Dream-tac: A unified tactile world action model for contact-rich robot manipulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.08737, 2026

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  38. [55]

    G. Lu, W. Guo, C. Zhang, Y. Zhou, H. Jiang, Z. Gao, Y. Tang, and Z. Wang. Vla-rl: Towards masterful and general robotic manipulation with scalable reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.18719, 2025 a

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  39. [56]

    G. Lu, B. Jia, P. Li, Y. Chen, Z. Wang, Y. Tang, and S. Huang. Gwm: Towards scalable gaussian world models for robotic manipulation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 9263--9274, 2025 b

    2025

  40. [57]

    Y. Lu, Y. Fan, B. Deng, F. Liu, Y. Li, and S. Wang. Vl-grasp: a 6-dof interactive grasp policy for language-oriented objects in cluttered indoor scenes. In 2023 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pages 976--983. IEEE, 2023

    2023

  41. [58]

    G. Luo, G. Yang, Z. Gong, G. Chen, H. Duan, E. Cui, R. Tong, Z. Hou, T. Zhang, Z. Chen, et al. Visual embodied brain: Let multimodal large language models see, think, and control in spaces. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.00123, 2025 a

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  42. [59]

    Luo, C.-K

    Y. Luo, C.-K. Fan, M. Dong, J. Shi, M. Zhao, B.-W. Zhang, C. Chi, J. Liu, G. Dai, R. Zhang, et al. Robobench: A comprehensive evaluation benchmark for multimodal large language models as embodied brain. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.17801, 2025 b

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  43. [60]

    Q. Lv, W. Kong, H. Li, J. Zeng, Z. Qiu, D. Qu, H. Song, Q. Chen, X. Deng, and J. Pang. F1: A vision-language-action model bridging understanding and generation to actions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.06951, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  44. [61]

    H. Ma, J. Cai, X. Xu, H. Li, Y. Yang, Y. Tian, J. Cao, H. Zhu, Z. Qiu, Y. Yang, et al. Internvla-a1. 5: Unifying understanding, latent foresight, and action for compositional generalization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2607.04988, 2026

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  45. [62]

    Morimitsu, X

    H. Morimitsu, X. Zhu, R. M. Cesar, X. Ji, and X.-C. Yin. Dpflow: Adaptive optical flow estimation with a dual-pyramid framework. In Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, pages 17810--17820, 2025

    2025

  46. [64]

    D. Niu, Y. Sharma, G. Biamby, J. Quenum, Y. Bai, B. Shi, T. Darrell, and R. Herzig. Llarva: Vision-action instruction tuning enhances robot learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.11815, 2024

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  47. [67]

    J. Pai, L. Achenbach, V. Montesinos, B. Forrai, O. Mees, and E. Nava. mimic-video: Video-action models for generalizable robot control beyond vlas. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.15692, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  48. [68]

    Peebles and S

    W. Peebles and S. Xie. Scalable diffusion models with transformers. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 4195--4205, 2023

    2023

  49. [69]

    Psiris, V

    A. Psiris, V. Argyriou, E. K. Markakis, P. Sarigiannidis, E. Gavves, K. Bekris, et al. Foundation models in robotics: A comprehensive review of methods, models, datasets, challenges and future research directions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.15395, 2026

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  50. [71]

    Sermanet, T

    P. Sermanet, T. Ding, J. Zhao, F. Xia, D. Dwibedi, K. Gopalakrishnan, C. Chan, G. Dulac-Arnold, S. Maddineni, N. J. Joshi, et al. Robovqa: Multimodal long-horizon reasoning for robotics. In 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 645--652. IEEE, 2024

    2024

  51. [74]

    Sundaresan, S

    P. Sundaresan, S. Belkhale, D. Sadigh, and J. Bohg. Kite: Keypoint-conditioned policies for semantic manipulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.16605, 2023

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  52. [75]

    H. Tan, E. Zhou, Z. Li, Y. Xu, Y. Ji, X. Chen, C. Chi, P. Wang, H. Jia, Y. Ao, et al. Robobrain 2.5: Depth in sight, time in mind. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.14352, 2026

    arXiv 2026

  53. [76]

    B. R. Team, M. Cao, H. Tan, Y. Ji, M. Lin, Z. Li, Z. Cao, P. Wang, E. Zhou, Y. Han, et al. Robobrain 2.0 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.02029, 2025 a

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  54. [77]

    G. Team, A. Ye, B. Wang, C. Ni, G. Huang, G. Zhao, H. Li, J. Zhu, K. Li, M. Xu, et al. Gigaworld-0: World models as data engine to empower embodied ai. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.19861, 2025 b

    arXiv 2025

  55. [78]

    G. Team, B. Wang, B. Li, C. Ni, G. Huang, G. Zhao, H. Li, J. Li, J. Lv, J. Liu, et al. Gigabrain-0.5 m*: a vla that learns from world model-based reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.12099, 2026

    arXiv 2026

  56. [79]

    G. D. Team. Gemini: A family of highly capable multimodal models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.11805, 2023. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.11805

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  57. [80]

    T. Wan, A. Wang, B. Ai, B. Wen, C. Mao, C.-W. Xie, D. Chen, F. Yu, H. Zhao, J. Yang, et al. Wan: Open and advanced large-scale video generative models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.20314, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  58. [81]

    L. Wang, X. Chen, J. Zhao, and K. He. Scaling proprioceptive-visual learning with heterogeneous pre-trained transformers. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37: 0 124420--124450, 2024 a

    2024

  59. [83]

    K. Wu, C. Hou, J. Liu, Z. Che, X. Ju, Z. Yang, M. Li, Y. Zhao, Z. Xu, G. Yang, et al. Robomind: Benchmark on multi-embodiment intelligence normative data for robot manipulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.13877, 2024

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  60. [84]

    Z. Wu, Y. Zhou, X. Xu, Z. Wang, and H. Yan. Momanipvla: Transferring vision-language-action models for general mobile manipulation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 1714--1723, 2025

    2025

  61. [85]

    M. Xu, Z. Xu, Y. Xu, C. Chi, G. Wetzstein, M. Veloso, and S. Song. Flow as the cross-domain manipulation interface. In 8th Annual Conference on Robot Learning, 2024

    2024

  62. [87]

    H. Xue, Y. Ge, Y. Zeng, Z. Li, M.-Y. Liu, Y. Chen, and J. Fan. Point-it-out: Benchmarking embodied reasoning for vision language models in multi-stage visual grounding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.25794, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  63. [89]

    S. Yang, L. Xu, H. Li, J. Mu, J. Zeng, D. Lin, and J. Pang. Robo3r: Enhancing robotic manipulation with accurate feed-forward 3d reconstruction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.10101, 2026

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  64. [91]

    S. Ye, Y. Ge, K. Zheng, S. Gao, S. Yu, G. Kurian, S. Indupuru, Y. L. Tan, C. Zhu, J. Xiang, et al. World action models are zero-shot policies. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.15922, 2026 b

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  65. [92]

    Y. Ye, J. Ma, J. Cen, and Z. Lu. Token expand-merge: Training-free token compression for vision-language-action models. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 11 0 (8): 0 9279--9286, 2026 c . doi:10.1109/LRA.2026.3703265

    arXiv 2026

  66. [93]

    W. Yuan, J. Duan, V. Blukis, W. Pumacay, R. Krishna, A. Murali, A. Mousavian, and D. Fox. Robopoint: A vision-language model for spatial affordance prediction for robotics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.10721, 2024

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  67. [95]

    Zhang, K

    J. Zhang, K. Pertsch, J. Zhang, and J. J. Lim. Sprint: Scalable policy pre-training via language instruction relabeling. In 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 9168--9175. IEEE, 2024

    2024

  68. [96]

    Q. Zhao, Y. Lu, M. J. Kim, Z. Fu, Z. Zhang, Y. Wu, Z. Li, Q. Ma, S. Han, C. Finn, et al. Cot-vla: Visual chain-of-thought reasoning for vision-language-action models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 1702--1713, 2025

    2025

  69. [97]

    E. Zhou, J. An, C. Chi, Y. Han, S. Rong, C. Zhang, P. Wang, Z. Wang, T. Huang, L. Sheng, et al. Roborefer: Towards spatial referring with reasoning in vision-language models for robotics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.04308, 2025 a

    arXiv 2025

  70. [98]

    Z. Zhou, Y. Zhu, M. Zhu, J. Wen, N. Liu, Z. Xu, W. Meng, R. Cheng, Y. Peng, C. Shen, et al. Chatvla: Unified multimodal understanding and robot control with vision-language-action model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.14420, 2025 b

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  71. [99]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

    Alfred: A benchmark for interpreting grounded instructions for everyday tasks , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

  72. [100]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.08545 , year=

    RVT-2: Learning Precise Manipulation from Few Demonstrations , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.08545 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  73. [101]

    Conference on Robot Learning , pages=

    Transporter networks: Rearranging the visual world for robotic manipulation , author=. Conference on Robot Learning , pages=. 2021 , organization=

    2021

  74. [102]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.03094 , volume=

    Vima: General robot manipulation with multimodal prompts , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.03094 , volume=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  75. [103]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.10712 , year=

    FutureVLA: Joint Visuomotor Prediction for Vision-Language-Action Model , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.10712 , year=

    arXiv

  76. [104]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.19816 , year=

    CronusVLA: Transferring Latent Motion Across Time for Multi-Frame Prediction in Manipulation , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.19816 , year=

    arXiv

  77. [105]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

    RoboGround: Robotic Manipulation with Grounded Vision-Language Priors , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

  78. [106]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , volume=

    Calvin: A benchmark for language-conditioned policy learning for long-horizon robot manipulation tasks , author=. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  79. [107]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

    Vlmbench: A compositional benchmark for vision-and-language manipulation , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

  80. [108]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.10355 , year=

    Evaluating object hallucination in large vision-language models , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.10355 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

Showing first 80 references.