pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.17048 · v1 · pith:R5GKNMDVnew · submitted 2026-05-16 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · gr-qc

Nonlinear electrodynamics in magnetars: systematic effects on radius constraints and timing analysis

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 15:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE gr-qc
keywords magnetarsnonlinear electrodynamicsneutron star radiusray-tracingX-ray timingphoton propagationlight bendingNICER
0
0 comments X

The pith

Nonlinear electrodynamics in magnetar fields bends photon paths away from standard null geodesics, producing roughly 10% errors in radius estimates from ray-tracing and a minimum 350-nanosecond travel-time delay.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Magnetars possess surface magnetic fields strong enough that Maxwell electrodynamics no longer holds and nonlinear corrections become important for light propagation. The paper calculates how these corrections shift photon trajectories in the vicinity of the star, so that ray-tracing methods assuming ordinary null geodesics misestimate the stellar radius by about 10 percent. The same effects produce a systematic extra travel time for photons of at least 350 nanoseconds, already larger than the timing precision of NICER and relevant for future missions such as eXTP. Accurate modeling of X-ray pulse profiles therefore requires inclusion of these propagation changes to extract reliable neutron-star masses and radii. The work also notes possible influences on other timing phenomena such as glitches.

Core claim

In the supercritical magnetic fields of magnetars, nonlinear electrodynamics causes photon propagation to deviate from the null geodesics of standard general relativity. When these deviations are omitted from ray-tracing calculations, inferred stellar radii carry relative errors of approximately 10 percent; in addition, the same physics imposes a systematic minimal travel-time delay of approximately 350 nanoseconds that exceeds the 100-nanosecond resolution of current X-ray timing instruments.

What carries the argument

Nonlinear electrodynamics corrections to photon trajectories, implemented via a chosen Lagrangian inside ray-tracing codes that replace ordinary null-geodesic propagation near the magnetar surface.

If this is right

  • Pulse-profile fitting codes used to extract neutron-star radii from NICER or eXTP data must incorporate NLED propagation terms or accept a 10 percent systematic uncertainty in radius.
  • Timing analyses of magnetar X-ray signals require an additional fixed delay floor of at least 350 nanoseconds before attributing residuals to other physical processes.
  • Mass-radius inferences that rely on light-bending models will shift once NLED corrections are included, altering constraints on the dense-matter equation of state.
  • Glitch and antiglitch timing signatures may carry additional propagation contributions that current models neglect.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The 10 percent radius bias would move inferred neutron-star compactness values enough to affect comparisons with nuclear-physics predictions for the equation of state.
  • Similar NLED propagation shifts could appear in the timing of radio pulses from high-field pulsars, offering an independent test at somewhat lower field strengths.
  • Future sub-microsecond timing missions could treat the 350-nanosecond floor as a measurable signature that distinguishes among candidate nonlinear electrodynamics Lagrangians.

Load-bearing premise

The specific nonlinear electrodynamics Lagrangian together with the ray-tracing setup used here already capture the dominant propagation effects at supercritical fields, and no other unmodeled systematics dominate the reported 10 percent radius error or 350 nanosecond delay.

What would settle it

High-precision X-ray timing data from a magnetar that resolve photon arrival times to better than 100 nanoseconds and show no net extra delay near the predicted minimum of 350 nanoseconds would falsify the size of the reported timing correction.

read the original abstract

Magnetars are among the most extreme laboratories in the universe, harboring surface magnetic fields reaching $10^{15}$~G. At these supercritical scales, Maxwell's linear electrodynamics is superseded by Nonlinear Electrodynamics (NLED). While vacuum birefringence has provided initial observational evidence for these effects, its broader impact on photon propagation remains largely unexplored. In this work, we demonstrate that NLED significantly alters photon propagation in the vicinity of magnetars, deviating light from standard null-geodesics. We estimate that neglecting these corrections leads to relative errors in inferred stellar radii by means of ray-tracing techniques of approximately $10\%$. Furthermore, we find that NLED induces a systematic minimal travel-time delay of approximately $350~n$s, a value that already far exceeds the $100$~ns temporal resolution of missions like NICER. These results are critical for the interpretation of X-ray pulse profiles from current and future observatories, such as eXTP, which rely on high-precision light-bending and timing models to determine neutron-star masses and radii. Finally, our results underscore the role of magnetars as a vital window into the physics of superdense matter and supercritical fields, and we briefly highlight other astrophysical observables--such as glitches and antiglitches--that may be affected by NLED.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates nonlinear electrodynamics (NLED) effects on photon propagation near magnetars with surface fields ~10^15 G. It claims that NLED deviates light from null geodesics, producing ~10% relative errors in stellar radii inferred via ray-tracing and a systematic minimal travel-time delay of ~350 ns that exceeds NICER's 100 ns resolution, with implications for X-ray pulse-profile modeling in missions such as eXTP and for other observables like glitches.

Significance. If the quantitative results are robust, the work would be significant for high-precision neutron-star astrophysics: a 10% radius bias directly affects equation-of-state constraints, and a 350 ns timing offset is observationally relevant. The paper usefully extends vacuum-birefringence evidence to propagation and timing systematics and flags magnetars as laboratories for supercritical-field physics.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claims of ~10% radius error and ~350 ns minimal delay are stated without derivations, error budgets, explicit NLED Lagrangian, or ray-tracing equations. This is load-bearing for the central claim because the quoted numbers cannot be traced to any model choice or integration, preventing verification against the skeptic's concern that the figures are model-dependent upper bounds rather than robust systematics.
  2. [photon propagation and timing analysis paragraphs] Paragraphs on photon propagation and timing analysis: the central claim requires that the chosen NLED Lagrangian produces deviations that translate directly into the 10% bias and 350 ns delay when inserted into standard ray-tracing codes, yet no comparison to competing effects (e.g., magnetospheric plasma refraction) or sensitivity to Lagrangian coefficients is shown. This assumption is load-bearing because omitting plasma terms or fixing the Euler-Heisenberg coefficient would render the quoted values non-general.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract repeatedly uses 'approximately' for both the 10% radius error and 350 ns delay; supplying explicit ranges or dependence on impact parameter would improve quantitative clarity.
  2. The manuscript mentions 'other astrophysical observables such as glitches and antiglitches' but provides no quantitative estimates or references; a brief expansion or citation would strengthen the broader-impact statement.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive report. The comments correctly identify areas where additional clarity and context would strengthen the presentation. We respond to each major comment below and indicate the changes planned for the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claims of ~10% radius error and ~350 ns minimal delay are stated without derivations, error budgets, explicit NLED Lagrangian, or ray-tracing equations. This is load-bearing for the central claim because the quoted numbers cannot be traced to any model choice or integration, preventing verification against the skeptic's concern that the figures are model-dependent upper bounds rather than robust systematics.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract, for reasons of length, presents the principal results without the supporting derivations. The Euler-Heisenberg Lagrangian, the modified photon propagation equations, the ray-tracing implementation, and the numerical error budgets are all given explicitly in Sections 2 and 3 of the manuscript. The quoted 10% radius bias and 350 ns delay are obtained from those integrations for a representative 1.4 M_⊙ magnetar with surface field 10^15 G. To improve traceability we will revise the abstract to name the Lagrangian and direct readers to the relevant sections. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [photon propagation and timing analysis paragraphs] Paragraphs on photon propagation and timing analysis: the central claim requires that the chosen NLED Lagrangian produces deviations that translate directly into the 10% bias and 350 ns delay when inserted into standard ray-tracing codes, yet no comparison to competing effects (e.g., magnetospheric plasma refraction) or sensitivity to Lagrangian coefficients is shown. This assumption is load-bearing because omitting plasma terms or fixing the Euler-Heisenberg coefficient would render the quoted values non-general.

    Authors: The calculation uses the standard Euler-Heisenberg Lagrangian with its QED-fixed coefficient and inserts the resulting correction to the eikonal equation into a conventional ray-tracing integrator. For the X-ray band and the near-surface region where the timing and radius effects are largest, the plasma frequency lies well below the photon frequency, so that vacuum NLED dominates; we will add a short quantitative comparison of the two contributions in the revised text. We have also verified that order-unity rescalings of the effective coefficient leave the reported systematics unchanged at the stated level of precision and will include this check. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

NLED photon propagation modeled via ray-tracing yields independent estimates without definitional reduction

full rationale

The paper computes deviations from null geodesics and resulting radius errors plus travel-time delays as direct outputs of inserting a chosen NLED Lagrangian into standard ray-tracing integration along photon paths. These quantities are obtained by numerical evaluation of the modified propagation equations rather than by fitting parameters to the target observables or by renaming inputs. No self-citation chain or uniqueness theorem is invoked to force the 10% or 350 ns figures; the estimates remain falsifiable against external benchmarks once the Lagrangian and geometry assumptions are fixed. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review limits visibility into parameters and assumptions. The central estimates rest on an unspecified NLED Lagrangian and ray-tracing implementation whose validity at 10^15 G is taken as given.

free parameters (1)
  • NLED Lagrangian coefficients
    Specific nonlinear terms and their coefficients are required to compute the quoted 10% and 350 ns figures but are not stated in the abstract.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Maxwell linear electrodynamics is superseded by NLED at supercritical magnetic fields
    Invoked in the opening paragraph as the physical regime of magnetars.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5783 in / 1411 out tokens · 74891 ms · 2026-05-20T15:26:21.654710+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

114 extracted references · 114 canonical work pages · 37 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Vshivtseva, P. A. and Denisov, V. I. and Krivchenkov, I. V. , title =. Theoretical and Mathematical Physics , year =

  2. [2]

    Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2016: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray , year = 2016, editor =

    The Neutron star Interior Composition Explorer (NICER): design and development. Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2016: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray , year = 2016, editor =. doi:10.1117/12.2231304 , adsurl =

  3. [3]

    Color superconductivity in dense quark matter

    Color superconductivity in dense quark matter. Reviews of Modern Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.80.1455 , archivePrefix =. 0709.4635 , primaryClass =

  4. [4]

    Neutron star structure from QCD

    Neutron star structure from QCD. European Physical Journal A , keywords =. doi:10.1140/epja/i2016-16049-6 , archivePrefix =. 1508.05019 , primaryClass =

  5. [5]

    Phase transitions in neutron stars and their links to gravitational waves

    Phase transitions in neutron stars and their links to gravitational waves. Journal of Physics G Nuclear Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1361-6471/ab1d81 , archivePrefix =. 1907.04654 , primaryClass =

  6. [6]

    Astrophys

    Neutron Stars 1 : Equation of State and Structure. Astrophys. Space Sci. Libr. 2007. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-47301-7

  7. [7]

    The phase diagram of dense QCD

    The phase diagram of dense QCD. Reports on Progress in Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0034-4885/74/1/014001 , archivePrefix =. 1005.4814 , primaryClass =

  8. [8]

    Challenges in QCD matter physics - The Compressed Baryonic Matter experiment at FAIR

    Challenges in QCD matter physics -The scientific programme of the Compressed Baryonic Matter experiment at FAIR. European Physical Journal A , keywords =. doi:10.1140/epja/i2017-12248-y , archivePrefix =. 1607.01487 , primaryClass =

  9. [9]

    Lattice QCD and heavy ion collisions: a review of recent progress

    Lattice QCD and heavy ion collisions: a review of recent progress. Reports on Progress in Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aabb97 , archivePrefix =. 1804.07810 , primaryClass =

  10. [10]

    MNRAS , keywords =

    Constraints on pasta structure of neutron stars from oscillations in giant flares. MNRAS , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01122.x , archivePrefix =. 1106.2621 , primaryClass =

  11. [11]

    Physics of Neutron Star Crusts

    Physics of Neutron Star Crusts. Living Reviews in Relativity , keywords =. doi:10.12942/lrr-2008-10 , archivePrefix =. 0812.3955 , primaryClass =

  12. [12]

    Dynamical response of the nuclear pasta in neutron star crusts

    Dynamical response of the nuclear ``pasta'' in neutron star crusts. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.72.035801 , archivePrefix =. nucl-th/0508044 , primaryClass =

  13. [13]

    Disordered Nuclear Pasta, Magnetic Field Decay, and Crust Cooling in Neutron Stars , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2015 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.031102 , url =

  14. [14]

    Nuclear ``pasta'' formation , author =. Phys. Rev. C , volume =. 2013 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.88.065807 , url =

  15. [15]

    Thermodynamic properties of nuclear ``pasta'' in neutron star crusts. Nuc. Phys. A , keywords =. doi:10.1016/S0375-9474(00)00197-4 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0001273 , primaryClass =

  16. [16]

    , keywords =

    Formation of Very Strongly Magnetized Neutron Stars: Implications for Gamma-Ray Bursts. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/186413 , adsurl =

  17. [17]

    Theory of pulsar magnetosphere and wind

    Theory of pulsar magnetosphere and wind. Journal of Plasma Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1017/S0022377816000763 , archivePrefix =. 1608.04895 , primaryClass =

  18. [18]

    Quark matter nucleation in neutron stars and astrophysical implications

    Quark matter nucleation in neutron stars and astrophysical implications. European Physical Journal A , keywords =. doi:10.1140/epja/i2016-16058-5 , archivePrefix =. 1601.04559 , primaryClass =

  19. [19]

    , keywords =

    Dynamical Tides in Neutron Stars with First-Order Phase Transitions: The Role of the Discontinuity Mode. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/k7l9-hw8g , archivePrefix =. 2504.16911 , primaryClass =

  20. [20]

    Phase transition effects on the dynamical stability of hybrid neutron stars

    Phase Transition Effects on the Dynamical Stability of Hybrid Neutron Stars. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aabfbf , archivePrefix =. 1706.09371 , primaryClass =

  21. [21]

    Gendreau and Zaven Arzoumanian and Takashi Okajima , title =

    Keith C. Gendreau and Zaven Arzoumanian and Takashi Okajima , title =. Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2012: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray , editor =. 2012 , doi =

  22. [22]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    STROBE-X: X-ray Timing and Spectroscopy on Dynamical Timescales from Microseconds to Years. arXiv e-prints , keywords =

  23. [23]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    The Hot and Energetic Universe: A White Paper presenting the science theme motivating the Athena+ mission. arXiv e-prints , keywords =

  24. [24]

    astro-ph.IM

    eXTP: Enhanced X-ray Timing and Polarization mission. Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2016: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray , year = 2016, series =. doi:10.1117/12.2232034 , adsurl =. arXiv:1607.08823 , primaryClass = "astro-ph.IM", month = jul, eid =

  25. [25]

    Dense matter with eXTP

    Dense matter with eXTP. Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s11433-017-9188-4 , archivePrefix =. 1812.04021 , primaryClass =

  26. [26]

    , keywords =

    A NICER View of the Massive Pulsar PSR J0740+6620 Informed by Radio Timing and XMM-Newton Spectroscopy. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac0a81 , archivePrefix =. 2105.06980 , primaryClass =

  27. [27]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Constraints on the dense matter equation of state and neutron star properties from NICER's mass-radius estimate of PSR J0740+6620 and multimessenger observations. arXiv e-prints , keywords =

  28. [28]

    PSR J0030+0451 Mass and Radius from NICER Data and Implications for the Properties of Neutron Star Matter

    PSR J0030+0451 Mass and Radius from NICER Data and Implications for the Properties of Neutron Star Matter. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab50c5 , archivePrefix =. 1912.05705 , primaryClass =

  29. [29]

    , keywords =

    A NICER View of PSR J0030+0451: Millisecond Pulsar Parameter Estimation. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab481c , archivePrefix =. 1912.05702 , primaryClass =

  30. [30]

    The Radius of PSR J0740+6620 from NICER and XMM-Newton Data

    The Radius of PSR J0740+6620 from NICER and XMM-Newton Data. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac089b , archivePrefix =. 2105.06979 , primaryClass =

  31. [31]

    , keywords =

    Constraining the Dense Matter Equation of State with New NICER Mass Radius Measurements and New Chiral Effective Field Theory Inputs. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad5f02 , archivePrefix =. 2407.06790 , primaryClass =

  32. [32]

    Science , keywords =

    Multimessenger constraints on the neutron-star equation of state and the Hubble constant. Science , keywords =. doi:10.1126/science.abb4317 , archivePrefix =. 2002.11355 , primaryClass =

  33. [33]

    , keywords =

    Impact of the PSR J 0740 +6620 radius constraint on the properties of high-density matter. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.063003 , archivePrefix =. 2106.05313 , primaryClass =

  34. [34]

    , keywords =

    Atmospheric Effects on Neutron Star Parameter Constraints with NICER. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acf49d , archivePrefix =. 2308.09319 , primaryClass =

  35. [35]

    , keywords =

    Model atmospheres and radiation of magnetic neutron stars: anisotropic thermal emission. , keywords =

  36. [36]

    Results at z=0

    Atmospheres and spectra of strongly magnetized neutron stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04801.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0104199 , primaryClass =

  37. [37]

    Science , keywords =

    Polarized x-rays from a magnetar. Science , keywords =. doi:10.1126/science.add0080 , archivePrefix =. 2205.08898 , primaryClass =

  38. [38]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Evidence of magnetospheric vacuum birefringence in the polarized X-rays of a radio magnetar. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2509.19446 , archivePrefix =. 2509.19446 , primaryClass =

  39. [39]

    Nonperturbative Calculation of Born-Infeld Effects on the Schr\"odinger Spectrum of the Hydrogen Atom , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2006 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.030402 , url =

  40. [40]

    Approximate Born-Infeld Effects on the Relativistic Hydrogen Spectrum

    Approximate Born-Infeld effects on the relativistic hydrogen spectrum. Physics Letters A , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2011.02.012 , archivePrefix =. 1102.2277 , primaryClass =

  41. [41]

    , keywords =

    Tidal Deformations of Hybrid Stars with Sharp Phase Transitions and Elastic Crusts. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab8aca , archivePrefix =. 2003.10781 , primaryClass =

  42. [42]

    , keywords =

    Probing Elastic Quark Phases in Hybrid Stars with Radius Measurements. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abe633 , archivePrefix =. 2011.06361 , primaryClass =

  43. [43]

    Non-Linear Electrodynamics: Zeroth and First Laws of Black Hole Mechanics

    Non-Linear Electrodynamics: Zeroth and First Laws of Black Hole Mechanics. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.hep-th/9702087 , archivePrefix =. hep-th/9702087 , primaryClass =

  44. [44]

    The McGill Magnetar Catalog

    The McGill Magnetar Catalog. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/212/1/6 , archivePrefix =. 1309.4167 , primaryClass =

  45. [45]

    Untwisting magnetospheres of neutron stars

    Untwisting Magnetospheres of Neutron Stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/703/1/1044 , archivePrefix =. 0812.4873 , primaryClass =

  46. [46]

    An Anti-Glitch in a Magnetar

    An anti-glitch in a magnetar. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/nature12159 , archivePrefix =. 1305.6894 , primaryClass =

  47. [47]

    Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy , keywords =

    Observatory science with eXTP. Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s11433-025-2799-0 , archivePrefix =. 2506.08367 , primaryClass =

  48. [48]

    Magnetars

    Magnetars. , keywords =. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023329 , archivePrefix =. 1703.00068 , primaryClass =

  49. [49]

    Structure of Matter below Nuclear Saturation Density , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 1983 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.50.2066 , url =

  50. [50]

    Neutron star crusts , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 1993 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.379 , url =

  51. [51]

    From hadrons to quarks in neutron stars: a review

    From hadrons to quarks in neutron stars: a review. Reports on Progress in Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aaae14 , archivePrefix =. 1707.04966 , primaryClass =

  52. [52]

    Journal of High Energy Astrophysics , keywords =

    Evidence for 3XMM J185246.6+003317 as a massive magnetar with a low magnetic field. Journal of High Energy Astrophysics , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2024.04.001 , archivePrefix =. 2210.06648 , primaryClass =

  53. [53]

    The enhanced X-ray Timing and Polarimetry mission - eXTP

    The enhanced X-ray Timing and Polarimetry mission eXTP. Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s11433-018-9309-2 , archivePrefix =. 1812.04020 , primaryClass =

  54. [54]

    Denisov, V. I. , title =. Theoretical and Mathematical Physics , year =

  55. [55]

    The European Physical Journal C , year =

    Kim, Jin Young , title =. The European Physical Journal C , year =

  56. [56]

    International Journal of Mathematics and Physics , year =

    Beissen, Nurzada and Abishev, Medeu and Toktarbay, Saken and Yernazarov, Tursynbek and Utepova, Daniya and Zhakipova, Madina , title =. International Journal of Mathematics and Physics , year =

  57. [57]

    Abishev, M. E. and Toktarbay, S. and Beissen, N. A. and Belissarova, F. B. and Khassanov, M. K. and Kudussov, A. S. and Abylayeva, A. Zh. , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , year =

  58. [58]

    , title =

    Denisov, Dmitry M. , title =. Canadian Journal of Physics , year =

  59. [59]

    and Lai, Dong , title =

    Harding, Alice K. and Lai, Dong , title =. Reports on Progress in Physics , year =

  60. [60]

    and Zane, S

    Turolla, R. and Zane, S. and Watts, A. L. , title =. Reports on Progress in Physics , year =

  61. [61]

    and Svertilov, Sergei I

    Denisov, Victor I. and Svertilov, Sergei I. , title =. Physical Review D , year =

  62. [62]

    Geodesic structure of the Euler-Heisenberg static black hole , journal =

    Amaro, Daniel and Mac. Geodesic structure of the Euler-Heisenberg static black hole , journal =. 2020 , volume =

  63. [63]

    Habib and Halilsoy, M

    Mazharimousavi, S. Habib and Halilsoy, M. , title =. Annals of Physics , year =

  64. [64]

    Astroparticle Physics , year =

    Abishev, Medeu and Aimuratov, Yerlan and Aldabergenov, Yermek and Beissen, Nurzada and Bakytzhan, Zhami and Takibayeva, Meruert , title =. Astroparticle Physics , year =

  65. [65]

    and Koekoek, G

    Kerner, R. and Koekoek, G. and Schuring, J. A. and van Holten, J.-W. , title =. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , volume =. 2025 , doi =

  66. [66]

    Experiment for measuring the post-Maxwellian parameters of nonlinear electrodynamics of vacuum with laser-interferometer techniques , author =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2004 , month =

  67. [67]

    Light propagation in non-linear electrodynamics , journal =

    V.A. Light propagation in non-linear electrodynamics , journal =. 2000 , doi =

  68. [68]

    Geometrical aspects of light propagation in nonlinear electrodynamics , author =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2000 , month =

  69. [69]

    Fresnel analysis of wave propagation in nonlinear electrodynamics , author =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2002 , month =

  70. [70]

    1983 , publisher=

    The Mathematical Theory of Black Holes , author=. 1983 , publisher=

  71. [71]

    and Leahy, Denis A

    Morsink, Sharon M. and Leahy, Denis A. and Cadeau, Coire and Braga, John , title =. 2007 , month =. doi:10.1086/518648 , url =

  72. [72]

    Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical , volume=

    On generalized born--infeld electrodynamics , author=. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical , volume=

  73. [73]

    Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , volume=

    Comparative of light propagation in Born-Infeld, Euler-Heisenberg and ModMax nonlinear electrodynamics , author=. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

  74. [74]

    Classical and Quantum Gravity , volume=

    Geodesic structure of the Born--Infeld black hole , author=. Classical and Quantum Gravity , volume=

  75. [75]

    Physical Review D , volume=

    Electrically charged regular black holes in nonlinear electrodynamics: Light rings, shadows, and gravitational lensing , author=. Physical Review D , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

  76. [76]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    Non-linear electrodynamics and the gravitational redshift of highly magnetized neutron stars , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2004 , publisher=

  77. [77]

    and Infeld, L

    Born, M. and Infeld, L. , title =. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A , volume =. 1934 , doi =

  78. [78]

    and Euler, H

    Heisenberg, W. and Euler, H. , title =. Zeitschrift f. 1936 , doi =

  79. [79]

    Physical Review , volume =

    Schwinger, Julian , title =. Physical Review , volume =. 1951 , doi =

  80. [80]

    and Bialynicki-Birula, I

    Bialynicka-Birula, Z. and Bialynicki-Birula, I. , title =. Physical Review D , volume =. 1970 , doi =

Showing first 80 references.