Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A comparative assessment of deep learning models for day-ahead load forecasting: Investigating key accuracy drivers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.12168 v2 pith:R3TSI7MD submitted 2023-02-23 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords modelsaccuracyforecastingstlfdeepnetworkscomparativeday-ahead
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Short-term load forecasting (STLF) is vital for the effective and economic operation of power grids and energy markets. However, the non-linearity and non-stationarity of electricity demand as well as its dependency on various external factors renders STLF a challenging task. To that end, several deep learning models have been proposed in the literature for STLF, reporting promising results. In order to evaluate the accuracy of said models in day-ahead forecasting settings, in this paper we focus on the national net aggregated STLF of Portugal and conduct a comparative study considering a set of indicative, well-established deep autoregressive models, namely multi-layer perceptrons (MLP), long short-term memory networks (LSTM), neural basis expansion coefficient analysis (N-BEATS), temporal convolutional networks (TCN), and temporal fusion transformers (TFT). Moreover, we identify factors that significantly affect the demand and investigate their impact on the accuracy of each model. Our results suggest that N-BEATS consistently outperforms the rest of the examined models. MLP follows, providing further evidence towards the use of feed-forward networks over relatively more sophisticated architectures. Finally, certain calendar and weather features like the hour of the day and the temperature are identified as key accuracy drivers, providing insights regarding the forecasting approach that should be used per case.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Trustworthy artificial intelligence in the energy sector: Landscape analysis and evaluation framework

    cs.CY 2024-11 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    The authors propose E-TAI, an EGTAI/ALTAI-based set of risk tables and an iterative assessment process for trustworthy AI in the energy sector.

Pith tools