Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Finite-Sample Guarantees for High-Dimensional DML

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2206.07386 v1 pith:R2R3EOXS submitted 2022-06-15 econ.EM cs.LGmath.STstat.MLstat.TH

Finite-Sample Guarantees for High-Dimensional DML

classification econ.EM cs.LGmath.STstat.MLstat.TH
keywords finite-sampleguaranteesasymptotichigh-dimensionalmanyparameterstreatmentcausal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Debiased machine learning (DML) offers an attractive way to estimate treatment effects in observational settings, where identification of causal parameters requires a conditional independence or unconfoundedness assumption, since it allows to control flexibly for a potentially very large number of covariates. This paper gives novel finite-sample guarantees for joint inference on high-dimensional DML, bounding how far the finite-sample distribution of the estimator is from its asymptotic Gaussian approximation. These guarantees are useful to applied researchers, as they are informative about how far off the coverage of joint confidence bands can be from the nominal level. There are many settings where high-dimensional causal parameters may be of interest, such as the ATE of many treatment profiles, or the ATE of a treatment on many outcomes. We also cover infinite-dimensional parameters, such as impacts on the entire marginal distribution of potential outcomes. The finite-sample guarantees in this paper complement the existing results on consistency and asymptotic normality of DML estimators, which are either asymptotic or treat only the one-dimensional case.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Model-Agnostic Bounds for Augmented Inverse Probability Weighted Estimators' Wald-Confidence Interval Coverage in Randomized Controlled Trials

    math.ST 2025-12 conditional novelty 7.0

    First Berry-Esseen-type coverage bounds for AIPW Wald intervals with estimated variance in RCTs show cross-fitting can improve coverage through variance overestimation.