Shear transport in far-from-equilibrium isotropization of supersymmetric Yang-Mills plasma

Li Li; Shoucheng Wang; Song He

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 36 references

Shear transport in far-from-equilibrium isotropization of supersymmetric Yang-Mills plasma

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that the late-time shear viscosity-to-entropy ratio after far-from-equilibrium isotropization depends on the driving function and initial energy density, and can be parametrically smaller than the universal 1/(4π) value.

desk verdict Solid holographic numerics with a central claim that collapses to finite-frequency linear response: the late-time 'equilibrium' η/S below KSS is η(ω=-2i/τ)/S, not a far-from-equilibrium transport discovery. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.10706 v2 pith:QVRHH65D submitted 2024-11-16 hep-th gr-qchep-ph

Shoucheng Wang , Song He , Li Li This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-thgr-qchep-ph

keywords holographystrongcouplingfar-from-equilibriumdynamicsshearviscosityisotropizationsupersymmetricYang-Millsplasmahydrodynamicderivativeexpansionholographicquench

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that the effective shear viscosity of a strongly coupled plasma, defined for arbitrary time-dependent driving rather than only for small linearized perturbations, does not settle to the near-equilibrium value even after the plasma has isotropized and apparently returned to equilibrium. Holographically, the plasma is quenched by a boundary metric $B_0(t)=\frac{c}{2}[1-\tanh(t/\tau)]$, and the stress tensor is computed nonlinearly; the apparent shear viscosity $\eta=(P_\parallel-P_\perp)/(3\dot B_0)$ is extracted from the ratio of pressure anisotropy to shear rate. The central numerical result is that the late-time limit of $\eta/S$, with $S$ the entropy density from the apparent horizon, depends on the quench function and the initial energy density, and can be parametrically smaller than the linear-response value $1/(4\pi)$. The paper argues this is not a fake viscosity: the same construction recovers $1/(4\pi)$ for a sinusoidal shear in the hydrodynamic limit, and the reduction is attributed to a resummation of higher-order derivative terms in the hydrodynamic expansion. If correct, this means shear transport far from equilibrium is not characterized by a single universal coefficient.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the ratio identity $\eta=(P_\parallel-P_\perp)/(3\dot B_0)$, which defines an apparent shear viscosity from the boundary stress tensor without assuming linear response; together with the entropy density $S(t)=2\pi\Sigma(r_h,t)^3/\kappa_N^2$ defined from the apparent horizon, it forms the ratio whose late-time plateau is the paper's main observable. The identity is supplemented by the energy-rate relation $\dot E=3\eta\dot B_0^2$, which connects the viscosity to viscoelastic energy storage and makes the apparent viscosity measurable as the coefficient in Newton's law of viscosity. What carries the argument is the claim that the relevant control parameter is not the shear rate alone but the size of all higher time derivatives: condition (4.20) requires $\tau_c^{n-1}\partial_t^n B_0\ll\dot B_0$, and for the tanh quench this fails even as $\dot B_0\to0$. That failure is what the paper invokes to explain why the late-time $\eta/S$ lies below $1/(4\pi)$ and why a quench with rapidly decaying higher derivatives restores the standard value.

What would settle it

Scan the quench family $B_0(t)=c/(1+e^{t/\tau})^{1/N}$ at fixed small initial energy density and plot the late-time $\eta/S$ plateau against $N$: the paper's mechanism predicts a continuous increase toward $1/(4\pi)$ as $N$ grows, with the limit reached only as higher derivatives die out. A plateau that jumps discontinuously or stays below $1/(4\pi)$ for arbitrarily large $N$ would falsify the resummation explanation. A second check is to replace the apparent-horizon entropy in Eq. (4.14) with the equilibrium entropy density from the final temperature $T_{eq}$; if the sub-$1/(4\pi)$ plateau moves or disappears, the claimed effect is an artifact of the entropy convention.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the equilibrium viscosity-to-entropy ratio reached at late times after a far-from-equilibrium quench is a genuine function of how the system was driven and of its initial energy density, not the universal $1/(4\pi)$ obtained from linear response. The paper computes the time-dependent stress tensor of strongly coupled $\mathcal{N}=4$ supersymmetric Yang-Mills plasma under a time-dependent boundary metric, defines the apparent shear viscosity through $\eta=(P_\parallel-P_\perp)/(3\dot B_0)=\sigma/\dot B_0$, and finds that after the shear rate has decayed the ratio $\eta/S$ saturates at a plateau below $1/(4\pi)$. The demonstration that the construction is not spurious is two-fold: with a small-amplitude sinusoidal driving $B_0=\epsilon\sin(\omega t)$ and $\omega/T\ll1$, $\eta/S$ saturates exactly at $1/(4\pi)$; and with a quench whose higher time derivatives decay, such as $B_0(t)=c/(1+e^{t/\tau})^{1/N}$ with $N=4$, the plateau returns to near $1/(4\pi)$. The explanation offered is that the hydrodynamic limit requires not only small shear rate but also small higher-derivative ratios; at late times for the tanh quench $\ddot B_0/\dot B_0\to-2$ and $\dddot B_0/\dot B_0\to4$, so higher-order derivatives contribute as much as the Navier-Stokes term and the effective viscosity includes a resummation of the derivative expansion.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the late-time plateau of $\eta/S$ is a well-defined physical limit, rather than an artifact of taking a ratio in which both the numerator and the denominator separately vanish exponentially, and that the numerical solution resolves that ratio reliably.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Outside the linear-response regime, the effective viscosity extracted from a time-dependent stress tensor is not a single transport coefficient but a function of the driving quench and initial conditions, so comparisons between experimental extractions and Kubo-formula calculations must specify the deformation protocol.
The late-time $\eta/S$ approaches $1/(4\pi)$ from below as the final equilibrium temperature increases, either through stronger quenches or larger initial energy densities, so any observed deficit carries information about the effective temperature scale at isotropization.
A quench whose higher time derivatives decay sufficiently fast restores $\eta/S\approx1/(4\pi)$, identifying the breakdown of the standard hydrodynamic limit with the presence of non-negligible higher-derivative terms rather than with the system remaining out of equilibrium.
Large initial energy densities shorten the isotropization time significantly and break the earlier scaling $\tau_{iso}\approx0.7/T_{eq}$, so estimates of pre-hydrodynamic or isotropization timescales in strongly coupled plasmas must include the initial energy density as a control parameter.
Entropy production from the apparent horizon stays positive throughout, so the far-from-equilibrium viscosity variation is compatible with a monotonic second-law-type entropy current.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the paper is right, the same higher-derivative mechanism could operate in any system with a time-dependent scale factor, such as an expanding cosmology or a heavy-ion fireball, making the shear viscosity inferred from anisotropic pressure protocol-dependent even in the late-time regime.
A sharp testable extension would be to define the same ratio $\eta=(P_\parallel-P_\perp)/(3\dot B_0)$ in kinetic theory under a tanh-like volume quench and check whether the late-time ratio depends on the quench shape; a kinetic analog would clarify whether the effect is special to strong coupling and holography.
A natural next step implicit in the paper is to feed the time-dependent $\eta(t)$ back into the stress-tensor evolution, using the computed effective viscosity as a closure for hydrodynamics; if the late-time plateau is real, such a closure would reproduce the anisotropic stress without needing full holography.
The quench dependence of the late-time $\eta/S$ may also affect interpretations of sub-$1/(4\pi)$ apparent viscosities in holographic models of QCD phases, since those models typically infer viscosity from the equilibrium Kubo formula while experiments measure a deformation-dependent quantity.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

You should know two things about arXiv:2411.10706. The numerics are competently done, and the paper reproduces the known isotropization and Kubo limits. But the central claim—that the late-time equilibrium η/S can be parametrically below the KSS bound and depends on quench details—does not survive scrutiny. The quench tail is B0(t) ≈ c e^{-2t/τ}, so at late times the system is a small linear perturbation of the final black brane, driven at imaginary frequency ω = -2i/τ. What the paper reports as the equilibrium η/S is η(ω=-2i/τ)/S_eq, a finite-frequency Kubo quantity, not the zero-frequency shear viscosity.

What is genuinely useful: the systematic scan over initial energy densities in the Chesler-Yaffe setup, showing the isotropization time depends on initial data, and the clean validation of the apparent-viscosity definition against the oscillatory-shear limit (Figure 7), which recovers 1/4π. The entropy-positivity check and the comparison with earlier τiso claims are also worthwhile. The numerical work looks solid, though the paper gives no convergence tests or error bars for the late-time plateaus—a minor but annoying omission.

The soft spot is interpretation, not computation. The authors argue that because \ddot{B}_0/\dot{B}_0 → 2/τ and higher derivatives do not vanish relative to \dot{B}_0, "linear response formalism and hydrodynamic approximation are no longer applicable." That conflates the hydrodynamic gradient expansion with linear response. Linear response requires small amplitude, which holds at late times regardless of derivative ratios; it simply probes a nonzero imaginary frequency. The quench-dependence of the plateau is then just the frequency-dependence of η(ω), and the dependence on initial data enters only through the final temperature. The authors' own Figure 9 makes this transparent: taking N > 1 in (4.21) reduces the late-time decay rate, pushes ω/T toward zero, and recovers 1/4π.

Who is this for? People working on effective or pre-equilibrium viscosities in holography and QGP modeling. The paper is a useful cautionary example of how a reasonable-looking effective viscosity can be misread, but it is not a discovery of a new equilibrium transport property. It deserves a serious referee—the numerics are nontrivial and the interpretational issue needs to be fixed. I would send it back for major revision, not desk-reject, but the abstract and the KSS claim need to be reframed.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses holography to study isotropization of strongly coupled N=4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills plasma driven by a time-dependent anisotropic boundary metric B0(t)=c/2[1-tanh(t/τ)]. Solving the bulk Einstein equations and extracting the boundary stress tensor, the authors define an apparent shear viscosity η=(P∥-P⊥)/(3\dot B0) and study the evolution of η/S during and after the quench. They report that the late-time plateau of η/S depends on the quench shape and initial energy density and can be parametrically smaller than the KSS value 1/(4π), which they interpret as evidence for a resummation of the hydrodynamic derivative expansion beyond linear response. They also compare isotropization times for different initial energy densities and quench amplitudes.

Significance. The holographic setup and renormalized stress-tensor extraction are standard, and the paper includes a useful control check: for a small-amplitude oscillatory shear with ω/T→0, the apparent viscosity reproduces the KSS value 1/(4π) (Fig. 7). If the claimed late-time equilibrium viscosity below 1/(4π) were correct, it would be an important challenge to the universality of the KSS bound. However, the central interpretation is flawed: the late-time plateau is a finite-frequency linear-response quantity, not an equilibrium transport coefficient. The paper's main physics claim is therefore not supported by the presented evidence, even though the numerical computations themselves may be of interest if properly reframed.

major comments (2)

[Sec. 4.2, Eq. (4.20), Figs. 6, 8, 9] The central claim that the late-time equilibrium η/S depends on the quench details and can be parametrically smaller than the KSS value is not supported. For the quench (2.3), B0(t)≈c e^{-2t/τ} as t→∞, so the deformation amplitude is exponentially small and the standard linear-response formula applies at late times; the failure of (4.20) only signals the breakdown of the gradient expansion, not of linear response. The apparent viscosity (4.6) therefore tends to a finite-frequency Kubo viscosity η(ω=-2i/τ) divided by the final equilibrium entropy (up to the convention in Eq. (4.19)), a quantity that is not constrained by the KSS bound. The observed dependence on τ and on initial data enters through the dimensionless ratio ω/T_eq, as is evident from the left panel of Fig. 8, where η/S approaches 1/(4π) as T_eq increases. The abstract's 'equilibrium viscosity-to-entropy ratio' claim should be withdrawn or substantially reframed.
[Sec. 4.2, Figs. 6, 8, 9] The late-time values reported in Figs. 6, 8, and 9 are limits of ratios whose numerator and denominator both vanish exponentially as t→∞ (Eq. (4.6)), yet no numerical convergence tests, error bars, or checks of the extraction window are reported. Since the plateau is a 0/0 limit, the reported numbers (for example η/S≈0.063 for N=1 in Fig. 9, and the curves in Fig. 8) require at least a grid-resolution study and a demonstration that the limit is independent of the time interval used for the fit and of the choice of S(t) in Eq. (4.14) versus the equilibrium entropy.

minor comments (3)

[Sec. 4.2, Eq. (4.19)] The chain δT_ij = -iω η B0 = -iω η δg_ij is inconsistent with the linearized metric (4.18), where the off-diagonal perturbation is δg_ij = -2B0 for i≠j; please clarify the sign and factor convention.
[Sec. 4.1 and figure captions] The phrase 'the perfecter' after Eq. (4.7) should presumably be 'the prefactor', and the axis labels in Figs. 6 and 7 (rendered as '4π η//g1') appear corrupted and should read '4π η/S'.
[Throughout] The manuscript does not state the numerical discretization details (grid size, time-step, convergence tolerance) used for the bulk evolution; adding this information would aid reproducibility.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The numerics are self-contained, but the late-time 'equilibrium' η/S is defined by Eq. (4.6) as an instantaneous ratio, and its quench-dependence is the finite-frequency (imaginary-frequency) Kubo viscosity, so the central below-KSS claim is a definitional artifact rather than an independent equilibrium prediction.

self definitional [Sec. 4.1, Eq. (4.6); Sec. 4.2, discussion below Eq. (4.20) and Fig. 6]
"Substituting (4.5) into the energy-momentum tensor of (2.12), we obtain η = P‖ − P⊥ / (3 ḍ B0(t)) ... Consequently, the linear response formalism and hydrodynamic approximation are no longer applicable, and the KSS result is not recovered at late times."

Equation (4.6) defines, rather than derives, η as the ratio of the stress anisotropy to the shear rate. For the tanh quench (2.3), the late-time tail is B0(t) ≃ 2c e^{-2t/τ}, so P‖ − P⊥ and ḍ B0 both decay as e^{-2t/τ}; the plateau in Fig. 6 is therefore the linear-response ratio at imaginary frequency ω = −2i/τ. The paper's own Eq. (4.19) identifies the same η with the Kubo viscosity for B0 ∼ e^{-iωt}, with the KSS value recovered only for ω/T ≪ 1 (Fig. 7). Invoking (4.20) to dismiss linear response is a gradient-expansion criterion, not a small-amplitude criterion: at late times the amplitude is exponentially small, so linear response applies.

full rationale

The holographic computation itself is self-contained and not fitted to the claimed viscosity: no parameter is tuned to reproduce the η/S plateaus, and the authors validate the definition against the standard Kubo/hydrodynamic limit in Fig. 7. There is no load-bearing self-citation chain: ref. [21] is used to motivate the apparent-viscosity definition and in a supporting footnote, but the actual evidence is the numerical stress tensor. The difficulty is interpretive/definitional. Because η is defined by Eq. (4.6) as (P‖ − P⊥)/3ḍ B0, any late-time limit for an exponentially relaxing quench is automatically a function of the quench decay rate, i.e. of the finite-frequency (imaginary-frequency) Kubo response. The abstract and Sec. 4.2 present this as an equilibrium viscosity-to-entropy ratio that can be parametrically smaller than the KSS value; that is a renaming of η(ω), not a derived equilibrium η0/S. This is a partial circularity in the central claim, although the underlying numerical data retain independent content.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

All parameters listed are scanned, not fitted to external data; the central claim is precisely that results depend on them. The axioms are the standard holographic dictionary plus the definitional choice of apparent viscosity. No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced.

free parameters (5)

quench amplitude c = c = 1, 2, 3, 4
Controls the strength of the boundary deformation and therefore the final temperature Teq; the central claim that late-time η/S depends on quench details is a scan over c.
quench timescale tau = tau = 1
Set to 1 by conformal invariance; all times are expressed in units of tau. Not fitted.
initial energy density a4(t0) = a4(t0) = -0.6, -1, -2, -4, -20, -10^4
Sets the initial energy density and the final equilibrium temperature; varied to demonstrate the dependence of isotropization time and η/S on initial conditions.
initial pressure anisotropy b4(t0) = varied, encoded as Delta P values in Figure 3
Initial pressure anisotropy, shown to decay via non-hydrodynamic modes; included as part of the initial data scan.
quench exponent N in Eq (4.21) = N = 1 and 4
Chosen to control the late-time decay of higher derivatives; N=4 approximately recovers KSS while N=1 does not.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption AdS/CFT duality maps strongly coupled N=4 SYM at large Nc and large 't Hooft coupling to classical Einstein gravity in AdS5 (Section 2).
The entire setup relies on this duality; without it the gravitational solutions are not statements about SYM plasma.
domain assumption The boundary stress tensor is obtained by holographic renormalization, Eqs (2.13)-(2.15).
Standard holographic dictionary; used to compute E, P⊥, P|| and hence η.
domain assumption The non-equilibrium entropy density is given by the apparent horizon area, Eq (4.14).
Used to form η/S; the apparent horizon area is the standard holographic entropy proxy in time-dependent settings.
domain assumption The constitutive relation πμν = -2η σμν defines an apparent viscosity for arbitrary deformation amplitude (Section 4.1).
This is a definitional modeling choice taken from prior work [21]; the paper's central quantity is defined by it.
ad hoc to paper The limit t→∞ of η/S exists and is independent of the approach direction in solution space (Figure 6).
The late-time ratio is a limit of two vanishing quantities; the paper assumes the numerical plateau is physical.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Shear transport in far-from-equilibrium isotropization of supersymmetric Yang-Mills plasma." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QVRHH65D

@misc{pith2026241110706,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Shear transport in far-from-equilibrium isotropization of supersymmetric Yang-Mills plasma},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QVRHH65D}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.10706}
}

abstract

We holographically study the far-from-equilibrium isotropization dynamics of the strongly coupled $\mathcal{N}=4$ supersymmetric Yang-Mills plasma. The dual gravitational background is driven to be out of equilibrium and anisotropic by a time-dependent change in boundary conditions. At late times, the system relaxes and asymptotically approaches a static configuration. The large initial energy densities accelerate the isotropization significantly compared to the initial geometry corresponding to the supersymmetric Yang-Mills vacuum. We analyze shear transport during isotropization by directly computing the time-dependent stress tensor, which is now a nonlinear function of the shear rate. The shear viscosity far from equilibrium displays much richer dynamics than its near-equilibrium counterpart. Moreover, we uncover that the equilibrium viscosity-to-entropy ratio at late times depends on the details of the quench function and the initial data, which could be due to a resummation of the hydrodynamic description. In particular, this ratio can be parametrically smaller than the Kovtun-Son-Starinets bound calculated from linear response theory.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages

[1]

Heinz and R

U. Heinz and R. Snellings, Collective ﬂow and viscosity in relativistic heavy-ion col lisions, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 63 (2013) 123 [1301.2826]

arXiv 2013
[2]

Busza, K

W. Busza, K. Rajagopal and W. van der Schee, Heavy ion collisions: The big picture and the big questions , Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 68 (2018) 339–376

work page 2018
[3]

Heinz, Thermalization at RHIC , AIP Conf

U.W. Heinz, Thermalization at RHIC , AIP Conf. Proc. 739 (2004) 163 [nucl-th/0407067]

arXiv 2004
[4]

Chesler and L.G

P.M. Chesler and L.G. Yaﬀe, Boost invariant ﬂow, black hole formation, and far-from-equilibrium dynamics in N = 4 supersymmetric Yang -Mills theory , Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 026006 [0906.4426]

arXiv 2010
[5]

Heller, R.A

M.P. Heller, R.A. Janik and P. Witaszczyk, The characteristics of thermalization of boost-invariant plasma from holography , Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 201602 [1103.3452]

arXiv 2012
[6]

Heller, R.A

M.P. Heller, R.A. Janik and P. Witaszczyk, Hydrodynamic Gradient Expansion in Gauge Theory Plasmas , Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 211602 [1302.0697]

arXiv 2013
[7]

Florkowski, M.P

W. Florkowski, M.P. Heller and M. Spalinski, New theories of relativistic hydrodynamics in the LHC era , Rept. Prog. Phys. 81 (2018) 046001 [1707.02282]

arXiv 2018
[8]

Kurkela, A

A. Kurkela, A. Mazeliauskas, J.-F. Paquet, S. Schlichting and D. T eaney, Matching the Nonequilibrium Initial Stage of Heavy Ion Collisions to Hyd rodynamics with QCD Kinetic Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 122302 [1805.01604]

arXiv 2019

Show all 36 references

[9]

Berges, M.P

J. Berges, M.P. Heller, A. Mazeliauskas and R. Venugopalan, QCD thermalization: Ab initio approaches and interdisciplinary connections , Rev. Mod. Phys. 93 (2021) 035003 [2005.12299]

2021 arXiv
[10]

Heller and M

M.P. Heller and M. Spalinski, Hydrodynamics Beyond the Gradient Expansion: Resurgence and Resummation , Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 072501 [1503.07514]. – 17 –

2015 arXiv
[11]

Soloviev, Hydrodynamic attractors in heavy ion collisions: a review , Eur

A. Soloviev, Hydrodynamic attractors in heavy ion collisions: a review , Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (2022) 319 [2109.15081]

2022 arXiv
[12]

Jankowski and M

J. Jankowski and M. Spali´ nski, Hydrodynamic attractors in ultrarelativistic nuclear col lisions, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 132 (2023) 104048 [2303.09414]

2023 arXiv
[13]

C. Gale, S. Jeon and B. Schenke, Hydrodynamic Modeling of Heavy-Ion Collisions , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 28 (2013) 1340011 [1301.5893]

2013 arXiv
[14]

Parkkila, A

J.E. Parkkila, A. Onnerstad and D.J. Kim, Bayesian estimation of the speciﬁc shear and bulk viscosity of the quark-gluon plasma with additional ﬂow har monic observables , Phys. Rev. C 104 (2021) 054904 [2106.05019]

2021 arXiv
[15]

Chesler and L.G

P.M. Chesler and L.G. Yaﬀe, Horizon formation and far-from-equilibrium isotropizati on in supersymmetric Yang-Mills plasma , Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 211601 [0812.2053]

2009 arXiv
[16]

Heller, D

M.P. Heller, D. Mateos, W. van der Schee and D. Trancanelli, Strong Coupling Isotropization of Non-Abelian Plasmas Simpliﬁed , Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 191601 [1202.0981]

2012 arXiv
[17]

Heller, D

M.P. Heller, D. Mateos, W. van der Schee and M. Triana, Holographic isotropization linearized, JHEP 09 (2013) 026 [1304.5172]

2013 arXiv
[18]

Romatschke, Relativistic Fluid Dynamics Far From Local Equilibrium , Phys

P. Romatschke, Relativistic Fluid Dynamics Far From Local Equilibrium , Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 012301 [1704.08699]

2018 arXiv
[19]

T. Alho, J. Remes, K. Tuominen and A. Vuorinen, Quasinormal modes and thermalization in improved holographic QCD , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 106025 [2002.09544]

2020 arXiv
[20]

Mondkar, A

S. Mondkar, A. Mukhopadhyay, A. Rebhan and A. Soloviev, Quasinormal modes of a semi-holographic black brane and thermalization , JHEP 11 (2021) 080 [2108.02788]

2021 arXiv
[21]

Baggioli, L

M. Baggioli, L. Li and H.-T. Sun, Shear Flows in Far-from-Equilibrium Strongly Coupled Fluids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 (2022) 011602 [2112.14855]

2022 arXiv
[22]

M¨ uller, A

B. M¨ uller, A. Rabenstein, A. Sch¨ afer, S. Waeber and L.G. Yaﬀ e, Phenomenological implications of asymmetric AdS5 shock wave collision studies for heavy ion physics , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 076008 [2001.07161]

2020 arXiv
[23]

Nijs and W

G. Nijs and W. van der Schee, A generalized hydrodynamizing initial stage for Heavy Ion Collisions, 2304.06191

arXiv
[24]

Kovtun, D.T

P. Kovtun, D.T. Son and A.O. Starinets, Viscosity in strongly interacting quantum ﬁeld theories from black hole physics , Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 111601 [hep-th/0405231]

2005 arXiv
[25]

Baggioli, S

M. Baggioli, S. Grieninger and H. Soltanpanahi, Nonlinear Oscillatory Shear Tests in Viscoelastic Holography, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 081601 [1910.06331]

2020 arXiv
[26]

Wondrak, M

M.F. Wondrak, M. Kaminski and M. Bleicher, Shear transport far from equilibrium via holography, Phys. Lett. B 811 (2020) 135973 [2002.11730]

2020 arXiv
[27]

Carballo and B

J. Carballo and B. Withers, Transient dynamics of quasinormal mode sums , JHEP 10 (2024) 084 [2406.06685]

2024 arXiv
[28]

Brevik, O

I. Brevik, O. Grøn, J. de Haro, S.D. Odintsov and E.N. Saridakis, Viscous Cosmology for Early- and Late-Time Universe , Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 26 (2017) 1730024 [1706.02543]

2017 arXiv
[29]

Hubeny, M

V.E. Hubeny, M. Rangamani and T. Takayanagi, A Covariant holographic entanglement entropy proposal, JHEP 07 (2007) 062 [0705.0016]. – 18 –

2007 arXiv
[30]

Lublinsky and E

M. Lublinsky and E. Shuryak, Improved Hydrodynamics from the AdS/CFT , Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 065026 [0905.4069]

2009 arXiv
[31]

Lublinsky and E

M. Lublinsky and E. Shuryak, How much entropy is produced in strongly coupled Quark-Gluon Plasma (sQGP) by dissipative eﬀects? , Phys. Rev. C 76 (2007) 021901 [0704.1647]

2007 arXiv
[32]

Kurkela, A

A. Kurkela, A. Mazeliauskas, J.-F. Paquet, S. Schlichting and D. Teaney, Eﬀective kinetic description of event-by-event pre-equilibrium dynamics i n high-energy heavy-ion collisions , Phys. Rev. C 99 (2019) 034910 [1805.00961]

2019 arXiv
[33]

S. He, L. Li, Z. Li and S.-J. Wang, Gravitational waves and primordial black hole productions from gluodynamics by holography , Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 67 (2024) 240411 [2210.14094]

2024 arXiv
[34]

Y.-Q. Zhao, S. He, D. Hou, L. Li and Z. Li, Phase structure and critical phenomena in two-ﬂavor QCD by holography , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 086015 [2310.13432]

2024 arXiv
[35]

R.-G. Cai, S. He, L. Li and Y.-X. Wang, Probing QCD critical point and induced gravitational wave by black hole physics , Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) L121902 [2201.02004]

2022 arXiv
[36]

R.-G. Cai, S. He, L. Li and H.-A. Zeng, Neural Ordinary Diﬀerential Equations for Mapping the Magnetic QCD Phase Diagram via Holography , 2406.12772. – 19 –

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Heinz and R

U. Heinz and R. Snellings, Collective ﬂow and viscosity in relativistic heavy-ion col lisions, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 63 (2013) 123 [1301.2826]

arXiv 2013

[2] [2]

Busza, K

W. Busza, K. Rajagopal and W. van der Schee, Heavy ion collisions: The big picture and the big questions , Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 68 (2018) 339–376

work page 2018

[3] [3]

Heinz, Thermalization at RHIC , AIP Conf

U.W. Heinz, Thermalization at RHIC , AIP Conf. Proc. 739 (2004) 163 [nucl-th/0407067]

arXiv 2004

[4] [4]

Chesler and L.G

P.M. Chesler and L.G. Yaﬀe, Boost invariant ﬂow, black hole formation, and far-from-equilibrium dynamics in N = 4 supersymmetric Yang -Mills theory , Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 026006 [0906.4426]

arXiv 2010

[5] [5]

Heller, R.A

M.P. Heller, R.A. Janik and P. Witaszczyk, The characteristics of thermalization of boost-invariant plasma from holography , Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 201602 [1103.3452]

arXiv 2012

[6] [6]

Heller, R.A

M.P. Heller, R.A. Janik and P. Witaszczyk, Hydrodynamic Gradient Expansion in Gauge Theory Plasmas , Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 211602 [1302.0697]

arXiv 2013

[7] [7]

Florkowski, M.P

W. Florkowski, M.P. Heller and M. Spalinski, New theories of relativistic hydrodynamics in the LHC era , Rept. Prog. Phys. 81 (2018) 046001 [1707.02282]

arXiv 2018

[8] [8]

Kurkela, A

A. Kurkela, A. Mazeliauskas, J.-F. Paquet, S. Schlichting and D. T eaney, Matching the Nonequilibrium Initial Stage of Heavy Ion Collisions to Hyd rodynamics with QCD Kinetic Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 122302 [1805.01604]

arXiv 2019