REVIEW 1 cited by
Cyber-Attack Technique Classification Using Two-Stage Trained Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Understanding the attack patterns associated with a cyberattack is crucial for comprehending the attacker's behaviors and implementing the right mitigation measures. However, majority of the information regarding new attacks is typically presented in unstructured text, posing significant challenges for security analysts in collecting necessary information. In this paper, we present a sentence classification system that can identify the attack techniques described in natural language sentences from cyber threat intelligence (CTI) reports. We propose a new method for utilizing auxiliary data with the same labels to improve classification for the low-resource cyberattack classification task. The system first trains the model using the augmented training data and then trains more using only the primary data. We validate our model using the TRAM data1 and the MITRE ATT&CK framework. Experiments show that our method enhances Macro-F1 by 5 to 9 percentage points and keeps Micro-F1 scores competitive when compared to the baseline performance on the TRAM dataset.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
SynthCTI: LLM-Driven Synthetic CTI Generation to enhance MITRE Technique Mapping
A clustering-guided LLM data augmentation pipeline raises macro-F1 for MITRE technique classification, e.g., ALBERT from 0.35 to 0.52 and SecureBERT to 0.66, across two CTI datasets.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.