Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Direct-Inverse Prompting: Analyzing LLMs' Discriminative Capacity in Self-Improving Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.11017 v1 pith:QWWRJI72 submitted 2024-06-27 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords discriminativellmsgenerativeuncertaintyanalyzecapacityinputsame
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Mainstream LLM research has primarily focused on enhancing their generative capabilities. However, even the most advanced LLMs experience uncertainty in their outputs, often producing varied results on different runs or when faced with minor changes in input, despite no substantial change in content. Given multiple responses from the same LLM to the same input, we advocate leveraging the LLMs' discriminative capability to reduce this generative uncertainty, aiding in identifying the correct answers. Specifically, we propose and analyze three discriminative prompts: direct, inverse, and hybrid, to explore the potential of both closed-source and open-source LLMs in self-improving their generative performance on two benchmark datasets. Our insights reveal which discriminative prompt is most promising and when to use it. To our knowledge, this is the first work to systematically analyze LLMs' discriminative capacity to address generative uncertainty.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools